Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Susan’s Bookshelves: The Appeal by Janice Hallett

I’m a bit late to the party with this engaging, intriguing novel but it was a best seller in 2021 when it first published and Janice Hallett has written more since in the same vein. It was the former conductor of one of the orchestras I play in who drew my attention to it, last summer, when we were chatting over an end-of-term curry –  as you do.  So I ordered a digital download and then forgot it until now. Why did I wait so long?

Appeal is an epistolary crime novel. It means that there is no traditional or single narrator.  Instead the story unfolds in letters or other documents produced by the characters.  Of course it’s not a  new technique. Samuel Richardson’s Pamela and Choderlos de Laclos’s Les Liaisons Dangereuses crossed by bows years ago and they both date from the eighteenth century. Recent examples I’ve enjoyed include The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Society by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows and Paul Torday’s Salmon Fishing in Yemen.

It’s particularly clever way of presenting crime fiction because the networks, subtleties and secrets between the characters are almost as complex as those of the fungi I’m currently reading about and will share with you next week. And of course the joy of the 21st century media means that people email, text, WhatsApp and things like transcripts of police interviews can be included.

 

The setting is an amateur dramatic society who are rehearsing and staging a production of Arthur Miller’s All My Sons. Lots of people are related to each other and/or have friendships which go back decades. And there’s a hierarchy, ongoing “history” between longstanding members and serious things going on that most of them don’t know about.

The blissfully neat framing device gives us two legal trainees being set an exercise by their Principal, a QC named Tanner. A murder conviction is coming up for appeal. He wants Femi and Charlotte to read all the emails and other communications connected with the case and, as a training exercise, work out the truth because he believes there has been a wrongful imprisonment. Thus we get, as an occasional commentary, their conversations with each other and eventually with Tanner, along with occasional summaries in the form of notes they make for each other and eventually a report to present to Mr Tanner.

Thus it becomes a puzzle for the reader too –  like an immersive whodunit game as snippets of evidence are subtly layered in. The family who run the drama society have a grandchild who’s been diagnosed with brain cancer. £250,000 needs to be raised for a new form of chemotherapy from America so there’s lot of fundraising, rallying round and money flows in. But the sums don’t add up. What is the oncologist up to? What on earth is the matter with pushy, apparently daft Issy? What is Arnie’s background? And surely being in hospital watching the birth of your premature twins is a pretty good alibi? A lot of people are lying about a lot of things to a lot of other people and it’s enormously entertaining working out where the truth lies.

It’s also very funny in places. I laughed aloud at Mr Tanner’s clumsy attempts to get the hang of WhatsApp so that he could join in the chat with his juniors.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Entangled Life by Melvyn Sheldrake.

Philharmonia – Elim Chan – Alice Sara Ott – Royal Festival Hall – 15 February 2024

Elim Chan launched Berlioz’s Le Corsaire overture at a cracking pace. Thereafter we got dramatic contrast assertively controlled by this dynamic woman whose power on the podium is in inverse proportion to her diminutive stature. She beats time energetically and cues entries scrupulously without any excess posturing and that’s refreshing. There was some exceptionally pleasing brass playing in this opener.

Then it was off (briefly) with upper strings, on with several percussionists, piano wheeled into position, everyone regrouped and we were into the UK premiere of Bryce Dessner’s Piano Concerto. It was written for Alice Sara Ott who has already played it elsewhere. She’s a charismatic player to watch – barefoot in cobalt blue, her dark hair flashing and bouncing.

The concerto is dedicated to, and inspired by, the composer’s sister, a dancer and choreographer who has cancer. The movements are titled “How to Dance”, “How to Breathe and “How to Feel”. The first of these is very percussive with an emphasis on ascending scales and a warmly lyrical cadenza. You can hear both the dance and the sad anxiety in the middle movement and it’s a treat (for an amateur second violinist like me) to see first violins “chugging” while seconds sail above with a melody.

There’s an evocative segue into the third movement which is lively with some ethereal percussion work. The solo part is, I suspect (although I am not a pianist) dauntingly challenging but Ott has clearly made it her own and the triumphant ending is quite something.

I am very fond of Scheherazade which is just as well since this is the second time I’ve reviewed it in less than a fortnight. It’s the combination of wistfulness and grandiloquence which gets to me every time.

The solo violin, said by Rimsky-Korsakov himself (who disliked over enthusiastic linking of music to story)  to represent the voice of the story teller between tales and it was played here with stunning sensitivity by Philharmonia leader Zsolt-Tihamér Visontay.

Lim’s gestures became bigger now as she coaxed out the big sounds that his glorious war horse of a piece needs. But she also made sure we heard and revelled in that fabulous bassoon solo over rumbling double basses and the insouciance of the snare drum and flute in the third movement. The final movement came with oodles of drama at the opening but it was beautifully pointed and never self-indulgent. They really played the big melodies before the end with make-you-smile warmth too. And then came the magical final violin solo and that searing harmonic note which ends the piece. Bravo indeed.

 

 

This book arrived on my desk, sent by the author with my permission because Finley de Witt and I have a mutual acquaintance. This quite often happens to people like me who write about books and sometimes it’s bad news. I have been sent books so squirmingly amateurish that I can barely read to page 3, let along the end. There was – thank goodness, because it can be awkward – none of that with Lovebroken. Finley’s beautifully written memoir had me well and truly hooked from first to last.

Finley, now a trauma worker in her 50s, has suffered all her life from mental illness, guilt and feelings she can’t understand. And most of it comes back to her monstrous mother. Lovebroken is, I suspect, partly a therapeutic exercise in coming to terms with the past. In that sense it reminds me a little of Jeanette Winterstone’s Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit and Margaret Drabble’s The Peppered Moth. They both had very difficult mothers (adoptive in Winterstone’s case) but neither did anything as dreadful as de Witt’s did. And yet … there is still, despite all that, the umbilical tie between mother and child which few people feel able to break and de Witt is very good indeed at conveying that guilty, troubled, despairing ambivalence.

Having grown up in Bradford the daughter of middle class (ish) dysfunctional parents who both had casual affairs, Finley went to Oxford to read English Literature and graduated with a First which may help to explain why she can write with such stylish flair. At university she acquired some stalwart – saintly almost –  friends who supported her assiduously though the difficult years which followed. Sometimes she worked in very low level jobs and she lived in some ropey accommodation in London as she pursued her pretty rackety love life.

Attracted to both women and men, she frequented gay bars and clubs and hooked up with many lovers. Her writing is gloriously graphic and I really like that. If you have a urge to “suck someone’s cock” then I’d much rather you said so than euphemised. But I shan’t be giving a copy of Lovebroken to, for instance, my elderly aunt who told me in horror recently how upset she was by Miriam Margolyes’s book Oh Miriam!: “Oh Susan, the language she uses and the things she does!”

In fact Finley’s exuberantly diverse sex life and flawed serial relationships which dominate the first half of the book are partly a mechanism to avoid facing the trauma in her past. The passion, the bullying and the hurt she suffers when a marriage of convenience which enabled house purchase is thrown back in her face are all a quasi side show, although the suicide attempt is a real crie-de-coeur. It isn’t until she finally meets a gorgeous man with extraordinary patience and more emotional intelligence than any counsellor (although she has a wonderful one of those too) that she finally finds monogamous peace in a little house in Hastings. Even then it isn’t plain sailing: for example, when she gets breast cancer or when her elderly parents visit. And it’s a measure of how difficult things are that the former is a lot easier than the latter.

The writing is crisp and witty. I underlined this paragraph for example: “The problem with dating a former Buddhist monk is that they tend not to have any money, unless it’s the one who founded the digital mindfulness company that became worth millions. My one wasn’t that one.”

Obviously I understand why she has changed the names of the people she writes about. I’m puzzled though about why she fiddles about with place names. Hastings, for example becomes Tastings and that seems pointless or, incomprehensibly esoteric.

I found this book richly compelling and it made me think long and hard about mental illness and parental responsibility. I recommend if warmly. It deserves to do well. And I sincerely hope Finley continues to find better health and healing.

Next week on Susan’s bookshelves: The Appeal by Janice Hallett

There’s a Monster in Your Show – Purcell Room, Southbank Centre and Touring

There’s a Monster in Your Show was reviewed at the Purcell Room, Southbank Centre. The tour continues until 24 December 2024.

Star rating: three stars ★ ★ ★ ✩ ✩

This decent little show for preschoolers (adapted by Zoe Bourn from the books by Tom Fletcher, with music by Fletcher, Barry Bignold and Miranda Lawson, who also directs) kept everyone in the room engaged at the performance I saw and some of the audience members were at least three years away from starting school.

One character is trying to stage a show against Laura McEwen’s colourful set of squares, boxes and shelves in primary colours and pastels.

The show is jinxed by the arrival of a round blue monster – soon joined by a green dinosaur, a yellow alien and a pink unicorn with light-up hooves, all of whom make gentle mischief.

These characters have hopped out of the books wherein they will be familiar to many of the audience ….

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Reviews: https://musicaltheatrereview.com/theres-a-monster-in-your-show-purcell-room-southbank-centre-and-touring/

SEASONS OF LOVE: WHY RENT MATTERS – Emily Garside (Applause Books).

Star rating: three stars ★ ★ ★ ✩ ✩

When Jonathan Larson’s Rent arrived at the Nederlander Theatre on Broadway in 1996, directed by Michael Greif, after an Off-Broadway stint at New York Theatre Workshop, it broke new ground.

Garside argues that it changed the course of musical theatre, and more widely, theatre history as one of the first musicals to depict AIDS truthfully and to show gay love as an ordinary, celebratory part of life.

Of course, Larson’s untimely sudden death (from an undiagnosed heart condition) at the age of 35 the day before the first Off-Broadway preview also had an impact. Tragic as it was, it provided an element of unanticipated “romance”.

Rent is inspired by Puccini’s La bohème which had premiered almost exactly a century before it. Tuberculosis becomes AIDS in this Upper East Side flat share …

Read the rest of this book reviews at Musical Theatre Reviews: https://musicaltheatrereview.com/book-review-seasons-of-love-why-rent-matters-emily-garside/

Show: Two Rounds

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Jermyn Street Theatre. 16b Jermyn Street, St. James’s, London SW1Y 6ST

Credits: Written by Cristina Comencini. Directed by Aida Rocci. Presented by Aslant Theatre Company.

Two Rounds

4 stars

 

Photo: Giulia Delprato


Beautifully observed and thoughtfully paced, this play explores the experience of Italian women across two generations.

Act 1 presents four 1960s women playing cards while their children play nearby. Act two gives us their four daughters in the early 2000s, clearly lifelong friends, meeting after the funeral (suicide) of one of the mothers.

The first group have to find their fulfilment (or lack of it) at home although – this is Italy, after all – one is having an affair and one has a serially unfaithful husband. The daughters have high powered jobs –  doctor, concert pianist, lawyer – but somehow they’re not much happier than their mothers were. It’s just the issues which are different.

The four actors (splendidly directed by Aida Rocci) are richly convincing in each of their two roles. Natalie Cutler is brittle as tactless Claudia and moving as her childless, single daughter on her fourth round of IVF. Donna Mazzocchio is good as the twittery, pregnant Beatrice and terrific as her distraught, bereaved daughter. Flora Sowerby finds a lot of anger and frustration in Gabriella who has given up a career in music to raise a family. As her daughter, Sara, who actually has the glittering international career she is forthright and funny but also troubled in her marriage. Finally comes Saria Steyl whose two characters are similarly rational and reasonable, on the surface at least. However, she may be successful paediatrician married to a gynaecologist but at heart she’d still like children of her own.

This intelligent play has had a lot of success in Italy. Part of Jermyn Street’s Footprints Festival, this is the UK debut in English. A word of praise for sound designer Hattie North who uses evocative pop tunes for both eras (“I’m a believer” in Italian!) and some effective undertones to heighten the emotional impact of some of the speeches.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/two-rounds/

Mozart: The Mixtape

London Mozart Players

Jonathan Bloxham

Fairfield Halls, Croydon

A gala concert to celebrate the 75th anniversary of London Mozart Players by Harry Blech, this event rather neatly replicated a concert which Mozart organised in Salzburg on 23 March 1783. Thus we got a symphony, two piano concertos, three soprano arias (Anna Prohaska) and two movements of a serenade.

Croydon is the current London Borough of Culture in connection with which, LMP, based at Fairfield Halls, has a partnership with a an inclusive photographic project, 100 Faces of Croydon. So the evening began with a short film about that. Then – a long way from Mozart and the concert’s title – we got Ligeti’s Poème Symphonique for 100 Metronomes which involved audience members, mostly those 100 Faces of Croydon,  standing up with their ticking metronomes and a rather engaging sound like pattering rain.

Of course, LMP play beautifully. They really don’t need gimmickry such as peculiar red lighting (to match their festive red and black outfits?) to remind us of this. And even the players began to look puzzled/amused by the amount of stage smoke unaccountably being puffed across the stage.

We began with Haffner symphony (vibrant with a nicely highlighted contrast in the second subject) and “began” is the operative word. After one movement Petroc Trelawny appeared to explain what the concert was about. Then we heard the two middle movements (lovely filigree flute work in the second movement) but we had to wait until the very end of the concert for the fourth movement (nippy pace and splendid timp work). Well, this is apparently how Mozart programmed in in 1783 but that doesn’t mean I have to like it. As far as I’m concerned a symphony is an integrated four (usually) section work and I want to hear it played all together and in the right order, please. I know the word “mixtape” was in this  concert’s title, but no thanks.

Imogen Cooper played Mozart’s piano concerto no 12 in C which is deceptively simple and doesn’t get as many outings as it should. It was stylishly played with the first movement’s dynamics and key change delivered with gentle strength and a pleasingly understated andante.

Martin James Bartlett’s take on Mozart’s first completely original piano concerto (K588) was so different in style that the piano sounded like a different instrument. Somehow he made it rattle like a harpsichord. I admired the beautiful horn work in the slow movement and Bartlett’s deftness of touch in the rondo as it winds through its witty variations.

Between items we were treated to filmed homage to LMP by various people who have worked with them and lots of input from Trelawny who also interviewed conductor Jonathan Bloxham. Well, since it was being recorded for broadcast on Radio 3 in a couple of weeks, he needed to explain a lot. Yes, I understand that but, good as he is at what he does, the constant repetition becomes very tedious for a live audience. It was a long concert by modern standards and could have done with a lot less chatter so we could all have got an earlier bus home.

Nonetheless it’s good to see a much broader audience demographic than you usually get at classical music concerts, even if the woman next to me managed to kick her metronome into action by accident during a quiet passage and never stopped reading stories on her phone about Prince Harry for the entire two and a half hours.

 

The Magic Flute

WA Mozart 

 Merry Opera Company

Barn Theatre Oxted and touring

The Magic Flute usually has a big cast and orchestra. Can you do it with just seven performers and a keyboard? Yes, given the imagination and wit that director John Ramster brings to Merry Opera Company, you certainly can. And it comes off in spades.

In fact there are advantages to a small cast in which everyone doubles and there are no stars. Musical clarity shines through. For example in the love duet between Tamino (James Searle) and Pamina (Rebecca Milford) the harmony is exquisitely delivered. You are forced to hear every note and suspension afresh.

The Magic Flute is an eccentric piece full of obscure Masonic symbolism and it’s unusual because Schikaneder’s libretto was written in German (not Italian) and includes spoken dialogue. The sparky Jeremy Sams translation is wittily upbeat and some of his rhyme is as good as WS Gilbert. It means that the opera becomes very accessible and the story telling – which can quite easily get lost in The Magic Flute – shines through like a beacon.

The cast consists of three women and four men, one of whom is a counter tenor. Casting is as cross-gender as it can be with, for example the Priests’ chorus arranged to accommodate women’s voices. Dominic Mattos, an accomplished actor with a versatile and high counter tenor voice, is excellent as the Third Lady and all the three boys are sung by women.

Eleri Gwilym delights as Queen of the Night. Of course, this talented young singer hits all those show-stopping high notes in both arias. But she also manages to make them funny – a furious, poisonous witch-like woman hurling her invective at people. It’s quite a performance.

And Christopher Faulkner is the best Papageno I’ve seen in a long time. He looks wonderful in pink tights and a feathery hat, hopping about ruefully and he sings impeccably (in a “rural” accent) in his famous solos as well as in ensemble numbers.

It’s quirky – as The Magic Flute really has to be. The three ladies wear red plastic macs and carry pale blue handbags. The serpent is made of a length of silver insulation pipe with a face at one end so it’s suitably slinky. Sarastro is dressed like Karl Lagerfeld and Searle lisps in vowels so distorted that he makes Jacob Rees Mogg sound like an East End barrow boy.

It all adds to the fun but, of course, it’s the music which really matters and music director Kelvin Lim, who sits at keyboard where an orchestra pit would be, has drawn excellent work out of most of the cast. Merry Opera Company specialises in providing a bursary-supported  springboard for emerging young performers. Since 2007 it has worked with over 240 professional singers. Of these 80% have gone on to major opera house choruses and 41 have launched international solo careers.

This performance at the delightful Barn Theatre in Oxted marked the opening of a ten-venue tour for this show. Catch it if you can. You won’t be disappointed but I warn you, it comes with earworms. My head is still rattling with glorious Mozartian snippets.