Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Hastings Philharmonic Singers 25 November 2023 (Jonathan Watts reviews)

Hastings Philharmonic (HPO) Singers
Saturday 25 th November at Christ Church St Leonards-on-Sea
Rameau Aquilon et Orithie
Rameau Quam dilecta tabernacula
Gilles Messe des morts
Ensemble OrQuesta Baroque
Music Director Marcio da Silva
Continuo Predrag Gosta

Marcio da Silva is something of a musical polymath. Among a whole host of activities, he is conductor of the Hastings Philharmonic Orchestra, Choir and Singers; he has set up his own ensemble, OrQuesta Baroque to perform music from the baroque repertoire in which he directs as well as playing the recorder; he has a fine baritone voice; and he also is an enterprising impresario who brings to the Hastings and St Leonards music scene a wide range of high quality, professional and good amateur performances, both of large scale choral and orchestral works as well as smaller ensemble and soloist recitals. He is no one-man-band, however, and he would be the first to admit that he would achieve little without the focus and musical intelligence of the instrumentalists and
singers with whom he works.

Good as it is to resurrect forgotten works, rigorously authentic performances sometimes suggest that it might have been best to leave such works in obscurity. On the other hand, this concert of unfamiliar French vocal music from the late 17 th and early 18 th centuries by Rameau and Gilles proved quite the opposite: three pieces of great poignancy and beauty performed with exquisite tenderness, sensitivity, drama and utter musicality, enhanced by the fine acoustic and intimate candle-lit atmosphere of Blomfield’s Gothic-revival church of Christ Church St Leonard’s.

In Rameau’s solo cantata ‘Aquilon and Orthie’, the north wind woos his lover. There was a wonderful lyricism to Marcio’s singing, which fully brought out the drama of the text, while the recorder and violin soloists and the continuo of the distinguished keyboard player, Predrag Gosta, provided brilliant but gentle support and contrast to the strong vocal line, emphasising both the dance like qualities and rustic melancholy of the music. The interweaving and imitation of the vocal and instrumental parts had a magical effect and the whole ensemble was perfectly balanced in a performance which was both intense but relaxed. I particularly enjoyed the graceful and implied shifting harmonies of the recitatives, which are unlike those of other composers.

The impressive instrumental playing continued in Rameau’s setting of Psalm 84. ‘Quam dilecta tabernacula’, with its sublime opening of strings and recorder, and the strings provided a firm but controlled accompaniment and counterpoint to the vocal lines. The soprano soloist had a bell-like purity of tone and, as elsewhere, the vocal line was not embellished with too many ornamentations which, in some period performances, can be excessive for a modern audience. The chorus provided a rich, intense but controlled sound which balanced the soloists well; entries were all precise, well-tuned and often dramatically joyful, with clearly articulated and pointed imitative phrases. Despite
the fullness of the writing, there was considerable variety to the texture of the choral singing. The light, evangelist-tone of the tenor soloist was exactly right, with a superb high register: his top notes floated out with consummate ease. This expressive lyricism was reflected by all four soloists who sang with perfect ensemble, balancing their volume and vocal quality to recreate Rameau’s wonderfully expressive harmonies and vocal lines. Crisp double-dotting gave the choral sections a light, dance-like quality while the bass solo with recorder again emphasised the harmonic intensity of the writing.

The quality of performance by soloists, instrumentalists and choir perhaps reached its peak in the performance of the Messe des Morts by Jean Gilles, a name new to me: what, one wonders, would he have produced had he not died so young aged 37 in 1705? The work has a remarkable variety of emotional content, from the solemn funeral march at the start to joyful, dance-like celebrations of the life hereafter, with sections of contemplative introspection, but at no point is there a sense of gloom: death is seen as either inevitable, a welcome release form the tribulations of worldly life or the door to eternal joy. This diverse approach to the subject matter was reflected superbly
throughout the performance, with the changing colour produced by different vocal, choral and instrumental combinations, all of which emphasized both the lyrical vocal lines and the often poignant harmonies. The variety of emotion was nowhere more apparent than in the solo performances, all well-balanced with measured instrumental accompaniment: it was good to hear soloists who were so responsive to each other, producing perfect ensemble singing. The choral elements were dramatic, exhilarating and, in the final chorus, heart-wrenchingly moving in its emotional content: throughout, the choir sang with great precision in tuning and in its entries, some of them quite exposed, and coped well with the harmonic changes, producing considerable variety
in tonal colour. There was never a hint of straining for top notes, and the more forceful passages were simply exciting, with some almost theatrical interjections. This was a fine, totally professional performance of an unjustly neglected work which brought out its deep emotional power and sheer beauty.

There were absolutely no weak links among those involved in this impressive concert, and Marcio is to be congratulated on balancing so well soloists, choir and instrumentalists, while taking a leading role as performer himself to produce a highly memorable evening. I will certainly now be listening to more early Rameau and Gilles.

I had vaguely heard of Dorothy Whipple (1893-1966) but never read any of her books and knew nothing about her. Then a friend, author and avid reader, recently listed her ten best novels of all time on Twitter.  Someone at a Distance (1953) was the only one on her list that I hadn’t read. What? Time I put that right, obviously. So I did.

My friend told me I wouldn’t be disappointed and she was right. JB Priestley dubbed Whipple “the Jane Austen of the 20th century” and I can see what he meant although she also reminds me, perhaps because of the period, of both Josephine Tey and Daphne du Maurier

It is the early 1950s. The war is a very recent memory and rationing is still in place. The family at the centre of this novel are well-to-do businessmen class although they can’t get live-in staff any more for their generously proportioned houses.  Whipple’s exposition is strong and clear. We meet difficult, self-absorbed Mrs North and her son Avery who lives happily nearby with his wife and two children, one at boarding school and the other doing his National Service. Then Mrs North, given to changeable moods and whims, decides to recruit a French companion, Louise Lanier. to live with her. And, very gradually and subtly, the rot sets in because Louise has an agenda of her own and is not at all what she seems – although she tends to create uneasiness. There is a whiff of Emma Bovary about her boredom with French provincial life. Inevitably Mrs North adores her blindly but then circumstances change and the novel sets off on a painful but immaculately observed path.

Someone at a Distance is a study of marriage, family dynamics and malevolence with splendid characterisation. Apart from Louise, every character is at best likeable and at worst more sinned against than sinning. They are all what EM Forster would have called rounded examples of Homo Fictus. Ellen, Avery’s wife, for example has to find inner strength and some independence – and does so convincingly. The staff at Anne’s boarding school are plausibly kind and supportive. And we all need people in our lives like wise, kind Mrs Brockington, a sort of mother-figure to Ellen, and Miss Daley, old Mrs North’s “help” who turns out to be perceptive and right there when she’s needed despite her dreadful singing voice. Louise’s parents are decent, well meaning but insular, staunch Catholic folk too. They do not deserve what their daughter does to them although their reaction when they finally discover the truth is satisfying.

I found myself unable to predict where this thoughtful novel might be going. As omniscient narrator, Whipple shows us what each main character is doing and thinking so the reader is well aware of all the complexities.  Surely after everything that happens there couldn’t be any kind of happy ending?   Well, yes and no. Suffice it to say that where well drawn sensible, and sensitive, human beings are involved there is always hope.

Whipple enjoyed great popularity between the wars but then fell out of favour. Her books have, however, been republished in recent years by Persephone Books, a company which specialises in bringing good authors back to public awareness. There are eight Whipple novels and I’m now looking forward to discovering the other seven

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves The Spire by William Golding

Philharmonia    Royal Festival Hall    Paavo Jarvi    James Ehnes   26 November 2023

However many times you’ve heard it and however familiar it is, there are few more atmospheric pieces than Prelude à l’après-midi d’un faune. In this performance Jarvi really ensured that it resonated with every detail of Debussy’s sunny, evocative score lovingly lingered over – especially the harp chords and then the tiny, tinkling bells in the final bars. And I really liked the way he allowed the sound to die away, arms raised at the end and – for once – the audience respected that and really listened.

James Ehnes is an admirably unshowy performer but, my goodness, he finds plenty of passion and bravura in the music. Dressed in “lounge suit” with tie (the orchestra was in full evening dress at 3pm) he looked more like a very business-like cabinet minister than a soloist. The Tchaikovsky violin concerto can seem like a populist pot boiler but Ehnes made it sound daisy-fresh most notably in his immaculate first movement cadenza and the delightful duet with the orchestra which ends it. His muted Canzonetta was moving and I enjoyed the excellent balance with the wind solos: flute, clarinet and bassoon. The segue into the finale was elegant and his staccato, vivacissimo, heel-of-the-bow rhythms were a masterclass in violin technique.

His encore was new to me, and I suspect to most of the audience. Eugène Ysaÿe’s sonata number 3 in D minor is a one movement piece. It’s plaintive with lots of double stopping and glissandi along with some wonderfully virtuosic cross string work. It was a well chosen contrast and the tumultuous applause Ehnes received was richly deserved.

And so to Prokofiev’s sixth symphony which dates from 1947, only six years before the composer’s death. It was, almost inevitably, banned in Soviet Russia: it was too austere and truthful for the Stalinist regime. At this concert it required a fair bit of interval stage management to accommodate an additional desk in each of the four string sections, five percussionists and full brass as well as piano. The symphony is structured as a triptych with a poignant, almost filmic largo at its heart.  Jarvi, always a very measured conductor who really holds general pauses for dramatic effect, brought out all the necessary sonority in, for example the violin solo in the first movement and the sensitively played brass solos in the second. And the insouciant (subversive?) trombone work against the strings in the third vivace movement was delightful.

 

 

Show: Nell Gwynn

Society: Huntingdon Drama Club

Venue: The Commemoration Hall, Huntingdon

Credits: Jessica Swale

Nell Gwynn

3 stars

Jessica Swale’s 2016 play about Charles II’s most famous mistress, the self-declared “Protestant whore”,  is almost as pretty and witty as Samuel Pepys wrote that Nell was. And Huntington Drama Club have evidently had a lot of fun with it.

Nell, famously, sold oranges (and other things) at the theatre, before she was talent-spotted. She became the best known of the first actresses to grace the stage in the 1660s when theatres re-opened and Restoration Comedy was born – with real women in the cast for the first time. Then Charles II fell for her charms and it becomes a real-life rags-to-riches story.

Georgie Bickerdike is outstanding as Nell. She smiles with translucent charm, flirts, pouts, sings beautifully and is very good at dropping double-entendres, almost literally tongue in cheek. Chris Turner makes a fine fist of the actor manager, Killigrew, with exaggerated actorly diction and Nat Spalding finds plenty of very funny petulance in Nat Spalding whose chance to play female parts is rapidly disappearing. Carl Perkins is reasonably convincing as Charles II  given to pragmatically sitting on the fence because he doesn’t, given what happened to his father, want to antagonise anyone. It’s not his fault that I can never take anyone dressed at Charles II seriously because it immediately takes me and my imagination to Neverland and Captain Hook.

It’s a big company.  Some of the roles which would originally have been doubled – are all cast singly, presumably to maximise opportunity. Thus, along with other reasonably decent acting there’s an enjoyable cameo form Naomi Ing as a furious Queen Catherine and another from Steph Hamer as Nell Gwynn’s bawdy mother. Most of the acting is acceptable but, despite skilful direction, standards are inevitably variable.

The best thing about Swale’s clever play and this production of it, is the send-up of theatre done badly – as comedy it works every time. It’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Noises Off, The Play that Goes Wrong, Our Country’s Good and many more. In Nell Gwynn, though it’s a bit more than that with some serious, quite topical, open-ended questions about who or what theatre is for and who should be doing it – with, of course, some knowing looks at the real 2023 audience lapping it up in Huntingdon’s Commemoration Hall.

The play comprises twenty five short scenes and I think the decision to mark each change with a black out is ill judged. It triggers audience applause and that makes the play feel clumsily choppy. Props and set are pretty simple. It would be perfectly possible for cast members to move from one scene to the next, maybe bringing items on and off as they go which would have made a much more seamless, less hiccough-y show.

 

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/nell-gwynn-3/

Oh What a Lovely War continues at Southwark Playhouse, London until 9 December 2023.

Star rating: five stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

This year marks the 60th anniversary of Joan Littlewood’s ground-breaking, devised show which satirised the absurdity and obscenity of war, roundly condemned the officers who gave the orders, issued relentless, chilling statistical reminders of the horrifying scale of the casualties and wrapped it all up in commedia dell’arte and songs from the First World War.

Normally it’s done with a sizeable cast so that you get chorus numbers and lots of cameos. In this production it’s entirely in the hands of just six actors, all actor-musos, most of them recent graduates of Rose Bruford College’s actor-musician degree, the leaders of which are going to be delighted with this show and the quality work their alumni are turning out.

Rarely have I seen so much talent in a small space and never have I seen six actors work so hard, although – with commensurate professionalism – they make it look effortless.

The energy level is phenomenal as they leap on and off instruments which they play with warmth and enviable competence, whether it’s an Irish jig or a poignant lament …

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review: https://musicaltheatrereview.com/oh-what-a-lovely-war-southwark-playhouse/

Show: Dennis of Penge

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Bridge House Theatre. 2 High Street, London SE20 8RZ

Credits: By Annie Siddons. Directed by Sahar Awad

Dennis of Penge

2 stars

It’s fun to see a play whose setting is so local that you know every street corner, shop and pub mentioned – although it means that it would sit very awkwardly anywhere other than at the Bridge House which lies in the heart of SE20 where all the action takes place. It’s almost a site-specific piece.

The author, a woman of Penge, writes in the programme that, in line with her own experience, this is a play about finding sobriety or freedom from addiction and telling the truth about how difficult it is. Actually it’s also about poverty, the shortcomings of the benefits system, friendship, identity, obesity, loneliness, marital fidelity, bullying, forgiveness, redemption and more. It’s ambitiously – perhaps over-ambitiously – complex both in terms of plot and style. The story is told by narrators who move in and out of the action and who speak – as in Greek drama – in verse.

The eponymous Dennis (Wayne C McDonald) is a reworking of Dionysus, the god of transcendence and ecstasy. He appears first as a child who is best friends with a little girl named Wendy but no body knows where he comes from. Twenty five years later he is serving in a local fried chicken shop and meets Wendy (Mariam Awad) again. She is now seriously damaged, a recovering addict with no self-esteem or possessions and hands which tremble continuously. Awad is very convincing in this role particularly when she  eventually finds the courage to speak up for herself and others like her. In Dennis, McDonald finds plenty of gentleness, including some tender, fecund lechery (not with Wendy) and eventually a roaring, god-like power as he gradually develops into “The God of Lost Souls.”

This play has the largest cast I’ve ever seen in a fringe show: twelve adult actors, two children, and three drummers who suddenly, rather oddly, appear ten minutes before the end as the play climaxes with a procession/demonstration on a megasaurus in Crystal Palace Park.  Many of these cast members are still learning their craft and for several, this is the first professional production so, inevitably acting – and especially the quality of diction – is variable.

It isn’t easy, either, to direct that number of people effectively in The Bridge House’s small studio space so it often seems crowded. Moreover, the play consists of a large number of short scenes separated by brief blackouts during which you hear actors moving in and out of position. That feels amateurishly bitty. In most cases it would have been far better simply to move from one scene to the next.

There are some witty and memorable lines in this busy, intense play. “Sex, death, petrol and hope” seems a pretty fair description of life for some less-than-fortunate Penge residents and I chuckled over “So we [South Londoners] don’t have the tube but we have chicken. Chicken is the opium of the people”.

 

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/dennis-of-penge/

 

 

 

 

This novel was first published in 1968 which was about the time I got to know my soon-to-be mother-in-law cosily enough to swap reading recommendations with her. She was very taken with Dance of the Dwarfs. So I read it. Of course I had forgotten the details – all except the precise nature of the secret in the forest – so I was intrigued to return to it.

It presents a British botanist, Dr Owen Dawnay, doing field work in a very remote part of Colombia when huge tranches of central America were still very wild and there is dangerous hostility between political factions. Locals talk, and are frightened of, “dancing dwarfs” in the forest so they keep well away.  As a scientist, Dawnay is dismissive of such superstitions and curious to know what is really there. Eventually he finds out. No spoilers here, obviously, except for two observational hints. First, I remember learning a new (to me, then) zoological term from this book which I’ve found mildly useful ever since.  Second, reading Dance of the Dwarfs now, I am convinced that Geoffery Household (1900-1988) must have been nurtured on The Wind in the Willows. He’d have been eight when it was first published in 1908.

It’s a novel which begins at the end, as it were, with a report of Dawnay being found dead in his adobe house with his arms round a young female along with remains of two horses. It is presumed that  insurgents shot the humans and that the horses died of starvation but the bodies are too far gone to ascertain cause of death. Why moreover did the guerillas not steal the horses rather than leaving them? It doesn’t quite add up. Then Dawnay‘s journal emerges unexpectedly and that’s what forms the backbone of the novel so we know all along that we’re not headed for any sort of happy ending as we gradually learn what actually happened.

Well, of course you don’t have to like any first person narrator (think of Humbert Humbert and Lolita) I certainly don’t like Owen Dawnay.  He does far too much shooting of wildlife – some of it for pleasure rather than food – for my 21st century sensibilities. Moreover his “colonial,” patriarchal attitudes are pretty foul. He talks of “Indians” (the term at the time for the indigenous people) as if they were a separate race and when he is “gifted” a young woman, Chucha, to keep his bed warm he laps her up and keeps telling us how good the sex is. He is, however, also kind to her so that gradually, against his own will, he falls in love with her and is troubled about her future and his own. He really doesn’t want to pass her on to someone else when he leaves – although he has been approached. This is pretty revolting stuff by today’s standards so it’s strong characterisation. Interestingly, though, I don’t recall being struck by any of that when I first read it. I suppose it’s a sign of just how much more sensitive about these issues most of us are now – thank goodness.

Meanwhile, against a background of violence and people turning up on the doorstep with guns quite regularly and some deaths and disappearances, is Dawnay‘s quest, determination and to an extent courage.  At its heart Dance of the Dwarfs is a study of fear, especially of the unknown, and Household manages it perfectly. Sometimes science simply can’t outwit nature. The locals know that. And if Dawnay had listened to them he might have survived to live happily ever after (or something) with Chucha. But, until finally overwhelmed with terror himself he’s a fatalistic character, and it wouldn’t have been such an arresting novel.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves Someone at a Distance by Dorothy Whipple