Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Gone Too Far (Susan Elkin reviews)

Show: Gone Too Far

Society: National Youth Theatre of Great Britain (NYT)

Venue: Theatre Royal Stratford East. Gerry Raffles Square, Theatre Square, London E15 1BN

Credits: Written by Bola Agbaje. Directed by Monique Touko. Co-Produced by Theatre Royal Stratford East and National Youth Theatre

Gone Too Far 3 stars

Photo: Isha Shah


This is the first revival of Bola Agbaje’s play about street life in her native Peckham since its debut at The Royal Court sixteen years ago. And with a cast of young people along with an edgy take on racism and identity, it’s a good fit for the National Youth Theatre’s Rep Company. Moreover, this is one of four “global majority” texts now set for study as a GCSE drama option so there’s growing interest in it from schools – and it was good to see a school party in the audience on the opening night.

Ikudayisi (Dalumuzi Moyo) has recently come from Nigeria to join his mother and his younger brother Yemi (Jerome Scott) who was born in London. The differences between the two of them – and the bonding – form the backdrop for the play’s exploration of the reality of Peckham life including the tensions between Africans and West Indians, the relationship with shopkeepers, police, neighbours and, of course, other young people on the estate. It could easily end in tragedy but doesn’t.

Of course the play deals with some very serious issues. Racist abuse is hurled about and lots of unsayable things are said – cue for wincing, sighs and gasps from the audience. It’s certainly powerful – and pretty insightful for those of us who haven’t personally experienced an environment like this or needed to worry much about our identity and where we belong.

It is also very funny indeed. So funny, in fact, that an audience rich in friends and enthusiastic supporters in celebratory mood laughed so long and loud on opening night that even from Row F I missed some of the dialogue. Moyo, whose character hides his vulnerablity behind fake accents and over-the-top Nigerian posturing, is a very accomplished, nuanced comic actor and definitely one to watch. Scott meanwhile gives us an impressively reasonable, articulate, exasperated Yemi. And the scene when they fight towards the end and are broken up by overbearing, patronising, abusive police officers, who completely misread the situation, is very telling.

Jessica Enemokwu is strong as the boys’ mother – using a fabulously stereotypical Nigerian accent and mannerisms but dropping it hilariously when she answers her phone. Hannah Zoe Ankrah is pleasing as the calm, refined, always reasonable Paris.

This production feels, however, spun out. It was advertised in the press release as ninety minutes straight through. In the event we get a twenty-minute interval and it runs until nearly 10.00pm. I suspect that various devised mini-scenes have been worked in order to give every member of the twenty-strong ensemble something to do. There is, for example, an entertaining couple of minutes with a lithely cavorting prostitute in the red light district. It’s quite fun but adds nothing to the narrative which loses impetus because it’s broken in the middle. Even the street entertainer singing down stage at the end of the interval feels like a bolt-on.

 

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/gone-too-far/

 

About 25 years ago, I hooked up with some teachers in Singapore who also ran a publishing company. At this distance I simply can’t remember how it came about.  They wanted a study text written at about age 11-13 level relating to a young adult novel called Rice Without Rain by Minfong Ho (1986) whose work was then new to me but was widely taught in Singapore.

I came up with the idea of using my study guide as a way of gently educating the student in “lit crit” technique or topic by applying a concept such as narrative point of view, symbolism, diction and the like to each of the fifteen chapters. I wrote a similar one on The Pearl by John Steinbeck. I still think it’s a good idea. If any publishers out there would like me to do more you know where I am. Read the book, study my guide and you’ll have a “toolkit” you can use to study any other novel.

RiceWithout

Anyway,  Minfong Ho was born in Myanmar (then Burma) in 1951, grew up in Bangkok and now lives in America. Like Rice Without Rain most of her books focus on poverty in South East Asia.

Rice Without Rain is set in Thailand during the student riots of the 1970s and it’s warmly readable. Jinda lives in a remote village, where drought has – again – ruined the rice harvest on which everyone depends. Because the villages don’t own their land they are required to give fifty per cent of their harvest to the landlord as rent. That is the situation when some well-meaning students from Bangkok arrive and sow disquiet by suggesting that a much lower percentage would be fairer. Meanwhile Jinda’s older sister Dao (effectively abandoned by her husband) has a baby, Oi, who is dying of malnutrition.

It’s a well plotted tale with lots of strands. Jinda’s widowed father, Inthorn the village chief, is badly injured in a farming accident and is, later, arrested. Dao and Jinda are both healthy young women. Dao gets into a toxic relationship with the man who represents the landlord and Jinda is gradually forming an attachment to one of the students. The strong, feisty grandmother is a lovely bit of characterisation. So is her little brother, Pinit. There is a lot of tension between the old ways and the new – symbolised by, for instance, the different approaches to treating Inthorn’s damaged hand. Jinda’s stay in Bangkok highlights this in other ways and we get a first hand account of the riots.

I was surprised when I first read it and still am now, that Minfong Ho’s work (The Clay Marble is a good read too) has never caught on much in Britain and particularly in British schools. It is after all an “other cultures” novel and curriculum devisers have been keenly including these for a long time now. And yet the copy I have is published (1989) in the Hienmann New Windmills Series –  erstwhile backbone of English department stock cupboards in British secondary schools – so there must have been an expectation that it would be used, read and taught.

I enjoyed rereading this quite gritty novel very much – not least for its forward looking ending which focuses on new beginnings, fresh life and future possibilities rather than anything slushily traditional.

I have some copies of my study guide if anyone wants one – £5 plus p&p. Contact me.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Quiet American by Graham Greene

Show: The Tempest

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Shakespeare’s Globe. 21 New Globe Walk, London, SE1 9DT

Credits: William Shakespeare. Directed by Diane Page

The Tempest

4 stars


This glitzily colourful, faintly futuristic take on The Tempest runs ninety minutes without interval – with plenty of clear verse speaking and space for Shakespeare’s lines to work their magic. “We are the stuff as dreams are made on” and most of the young audience members near me were totally swallowed up by those dreams.

We start with a rather good, low budget storm with loud wailing saxophone and drum from the gallery while Ariel (Charlie Champion) twirls her 180 degree wings and the rest of the cast of ten fall and stumble as they fight for their lives at sea.

David Hartley then gives us an authoritative but quietly understated Prospero. Bea Svistunenko (who doubles as Trinculo) is pleasing as Miranda and funny in her first encounter with Ferdinand (Azan Ahmed) and later his fellow travellers. Emma Manton is strong as Alonso who believes her son drowned and finds the right bearing for a modern, trouser-suited queen. I don’t quite understand why Archie Rush’s Caliban is dressed in a shiny red puffer jacket and sparkly quasi-bathing hat although he – the enslaved and abused indigenous inhabitant of the island – seems a lot more human and poignant than usual which is both appropriate and topical.

On the whole this is, then, a perfectly decent 3-star show. It’s the stonkingly good integral signing which gets it the fourth star. Clare Edwards and William Grint are woven into the action – standing beside characters and communicating words, feelings and plot. Both fine actors themselves, they interact with the cast sometimes becoming a sort of alter-ago for the character they are signing with at any given moment. They should, in my view, have been credited in large print alongside the actors in the programme not tucked away in the middle of a page about creatives – although they appear in only two performances in the run. I was delighted to have caught this particular one.

This production of The Tempest is the seventeenth in the Playing Shakespeare With Deutsche Bank series, a project which has been in place since 2007. It allows groups from state schools in London and Birmingham to see a Shakespeare play free of charge. 293,277 students have so far benefited from this experience. Yes – despite the (justified) doom, gloom and handwringing – there are still some excellent things happening in this industry.

 

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-tempest-13/

 

Show: Hamlet

Society: National Theatre (professional)

Venue: Dorfman Theatre, National Theatre,London SE1 9PX

Credits: by William Shakespeare, reimagined for young audiences by Jude Christian

Hamlet

3 stars

Adam Clifford as Polonius and Simeon Desvignes as Hamlet in Hamlet for younger audiences at the National Theatre 2023. Photo: Harry Elletson


Although it’s my job to tell you my reactions to this 65-minute Hamlet (see below), the truth is that is really doesn’t  matter what I thought. The important thing is that it engaged hundreds of Key Stage 2 and 3 schoolchildren at the performance I saw – they oohed, aahed, gasped, listened attentively, joined in when asked to and sighed sadly at the end. And that’s a moving and encouraging thing to be present at. I’m sure the cast were delighted too.

This is a revival, now directed by Ellie Hurt, of Tinuke Craig’s 2022 production which I saw and reviewed last year. And there’s a lot about it to admire. The story telling is as clear as it could possibly be and the framing device is neat – starting with the cast of eight at Old Hamlet’s funeral singing a lament and ending with a similar scene with everyone with white nets over their heads singing mournfully at the end.

There’s a lot of Shakespeare’s text, spoken intelligently and pared down for accessibility seamlessly interspersed with inserts. I liked the idea of the initial funeral wake morphing into a riotous wedding party which is then dispersed to accommodate Hamlet (Simeon Desvignes – pleasing work) with “How weary, stale” to establish his inner turmoil. The antic disposition is made very clear as pretence and the presentation of the Murder of Gonzago is simple but ingenious. I like the idea of dressing Claudius and Gertrude in matching emerald green to make them stand out. And Annabelle Terry as Laertes is totally convincing – love between sisters works well here.

There are some imaginative scenic devices too. Hamlet with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern sit on a blue tarpaulin, rowing and singing a muscular sea shanty. The same tarp, a few moments later is the river Ophelia drowns in and then her grave.

On the other hand, I think there is too much popularising in this production. Characters dance, make comedy and there are several passages of quite loud modern melody. It’s certainly entertaining but in places it goes against the grain of the play. Nonetheless this is supposed to an introduction to Shakespeare and I’m certainly in favour of anything which grabs a young audience as clearly as this does.

 

Ruddigore continues at Wilton’s Music Hall, London until 25 March 2023.

Star rating: four stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ✩

For decades I’ve struggled to understand why Gilbert and Sullivan’s magnificent gothic send-up isn’t better known. The score, which I’ve known and loved since my teens, includes some of Sullivan’s loveliest gems.

The good news is that in this bijoux version (cast of 13) it sits very happily in the gothic shabby chic of Wilton’s Music Hall. Peter Benedict, who also appears as Sir Despard, has retrieved some of Gilbert’s cut dialogue and reordered some of the songs in order to make this complicated plot about ancestors, three men with the same surname, ghosts and the rest as clear as possible.

The talented cast is a mixture of opera-trained singers and those who’ve come via the musical theatre route and the difference is clear. Benedict himself, for example, is a terrific actor – all Hitchcock-ian menace and eyes – and very good indeed at diction but his singing style is more Noel Coward than Bryn Terfel.

Madeline Robinson, on the other hand ….. (read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review https://musicaltheatrereview.com/ruddigore-wiltons-music-hall/

I’m an eclectic reader. I read most sorts and deliberately choose different levels of intensity. I used to tell my students that this is what  they should aim for too. No one can or should read, say, Walter Scott or James Joyce to the exclusion of everything else. How are you ever going to learn to read critically if you don’t read widely so that you can make comparisons? In this I differed completely from one colleague who told our students so often that they should be reading the essays of George Orwell instead of what she called “trash” that I secretly wondered if she’d ever read anything else … until she “confessed” that during school holidays she read nothing but John Grisham. Fine, but I wish she’d discussed that with the students too.

Anyway the romantic novels of Katie Fforde are what I turn to when I want a change from, say, Charlotte Bronte, Rudyard Kipling and Leo Tolstoy all of whose books I have featured here in the last month. Moreover, of course, I read plenty of books – a lot of detective fiction, biographies, young adult titles and more which don’t necessarily get into these blogs.

Fforde has been publishing her feel-good stories since 1995 and she’s admirably prolific. They’ve been coming at the average rate of one every nine or ten months for 28 years. They are undemanding but witty with lots of likeable characters: the literary equivalent of a really well made cup of tea. She’s particularly good at warm, supportive, female friendship. And Fforde’s books are full of food, gardens, pretty décor, lovely scenery, flowers and beautiful houses. Another characteristic is talented, competent  women succeeding – as chefs, gardeners, wedding arrangers and so forth – and I like that especially as they are often initially diffident people discovering their own potential.

She likes a traditional plot – and we all know there are only seven stories in the world. Fforde’s favourite is a version of rags-to-riches in which a woman is just establishing herself at something or somewhere when a rude/difficult/patronising/wealthy Mr Darcy type turns up and annoys her. Eventually he usually does something kind and unsolicited behind her back and she realises that she’s in love with him. This is so typical of Fforde that I now wait for him and smile. In her latest, One Enchanted Evening, his name is Justin – all motor cycle, leathers and aggression –  and he doesn’t believe women should work in professional kitchens but eventually …

One Enchanted Evening is not set in the present although Fforde never dates it precisely. Meg, the protagonist is helping to run a hotel in rural Dorset where black forest gateau and coronation chicken are the thing, the dessert trolley (remember those?) is an innovation, en suite bathrooms are unusual and the war seems to be only one generation back so we are, presumably in the 1960s. Although even then I can’t believe that the stage crew would have installed an actual curtain for an outdoor production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream.

 Meg has a group of friends (already familiar from other books because there is sometimes a tangential overlap) all of whom turn up to help in their different ways bringing their own joys and problems. In the hotel Meg meets Ambrosine an elderly lady who turns out to have quite a back story and they become close friends. She is beautifully done, as is Meg’s pretty, young (ish) mother, Louise and Susan, the ultra competent village woman who knows everyone and can get any sort of job done without fuss.

In short I loved it. I make absolutely no apology for enjoying light fiction along with everything else in my busy mix and I hope some of my former students are reading this, nodding and enjoying their own wide range reading.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Rice Without Rain by Minfong Ho

Macbeth

Flabbergast Theatre

Southwark Playhouse

Star rating: 4

As you’d expect, I’ve been round the block many times with this play. I’ve probably seen 50 productions and because it featured so often on the O level, GCSE or, later, the Key Stage 3 syllabus I’ve taught it to more classes than you can shake branch of Birnam Wood at too. It means I know the text almost as well as the actors do. Never, however, have I seen a Macbeth as visceral and muscular as this one. Flabbergast Theatre’s take on physical theatre takes in puppetry, dance, song, drumming and comedy all wrapped up in some riveting movement. The term “physical theatre” doesn’t actually do it justice. It’s an understatement.

All eight cast members – five male and three female – wear  grubby beige skirts over trousers and each role emerges from the ensemble. The seating is on three sides in the Large at Southwark Playhouse’s Borough building. As the audience files in it has to walk round  a disturbingly weird (I use the word in Shakespeare’s sense) scene in which the cast pants, whimpers, moans, intones and leaps about interacting with each other. It must have been great fun to devise. It’s pretty menacing scene setting and one tearful little girl, aged about 9, had to be taken out by her parents before the play even began at the performance I saw.

Ludlow1

The action is devised but the text and the verse speaking are respectful. I liked the idea of chorusing the account of Macbeth’s valour at the beginning rather than leaving it with the Bloody Sargeant and it meant we could have graphic mime to convey the brutality of “unseaming” someone from “the nave to the chops”. And remember in small talk about extreme weather Macbeth says “Twas a rough night”? Well he’s just committed regicide  so obviously it’s a double edged comment. I have never heard an audience chuckle at it before which shows how engaging and intelligent the story telling is.

It’s a production full of original ideas. Duncan is calculating, unlikeable and probably senile with a hideous cackle. The porter scene is almost wordless and certainly doesn’t use Shakespeare’s words but it’s funny and does the job it’s meant to – building up the anticipation before the finding of Duncan’s body. There is always a hint of sexual chemistry between the Macbeths but I’ve never seen it as overtly played as this and there is a strong suggestion, as they plot, that they find violence sexually arousing.  The banquet scene is simply  but effectively done with a large board from which Banquo’s ghost emerges.

The witches meanwhile, since they’re on stage all the time and play other roles, convey the impression that they’re part of everyone. And I really liked the whole cast creation of the apparition which the witches show him when he visits them for advice after the murder of Banquo. The whole cast creates a many headed monster when Macbeth is commissioning the assassin too.

This Macbeth is a taut production running just over two hours including an interval which is  probably needed as much by the exhausted cast as by the emotionally battered audience. I found it a refreshing approach but if you want “traditional” Shakespeare with long uncut speeches and each role cast and costumed then this is not for you. The fact that at least 10 people didn’t return after the interval at the performance I attended is a sad but clear indicator that this way of working isn’t everyone’s cup of tea.

This review will be published by Sardines in due course.

So the censors – sorry “sensitivity advisers” – have decreed that Roald Dahl’s Matilda can no longer read Rudyard Kipling. She has to read Jane Austen instead. Why on earth she can’t read both is beyond me but that’s not my point here. I doubt that Matilda was reading Kim or Stalky and Co anyway. I expect she was lapping up Kipling’s wonderful short stories or possibly Puck of Pook’s Hill.

Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936) was born in India which became the backdrop for much of his fiction. A highly successful writer, he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1907 and eventually buried in Poet’s Corner in Westminster Abbey.  Decades later cakes and handbags were named after him. In 1995 a poll found that “If” was the most popular poem in England.

Of course he was a patriotic supporter of the British Empire and all it stood for.  Most people were – including, obviously, Queen Victoria,  nineteenth century prime ministers and, in the early decades of the twentieth century  millions of ordinary folk like my grandparents. Kipling was a man of his time – widely respected for his writing –  and attempts to cancel him retrospectively make no sense at all. Good art in all genres can stand proud on its own irrespective of what any picky inhabitant of the 21st century may think about the creator.

The whole debacle sent me scuttling back to the delights of The Jungle Book (1895) and the Just So Stories (1912) The former, let’s not forget, is a book of short stories not a novel about Mowgli as Disney and many stage adaptations like to hint. The first three are about Mowgli. Thereafter we get the delights of “The White Seal”, “Toomai of the Elephants” and best of all, “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi.”

Jungle Book

Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is a mongoose who takes charge of the bungalow garden during the Raj period. He despatches three snakes and saves the white human family. It’s a bit anthropomorphic. Animals don’t talk and cobras don’t plot revenge but it’s powerful and very exciting – especially when Rikki finally confronts Nagaina, the female cobra, in an outhouse bathroom. And along the way, as a child, I learned quite a lot about wildlife in an Indian garden. All fiction enhances general knowledge, as I frequently observe.

I would often read “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi” aloud to classes. It lasts just 40 minutes which is perfect for a single secondary school teaching period. Almost always I could sense attentive tension in the room as we neared the end.  On one occasion in the 1990s when I was teaching in a girls’ boarding school I read it to a Year 9 group. The next day a parallel group came in for their lesson and said: “That story you read the others yesterday – will you read it to us please?” They had actually been talking about it amongst themselves and away from the classroom! Music to a teacher’s ears. How can anyone want to “cancel” a writer who can do that?

JunglebookCover

And so to the Just So Stories. I first heard “How the First Letter Was Written” and “How The Alphabet Was Made” in primary school when an inspired student teacher read them to us. And soon found the others for myself. I’m particularly fond of “How the Leopard got his Spots” and “The Cat that Walked by Himself” but “The Elephant’s Child” is the real pearl.

Of course Kipling was a fine poet (“The Way through the Woods” and “Danny Deever” are, for example, splendid) and it shines through his prose.  “The Elephant’s Child” is almost more poetic than a poem with its oft repeated “great grey-green Limpopo river all set about with fever trees”. The crocodile has a “musky, tusky mouth”  and the Bi-Coloured-Python-Rock-Snake has a “scalesome, flailsome tail”. It’s engagingly musical which is why any child you read it to will soon start chanting it with you.

JUST SO 2

Adults must have read it to me a lot when I was little because I can do an abridged amateur version of it from memory. Once, in a restaurant in central France when we’d travelled all day, our small children were very tired and the service was slow, I launched into “The Elephant’s Child” to distract them. After a few minutes I sensed that everything had gone quiet and my husband was grinning incredulously. I then realised that every single person in that busy restaurant was listening. Well, given that most of them were not English I doubt that is was my story telling ability which had caught their attention. It was the compulsive musicality of Kipling’s words which are catchy even if the language isn’t your own. How many other writers can you think of who could do that?

So please don’t let’s belittle Rudyard Kipling, Yes he’s a bit dated and quaint in places and he took colonialism for granted but my goodness, he was  a wordsmith who could tell a fine story.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: One Enchanted Evening by Katie Fforde