Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Historical Bassoons (Susan Elkin reviews)

Historical Bassoons

Directed by Peter Whelan

Royal Academy of Music

25 June 2025

 

I booked this concert with glee. Bassoons make me beam. I just adore that mellow creaminess and the instrument’s range which means that in its bottom register it can sound like a wistful cello and at the other end like a saxophone. Yet, there’s something about the bassoon’s bounciness which nearly always sounds good humoured.  Moreover, as a string player, I have no understanding of the techniques required to achieve those effects. I just admire them.

It’s also a pleasure to note that the RAM can field nine promising bassoonists. I read recently that conservatoires are now finding great difficulty in recruiting bassoon players because, children are not taking the instrument up. So this was rather an encouraging ensemble.

Led by Peter Whelan,  bassoonist with parallel careers as a conductor and keyboard player, this concert featured five works from seventeenth century Germany, Italy and France. Whelan introduced each with humour and it was evident that, Professor of Historical Bassoon at RAM, he has an inspirational rapport with these smiling young players.

The opener was part of a Telemann cantata which Whelan quipped was probably a world premiere because it was hidden away when he found it. It featured the whole group and I was immediately struck by the clarity of the acoustic in the David Josefowitz Recital Hall, a room at RAM I haven’t been in before. I was also impressed by the musicality of Fergus Butt who played a declamatory bass line in this work. His rhythmic expressiveness and tone are outstanding. And he visibly lives the music he’s playing. Definitely one to watch.

This view was confirmed when he then gave us a four movement Vivaldi concerto for recorder (Gabriel Alves Candido da Silva – good)  and bassoon with Whelan playing harpsichord continuo. It’s a piece full of virtuosic colour and I liked the way these two players delivered the plaintive recorder melody over pretty stunning bassoon semiquavers in the third movement followed by lovely bassoon work and recorder “knitting” in the last. It’s surprising how well this arguably unlikely combination of instruments works.

Sadly, the arrangement of Quoniam Tu Solus from JS Bach’s B Minor Mass which came next was the least successful item in the concert. It featured all five bassoons and the best that can be said is that it was a brave effort. It lacked cohesion and wasn’t always in tune.

Moving quickly on we then got part of a suite by Joseph de Boismortier (1689-1755) who was, apparently, a prolific composer of bassoon music. This work gave each of the five players time in the spotlight. It was cheerful, tuneful and competently delivered.

The  50 minute concert ended with Michael Corrette’s Concerto for Four Bassoons. Again it was Fergus Butt who drew the eye and ear as the parts wove round each other in the first movement. Working seamlessly with the other three, he then produced all the soulfulness the instrument is capable of in the short middle movement. His quasi-cadenza in the third movement was quite something too.

Whelan told the audience that this was the first historical bassoon concert presented by RAM in a very long time – and perhaps ever. I think it’s a lovely idea and smiled all the way home. Please do it again soon.

First, two David Copperfield-related anecdotes: When I was teaching part-time in the English department of a girls’ boarding school, our Head of Department decided that we should prepare a module of “off-piste” work for our 40 incoming A level students in the first week of the autumn term based on a book which they would all be required to read over the summer. I suggested David Copperfield and got the job of preparing the work which I duly did, after joyfully rereading the text. Then Sir, who had a personal loathing of anything longer than a novella, patronisingly decided that we couldn’t possibly ask our students to read a 950-page novel. “It’s not even on the syllabus. The parents wouldn’t wear it.” So that was the end of that. And I was outraged.

A few years later I was interviewed on the Radio 4 Today programme about children’s reading and the importance of the so-called classics along with author Melvyn Burgess who was there to argue for modern “relevance”. At the end of it, John Humphrys, renowned for putting interviewees through the mangle, turned to me kindly and said. “Well Susan, one final word: Name one book everyone should have read” I shot back David Copperfield and he terminated the interview with the warm comment: “Well no one could disagree with that.” Game, set and match to Susan (and Mr Humphrys).

David Copperfield (1850) is a gloriously meaty novel, definitely one of the 19th century’s greatest and, in my view, Dickens’s best. Narrated by the eponymous David (also known in the novel as Davy, Trot, Trotwood and Daisy among other things) in autobiographical format it owes some of its material to Dickens’s own life: the horrendous spell in a factory when he was still a child, the debtors’ prison and the success as a novelist are all there. It is written like a soap opera because it was first published in serial form and Dickens knew exactly how to keep his readers panting for more.

It’s also full of colourful minor characters who tend to get omitted from the frequent bland dramatisations, adaptations and spin-offs. It’s worth going back to the novel every ten years or so, as I do, to meet Dickensian wonders such as Miss Mowcher, the dwarf who tells David, in a very 21st century way, that he shouldn’t assume that because she’s short of stature she’s short of brain. Then there’s the appalling “respectable” (not) Littimer and the poor girl Sarah who turns in desperation to prostitution. Or think of the carrier Mr Barkis who is “always willing” (to marry Peggoty) and leaves her and others a surprising amount of money when he dies. Or what about Mrs Gummidge? She’s profoundly depressed but give her a purpose and she can rise to an occasion with aplomb.  It’s a rich, three dimensional tapestry whose main theme is, I suppose, parents/quasi parents and children who feature in many forms.

At the heart of the novel is a whole cast of characters who are so famous that they have somehow acquired a life beyond their context in the 175 years since David Copperfield first landed.  Meet Peggoty, David’s old nurse, dear friend and mother substitute and Betsey Trotwood, his forthright, decisive aunt with her hilarious loathing of donkeys. Mr Micawber, whose loquaciousness belies his fecklessness, and said to be based on Dickens’s father, who was imprisoned for debt, is a magical creation. So, in a completely different way, is kind, caring, decent Mr Peggotty – the sort of man we’d all like in our lives. Uriah Heep, characterised by his feigned humbleness and clammy handwringing, is a calculating crook and so it goes on.

David, orphaned young and virtually abandoned thanks to his step-father the cruel Mr Murdstone, eventually finds love but he doesn’t get it right the first time. Dora, his boss’s daughter is a silly goose and never likely to pull her wifely weight although she’s sweet. The reader can see ruefully past the narrator’s passion. He or she can also see where David’s affections are likely to end up and Agnes is one of the more convincing of Dicken’s virtuous women. In general he tends to be better at flawed females.

The most interesting character in this long, free flowing but utterly compelling novel, is James Steerforth. David meets first meets him at Salem House, the appalling Blackheath school he is banished to by Mr Murdstone. Steerforth is older, good looking, highly charismatic and takes David under his protection. We know he’s bad news almost from the start because he tricks David into parting with his money at first encounter but the younger boy is entranced. Years later their paths cross again and David introduces him to the Peggotys, and, fatally, to their pretty little niece, Emily. Steerforth behaves appallingly and David comes to recognise what his old friend is really like from the injury to Mrs Steerforth’s companion, Rosa, onwards. On the other hand, Steerforth is a rounded, complex character and David’s feelings are very mixed because this is a man he actually adores like a beloved older brother. In a way it’s yet another take on parent/child relationships and it’s quite nuanced.

Notice the way Dickens evokes places in this novel too. He travelled a lot on book tours and dramatised readings so he really does know Canterbury, Dover, Yarmouth and rural Suffolk and Kent – as well, obviously as London which was rapidly expanding to include former villages such as Highgate where the narrator buys a house. The backdrop is anything but bland.

Of course David Copperfield is studded with coincidences. It’s a Dickensian trademark that his huge cast of characters should encounter each other quite by chance in unlikely places. In general  the complex plotting is immaculate although there are flaws. For example, when she recovers her fortune, Betsy Trotwood cannot move back to her Dover house because she sold it for £70 hundreds of pages earlier but that’s a very minor criticism in a novel which races along. Despite the length, I reread it this time in ten days (while, as always, reading other things concurrently). It’s a page turner like no other. If only those 40 students had been led to discover it. Let’s hope many of them have found their own way to it since.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves:  We Germans by Alexander Starritt

Love, Conflict, Renaissance

Monteverdi, Strozzi and Jonathan Dove

Directed by Sir Thomas Allen

Britten Theatre, Royal College of Music

 

Some might deem this material obscurely esoteric so it’s a real treat to be in an environment where it’s mainstream. And, of course, it’s richly encouraging to see and hear young, emerging performers running with it and achieving excellence.

The opening work, programme devised by Nick Sears, links songs by Monteverdi and Strozzi to provide a loose narrative about joshing young men and wistful women. The “plot” (such as it is) doesn’t matter much. The important thing is the sound and that soars with aplomb. Cecilia Yufan Zhang, mezzo, currently studying at RCM Opera Studio gives an especially arresting performance, her voice every shade of nuanced claret.

This is followed by a short account of  Monteverdi’s scene. Tancredi e Clorinda in which a Sarcen woman and a Christian knight fight, masked, to her death and a love revelation. All three items in this programme are visually illustrated by dancers from Rambert School, choregraphed by Anna Smith and Harry Wilson. It works especially effectively in Tancredi e Clorinda in which the dancers enact the fight while the singers freeze behind them.

After the interval we get Jonathan Dove’s mini-opera, Angels. It tells the story of Piero Della Francesca (died 1492)  who was inspired by Angels and painted them – a lot. With libretto by Alistair Middleton, this version is for harp, counter tenor and soprano. Will Prior, counter tenor, as Piero is splendid. He has a mellifluous voice and really catches his character’s wistful uncertainty and vulnerability. It’s staged against three arches at the back in which his soprano angels (Bella Marslen and Maryam Wocial – both good) often stand, looking like paintings.

The RCM Opera Orchestra does a fine job in a small pit only just below the stage – historical instruments carefully tuned to A=415 for Monterverdi and Strozzi. The lay out means that conductor, Michael Rosewell is clearly visible to all.   For me, it was an unexpected bonus to see and hear that wonderful instrument the theorbo played live (by Kristiina Watt)  and from row D, I was close to it.

And what a delight to see octogenarian, Sir Thomas Allen who directs this show so ably, on stage with the students and cheerfully taking part in the Monteverdi number which concludes Love, Conflict, Renaissance. His engagement and pleasure at what has been achieved are warmly clear. 

Emma

Jane Austen, adapted by Doon Mackichan and Martin Millar

Director: Rachel Moorhead

Questors Theatre in Walpole Park

 

Star rating: 3.5

 

Well it may be technically “amateur” but this outdoor production is professionally strong. Moreover, it sparkles with wit and flair, as Jane Austen must if you want to bring it off the page successfully. The blend of Austen’s own words, imagined conversations between author, her nieces and her characters and whacky blasts of the 21st century (the shades-of-Six rap at the opening, for instance) all cohere to make pleasing theatre. It respects the source but isn’t afraid to be innovative with it.

Emma Woodhouse (Caitlyn Vary) is a manipulative and snobby young woman who gets her kicks from trying to arrange marriages for everyone around her, especially the gullible seventeen year old Harriet Smith (Eloise McCreedy – good). Of course it always goes wrong and eventually she realises that she has been suppressing her own love for the man who’s been in her life all along.

Priya Patel is excellent as Jane Austen sharing her story with her family as she writes it. She creates a benign, mischievous personality allowing the story to evolve while retaining control. It’s a neat device and Patel has nailed the essence of Austen. Moreover, she morphs seamlessly and many times into the sensible, avuncular but appealing Mr Knightley simply by changing her voice and standing in a masculine way. It’s very accomplished.

Multi-roling lies at the heart of this adaptation for a cast of eight. And Nick Thomas is wonderful at it, turning some of his quick character changes into part of the comedy. His querulous, health-obsessed, elderly Mr Woodhouse delights as does his country-voiced Robert Martin and the good-looking, apparently sophisticated Mr Elton among other roles.  It’s a complicated story with a big cast of characters but the story telling is pretty clear in this version.

Vary, who plays just one role, gets the complexities of the title character – the heroine Jane Austen famously expected no one to like except her – convincingly. And Anoop Jagan, the only other cast member to play just a single role, has huge fun with the dishy but dastardly Frank Churchill. I really like the way this production leans gently and wittily on the occasional sexual innuendo too because of course Austen’s writing, at heart, is all about longing and lust usually fuelled by rampaging teenage hormones.

The first outdoor Questors production since the pandemic, Emma is played on a simple but effective set (by Nikoleta Stefanova) with a pair of brick-like pillars, a chaise longue and a side table. But it is graced by the Pitzhanger museum, the Georgian back of which towers atmospherically over the set and that works nicely. The cast are mic’d so that everything is audible even in a busy public park, although there was a great deal of crackle at the performance I saw and that needs sorting out.

A “straight through” show, Emma runs for one hour and three quarters which is too long. It could, and should, easily be played at 50 minutes each way without loss of impetus.

Rockets and Blue Lights

Winsome Pinnock

Directed by Lande Belo

Tower Theatre until 28 June

 

Star rating 3.5

 

It’s very interesting play which examines the truth and complexity of the legacy of slavery from a kaleidoscopic range of angles. Structurally it reminds me of both Our Country’s Good and Tom Stoppard’s adaption of A French Lieutenant’s Woman.

Famous Hollywood actress Lou (Tiffany Ola – excellent) is back in Britain working on a new film about JWW Turner and his 1840 painting The Slave Ship – except that she feels the film should be a lot more about the kidnapped, incarcerated murdered Africans than about a white British artist, not least because we’re in 2006/7 and, funded by an anti-slavery charity,  the film is timed to mark the 200th anniversary of the abolition of slave trading across the British Empire.

There’s a reproduction of the painting at the entrance to the auditorium, as well as historical information displayed around Twer Theatre’s bar area. The original hangs in the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, Mass. It was inspired by the utterly horrifying 1781 Zong massacre in which 130 enslaved Africans were thrown overboard so that the company could claim insurance. Turner’s painting is subtitled “Slavers Throwing Overboard the Dead and Dying – Typhoon Coming On” and, given that it depicts only impressionistic fragments of bodies amongst the wind, waves, mist and panic, Pinnock’s play presents Turner (Paul Kristovic – impeccably nuanced performance) as a man of moral ambiguity.

It’s a play full of short scenes which shifts from film set  (Akeem Mauli-Nicol is good as the director) where the cast are doing an initial read-through to horrifying scenes which Lou finds very difficult to act because she  loathes what she calls “torture porn” and at one point turns violently on the actor playing the overseer (Matteo Caporusso – pleasing in several roles). The white version of events, Lou says, eliminates the many insurrections. These people were a lot more than mere victims

Along the way we see illustrations of how abolition didn’t “cure” slavery as we dart about in time. Decommissioned slave ships, for example, were an issue. And what were slave traders supposed to do once their living had been taken from them? Obviously the trade didn’t die overnight – it went underground and resurfaced in different guises. And it’s still with us. “We used to have slave boats. Now we have equality laws” as one character comments ruefully, implying presumably that had we not had the former we would not need the latter. One of the last speeches in the play movingly lists names such as Stephen Lawrence and incidents such as the New Cross fire  – deaths whose root causes can, arguably, be traced back to slavery.

Winner of the 2018 Alfred Fagon Award, Rockets and Blue Lights opened at the Royal Exchange Theatre, Manchester, in 2020, directed by Miranda Cromwell. It  eventually, pandemic notwithstanding, transferred to the National Theatre, London, in 2021. It’s good to see it so competently revived now because it has a lot of important things to say.

On the other hand at nearly three hours (with interval) this production is  too long and the fractured story telling isn’t always as clear as it should be  Music by Isabelle Ajani is nicely composed but adds little to the narrative although it gives several actors the chance to sing. It was a treat, though to get a snatch of Joseph Boulogne’s music.  Often called “the Black Mozart”, he lived from 1745 to 1799 and was a prolific composer of whom we don’t hear enough.

Over the years I have read many books by actors describing their adventures with, and thoughts about, Shakespeare: Michael Pennington, Antony Sher, Judi Dench and Oliver Ford Davies to name but a few. The durability, topicality and humanity of Shakespeare is an endlessly fascinating subject. So naturally, having seen Simon Russell Beale on stage many times, in a wide range of roles including a lot of Shakespeare, I pounced on A Piece of Work: Playing Shakespeare and Other Stories which was published in 2024.

When I interview actors, as I often do, I generally ask as an opener “So where did all this start? At school? At home?” and that’s pretty much where Russell Beale begins in this book which is partly an autobiography. He played, we learn King Lear at school (Clifton College, Bristol) before going to Cambridge to read English but also as a choral scholar at Gonville and Caius because, as he grew up, music was always central to his life. He had been a chorister at St Pauls before Clifton College. No one in his medically inclined family was bothered about his decision not to be a doctor and his being gay was a non-issue both at home and at school. His father was an army medic so the family – he has three brothers, a sister and a sister who died when she was four – moved around a lot.

He seems to have been in work almost full time since he left Guildhall School of Music and Drama, where he started on a singing course but soon switched to drama as his family had always expected. Thereafter followed decades of work with the RSC and then National Theatre. He has enjoyed long working relationships with directors Sam Mendes and Nick Hytner and speaks very warmly of Gregory Doran. The work has led to world  tours, off-Broadway, Broadway and a Knighthood from the late Queen in 2019. He has a CBE too although he doesn’t mention either of these in this book.

He comes across as a modest man and mentions more than once that he has always been overweight and that lithe movement has never been his forte although he is very funny (and incredulous) about his ballet role as the Duchess in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland at Royal Opera House. At the beginning of his career he tended to be cast in comic roles and Shakespeare’s “clowns” (he’s interesting on the meaning of that word, then and now) tend to speak prose so it was a long time before he was offered a full- blown verse-speaking role.

He was unlikely casting as Ariel in The Tempest,  a production  I saw in 1993, so he and Mendes and the designer, had to do something different with it. When he played Prospero in 2016 (I saw that too) it was time to think again. He regards Prospero as a manipulative failure. He probably wasn’t attending to his duties which he why he was ousted and dumped on the mysterious island.

He has also played Hamlet (having years ago done Second Grave digger), Macbeth, Lear, Leontes, Richard II, Falstaff and many more. There has been some film and TV but he is more at home on stage. His account of the closet scene in Hamlet is fascinating. Imagine what’s going on the head of a young (?) man who tells his mother she’s too old to be having sex with anyone let alone her new husband who was, until recently, her brother-in-law.

Russell Beale mentions dozens of plays and characters in the course of this book, as you’d expect. But he never makes assumptions about reader knowledge. He gives a brief run down on the plot of every play he discusses and I, for one, was glad of the information about Timon of Athens one of the few Shakespeare plays I have neither seen nor read.

He has worked in plays by other playwrights too, of course and is fascinated by Chekhov. There was a fabulous, unforgettable production of Ben Johnson’s The Alchemist at National Theatre. It is almost a farce and in this astonishingly slick production was hilariously funny. “All these fucking stairs” commented so-star Alex Jennings sotto voce during one performance, apparently, as they dashed up them with Lesley Manville. Yes. Russell Beale is happy to share a few gossipy bits. I enjoyed his account of the US tradition of any great actor who happens to be “in” for a show popping back stage afterwards to wish you well. Hence Paul Newman materialising in your dressing room or Dustin Hoffman buying you all a drink.

Then there was Candide in which Russell Beale played Voltaire and narrated the piece which is one of Bernstein’s best scores, although it has a troubled production history. It is one of the few musicals which Russell Beale has done and he doesn’t – despite his background – reckon much on his own singing even as King Arthur in Spamalot. The fact that he is a musician as well as an actor led, however, to two BBC series: one on sacred music and one on symphonies.

It’s an informative, warmly accessible book in which the reader meets an actor who manages to be self-effacing as well as at the very top of his game. I learned a lot about how an actor of this calibre works with directors and designers. The doctor siblings, now with families of their own, provide the solidarity of ordinary family life and seem to keep him rather appealingly grounded.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: David Copperfield by Charles Dickens

Anna Karenina

Leo Tolstoy adapted by Philip Breen who also directs.

Chichester Festival Theatre

 

Star rating: 3

Photography by Marc Brenner

Henry James once described War and Peace as a “loose, baggy monster”. Well, Anna Karenina, published ten years later in 1877, is rather less loose and baggy but it’s still a vast narrative canvas. And what works in a 900 page novel doesn’t necessarily translate to a three hour theatre piece. That is why the first half of this show feels as if it is trying too hard – short scenes, time shifts, big stage – and the story telling is, perhaps inevitably, fudgy, although the second act is more crisply focused. Moreover, adapter Philip Breen is keen to incorporate Russianness, feminisim, imperialism, topicality and a lot more so that if feels, in places, a bit like being banged on the head with a heavy samovar.

Anna Karenina has three main, but tightly interwoven, plot strands. First there’s the troubled marriage of Dolly (Naomi Seldon – suitably volatile) and Stiva (Jonnie Broadbent – good at pragmatic contrition). And the play opens with their quarrelling because he has seduced the governess. I enjoyed Breen’s careful inclusion of Tolstoy’s famous opening statement which is here given to a rueful, angry Dolly: “All happy families are alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.”

Then there’s the infidelity of Stiva’s sister Anna (Natalie Dormer – fine performance) whose marriage to senior government official Karenin (Tomiwa Edun) is dull but who adores her son. She is entranced by, and becomes a quasi wife, to an officer named Vronksy (Seamus Dillaine). Edun and Dillaine are both fine actors but each is miscast or misdirected. Karenin should be cold and unattractive but here he’s almost cuddly. Moreover he needs to be much older than Vronsky but isn’t in this interpretation. Vronksy, moreover, is really a bit of a cad but this version of him – asides to the audience notwithstanding – is just so damned reasonable that we end up sympathising with him and wishing Anna would stop all her self-indulgent soul searching.

Finally – although there is a lot more thematic underpinning, of course – we get Levin, who has some self-confessed history as a womaniser, but who is now desperately in love with Dolly’s sister Kitty whom he eventually marries and take home to his utopian country estate where he farms, the women make jam and we get warmly lit peasant scenes.

And the point (or one of them) behind these three stories is that men are routinely forgiven for sexual profligacy but women are not. Or at least they weren’t in Imperialist Russia amongst the noble classes.

Paddy Cunneen’s music played by a fine three piece band, led by MD Kotaro Hata on piano and accordion,  adds a lot of atmosphere. There’s a mazurka when everyone’s at a ball and Akiko Ishikawa’s violin accompaniment to Kitty and Levin’s grandly staged wedding which opens the second half, is a musical delight. There is a mood music undercurrent to most scenes which works well too and I loved the grating glissandi during the death of Levin’s brother along with the whole cast, heads bowed, humming a minor key, very Russian sounding lament.

Trains are central to Anna Karenina. The 440 mile distance between Moscow and St Petersburg (think London to Edinburgh) has recently become do-able in just a few hours. They also symbolise new, changing technology and shifting social attitudes with a hint of decadence. Arguably, too, there is something phallic about trains in and out of tunnels and their climactic whistling. Breen and Cunneen have a lot of fun with this here – providing train music and whole cast rhythmic participation. And of course this story has a tragic, train-related ending but no spoilers in case you’re new to it.

There are some inexplicable oddities in this production which grate. Why, for example, in the horse riding scene do the cast start commenting in rhyme? And there are too many blackouts. On the other hand there are some brave, and pleasingly successful ideas such as the use of colloquial modern English throughout and British regional accents to connote social class and locational differences between characters.

Like almost anything Tolstoyan, this show is (very) good in parts but doesn’t always quite ground itself enough.

Itch – Opera Holland Park, London

Reviewer: Susan Elkin

Based on the novels by Simon Mayo

Librettist: Alasdair Middleton

Music: Jonathan Dove

Best headphones deals

Conductor: Josephine Korder

A revival of Opera Holland Park’s 2023 commission, this is a performance by members of the company’s Young Performers scheme. The aim of this is the provision of opportunities for singers to bridge the gap between conservatoire and professional work. Only Eric Greene (fine bass), who sings Nicholas Lofte, is a member of the main cast, and his job here is partly to support the others with on-the-job mentoring. Moreover, this Sunday matinee is a relaxed performance, so there are a lot of children in the audience.

In a story which neatly unites art (it’s an opera) with science (it’s about elements), we get a goodie/baddie plot deepened by themes such as climate change and parenting. Itch (Sebastian Hill) collects elements and enthuses knowledgeably about them. When he explains them to his mother, they are illuminated one by one on the set to form the familiar castle-like table, and it’s surprisingly moving. Then he and his sister Jack (Madeline Robinson) think they’ve discovered a new radioactive one which would be number 126 on the periodic table. If they’re right, it would have world-changing commercial implications. Enter big business, ruthless skullduggery, ethical decisions and a near tragedy.

Most of the song-through piece is dialogue set to music rather than offering much in the way of “arias”, although Eleri Gwilym, as the villain in charge of the company which wants the element at any cost, gets some pretty forceful Queen of the Night moments. Jonathan Dove’s music unfailingly supports the mood of the moment, and his orchestrations are often delightful.

City of London Sinfonia is pared down to thirteen players, one to a part, including harp and piano. There is, for instance, a sinister musical conversation between bass clarinet and horn when the children are kidnapped and frightened. A disturbing fortissimo octet is sung on the tiers of the set before we meet Itch in trouble in a disused Cornish mine over glockenspiel and celeste, and it’s an effective contrast.

As usual at Opera Holland Park, the orchestra sits at the centre of a sloped annular playing space, which means, on this occasion, that conductor Josephine Korder looks backwards over her shoulder quite often because she is, presumably, not used to this configuration. It’s an engaging directorial idea, though, meaning that access to the mine involves picking a route through the band.

Online art courses

The orchestra plays well, of course, including some nice solo work by the first violinist, but is sometimes overpoweringly loud for this inexperienced cast, talented as each one of them is.

Runs until 13 June 2025

The Reviews Hub Score

Entertainingly fuses art, science and adventure

This review was first published by The Reviews Hub: https://www.thereviewshub.com/25-itch-opera-holland-park-london-2/