Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Half a Sixpence (Susan Elkin reviews)

Half a Sixpence continues at the Noel Coward Theatre, London.

Star rating: five stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

Director Rachel Kavanaugh’s production of Half a Sixpence was good in Chichester last summer. It is now in another league and I predict a long run.

Of course HG Wells’ Edwardian rags-to-riches-to-rags-to-riches story, adapted for the stage by Beverley Cross, and then warmly brushed up by Julian Fellowes, is old fashioned. That’s its charm …

Read the rest of this review via Musical Theatre Review http://musicaltheatrereview.com/half-a-sixpence-noel-coward-theatre/

Baddies the Musical continues at the Unicorn Theatre, London until 31 December.

Star rating: four stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ✩

From the moment bearded Nigel Barrett’s night-gowned Wolf and Kathy Rose O’Brien’s saccharine Red Riding Hood are interrupted at the crucial ‘big teeth’ moment by two 21st century London cops preventing an assault, you know you’re in for an original treat of an evening. Nothing in this show is quite what it seems – the five baddies aren’t all that bad and the two ‘goodies’ turn out to be anything but good. It was a fine show 12 months ago. This revival is even smoother, funnier and more thoughtful …

Read the rest of this review via Musical Theatre Review http://musicaltheatrereview.com/baddies-the-musical-unicorn-theatre-2/

2638_1479514177
book by Joseph Stein music by Jerry Bock and lyrics by Sheldon Harnick
society/company: West Wickham Operatic Society
performance date: 18 Nov 2016
venue: Churchill Theatre, Bromley

It’s a refreshing treat to see Tevye played as anything other than an imitation of Topol who made the part his own for so long on stage worldwide and in the 1971 film. In this imaginative production, Kevin Gauntlett, who has a rather magnificent bass singing voice, creates a convincing individualised, fully rounded personality for musical theatre’s most famous Jewish milkman. And his acting is very natural and convincing.

Fiddler on the Roof is a long way from the froth of much standard musical theatre fare. In amongst the Jewish jokes and all that fabulous Klesmer-style music with its minor keys and syncopated accelerating rhythms it deals with two very serious topics: the rejection of traditional culture by a younger generation and the eviction of Jews from Russian villages in the years before the Revolution. And that’s its strength. It is deeply moving as well as entertaining.

There is a lot of talent in this company, Tracy Prizeman as Golda plays beautifully off Kevin Gauntlett and she has a striking old-fashioned claret contralto singing voice which works beautifully here as she creates a personality who (usually) hides her real feelings behing gruff brusqueness. There’s some lovely singing form Amy Ghinn as Hodel and Sophie-Rose Jackson as Chava too.

It’s a show which works perfectly for a non-professional company because you can use a large cast for the crowd scenes as director Terry Gauntlett does here to fine effect. A wide range of ages, including a number of children, mean that it really does look like a village. And of course, apart from Teyve and Golda it’s a show with lots of quite small roles so there’s plenty of opportunity. The WWOS version gives us, for example Richard Rook as a decent but not appealing Lazar Wolf, Lee Durnford as the impoverished tailor, Motel and Paul Mount as a delightfully bearded Rabbi. The ensemble set pieces such as Tevye’s imagined dream, the drinking scene and the wedding are vibrant and energetic.

Caroline Daniel and her thirteen-piece band do a fine job in the pit bringing out masses of orchestral colour. One or two blips in the cohesion between singers and orchestra were quickly popped back on track at the performance I saw. Marvin Duenger is terrific as the titular fiddler frequently appearing onstage like a ghostly presence whose clear music represents Tevye’s thoughts.

My only quibble with this otherwise excellent show is that it is a tad too long. One or two numbers which are often cut are included and they really don’t add much but take the running time up to a rather excessive three hours. But it’s a minor reservation.

This was my first WWOS show. It certainly won’t be the last.

First published by Sardines http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20Wickham%20Operatic%20Society-Fiddler%20On%20The%20Roof&reviewsID=2638

img_2065-theatrecraft-2016-market-place-2-photo-credit-andy-barker

Last week I went to TheatreCraft 2016, the eleventh annual “beyond the stage” careers event which routinely attracts over 1000 people, most of them young. This time it was based at the Waldorf Hilton Hotel in Aldwych – with seminars and sessions running in nearby theatres – which worked very conveniently. The light bright open space in the hotel was ideal for the “marketplace” and several exhibitors told me approvingly they had more room than usual.

TheatreCraft is run by Theatre Royal Haymarket’s Master Class initiative in partnership with Royal Opera House, Mousetrap Theatre Projects and Society of London Theatre. Over the last decade or so I’ve watched it outgrow the foyers of Theatre Royal Haymarket and move to the Floral Hall at ROH. And now to the Waldorf Hilton.

It has always been difficult to get awareness of careers in directing, producing, playwriting, lighting, stage management, PR and the rest into schools. Pupils, parents and teachers see what happens on stage but often have little understanding of the infrastructure which supports it. That is why I wrote a book in 2013 – So You Want to Work in Theatre, NHB – to try and get some of this information across.

TheatreCraft is another excellent source of expertise and advice and it’s always encouraging to see young people being brought to it in school and college groups by their enlightened teachers.

This year there were technical departments from – for example – Guildhall School of Music and Drama, East 15, Mountview, Central and GSA along with universities such as Nottingham Trent, South Wales and Aberystwyth which offer courses in various sorts of design. Lots of organisations such as NYT, Theatres Trust, Equity were there too along with representatives from lots of  companies and venues offering training, apprenticeships and other opportunities. There was also lots to learn in workshops of which a really indefatigable person could have fitted nine or ten into the day from learning about scenic art from ROH’s Emma Troubridge to approaching plays with Blanche

img_2400-theatrecraft-2016-market-place-7-photo-credit-andy-barker

MacIntyre or touring theatre with James Quaife among much else.

All in all then, a fine and worthwhile day for anyone who wants to work in theatre in almost any capacity. My worry is that although a thousand people is a good number, in national terms this is a drop in the ocean. Moreover the young people there are the ones whom someone has encouraged to come. What about their counterparts in other parts of the country or in schools and colleges where no one knows enough even to point them in the right direction? There is still a huge job to be done in off-stage careers education.

All photos by Andy Barker

20161112_095738

The New Oxford Shakespeare the Complete Works has just arrived and it has set me reminiscing.

My only other complete works is a nice old edition, which I had rebound in 2008 because it was falling to pieces. It was bequeathed me in 1974 by my lovely grandmother-in-law who knew a Shakespeare enthusiast when she saw one. She’d been given it by her uncle in 1913 when she was 22 and it had been very well read. Yes, she knew all the plays and also used it regularly for help with Daily Telegraph crossword which she did every day.

Since her death, I’ve used it for forty two years for quick access and reference. That’s as well as, of course, having copies of nearly all the plays and in some cases several editions even after recent pruning related to moving house.

I can’t help comparing the old with the new. Traditionally a Complete Works simply provided the bare text – often with very ancient editing to keep the price down. No so The New Oxford Shakespeare the Complete Works which does several very interesting and welcome things.

First the plays have been edited with modern scholarship and there are a few pages of information and views about each play before the text along with occasional black and white photographs. Information includes comments by actors, directors, critics and academics and there’s a timeline for each play detailing some of its production history. All of this is very useful, especially for students who may be new to whichever play it is.

Second, there are glosses in the form of footnotes – not usual in a Complete Works. These are informative although sometimes a bit banal and arguably unnecessary. As the late, great Shakespeare education guru, Rex Gibson, used to say, not even the youngest child needs an explanation for “hurly burly”. It’s absolutely obvious from the context. There’s a fine line between elucidation and the sort of laboured translation which actually erects a barrier between the reader and the language. Many of the footnotes, are however, welcome and it’s a valuable idea in principle.

Third, I’m delighted to see the plays printed in the order in which they were written rather than alphabetically or grouped according to some unworkable Polonius-style category system. It give a real sense of the playwright’s developing and changing talent along with historical context.

I’m not sure whether students are still blithely told to read all of Shakespeare’s plays before or during their English degree courses. Are drama students advised to read them all? If they are then this would be a fine edition to use.

As for me, I shall use it if/when I need to read one of the few plays which remain unfamiliar and of which I don’t have a specific copy. It’s probably time I read Venus and Adonis properly for example. And also included here – in one volume – are all those co-written, and questionable authorship plays such as The Spanish Tragedy and The History of Cardenio. It’s an extraordinarily comprehensive volume and really sets a new standard for books of this type.

But that comprehensiveness that makes for its only disadvantage. It weighs 2.75kg. Don’t try and carry it about with you or read it in bed. You also have to treat it with care because the paper is, perforce (3382 pages) Bible-thin and fragile so it’s a read-at-a-desk job.  I doubt that Grannie would have been able to lift it. I shall continue to keep her copy handy too for really quick reference without the literary answer to a gym workout.

20161112_095655

Ok, so we all want to recycle as responsibly as possible but, however hard you try, 21st century life generates a lot of rubbish. It isn’t easy to get rid of it. And it’s getting worse.

I have recently moved house. We ended up with about 70 flattened cardboard boxes and roomsful of screwed up packing paper courtesy of our removal company. My son took some to the tip in enlightened Cambridge  (although we now live in London) where he lives and can drop off free of charge. Elsewhere if you have a van, in most areas you are suspected of trading (what’s the problem if you are?) and charged fees. My borough’s green bin people will take extra cardboard – within reason – if you squash it up. So gradually we’ve shifted most of it.

But what about the polystyrene and wooden frameworks new electrical appliances come packed in – and we’ve bought several machines for the new house? What about the old rabbit hutches filled with the rubbish of decades left in the garden by our vendors along with various untidy planks, sacks of solidified concrete and more? What about the internal door we’ve removed? What about some small items of worn out furniture which will soon be redundant when the ordered replacement item arrives?

Well, some of it you can break up and sneak into the general bin but most you can’t. The Council – at a price – will collect electrical items and pieces of furniture but not miscellaneous rubble, planks or, for that matter, old rabbit hutches.

In the end we paid a stonking £250 to get the garden rubbish cleared by a private company. What happens if you’re strapped for cash and can’t pay that?  And I suppose we are going to have to load the car and take to the tip ourselves the stuff which has accrued since.

Said tip, however, is on the other side of the borough and will probably take an hour to drive to though heavy traffic. Hardly a green solution. There is one much nearer in the next borough but  – almost unbelievably to me – you need a special pass to access it if you don’t live in the parent borough.

Given all this, why is anyone surprised that fly tipping is such a problem?  How are you supposed to get rid of rubbish?

Here is the Elkin Rubbish Solution (ERS). It would cost but then so does fly-tipping. ERS proposes that rubbish disposal should be a free public service.

  1. Every borough and local authority should provide many more easily accessible tips – aka “recycling centres”. A rose by any other name.
  1. Tips should be FREE for everyone irrespective of where they live and what they do for a living. Why put obstacles in the way of people wanting to dispose of rubbish responsibly? We should be supporting tradesmen in their work not making their lives difficult.
  1. Councils should, by arrangement, pick up rubbish of all sorts from their council tax payers free of charge. What are car-less, elderly or infirm people meant to do otherwise?
  1. Once 1,2 and 3 are in place make fly-tipping a very serious offence indeed. Much higher, properly enforced fines and a custodial sentence for second and subsequent offences.

,Just wait until I’m Prime Minister …

finchley-pupils-large_transqvzuuqpflyliwib6ntmjwfsvwez_ven7c6bhu2jjnt8

Had you visited the Design Museum shop in London earlier this year with £10 to spend, you might have bought an intriguing children’s toy called Dazzle Racer.

A self-propelled cylinder, it included a wind-up, elastic-band-powered mechanism, minimal parts (all 100 per cent recycled) and lots of stickers. It was good fun, simple, eye-catching, nostalgic and very original ….

Read the rest of this article in The Daily Telegraphhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2016/10/22/the-race-is-on-to-get-young-minds-into-design/

5616

A recent study has shown what every teacher and parent knew: most boys read less enthusiastically and thoroughly than girls. Sue Palmer, in her book 21st Century Boys attributes this to brain development. Testosterone accelerates right brain growth and makes boys more interested in overview, movement and space for longer. The effects have now been confirmed in two big studies led by Keith Topping, professor of education and social research at the University of Dundee.

So what can we do to stimulate the left brains of squirmy boys and get them reading with as much commitment as their sisters? …]

For the rest of this article published by The Guardian see:https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2016/oct/31/how-to-get-your-boy-reading-susan-elkin#comments