Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Troilus and Cressida (Susan Elkin reviews)

Troilus And Cressida
William Shakespeare. Performed by The Marlowe Youth Company
society/company: Marlowe Theatre
performance date: 07 Mar 2020
venue: Marlowe Theatre Studio, The Friars, Canterbury, Kent CT1 2AS
 

Staged by the ever-ambitious Marlowe Youth Company in the theatre’s studio space, this version of Troilius and Cressida features a huge cast of twenty-eight so it provides plenty of scope for these young actors, many of them in quite small roles. That means it isn’t always easy to work out who everyone is but it doesn’t matter much. And it’s both moving and encouraging to see such diverse participation – united by Shakespeare. I loved the gender-blind casting too. Caitlin Hatton, for example, was well cast as Ulysses.

Configured in-the-round with audience on all four sides with big panels featuring Grecian figures and shapes dominating two of them (design by Rachael A Smith), the Studio felt pretty atmospheric – and tense, because we are, after all, in the middle of the Trojan wars. A relentless drum tattoo and the whole cast on stage looking variously anxious, puzzled, fired up at the beginning is a good idea to convey that tension but arguably it was sustained for too long. After several minutes the audience was getting restive.

There are some fine performances in this show. Dan Ghigeanu stands out as Paris – direct, sure of himself and all over Helen (Matilda Scott – good) who has been famously whisked off to Troy, thereby causing a war. Chigeanu’s strong delivery works very well.

Lewis Dempsey – with expressive face and sensitive naturalistic delivery – gives an impressive account of Troilus and Darcy Priston is fun as the perceptive, fearless Thersites, one of Shakespeare’s most engaging fools. Roy Clarke is an excellent Achilles. He gets the fierce loyalty combined with not being over-bright perfectly.

There is a problem, however, with staging a youth company in the round. It takes a great deal of experience to engage an audience fully and audibly when you can face only a quarter of them at a time. Some lines in this show were lost because they simply couldn’t be heard from all sides of the auditorium – and this applied especially to the female voices because they’re higher pitched. And that, unfortunately, meant that the story telling wasn’t as strong as it might have been.

Director Paul Ainsworth and his team of keen young actors have clearly worked very hard on this interesting production and it does them all credit. Quite a journey with a play which is by no means an obvious or easy choice.

 
 First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Marlowe%20Theatre%20(professional)-Troilus%20And%20Cressida&reviewsID=3891
Can I Help You?
By Philip Osment. Presented by Playing On
society/company: West End & Fringe (directory)
performance date: 05 Mar 2020
venue: Omnibus Theatre, 1 Clapham Common North Side, Clapham Town, London SW4 0QW
reviewer/s: Susan Elkin (Sardines review)

Susan Aderin and Gabriel Vick. Photo: Bridie O’Sullivan

⭐⭐⭐⭐

The late Philip Osment’s last play is, as you’d expect, powerful, painful and poignant. Addressing some deeply difficult issues (Samaritans contact details are provided in the programme) the play is set on Beachy Head at night – with Max Pappenheim’s sound track providing the continuous, slightly threatening, rhythm of breaking waves.

Gabriel Vick is a policeman, Frances, covered in (someone else’s) blood at the end of a difficult day which has awakened dreadful memories of his own past. Just as he’s poised to jump Susan Aderin’s Fifi arrives – eccentric, funny, wise with a whole raft of unhappiness in her own life. Through the night they talk, eventually revealing their pasts and redeeming each other to such an extent that by morning when the sun rises (lighting: Ian Scott) there is definitely hope for both of them.

It’s imaginatively directed (Jim Pope) nicely nuanced acting as they fence around each other, he initially exasperated and she incredulous. There’s a lot of warmth there, though, as each slowly comes to understand the other. These actors spark effectively off each other and I admired the versatility of their frequent dips into other roles as they relive their troubled pasts – all done with nothing other than body language, accent and acting. There’s an especially striking moment when Fifi cuddles the “baby” she remembers – but it’s not the happy memory it should be.

Mental health problems are all around us and need to be taken very seriously – and drama is doing it’s utmost to support that. This is the second play addressing such issues I’ve seen in 48 hours. And if these explorations can a) raise awareness and empathy in those of us who are mentally healthy and b) help people who aren’t to understand that they’re not alone so that they can reach out for help – than that is a very good thing. I’d be the last person to suggest that drama has to have a purpose to justify it’s existence but it can be useful when it does.

This is an arresting piece of theatre, though, and well worth seeing for its own sake too.

Susan Aderin and Gabriel Vick. Photo: Bridie O’Sullivan

 
 First published by Sardines:http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-Can%20I%20Help%20You?&reviewsID=3889
 
Am I Happy Yet?
Written and performed by Jack Hesketh. Produced by 3Dumb Theatre
society/company: West End & Fringe 
performance date: 03 Mar 2020
venue: The Lion & Unicorn Theatre (Above the Lion & Unicorn Pub), 42-44 Gaisford Street, Kentish Town, London NW5 2ED
 

⭐⭐⭐

Rooted in his own experience of growing up in Aberdeen and then moving to a larger city to train at LIPA, Jack Hesketh’s one-man play is thoughtful, moving and entertaining.

We’re in a young man’s bedsit and we follow him as he gets up on several mornings and goes out variously meeting friends, on a date and doing what he needs to do – addressing the audience continually as he reflects on his own state of mind and enacts his encounters. He remembers his parents and talks to his dead father too, all the time trying to come to terms with his own anxiety and depression.

Hesketh is a charismatic and personable actor. He tiptoes, dances, mimes, uses the space imaginatively (director Coral Tarran has done a good job), talks naturalistically to the audience and is often quite funny. At the end of the fifty minutes we, the audience, are onside and rather sorry when it’s over.

Dominic Beale’s sound design provides rhythmic music for the young man to wake up to and a harsh grating sound like a radio which has wandered off the signal whenever the protagonist has a moment of anxiety. Red lights come on at the same time. It’s a simple device but it works,

LIPA has a strong tradition of encouraging its graduands and graduates to make their own work and supporting them to do so. Hesketh is clearly another example of that ethos and I suspect we shall we hearing/seeing a lot more of him very soon. It’s also good to see yet another piece exploring mental health – so many people have problems that these are issues which really can’t be visited too often.

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-Am%20I%20Happy%20Yet?&reviewsID=3886
 
 

Until four years ago I wrote three columns a week for The Stage –  one in print and two online. This theatre blog, here on my own website, is the direct descendant. I started it when the Stage columns ended in June 2016.

Every columnist writing on any topic has nightmares about running out of material when there’s a commitment to produce something every week. But somehow the stories go on emerging and the ideas go on coming. So in the end, you stop panicking because you know that something will turn up. It always does.

Until now. Never could I (or anyone else) have ever imagined that we’d suddenly be plunged into a theatre-free world – no theatres, pub, concerts, clubs, or even church services (a form of theatre, if you stretch a point). Nothing.  And I’ve always written a lot about education and training but COVID-19 has closed the schools and drama colleges too. My life and work is suddenly one vast sea of nothingness. Never has my diary been so blank and white.

So what am I doing instead? Trying to write a play. An act of faith? Maybe.  You’ll hear more about it (here) if it works. I also have a book project or two in mind which may or may not firm up.

Of course there are theatrical things I could write about: the fabulous levels of altruism and ingenuity which are emerging digitally: actors reading poems, free streamed theatre, music lessons from Big Names and more. The cloud may be all enveloping but the silver lining is shining pretty brightly.

But I’m not going to clutch at straws in order to space fill.  For the moment, I’m going to suspend these columns. I plan to be back as soon as the industry begins to rise again – and it will. Eventually. So this is au revoir and definitely not goodbye.

I may start a new blog about something else during this long virus-enforced interval. I’ll see how it goes.

It’s hard to think of anything to write about theatre which is not Coronavirus-related so here goes – with the caveat that I’m writing this 24 hours ahead of scheduled post time so that by the time you read this, it may already be out of date.

Last week I saw and reviewed The Tempest at Jermyn Street – and I’m glad I did because it’s a fine production. I thought very carefully about whether or not I should go but decided that it should be business as usual for as long as possible. I simply tried not to touch things or people more than I could help. Pret in Lower Regents Street where I had a sandwich first was deserted and closed earlier than its advertised time and the streets were uncannily quiet for a Friday evening.

Jermyn Street Theatre, however, was full for press night. Artistic Director, Tom Littler, thanked people at the beginning for coming and told us he and his colleagues were following government advice fully.

Then the next morning we were told that public gatherings will probably be banned this week so that presumably means no more review jobs for the duration – and almost certainly not the Globe (matinee) Macbeth and The Marriage of Figaro at ENO on Thursday. Shakespeare would have understood … how many times were theatres closed by plague in his lifetime?

I am puzzled, though. What is so magical about the number 500? Surely Covid-19 is passed from one person to another? So wherever “two or three are gathered together” as the Bible puts it, there must be a danger. It’s going to be a bit odd if people can sit in close proximity, share lavatories and bars at , say, Above the Stag or the Donmar but not at Covent Garden or the Palladium.

I am in the age group that the government, apparently, regards as an economic nuisance. It would suit them, it seems, if I and my contemporaries were killed off by a “population balancing” virus.

Well actually I’m not a burden to anybody. I’m still working and paying taxes – exactly as the government, wearing a different hat – wants me to. And I plan to go on doing so as long as I possibly can because it happens to suit me.

Meanwhile I shall follow health advice and be careful. I shall continue to go out working while it’s “permitted” and I can do a lot of interviews and the like on the phone.  If soon, we really are all told, like the Italians, simply to stay at home, then of course I shall comply. In fact it will be a good opportunity to finish my play – and cheaper than a writing retreat.   Always look on the bright side? Sometimes easier than others.

And of course an easier situation for some people to weather than others. I am desperately sorry for freelance workers everywhere – and especially performers and creatives – whose livelihoods are threatened.

0BAN (British Actors Network) was set up in 2012 and now has over 18,000 members. “The group has grown organically by word of mouth as it is not searchable on FB (set to private) to stop bots and spam accounts finding us,” says spokesperson, Helen Raw – which would explain why BAN has, until now, slipped under my radar. A website is in preparation.

Everyone in the group is vetted and checked to make sure they have something to do with the industry. “We take in everyone at all stages of their career: beginners, am drammers looking to make the move to pro, and everyone in between” says Raw.

So what does BAN actually do? “We have shut down scams, been vocal about Spotlight’s stance on allowing unpaid work on their platform and all sorts of other issues. We speak out against the bullies and let actors know what due diligence they should be doing before agreeing to auditions and jobs” says Raw. “I am an elected Equity Branch Committee member and BAN does, and will continue to, work closely with the relevant Unions but they can only do so much.”

And that’s the problem. How does a demonstrably useful organisation like this operate without funding or proper support?

It can’t.

“We have raised £16,760 so far from 311 Founding Members and 7 donating supporters, which is great but way off target.” Raw tells me.

“Our fundraising strategy was to get 800 BAN members to pay £51 Founding Member investment (which would give them certain privileges towards future BAN memberships and benefits) and bearing in mind that we were looking at 800 people out of 18,405 current BAN members we were sure there is enough BANers who appreciate the work BAN and I personally have done enough to support this cause.”

She continues: “£50 (£51 with Stripe fee) from 800 members would have  given us a £40K working cash injection to get things moving, The fundraising campaign kicked off on 21st November 2019 and our target was to get £20K by mid December and £40K by end of January.”

This didn’t happen.

The money raised so far is being used to pay for the work: creating content for the current temporary website, proper web and casting site development, Mailchimp costs, domains, hosting etc. If BAN gets no further money into the pot, it only has enough to keep it all (and the 5 people behind the scenes) going until mid-May as they are all working on very reduced rates.

“If we get the rest of the money we need (around £25K) then, with very careful planning,  we can go until mid autumn  if need be before subscription and ad money starts to come in.” says Helen.

“The plan is that once BAN is properly up and running and out of ‘start-up and test site’ modes, ALL profit will go back to the members in the forms of free workshops, funds they can access to create their own work, a hardship fund etc.

Helen adds: “I have run BAN since 2012 with a colleague (who stepped down last summer) completely for free – giving out loads of advice, help, shutting down scams, collating complaints to take to Equity and the Police. My decision to move BAN out of the confines of Facebook were partly because I can no longer put in the time and hours it was (and is) taking up – unpaid – and because if we really are serious about making huge changes in the industry, running as a group out of Facebook just won’t cut the mustard.”

The bottom line is that this worthwhile organisation will fold unless many more of its members start supporting it – fast.

Can you help?

#WeAreBan

@HelenRaw

www.britishactorsnetwork.co.uk

0

Photo credit: Rob McDougall

Sweat
Lynn Nottage
society/company: Tower Theatre Company (directory)
performance date: 29 Feb 2020
venue: Tower Theatre, Stoke Newington N16 7HR
reviewer/s: Susan Elkin (Sardines review)

Photographs courtesy of David Sprecher

I arrived at Tower Theatre for Sweat with no idea of what to expect. I have limited experience of Lynn Nottage’s work and didn’t know this play. In the event I was – unexpectedly – quite bowled over. This is the first amateur performance of Sweat (it had a West End run in 2018) in the UK and I doubt that it could be in better hands than those of this strong cast and their director, Ian Hoare.

A powerful play, it is about a community being torn apart by the changes in the industry which sustains them all. It examines the effect of job loss on individuals and families and has its roots in meetings Nottage had with redundant steel workers in Reading, Pennsylvania. It’s angry, anguished writing.

The first half feels a bit episodic and it’s a while before it’s clear that this is a story being told with time shifts and a framing device. Factory bosses need/want fewer workers although families have worked in this industry for generations. The workers meet continually in a bar which acts as theatrical glue. Tensions mount, especially in the second act, when one of them is promoted to management. Then there’s an incident which leads to two young men going to prison and it’s their being interviewed by a quasi social worker which frames the rest of the piece.

The quality and conviction of the acting is outstanding. Isaiah Bobb-Semple is a charismatic young performer who brings throughtful warmth to the cerebral Chris who should have gone to college instead of prison. Lande Belo, as his mother, develops her character with real truthfulness from a relatively carefree factory worker enjoying herself with her friends to a suited manager trying to be fair, keep her job and not betray her mates and, eventually a weary woman trying to survive by doing two menial jobs.

Peta Barker is impressively naturalistic as the social worker trying to talk sense into two sulky young men and Matthew Vickers is a very believable barman listening to his customers/friends and trying to keep the peace. I was also very taken with Richard Bobb Simple (presumably he and Isaiah are father and son in real life, too) as the pitiful, broken Brucie.

At the performance I saw that there was a technical problem at the beginning which meant that two actors started the show almost unlit. It is greatly to their credit and professionalism that they simply carried on until, about ten minutes in, the issue was resolved. It didn’t affect the quality or impact of the show at all because it was so competently worked round.

This is a show which hits you squarely between the eyes especially at the shocking climax and in the simplicity of the very last line – spoken by Carlos Fain-Binda as Oscar. Well done, Tower Theatre.

 

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Tower%20Theatre%20Company-Sweat&reviewsID=3882

society/company: Artform
performance date: 27 Feb 2020
venue: Broadway Studio Theatre, Catford, London SE6 4RU
 

Of the several accounts I’ve seen of the story of John Merrick over the years, Bernard Pomerance’s 1977 play is certainly the most thoughtful. It’s in good hands with director Peter Watts and Artform too. The play challenges how we respond to otherness, diversity and inclusion – and could hardly be more topical although the story it tells stems from the Nineteenth Century.

John Merrick – famously – had major physical deformities. Modern medics tell us he was affected by proteus syndrome which is congenital. Exploited as a freak in a travelling circus, Merrick is discovered by Frederick Treves, a doctor at the London Hospital. Treves observes and befriends Merrick. Discovering intelligence and sensitivity in Merrick he introduces him to London society. Eventually Merrick dies of asphyxiation caused by the weight of his huge head on his windpipe.

There is a magnificent central performance from Matthew Westrip as Merrick. It’s a theatrical challenge to present Merrick as hideous enough to send women screaming and vomiting in revulsion while also developing him as a character with whom the audience identifies and empathises. “I am not an animal. I am a human being,” he declares in anguish. Westrip gets round the problem by twisting his face, holding his head at an angle, moving very awkwardly on crutches and speaking in a clear but slightly muffled voice. He also does impressive things with breaths and grunts. He is, in short, totally believable, and that heightens the horror at the way he is treated especially at the beginning of the play. It also makes us like him.

Shane King (looking like a young Arthur Sullivan in this role) is a very creditable Treves – initially just a decent young doctor and later a conflicted, troubled man trying to come to terms with his situation.

Also noteworthy are Robin Kelly’s strikingly convincing performance as Treves’s boss and Kim Pappas as Mrs Kendall, the actress who becomes Merrick’s friend.

This is a production I shall remember for its neat scene changes too. So often in low-tech non pro theatre they’re a problem. Not on this occasion. With cello, organ and piano music appropriate to the period, items of furniture and props arrive on and leave the stage courtesy of a cast who understand slickness.

 

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Artform-The%20Elephant%20Man&reviewsID=3881