Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Susan’s Bookshelves: A Horseman Riding By by RF Delderfield

 

Delderfield2 (1)I’m a sucker for sagas. So, around 1970 – once I’d worked through everything saga-ish by Daphne du Maurier, read all the Forsytes and much more – I was delighted to stumble across RF Delderfield. His best ideas involve a young man returning from something (usually a war) looking for a purpose in life. The author then contrives an evolving community – suburban street, school, family business or whatever – in which to develop a huge network of characters across several generations, dominated by the aforesaid young man, in big fat trilogies the length of which makes a Victorian three decker seem like a novella.

A Horseman Riding By (1966) is arguably the best example of Delderfield’s prime genre, although, very prolific he also wrote other things including standalone novels, biographies and plays such as Worm’s Eye View. Its three component novels are: Long Summer’s Day, Post of Honour and The Green Gauntlet. All are still in print or you can download them.

Paul Craddock arrives back in London in 1902 having been injured in the Boer War. Although he’s not proud of it, he discovers from his late father’s partner that he has inherited a fortune made from scrap metal, an industry which usually benefits from war. He uses it to buy a Devon valley estate which includes six farms and gradually turns himself into a very wise, benevolent “Squire”. Cue for a wonderfully plausible, mostly likeable cast of characters including the valley families, his growing family of children and eventually grandchildren and great grandchildren.

All this is set accurately against the events of the day including the Suffragette movement (of which Paul’s first wife is a member), two world wars, the move away from farming towards tourism in the 1950s and lots more. The third novel ends soon after Churchill’s funeral in 1965.

One of the best things about A Horseman Riding By and its two sequels is Delderfield’s gift for realistic character development. No one stays the same any more than they do in real life. Circumstances change and so do people. Paul, a natural leader,  becomes a Liberal and, at one point, stands for parliament but I love the reactionary crustiness he acquires in old age. Smut Potter is the valley poacher and does a stretch in prison but later becomes a useful member of the community – among other things enlisting in 1914, meeting a French wife and starting a bakery back home in the local village. Paul’s twin sons seem very rackety and shallow until events change them both – in different ways.

It still reads very compellingly although it’s probably too long, at over 18,000  pages across the three novels. A modern editor would probably want to cut much of the philosophical reflections attributed to characters, especially Paul and would certainly condemn the weird whimsical passages in which a lone seagull drifts over the valley observing the activity below. There’s also a fair amount of repetition as Delderfield strives, usually, successfully to keep the reader on board when he’s harking back to something which happened hundreds of pages earlier. Don’t attempt to read this trilogy other than in the right order. These are minor points though, these three books have drawn me in in 2021 just as much as they did when I first read them 50 years ago.

Some of us remember a 1978  BBC TV adaptation of A Horseman Riding By starring the young Nigel Havers as Paul and the late Prunella Ransome as his wife, Claire. There were thirteen episodes back in the days when the BBC was willing/able to invest in big budget, ambitious projects. Perhaps Netflix could consider having a go at it now? I bet it would go down well in the US.

Meanwhile I shall continue to enjoy the books – there are three more Big Sagas on the Delderfield shelf. If, by the way, you want to know who Mr Delderfield was and what he did check out the New Dictionary of National Biograpahy ( online through your local library) Guess who wrote the Delderfield entry?

Delderfield3

Delderfield2 (2)

 

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: An Experiment in Love by Hilary Mantel

It’s like buses. You wait a long time and then two come along at once. I don’t remember ever seeing a dramatisation of Animal Farm and now I’ve seen two in a month courtesy of National Youth Theatre Rep Company and Spontaneous Productions. Well, I don’t really do politics in this blog but the parallels between our current situation and  Animal Farm are so glaringly obvious that I can see why theatre companies are homing in on it … cabinet ministers getting up close when the rest of us have to observe the two metre rule, allowing the ruling class to travel but not the plebs and all the rest of it.  Rarely has “All animals are equal but some are more equal than others” seemed truer or more sinister.

Anyway, having – as a reviewer – had to think a lot about Animal Farm lately I was drawn back to the book which was published in 1945. I don’t remember when I first read it – probably in my mid teens at my future husband’s recommendation. Mr E ( I first met him when I was 14) was very keen on Orwell. And, inevitably, I shared it with, and taught it to, many classes over the years because – witness where we are now – it’s an absolutely timeless a book about human nature. It hits you on the head on almost every page.

Orwell’s “fairy story” about a group of animals who rebel against, and evict, the farmer in order to manage the farm themselves was inspired by the Russian Revolution, Stalin’s emerging autocracy and the inclusion of Russia as an ally in World War Two. With clear sighted, cynical accuracy, Orwell saw those thirty years of history  as entirely cyclical.

The near-miracle of Animal Farm is its clarity. In the real world these are very complex issues. In just 118 pages Orwell entertainingly puts them within reach of any child who can read – although, of course, this is not in any sense a children’s book.

I also found myself marvelling (again) at his precise, succinct use of language. Sentences such as “At this moment there was a tremendous uproar.”, “The animals were thoroughly frightened.” and “Benjamin felt a nose nuzzling at his shoulder” are exquisite in their simplicity.  Semi-colons, subordinate clauses and other clutter are rare. Elsewhere Orwell condemned the gratuitous use of adjectives and long words where short ones will do and Animal Farm is a fine example of exactly what he meant. It should be used as a text book in creative writing classes and I hope it is.

If, like me, you haven’t read Animal Farm for a while go back to it – and prepare to gasp. Often.

Orwell died in 1950 aged only 47 with a whole string of fine books under his belt. I don’t suppose I’m the first person to wonder what he could have achieved if he’d lived to old age. Imagine Orwell in the 1960s and 70s ….

On Susan’s Bookshelves next week: A Horseman Riding By by RF Delderfield.

how: The Boy with the Bee Jar

Society: West End & Fringe

Venue: The Hope Theatre. (above The Hope & Anchor pub) 207 Upper Street, Islington, London

Credits: By John Straiton

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performence Date: 01/07/2021

The Boy with the Bee Jar

Susan Elkin | 02 Jul 2021 09:02am

I see a lot of new plays. Rarely do I see one as captivating as this. John Straiton’s quick-fire dialogue interspersed with poetic moments of escapism and convincing characterisation is highly compelling – and often funny.

It’s also a joy to see two very different actors working together as well as this. Colin Hurley is a veteran, highly experienced actor at the top of his game. George Rowlands graduates from drama school this month. They spark off, and grate against each other, with gritty realism and warm sensitivity.

Hurley’s Euston is a drunkard and drop out who hangs around a bit of wasteland. He’s grizzled, gnarled and angry as well as vulnerable, lonely, anxious and sometimes kind. When A level student, Simon turns up, fresh faced and intense in his school shirt and tie collecting bees in a jar and watching a swarm through binoculars there is mutual suspicion. Gradually Euston stops baiting Simon and they strike up a proper conversation. As confidence grows we see them telling each other and acting out stories. Both, it transpires, are racked with guilt: Simon because he fears he didn’t pay his late father enough attention and Euston because he’s witnessed a fatal incident outside the local kebab shop but failed to tell the police what he saw.

There is a great deal of lyricism and beauty in this powerful, intelligently directed play –  both verbal and physical. The bees, of course, stand for nature, order and hope.  And the simple set supports that depth: a small climbable scaffold at the back. Dumped junk such as an old washing machine, a plastic crate and a supermarket shopping basket is used to form tables, chairs and so on as needed.  And the small playing space of The Hope Theatre is an ideal venue for this play because the proximity of  the  actors makes for lots of impact and immediacy.

This is the Hope’s first post-pandemic show and it’s good to see it open again. I hope first, to see lots more work of this quality there very soon and second, that this interesting play will get lots of revivals.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-boy-with-the-bee-jar/

Show: Shakespeare in Love and War

Society: Shakespeare at The George

Venue: The George Hotel, Courtyard

Credits: William Shakespeare & Richard Brown

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performence Date: 25/06/2021

Shakespeare in Love and War

Susan Elkin | 28 Jun 2021 08:28am

Warmest congratulations to writer/director Richard Brown and the SATG company for coming up with an ingenious show which allows a cast of eleven  to distance, entertain a reduced audience while remaining true to everything the organisation stands for – and doing justice to the wonderful Jacobean courtyard which is The George’s big USP.

Reuben Milne – always a charismatic actor – is directing a show and we start with him and his stage manager, Maggie Redgrave (a good foil) quoting from plays and joshing each other. Disinfectant, wipes, distancing jokes and the occasional Brexit allusion are all part of the fun.

Then we get extracts from lots of plays with linking discussion between the director and stage manager and sometimes the actors. Asides aside (sorry) most of it is pure Shakespeare. It’s often funny, sometimes moving and nearly always well done – a rare opportunity for talented non professional actors to demonstrate real versatility.

I really liked, for example, James Barwise’s Henry V from egging his troops into Harfleur to wooing Princess Katherine (Rebecca Gilbert) in terrible French. And he does a fine St Crispin speech, understated and warm. I usually have to swallow the lump in my throat at this point and this account of a troubled king who expects to lose the battle was no exception. We also see Barwise as a suitably sardonic Berowne and a Benedick visibly coming to terms with his own reservations – among other roles

Ashton Cull is roundly convincing as lusty, pragmatic Falstaff and a seriously hedonistic Sir Toby Belch while Georgie Bickerdike (who dies several times in this show) gives us a lovely Juliet and a resolute Cordelia. Simon Maylor tackles with aplomb one of the most difficult scenes in Shakespeare Lear’s final speech over the dead body of Cordelia (“Howl, howl, howl, howl, howl”) and it’s a good moment. He is also, among other roles, a rather good Petruchio – wrestling with his Katherine (Charlotte Maylor) while they banter angrily towards the cunilingus passage, a bawdy reference missed by most of the audience. These two, incidentally, are the only two actors in this show allowed physical touch because they are wife and husband in real life.

Lynne Livingstone is strong in several roles but her Scots account of Malvolia picking up the gulling letter is as good as I’ve ever seen it. Similarly, in a show characterised by multi-roling I especially liked Jordan White’s soppy Sir Andrew Aguecheek and Ryan Coetsee’s take on Lear’s Fool

Spliced into this jolly melange is Sonnet 119, spoken rather well by Rebecca Gilbert, a couple of pretty songs (music by Ian Favell), a neat dance, a whole cast quick fire send up of As You Like It and a witty touch: every time Don John is mentioned, the whole cast choruses “The Bastard”. And the linking script – mostly Milne and Redgrave on either side of the stage –  is great fun and includes lines such as “Cupid doesn’t do sensible – quite the opposite” and a corny, but still funny, visual pun on beer and bier.

The courtyard is configured sideways for this production with free standing audience chairs in groups and the action on a simple pop up stage along one edge – not a million miles, I suspect, from how Shakespeare and co would have performed on tour when driven out of London by plague. Not much changes, really.

 This review was first published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/shakespeare-in-love-and-war/

Show: Animal Farm

Society: Spontaneous Productions

Venue: Mayow Park’s bowling green. 41a Bishopsthorpe Road, London

Credits: by George Orwell

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performence Date: 27/06/2021

Animal Farm (professional)

Susan Elkin | 28 Jun 2021 08:43am

I doubt that Animal Farm has ever been more current. With politicians busy dictating to the populace about the minutiae of everyday life while disobeying their own rules, never has “Do as I say and not as I do” seemed more apt and it’s all there in George Orwell’s seminal 1947 novel. You don’t even need to labour it, as Emmanuel Akwafo and Jonathan Kaufman, co-directors of this quite sparky 90 minute adaptation, understand very well. Nonetheless the parallels still bring you up short.

A cast of six play all the roles, using elbow crutches to suggest each animal’s four legs. Hats with ears – and convincing animal movement by actors – are used for characterisation but I must say the doubling is sometimes confusing. Accomplished actors use different voices and accents for characters though and that helps.

Anton Rice gives us a formidable military Snowball in a badged cap and then Moses the Raven flapping about preaching and speaking in a Jamaican accent. Evelyn Craven is powerful as the revolting, transparent, terrifying Napoleon and Emma Reade-Davies works hard and well doubling Old Major, Mollie and Squealer in three different voices. Christopher Lucas’s solid, indefatigable (almost) Boxer is quite moving and I really liked Hjalmar Norden’s take on the common sensible, plain speaking realistic donkey, Benjamin who steadfastly refuses to accept the rewriting of history. Georgia Jackson, meanwhile, brings all the required decency and delicacy to Clover.

There are, however, some problems with this production. The playing space on Mayow Park’s old bowling green is quite “theatrical” with a balustraded walk way at its back but it is very spacious. This means that the actors are often a long way from each other and seem to have difficulty hearing each other at times. At one point, at the performance I saw, the whole thing ground to a halt because a cue had been missed. Of course these professional actors quickly pushed it back on track but it felt awkward. Moreover there are issues with radio mics. In some cases – most notably Hjalmar Norden – the mics seemed hardly to be working at all although for other actors they were fine. It meant that too much of what Norden said was lost while mics worn by some of the others faded in and out.

I’m also puzzled as to why Tchaikovsky’s Pathetique symphony was chosen to highlight Old Major’s speech at the beginning and again at the end. Peer Gynt for the animals’ post revolution  euphoria is a bit odd too.

 This review was first published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/animal-farm-professional/

I met John Peter, who died last year, once or twice at Critics’ Circle events in London and of course I read his outstandingly well informed and perceptive theatre reviews in The Sunday Times.

I had no idea, however, of his dramatic and dangerous Hungarian background and his arrival in Britain as a teenaged refugee after the 1956 Uprising. His widow Judith Burnley, herself a writer, has now set down the whole story as a first person narrative. One presumes he talked about all this a lot and/or that she coaxed it out of him with a view to recording it. Either way the book, published earlier this year, reads very well.

John – that’s his Anglicised name – lived his entire childhood in danger,  under the fiercely totalitarian Soviet regime. His father had been murdered (tortured, shot and then pushed into the river next to the Chain Bridge in Budapest) by the Nazis in 1944. His mother led a flighty life of comings and goings and her young son was often left in orphangages and convents or with family in the country where he did some manual jobs. Narrow escapes were commonplace. Eventually, after he’d nailed his colours to the mast in the Uprising he really had to leave – heading for Austria concealed in a hay wagon with his mother and other family members including a pretty useless ex of hers and his current girlfriend.

The thing which strikes me most forcibly about all this is that there was a time – not all that long ago – when refugees were made welcome in this country and willingly supported. The WI made them cups of tea when they arrived at an RAF base on Salisbury Plain. They were given clothes, food and a small allowance along with a lot of help in learning English and getting jobs. There were even free places at university set aside for them.  It was very enlightened.

John Peter was a bit late to get one of those university places but although he’d arrived knowing only two words of English: “Cowboys” and “Times” he was soon accepted – maybe because of his native Catholicism – at Campion Hall, Oxford. He read history but then switched to English Literature “paying” for his place by helping out in the kitchen and waiting at table. And of course, he started seeing plays and writing about them during the seven years he remained at Oxford.

Given where his future lay it’s a nice touch that “Times” was one of his two English words. He arrived already knowing that The Times one of Britain’s most respected newspapers.

I was sent this book, complete with foreword by Jeremy Irons, by its author who wanted me to read it along with the poems she wrote about her husband’s decline into Alzheimer’s. I’m so glad she contacted me because it’s as uplifting as it is informative. It’s available via Amazon as a paperback or Kindle download.

La Nuova Musica Monteverdi Vespers Brighton Dome -Brighton Festival 23 May

It was a real joy to be back in an indoor space listening to live music again for the first time since before Christmas. And I have to say that distanced seating in Brighton Dome had an interesting effect on the acoustic which suited the ethereal Monteverdi sound very well as conductor David Bates carefully allowed every echo and harmonic to die away in the lofty cathedral-like space.

This, however, was not quite the Vespro della Beata Vergine as we know them. Rather it was a concert based around most of the Vespers – no plain chant between movements – with other contemporary pieces which deliberately blurred the sacred/secular divide and gave us a mix of Latin and Italian. Thus we got Pur ti miro from L’incoronazione di Poppea tucked in after Laetutus Sum and, sung with warm passion by Julia Doyle and Joanne Lunn, it was an electrifying, show stopping moment.

One of the strengths of this performance is the authencity of its small size. Ten singers stood, distanced at music stands around the back of the stage behind the eight piece band. They reconfigured their postions for each number so that the sound varied rather effectively. Sololists sang with the ensemble. High spots included the precision and colour of Dixit Dominus with an immaculately controlled amen, the jolly folksy theatricality of the madrigal Vogilo di vita uscir and the otherworldly echoes in Audi coelum.

Ot course all this was accompanied on original instruments with all the drama of two fetching theorbos and organ as well as David Bates conducting from the harpsichord. It’s quite an education too to see a period harp played standing up (Joy Smith – her opening Toccata seconda was arresting) and double bass (Judith Evans) played seated.

Perhaps this wasn’t the Vespers for the purists as you might hear it in, say, an Italian cathedral but full marks for highlighting the eroticism of this music and for drawing attention to the way in which musical boundaries were rather less absolute in the seventeenth century. And the sound was terrific.

This review was first published by Lark Reviews: https://www.larkreviews.co.uk/?p=6438

Show: Anton Chekhov

Society: West End & Fringe

Venue: Jermyn Street Theatre, 16b Jermyn Street, London

Credits: Written and performed by Michael Pennington. PART OF THE CLASSICS, FOOTPRINTS FESTIVAL

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performence Date: 21/05/2021

Anton Chekhov

Susan Elkin | 21 May 2021 23:22pm

Michael Pennington is, as always, a joy to watch and listen to. One of at least three fine one man shows he has toured and revived many times, Anton Chekhov dates from 1984. It’s a glorious monologue in which he depicts the aging Chekhov, reflecting on his life.

Of course it’s autobiographical. We learn that Chekhov trained as a doctor but wrote as a sideline. Even when he’d made enough money to buy an estate in the Crimea he still practised medicine – the only doctor available for “his peasants”. He talks of his boyhood and his grandfather who was a serf. There’s a horrifying, chilling account of witnessing a flogging when he spent some time in a Siberian prison camp observing and writing a report. And he’s witty about people and life – and his own plays which he claims not to like much. He wrote 600 stories too.

What I really like about Pennington in this role is the mellifluous crispness of his voice and the accomplished way – dressed as a shambling old man – he manages mood changes including the occasional youthful grin at some memory. Often such flashes relate to women Chekhov has known – in every sense. It’s odd though that Pennington has a book in his hand which he uses as a prop as he leads us to imagine that Chekhov is reading his own work. In fact this is the play script which he is constantly referring to. It doesn’t matter too much but at times we could do with a bit more eye contact. I find it hard to believe that this fine actor has always done Anton Chekhov like this and wonder whether, now 78, he isn’t finding it quite as easy to remember lines as he once did. Not that it detracted from my enjoyment. It’s still a masterclass in measured, intelligent acting.

This production is part of the Footprints Festival with which Jermyn Street Theatre has feistily re-opened. Hats off to Tom Littler and Penny Horner for the way they manage their reduced socially distanced audience with cheerful, rueful good humour. The serving of interval drinks to seats is almost as entertaining as the show.

This review was first published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/anton-chekhov/