Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Our Country’s Good (Susan Elkin reviews)

Show: Our Country’s Good

Society: Tower Theatre Company

Venue: Tower Theatre. 16 Northwold Road, London N16 7HR

Credits: by Timberlake Wertenbaker. Directed by Peta Barker.

Our Country’s Good

4 stars

Timberlake Wertenbaker’s 1988 play is probably her best and it’s certainly my favourite because, of course, it’s a play about theatre and a huge clarion call for the redemptive power of the arts. So it’s always been topical and never more so than now.

Adapted from Thomas Keneally’s 1897 novel The Playmaker, the play takes us to the early days of the penal colony in New South Wales.  Everyone is there for the “good”  of the motherland – or  for “our country’s good”. The governor of NSW Captain Arthur Phillip (Georgia Koronka) wants to move away from the hanging and flogging culture. He is ridiculed by some of his die-hard staff for wanting to “civilise” the convicts through drama (sounds like the situation in many a 21st Century inner city comprehensive school). Eventually he gets Second Lieutenant Ralph Clark (Jonathan Wober – good) to direct a production of George Farquar’s The Recruiting Officer and as rehearsals progress and repeatedly stall we watch the change and development of his motley cast. Our Country’s Good is indeed a fine and powerful  play.

Peta Barker’s imaginative direction places all the cast on stage sitting around the edge of the playing space in the dark beneath an awning visibly managing their costume changes.. Thus they are, in every sense, a company of actors able to chorus the chapter/scene headings effectively. Their seating is a row of small crates which are brought on stage to suggest various things such as a rowing boat or chairs at a meeting.

I admired the role doubling and enjoyed a shared chuckle when the play itself comments that an actor playing more than one part would confuse the audience. Koronka is especially good as the governor, using gently heightened RP and presenting plenty of authority and then, in complete contrast,  as Wisehammer the intelligent, sensitive Jewish convict who wants to write plays.

Casting is cheerfully gender blind too. Rebecca Allan is totally convincing as Midshipman Harry Brewer, deeply in love with his live-in convict Duckling Smith (Georgina Carey who is also excellent as the sneering Captain Jeremy Campbell). Allan brings lots of pushiness and attitude to Dabby Bryant too. And we are all “ “paying attention” as the play instructs us that theatre goers should, so nobody is in the least confused.

This is a commendable production of a play which is warmly familiar. Most of the cast are strong and it has been made to sit very happily in the Tower’s triangular playing space. As ever I had to swallow a lump in my throat at the end. Let’s hope some of  those people – in government and elsewhere – wont to beliitle the power of the arts in education and elsewhere know the way to Stoke Newington.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/our-countrys-good-6/

 

Show: Much Ado About Nothing

Society: National Youth Theatre of Great Britain (NYT)

Venue: Duke of York’s Theatre. St Martin’s Lane, London WC2N 4BG

Credits: William Shakespeare remixed by Debris Stevenson. Performed by National Youth Theatre Rep Company.

Much Ado About Nothing

4 stars


So how do you make sense of a patriarchal Elizabethan play for an Instagram-obsessed world? Set it as a production of Love Island, of course. You can always rely on National Youth Theatre to come up with an interesting and original slant, but this time it has really excelled itself with this whackily, clever take on a play written over 400 years ago in 1598.

Nothing Island is a TV programme in which five young men and five young women are lined up to pair off. The producer sits at the side with a screen while her head-phoned minions scamper about with i-Pads. Over-stage screens comment on what’s happening with social media comments – a lot of fun has evidently been had in making these up.  We see the characters both in action and at times when they’re meant to be off-duty but they’re continuously observed. The production is the king to which everything must defer.

Most of the language is Shakespeare with occasional asides, interjections or comments in modern English and liberal word substitution to make it all hang together. Debris Stevenson has also had fun slipping in the odd line from other plays which makes a few people in the audience chuckle. I love the rap dance performed by Beatrice (Isolde Fenton) and Benedick (Daniel Crawley) the first time we see them together. It’s a perfect match to Shakespeare’s iambic pentameter as they fence verbally and in dance with each other.

I also admire the decision for each actor to play in his or her own accent because these young people come from all over the country and it means we get a gloriously diverse aural mix. Fenton, for example, is Irish while Crawley is Scottish.

The cast – the  sixteen actors who form the 2023 NYT rep company – are all strong and there’s some pleasing ensemble work. Both gulling scenes are beautifully directed (Josie Dexter) and very funny. A female Don Jon and Verges as a dappy therapist are among the play’s many good ideas.

Thuliswa Magwaza’s Hero is giggly, girlish and convincingly in love and she does the anguish when she’s wrongfully accused with conviction. Fenton is warm and witty as Beatrice and manages to make the eventual capitulation to Benedick feel natural. And I liked the way Crawley really stressed the innate decency in his character underneath the banter and joshing.

Zoe Hurwitz’s set is terrific. She gives us a window which swivels to become lots of other things including an absurdly excessive floral wall for Hero and Claudio’s wedding. At the end of the play, the production is over and the cast clears the set off the stage – another neat touch.

I’ve seen many way-out attempts to modernise Shakespeare in my time. I have rarely seen one as intelligent as this. It works a treat and never feels forced. Keep ‘em coming, NYT. The Rep Company project is celebrating its first ten years in 2023. Here’s to the next decade and beyond.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/much-ado-about-nothing-12/

 

I read James Baldwin’s Another Country around 1968, when it was only six years old and therefore quite a recent book. Baldwin lived on until 1987.

I remember it vividly for two reasons. First,  post-Lady Chatterley, I was fairly accustomed to graphic literary (not always) sex between men and women. But Another Country was the first account I’d ever read of sexual love between men and it was quite an eye opener. I’d led a pretty sheltered life and had never knowingly had a conversation with a gay man. And my parents were of their generation – homophobes by today’s standards.

The other reason I recall it with such clarity is that I was sitting reading Another Country in the family home waiting for my beloved fiancé to arrive. When he did and I went off to find coffee he picked it up, flicked through it and said: “I don’t think this is the sort of book you should be reading”. To say I was astounded would be an understatement. When I had picked myself up off the floor, I said firmly: “If you and I are going to spend the rest of our lives together, let’s get one thing straight now. No one tells me what I’m allowed to read”. That sorted it and I had no more of that sort of thing for the next 50 years.

Thinking about all this recently reminded me that I had not read Baldwin’s other novels – and that was what led me to Giovanni’s Room (1956) and its elegant  descriptive prose: “Flakes of snow have drifted across the shawl which covers her head; and hang on her eyelashes and on the wisps of back and white hair not covered by the shawl” or “The table was loaded with yellowing newspapers  and empty bottles and it held a single brown and wrinkled potato in which even the sprouting eyes were rotten.”

Narrator David is an American in Paris – it would be nice to hear some of this novel read aloud against George Gershwin’s piece of that name. I wonder if anyone has ever done it? In part it’s a reflection of Baldwin’s nine year stay in that city from 1948 – we certainly get a very clear picture of  the ambience of post-war Paris.

David’s girl friend Hella has gone travelling elsewhere in Europe, mostly Spain, and he is at a loose end. He falls in with a group of gay men and meets and falls in love with a glitteringly attractive  Italian barman named Giovanni. For several months they live together in the titular Giovanni’s room. Baldwin is very good indeed at the physical ache David feels for Giovanni even when, eventually, he leaves him because he thinks he should marry Hella and Giovanni becomes very self-absorbed and manipulative. About half way though the novel the reader realises that a very tragic end is coming. David is narrating from the South of France. He is alone. Giovanni is … well, no spoilers.  And Hella has seen the truth and gone home to America. David feels a wonderfully well observed mix of guilt, hatred, passion, longing and despair.

I learned something from this novel. I had no idea that sex between men was decriminalised in France in 1791 after the Revolution. It was socially frowned upon especially by the church but wasn’t a crime as it remained in Britain until 1967 and until various 20th century dates in US as each state gradually did the same. Thus David,  in the early 1950s is not going to be arrested for his relationship with Giovanni as he would be in his own country. Italy, where Giovanni comes from, decriminalised it in 1890 and that surprised me too.

And that’s why David feels such a tug – what he wants to do is at variance with what, conditioned by social pressure, he thinks (and convinces himself for a while) that he ought to do. And the tension is very powerful.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Cossacks by Leo Tolstoy

Giovanni2

Venue: The White Bear Theatre. 138 Kennington Park Road, London SE11 4DJ

Credits: By Jonathan Guy Lewis and Jasper Rees. Presented by The White Bear Theatre.

I Found My Horn

4 stars

Susan Elkin | 03 Feb 2023 01:08am

Photo by: Max Hamilton-Mackenzie


This is a show which exudes heart. It is also very funny and beautifully observed.

Back in 2008, journalist Jasper Rees wrote a book about how, at a time when his life was troubled, he rediscovered the French Horn he’d played decades before at school but abandoned. Setting himself the challenge of playing the third Mozart concerto to an audience at the end of the year he then took lessons, studied, practised and consulted top horn players worldwide. I read this with fascination at the time because I know from my own experience,  the frustration, wonder and joy which comes from returning to a musical instrument after a long absence.

Jonathan Guy Lewis worked with Rees and his book to develop a one man stage show a few years later and this White Bear Theatre production ably directed by Harry Burton is a welcome revival. The casting, of course, is perfect because Lewis, like Rees, played the horn as a boy, gave it up for a long time but is still a competent player.

The play opens with Lewis as Rees turning out the attic in the house he has had to leave for his wife and son after divorce. Then he finds the horn which delightfully, has a personality and speaks to Jasper in a Czech accent because that’s where it was made. Lewis is very good indeed at morphing into different characters. Along the way, among others, we get the sulky son, Daniel (all troubled grunts and shrugs), an eccentric music teacher at Jasper’s school, a Yorkshire horn player who becomes a mentor, and several differently accented Americans when he attends Horn Camp in New Hampshire. The characterisation is often hilarious but the accuracy of portrayal is sharp edged.

And of course we hear lots of music as Jasper talks to different people and thinks about different aspects of horn playing – frequently tempted to give up completely and permanently. Finally, of course, having heard only derisory wrong notes for over an hour we know that somehow he’s going to crack it and I walked back to the Elephant and Castle happily humming the slow movement of K447.

It isn’t, though, just a play about music and learning to play an instrument. It’s also about human relationships and finding new ways of being happy. The reconciliation at the very end of the play is understated but warmly powerful.

 

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/i-found-my-horn/

Venue: The Mill at Sonning. Sonning Eye, Reading, Berkshire RG4 6TY

Credits: By Jill Hyem

We’ll Always Have Paris

2 stars


Jill Hyem’s ten year old play is gently harmless, undemanding and quite funny in places.

Nancy (Elizabeth Elvin) who lives happily in a flat in Paris is expecting a visit from her recently widowed old school friend, Anna (Natalie Ogle). Another old school friend Raquel (Debbie Arnold) lives nearby. All three are pally, or become so, with an out of work French actor (Richard Keep) who does odd jobs when he’s resting. And there’s a ghastly landlady named Madame Boiuissiron (Basienka Blake).

The big flaw in this play is that my summary more or less says it all.  It doesn’t really go anywhere. At times it almost feels like a series of sketches – the scene in which the three women play French Monopoly, for example, is standalone funny but adds nothing to the play’s flimsy trajectory. Sometimes it feels as if competent actors are fighting the thinness of the material. Arnold, for instance, works very hard to make the stereotypical older, man-eating woman she’s playing believable but in the end it’s overdone.

The most interesting character is Anna because she changes and develops as she gradually discovers freedom from the long-term sick and now dead  husband who turns out have been a bully. Ogle, clearly a strong actor, makes her convincing and someone we feel real sympathy with and for – unlike any of the other four characters.

We hear some recordings of French songs – all those insouciant, clear words, before the show and at the end of scenes and that’s attractive. But the song sung live with guitar by Richard Keep “Les Dames Anglaise” is anything but. We are supposed to believe that he has just returned from a successful professional singing gig. Well I’m afraid it he sang and played at that standard most of his audience would probably have slunk away. When he’s not singing Keep gives a pleasing performance as the clever, witty but kind Frenchman who flirts with his English friends and plays a good word game in which they exchange idiomatic euphemisms to improve his English – fun but there’s probably a bit too much of it.  I enjoyed learning the French word for a stop cock though – robinet d’arrette.

However, despite my misgivings, you have to hand it to director Sally Hughes. She evidently knows her audience at The Mill at Sonning very well. The theatre was almost full and most people seemed to be lapping it up. There was a lot of enthusiastic applause and laughter for this light – very light – comedy. If it works, go for it.

 

Natalie Ogle (Left) Elizabeth Elvin (Centre) Debbie Arnold (Right). Photo: Andrea Lambis

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/well-always-have-paris-2/

Venue: Jack Studio. 410 Brockley Road, London SE4 2DH

Credits: Adapted from Robert Louis Stevenson by Mark Stratford. Presented by Stratford Productions

The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde

5 stars

Susan Elkin | 28 Jan 2023 02:33am

With the possible exception of A Christmas Carol, Robert Louis Stevenson’s 1886 novella The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is probably one of the most frequently adapted prose texts of all time. I’ve lost count of the number of stage versions I’ve seen over the years. Moreover this isn’t the first time I’ve seen it as a one man show – James Hyland and his Brother Wolf Company did it that way a few years ago. The novella is widely studied in schools too, often for GCSE, so that makes it a popular choice for theatre because teachers and parents will bring teenagers.

In Mark Stratford’s highly accomplished hands, though, it manages to feel freshly minted and that’s quite an achievement given that this is a tale everyone knows something about even if they haven’t read it. He uses Inspector Newcomen, investigating the death of Sir Danvers Carew as a framing device – gruff, rough and mopping his brow. Then he becomes the rather quiet, anxious, trustworthy, decent Mr Utterson the lawyer, who speaks in a soft voice with gentle RP vowels. Then there’s the Harley Street doctor friend whose accent is Scots. The story telling is as clear as it could possibly be.

Of course the reason it works so well with a single actor is because it investigates two extreme sides of the same personality. Stratford is initially urbane as Jekyll and pretty terrifying as the staring eyed, growling menacing Hyde – crouching to suggest a shorter man. “As Edward Hyde I was free to pursue all the activities denied tom me as Dr Jekyll” he observes in Jekyll mode, mentioning “undignified pleasure and precarious depravity”. We see him commit a gruesome murder, so convincingly mimed that we’re all wincing and we hear the screams of the terrified child he knocks over in the street. Other horrors are merely hinted at – after all Stevenson was fettered by Victorian censorship laws and Stratford’s adaptation is pretty faithful to the words the author used.

Stratford is a very talented actor. In the last few minutes, when the transforming drug is failing, he has to ricochet involuntarily between Jekyll and Hyde at speed and it’s dramatically exciting to watch. And I really admired his death scene complete with poison-induced involuntary twitches before he quietly gets up and resumes the Inspector Newcomen role to round off the narrative. Bravo, Mr Stratford.

The atmosphere is enhanced with some sinister sound effects and some evocative lighting. Both help to ratchet up the sinister mystery and struggle which lies at the heart of the piece.

This show is touring until June and is definitely one to catch if you possibly can.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-strange-case-of-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde-2/

 

Venue: Golden Goose Theatre. 146 Camberwell New Road, London SE5 0RR

Credits: By Edward Bond. Presented by Four Points Theatre.

Have I None

3 stars

Susan Elkin | 26 Jan 2023 03:23am

Photo by Francesco Codardo


Edward Bond’s visceral, aggressive one act play may be 23 years old but it has lost none of its forceful oddness.

We’re in a dystopian 2077 whose bleakness makes Orwell’s 1984 seem quite cosy by comparison. Families, memories and photographs are illegal. Mass suicides are an everyday occurrence and the old cities are in ruins so depersonalised people are re-housed in regimented suburbs.  Furniture is reduced to a government issue table and the right number of chairs which, incidentally, makes this play pretty simple to stage.

The Golden Goose is configured more of less in the round (seating on three sides) for this production and director Lewis Frost makes neat use of the space so that all the action feels pretty immediate although sight lines aren’t perfect from where I was sitting.

 

 

Sara (Abigail Stone) and Jams (Brad Leigh) are miserably, angrily, violently married and at the opening of the play she sits alone at the table plagued by knocking at the door which may or may not be real. Then her appalling husband, who works for the security service, arrives home and soon shows his true colours as a shouty bully while she screams back at him. They fight over things such who has sat on whose chair and who left the tap on – the absurdity is often funny.

Then the dynamic shifts at the arrival of the relatively insouciant Grit (Paul Brayward) who claims to be Sara’s brother and to have walked the length of the country to find her. Visitors are definitely off limits so that’s a cue for a lot more fury and distrust.

Stone is good at mood shifts:  gleaming with unfettered rage in contrast to silent, glassy anxiety, for instance. Her dream scene is good too. She wears a blue robe to which rattly spoons are stitched. Then she reverses it to reveal bones sewn onto black fabric.  Someone must have had fun creating that.

Leigh – who has played Grit in this play before – stresses the gritty nastiness but manages to temper it with a shred of vulnerability and fear so that the character is just about plausible. Brayward’s performance is distinguished by the quality of his active listening, especially when the other two are shouting at each other over his head.

Yes, Bond is a great original but there are echoes in this play. The knocking reminds me very much of the Porter in Macbeth and the misfired poisoning at the end is almost straight out of Hamlet.

Have I None is an interesting piece of drama but it’s relentless and I wasn’t sorry it runs 50 minutes rather than, say, a couple of hours.

First published by Sardines https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/have-i-none/

 

Somewhat late to the party, I saw Hamilton last month. Like everyone else, I admired its originality, ensemble work, story telling and concept – with just a minor caveat or two. I was also forcibly struck by how shamefully little I know about the early decades of American independence after the Revolution.

My theodosia

I was, however, familiar with the name of Aaron Burr, Jefferson’s vice-president who shot and killed Hamilton in a duel.  And that was because, decades ago, I read Anya Seyton’s 1943 novel, My Theodosia – the story of Burr’s, beautiful, accomplished daughter who died at sea aged 29 and no one knows quite how or why. Seyton, of course, shows us exactly what happened. It’s speculative fiction. And rereading it now, I’m satisfied that her suggestion is as valid as any other although, as far as I can tell, there’s no historical evidence linking her to Captain Merriwether Lewis governor of Missouri Territory who led an expedition into the “wild country” after the Louisiana purchase of 1803.

Theodosia has an exceptionally close relationship with her charismatic, widowed father who owns a beautiful estate in what is now Greenwich Village. Despite her having fallen mutually in love at first sight with Merriwether at the theatre, she is soon married to Joseph Alston, a wealthy South Carolina rice plantation owner:  a marriage of convenience.  Aaron Burr’s problem is living beyond his means along with, ultimately, absurd delusions of grandeur. He milks Joseph, of whom Theodosia becomes mildly fond, for money and gradually gets into serious, impoverished debt. Moreover there’s a court case, and a spell as a prisoner on remand, relating to the alleged murder of Hamilton.  But his daughter never loses her faith in him even when he goes into exile in Europe.

It’s tightly, carefully plotted and if, like me, when you read a historical novel set in an unfamiliar place and/or period you keep thinking “Really?” and reaching for Google,  you find that nearly all the big issues, places, people and events in this novel are well researched and factually pretty accurate. I enjoyed some of Seyton’s depiction of historical figures such as Thomas Jefferson and Dolly Madison too.

Some 2023 readers, though, will find My Theodosia an uncomfortable read. Theodosia travels hundred of miles south to live on a hot, swampy, unhealthy plantation in the last years of the eighteenth century. Obviously it runs on slave labour. Joseph’s family owns all the plantations for miles and have literally hundreds of slaves. Of course the Alstons casually use the language of slavery including many wince-inducing words. Whatever any of us might think now, that’s how it was. At the time, in that situation, the language was often simply descriptive rather than perjorative. Theodosia, as a northerner, makes it quite clear that she doesn’t approve of slavery and treats most of ones she gets to know reasonably decently but even she uses the same language – and refuses point blank to use a slave midwife, whose methods are all based on lucky charms, or a black nurse when her son is born. In a way though, Theodosia’s objections, highlight the horror of the slavery system especially when it comes to a pretty young woman named (appropriately as it turns out) Venus.

I’m not sure that a publisher would have the courage to run with this today if it were submitted as a new manuscript because there would be fears that blinkered people would simply see the language and not think through the issues – rather as many did with Lady Chatterley’s Lover.  1943 was a long time before Black Lives Matter, after all. Actually, I think if you look at My Theodosia carefully and open-mindedly you will, I hope,My theodosia2 agree with me that the presentation of the slavery issue is pretty sensitive – with Theodosia’s attitude continually contrasted with Joseph’s.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Giovanni’s Room by James Baldwin