Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Never Have I Ever (Susan Elkin reviews)

Show: Never Have I Ever

Society: Chichester Festival Theatre (professional)

Venue: Minerva Theatre, Minerva Theatre, Oaklands Park, Chichester PO19 6AP

Credits: by Deborah Frances-White

Never Have I Ever

3 stars

This tight, visceral four hander is a debut play and a remarkable achievement for Deborah Frances-White. It is also a relatively unusual theatrical treat to see four highly accomplished actors playing off, and listening to, each other with this level of focused intelligence.

We’re in the Masada Restaurant in East London run by Jacq (Alex Roach) and her partner Kas (Amit Shah). The pandemic has left them facing bankruptcy, news which they now have to break to their wealthy friends, married couple Tobin (Greg Wise) and Adaego (Susan Wokoma) who financed the enterprise. All four were at university together.

That’s the exposition. What happens after that is a sharp, shocking and sometimes funny exploration of sexual, racial and gender politics. I was totally convinced by it all until a few minutes before the end when suddenly we’re in a Mozart Opera or a Shakespeare comedy with unlikely deals being made by two women out to fool the men.

Greg Wise is terrific as the only white male and a successful/wealthy one so he has a lot of power or thinks he has. It’s the drunken game of Never Have I Ever in which players force unexpected truths out of each other which throws up something he can’t deal with. Then we see hurt, anger, cool logic and incisiveness all done with the sort of timing you only get from a highly experienced actor.

Wokoma’s character is meant to be impressive and magnificent and she rises splendidly to the challenge. This is a woman you’d want on your side rather than anyone else’s and of course the script gives her plenty to say about the experience of being a black woman.

Roach presents a thoughtful, feisty, bi-sexual woman in Jacq with a huge talent as a chef but she’s troubled too and we see her three dimensionally especially in her scenes with Wokoma. Frankie Bradshaw’s set configures the whole playing area as a restaurant but the space in front, very close to the audience, represents the wine cellar and imaginative use is made of that for some two-person scenes.

Shah, of course, plays a brown man so he too has “otherness” issues but wears them lightly – often seeming the simplest and most straightforward of the four until he finally loses his cool in the second act and launches into and impassioned account of  his true feelings. It’s an arresting few minutes.

This production makes interesting use of stillness. All four actors are on stage, almost continuously. If two have a scene together then the others are usually silent, shadowy, stationary figures elsewhere on the set. Also fun is the use of loud music, strobe lighting and some neat choreography (movement director, Chi-San Howard) as the four of them get drunk in act one although it felt as if it belonged in a different play.

I am still pondering on the observation that you have to keep your head down to keep it above water.

 

 First published by Sardines https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/never-have-i-ever/
 Subscribe 

Show: Colder than Here

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: THE JACK STUDIO THEATRE. 410 Brockley Road, London SE4 2DH

Credits: by Laura Wade. directed by Jenny Eastop and produced by Upper Hand Theatre

Colder than Here

3 stars

This play, which premiered in 2005 at Soho Theatre, is new to me. And I’m forcibly struck by its total lack of theatrical pretentiousness. It is simply a well written four hander presenting four members of a family facing an imminent death.

Myra (Laura Fitzpatrick) has bone cancer and a few months to live. She is trying to be much more upfront and direct about this than her daughters and husband feel able to be and she wants a “green” woodland funeral. The play is set over six months in the family living room and in various possible burial venues.

I liked the paciness of Wade’s dialogue and very much admired Emma Riches’s beautifully nuanced work as the younger daughter, Harriet. She is one of those actors who can communicate volumes with a tilt of her chin or an eye movement and she finds a huge range of moods during the course of the play.

Also enjoyable was the sub plot about the broken boiler. Michael Tuffnell as Alec finally comes into his own with a wonderful telephone conversation with the boiler company. I’m not sure it actually adds much to the play but it is a fine five minutes of nicely paced comedy.

The set is ingenious in its simplicity. A few items of sitting room furniture are upended, rearranged and covered with cloths to represent different burial grounds, appropriately lit by Matthew Karmios as we progress through the winter to spring.  The music which covers the scene changes is pleasing too. Alec is a classical music buff so we get at various times, Mozart, Verdi, Vivaldi, Brahms and some evocatively remixed Purcell.

I’m doubtful, though, about the cardboard coffin. I attended a funeral recently which featured one and it was the traditional navicular shape. It certainly didn’t look like a coffee table.

Colder Than Here is not especially cutting edge but this production is decent work. Moreover, it’s a thoughtful piece of theatre and it’s always good to be made to think about the need to confront death and loss rather than deny it.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/colder-than-here-2/

 Subscribe 

Lines from Shakespeare’s Sonnets have a habit of lodging themselves in my head and playing on a repeat loop – poetic earworms as it were. I suppose it’s not surprising really. Poetry is, after, all a form of music (or should that be the other way round?) and the Greeks, in their wisdom, barely distinguished between the two forms.

When, for no apparent reason, “No longer mourn for me when I am dead” (Sonnet 71) sprang persistently into my brain recently, I reached for my favourite edition of the Sonnets. Of course I have several versions but the one I like best is edited by Katherine Duncan-Jones for Arden Shakespeare, 1997 – mine is the revised 2010 edition. I like it because her introduction and notes are so good. It’s scholarly and very detailed but always accessible and never abstruse.

I took it away with me to a six day residential music summer school last month so that I’d have something completely different – although the music clearly a linking factor – to read at night. And it turned out to be an inspired idea.  “Music to hear, why hear’st thou music sadly?” (Sonnet 8).

I think, on balance, I prefer the “dark lady” sonnets to the young man ones but I don’t much care whether either of them was real or why these love poems were written. I just adore the idea that “fair” might mean both blonde and pretty but you can be attractive and dark. I was brunette in my youth so I don’t need convincing. I empathise with anyone who is not blonde for ethnic and or genetic reasons. “Then will I swear beauty herself is black/ And all they foul that thy complexion lack”. (Sonnet 132)

I enjoy, and marvel at, the shape of each Sonnet too: four quatrains and a clinching rhyming couplet. The  technical craftsmanship is as extraordinary as a Mozart string quartet or a Dante Gabriel Rossetti painting. If you hear one of these sonnets read aloud Shakespeare makes you listen for those last two lines – like a cricket ball landing.

A few years ago I set myself  the task of reading the 154 sonnets, one each night, starting on 01 January and finishing around the end of May – I can’t remember whether or not it was a leap year. It was a rewarding experience to savour each one slowly and individually. Yes, scholars divide them into sequences but each and every sonnet also stands alone with something timeless to say: about love, beauty, respect, the power of writing, ageing, grief, mortality and a whole lot more

I am of an age now, for example, when “Like as the waves make towards their pebbled shore/ So do our minute hasten to their end” (Sonnet 60)  has more resonance than it once did as I try to pack more and more in while there’s still time. And having published a book (selling well – thanks, Folks) The Alzheimer’s Diaries about my late husband’s final years, the line “Or I shall live, your epitaph to make” (Sonnet 81) packs a certain punch too.

Sonnets

Shakespeare’s Sonnets, which were appeared in 1609 are unusual because they were published in his lifetime – unlike almost everything else he wrote. I hope they made him lots of money. And how right he was: “Since spite of him I’ll live in this poor rhyme” … “When tyrants’ crests and tombs of brass are spent” (Sonnet 107). We are still listening to that voice and its music 414 years after these near-perfect poems were published.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Twilight Garden by Sara Nisha Adams

 

Show: The Threepenny Opera

Society: OVO

Venue: Roman Theatre of Verulamium. Bluehouse Hill, St Albans, Hertfordshire AL3 6AE

Credits: Produced by OVO By Bertolt Brecht (text & lyrics) and Kurt Weill (music) in collaboration with Elisabeth Hauptmann English translation of the dialogue by Robert David MacDonald | English translation of the lyrics by Jeremy Sams Directed by Adam Nichols and Co-Directed by Julia Mintzer | Musically Directed and Conducted by Lada Valesova

The Threepenny Opera

2 stars

Photo: Elliott Franks


This is the first open air production of The Threepenny Opera that the Kurt Weill Foundation has given permission for so I suppose there was a lot of pressure to make it special. That might explain the over direction, busy-ness and an apparent  lack of trust in the material which isn’t really allowed to speak for itself until well into the second half.

Famously, it’s a response to John Gay’s The Beggars’ Opera, set in the corrupt, murky underworld of 1920s Berlin as a radical, no-holds-barred political comment. It’s timeless and I like the translation by Jeremy Sams and David MacDonald very much.

The production’s greatest strength is Peter Watts as Macheath. He has commanding stage presence, a terrifying sneer, heaps of charisma and a powerful voice. He’s also deliciously “Brechtian” stepping into the audience at one point to “steal” a phone from an audience member and he brings intense physicality to the part. Of course, when he’s in role and within the fourth wall we’re meant to see him as an unscrupulous villain but Watts also manages to factor some vulnerability and even tenderness into this serpentine character. He is well matched by Emily Panes who sings beautifully  as Polly Peachum, whom neither we nor Macheath can ever quite trust. She’s convincingly – and by turns –  sassy, coy, persuasive and ruthless.

Otherwise there’s a lot of miscasting. Although some of the 15 performers sing well, others don’t and in places the weak intonation is embarrassing. Most of the cast are actor-musicians and normally I’m full of praise for that. In this case, though, everyone seems overstretched as they shift in and out of the three shelters which (sort of) sometimes house the band to take quite big roles. It feels oddly random. And as for musical director Lada Valesova, who hops about and sometimes dances round set and the actors, conducting from all sorts of strange angles – the music would have been much more accurate, rather than woolly and not together as if often is, if all players had been able to see her.

Simon Nicholas’s set comprises a centre stage gasometer (or is it meant to be a bandstand?) which becomes the various unlikely things such as the abatoir where Macheath “marries” Polly. It also obscures sightlines so that musicians can’t see the MD and, worse, so that many of the audience can’t see the action on the balcony or in corners of the main stage. Yes, I know Brecht defied every convention and, in many ways, redefined theatre and the audience won’t be expecting Puccini. But they are still entitled to be able to see what’s going on – and they would probably rather not go home wondering what on earth Mattis Larsen’s apparently random lighting design was meant to contribute.

The applause, at the end of the performance I saw was polite but far from rapturous. It’s a pity because every one of these fifteen performers is talented and has much to offer but they are sold short by this messy production.

 

 

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-threepenny-opera-4/

Show: A Midsummer Night’s Dream

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Brockley Jack Studio. 410 Brockley Road, London SE4 2DH

Credits: By William Shakespeare and adapted by Heather Simpkin, produced by Bear in the Air Productions

A Midsummer Night’s Dream

4 stars

Directed by Conor Cook

If you’ve read, seen, taught, studied and written about a play as much as I have A Midsummer Night’s Dream every line is as familiar as your own fingers. It’s a delightful surprise, therefore, to see a production which has actors speaking the text in freshly nuanced ways and features some interesting directorial ingenuity. It also made me giggle throughout, often in places I’d never found especially funny before.

Six talented actors have to do a great deal of doubling but they are so good at it that it barely notices. Distinctive accent work – another strength – helps to make it work. Sadie Pepperrell, for instance is just a frightened girl in love as Hermia. She then gives us a Starveling who is so terrified of being in a play that s/he shakes continually, his/her mouth working. As First Fairy she is sexy, knowing and otherwordly with a London vernacular voice. I also really liked Jack Jacob’s performance as Peter Quince, fussing about and, a totally incompetent director, trying to get his actors to toe the line and keep them happy.  As a stereotype it’s only just exaggerated. He also brings a cocky, insolence to Lysander which I’ve never seen stressed before but it sits well with the text and situation.

Yvette Bruin and Elizabeth Prideaux play both the Theseus and Hippolyta and Oberon and Titania pairings  as lesbian relationships with Bruin being bossily, gruffly mannish in both roles. Prideaux is wonderfully plausible at the beginning as a Hippolyta who wants nothing to do with it and is clearly repelled by this political marriage she has to undertake. She also delights as angry misunderstood Helena and as bored Snout who has a drink problem.

Nicholas Southcott, who also plays Demetrius, is terrific as Bottom – interfering and arguing, dominating every conversation and very funny when he manages to produce donkey brays which sound like sexual arousal.  His acting is so intelligently detailed that even when he’s asleep in Titania’s arms he twitches his face as a donkey probably would. He loads “I could munch your dried oats” with delicious innuendo too.

The attractive costumes, designed by Heather Simpkin are more or less Grecian and quite complicated. So there are many costume changes which are neatly accommodated by giving some of the speeches to different characters. For instance Sally Sharp as Egea, who also does a lovely northern Puck, gets “My hounds are bred out a Spartan kind” as a soliloquy with a rather good mime of playing with a dog which gives other characters time  to get into their Mechanicals costumes. She then slips in to join them as Snug, almost unnoticed a few minutes into the next scene.

I’ve always understood that when Shakespeare uses continuous rhyming couplets it’s a signal not to take what’s happening too seriously. There’s a lot of that in the central three acts of A Midsummer Night’s Dream while the action is in the wood and this production leans on it which heightens the comedy. There are however some rather odd pronunciation decisions such as “ere” to rhyme with “here” and putting the stress on the second syllable in “promontory”.

This is a very funny, pacey (2 hours with interval) Dream in which the meaning of every word is clear even though it’s very true to the original text. The asides in modern English occur mostly in the Mechanicals scenes where they really add to the humour. I’m not sure we really need the rather banal songs at the beginning, end and before the interval though. They don’t add anything worthwhile.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/a-midsummer-nights-dream-12/
 Subscribe 

Show: Merrily We Roll Along

Society: National Youth Music Theatre (NYMT)

Venue: Southwark Playhouse Elephant. 1 Dante Place, London SE11 4RX

Credits: Music and Lyrics Stephen Sondheim, Book by George Furth

Merrily We Roll Along

4 stars

Photo: Konrad Bartelski


It fizzes with youthful exuberance and talent but Katherine Hare’s imaginative direction and Julia Cave’s sharp choreography ensure that this production of Merrily We Roll Along never lurches out of control. The level of professionalism is richly impressive.

Sondheim’s 1981 musical tells the story of a successful musical theatre composer, Franklin Shepard, from 1955 to 1980. We start with him hosting a glitzy show biz party and then wind back in a series of “transitions” so that eventually we see Franklin as a teenager – watching Sputnik on the roof of a “rooming house” where he meets his future lyricist, Charley Kringas and his soon-to-become life-long friend, Mary Flynn. George Furth’s book is strong and compelling – there’s a lot of angst and heartbreak in this story. And I was struck more than ever this time by the way the reverse narrative highlights the poignancy. Because we know what happens in the future, the hopeful teenage enthusiasm at the end is tempered with rueful sadness.

There are no weak links in this cast and the show is characterised – as anything by Sondheim needs to be – with excellent ensemble work from which lots of minor roles emerge, thus making this a good choice for a youth theatre with a company of 28.

Amongst the outstanding team of principals, Thomas Oxley as Charley, sings a fabulous patter song in the first act, sings lyrical numbers with warm musicality and has a good line in rueful looks. Madeleine Morgan excels as the troubled, eventually alcohol-dependent, tactless Mary Flynn and her wide-range singing voice allows her to cover complex moods. Matilda Shapland’s Beth is petite, pretty and joyfully supportive as the idealistic young first wife with beautiful silvery soprano voice.

Toby Owers finds plenty of nuance in Franklin who wants to compose more than anything else but is, inevitably, tainted by commercialism. And Sophie Lagden commands the stage whenever she’s on it as the over-acting, self-interested ruthless Gussie who becomes Franlin’s second wife but it isn’t going to last. Her powerful singing voice is perfect for the role.

All this is accompanied by an 11-strong youth band visible at either end of a balcony above the stage. They play with precision and passion under Leigh Thompson’s musical direction and I was delighted to see them all out of the shadows for applause at curtain call,

South Playhouse’s new Elephant venue provides a wide, inclusive playing space with audience on three sides and this production uses every inch of it including the two side aisles through the audience. The balcony between the two sections of the band is integrated into the action too.

In short, it’s a treat to see so many young people finding and exploring their (considerable) potential in a show of this quality.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/merrily-we-roll-along-7/

It was the first Jane Austen novel I read after Northanger Abbey, which was my O Level set text. Part of the Bishop Otter College English course, Persuasion inspired me to read the other four Austen novels over the next couple of years. I revisit them all fairly regularly but it’s a while since I’ve been back to Persuasion which was published in 1817, after the author’s death.

I’m immediately struck now by the precision of its setting. We’re often told that Austen completely ignored the war which raged for most of her life and wrote only about the insularity of country houses. Well Persuasion certainly debunks that. It’s set immediately after “The Peace” (Waterloo, 1815), which is often mentioned, and the novel full of naval officers who have worked together commanding war ships and are now returned home, in some cases with newfound wealth. The war is frequently referred to although it’s obviously true that Austen’s only experience comes through hearing men talk about it – so that’s what she writes about.

Persuasion

Eight years before the novel opens, Anne Elliot, Austen’s most mature heroine, fell for Captain Frederick Wentworth and he with her. She was, to her long lasting regret, “persuaded” by her family that the match was unsuitable because Wentworth had no money or title. Inevitably he shows up, still single, soon after the novel opens.  Thereafter he is a frequent presence in the Elliot social circle including at Lyme where Louisa Musgrove’s accident  becomes pivotal to the plot. Anne’s feelings haven’t changed. The question, in a third person narrative presented from her point of view, is have his? And, just to make matters convenient the war has enabled him to amass a fortune of £25,000. There is embarrassment, awkwardness and a lot of misunderstanding as the plot winds towards its conclusion and Anne, gradually, begins to detect what a 21st century woman might call “vibes”. It’s the usual Austen big scale sisters, cousins and aunts cast in which the happy ending is an inevitability from chapter 1. It’s a letter rather than a “clinch” which clinches (sorry) it and I love this terse sentence, laden with feelings, subtext and understatement, which follows Anne’s reading of it: “Such a letter was not to be soon recovered from.”

Austen’s characterisation is nine tenths of the reason we still read (and dramatise and discuss) her over 200 years after her death. Anne’s father, Sir Walter Elliot, “a foolish, spendthrift baronet,” is beautifully observed in all his shallow, judgmental, narcissistic awfulness. His other daughters, Mary, married to the long-suffering Charles Musgrove, and Elizabeth, who’s still at home are, in their different ways very much like their father. We presume that Anne’s pleasantness, quiet intelligence and sensitivity comes from her late mother – which explains why Lady Russell (wise, nuanced and willing to admit mistakes), a dear friend of the late Lady Elliot, is so fond of her.

Austen is good at cads too. Who could forget charismatic but amoral Mr Wickham in Pride and Prejudice for example – initially attractive but definitely Bad News. The man up to no good in Persuasion is Mr Elliot, a cousin who stands to inherit Sir Walter’s estate.  He rather desperately doesn’t want the silly old man to remarry and produce a direct heir so he schemes to prevent it –  but, my goodness, he’s a charmer.

People sometimes ask me to name a favourite author or book and, of course, like most voracious readers, I can’t. The truth, especially if it’s a “classic”, is that it’s usually the one I’m reading now. So this week Persuasion is getting my vote.

Persusion2

 

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Sonnets by William Shakespeare

 

 

In 1990, a Crime Writers’ Association poll declared Josephine Tey’s 1948 novel one of the hundred best crime novels of all time. It’s hard to disagree – although maybe it’s a silly concept because no one has read every single crime novel ever written. And a tremendous number of fine crime novels have been published since 1990.

Nonetheless The Franchise Affair has long been a favourite of mine. I’ve read it several times so I know more or less where it’s going although, inevitably, one forgets the details between re-reads. The interesting thing, coming back to it now, is that, 75 years after it was first published, it still holds the attention to the end first, because Tey writes so beautifully; second, because her characterisation is intriguing; and third, because she is very good at understated tension.

Two women, an elderly mother and her middle-aged daughter, are accused of kidnapping and beating a teenage girl in their country house. Solicitor, Robert Blair, from whose point of view the story is predominantly presented, takes on their case because he is totally convinced of their innocence. And yet the girl is able to describe the women and their house with total accuracy so how could she be lying? If you haven’t read it before there’s a jolly good plot waiting for you to explore although I don’t find the final page convincing.

Marion Sharpe is gypsy-like in appearance and has unconscious sexual allure so that Robert gradually becomes enamoured. Even Nevil, his rather casual nephew – who “works” in the business – visits the Franchise more often than he need. Mrs Sharpe is entertainingly direct to the point of rudeness, intelligently perceptive and no sufferer of fools. Tey, evidently chose their surname with care.

In 2023 I’m struck too by the almost instant decision by Robert, the local police and Scotland Yard that these women are almost certainly innocent because of their social class. I suspect today the opposite might be true?  But, they’re regarded with suspicion locally because they don’t mix with the community and, of course, once the tabloid press gets hold of the story …

This enjoyable novel made an excellent TV series in 1998 with Patrick Malahide as Robert, a very young Alex Jennings as Nevil and Rosalie Crutchley unforgettable as the redoubtable Mrs Sharpe. Interestingly, it was Crutchley’s second go, so to speak, because she’d played Marion Sharpe in an earlier, 1962, version for TV. It was always a novel which cried out for dramatisation. There was a film, starring Michael Denison and Dulcie Gray, in 1951 when the novel was only three years old.

Some things date in a bad way and some things, although full of 1948 detail, stand the test of time with aplomb. This novel is one of them.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Persuasion by Jane Austen