Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Jack and Sarah (Susan Elkin reviews)

Jack and Sarah

Written and directed by Tim Sullivan

Based on the 1995 film Jack and Sarah

The Mill at Sonning

Runs until 14 June 2026

 

Star rating: 3.5

Photograph credit: Pamela Raith

 

This show about grief and finding ways of moving on is tenderly entertaining without being mawkish. It is also often funny despite the sadness of its main narrative. This production is its debut.

Jack (George Banks) is a successful lawyer whose wife dies in childbirth leaving him with a baby girl named Sarah, after her mother,.He is, of course, distraught. But eventually, after many set-backs, he finds ways of moving on through the network of four people who support him and one, his boss (Lucy Doyle) who is stereotypically,  coldly self-interested. We are firmly in the present: the mobile phones are a clichéd but useful signal.

Banks is convincing as the bereaved father – ricocheting from exasperation to weeping in despair and from sardonic comments to passionate concern for his baby daughter – which he has to do around various well meaning people: his mother-in-law, Phil (Sarah Moyle), his doctor father (Neil Roberts), the builder who is slowly renovating Jack’s house (Lee White) and William (Rufus Hound) a down-and-out antiquarian bookseller who simply wanders in. Hound has the patrician voice, addictive drinking and  shabby shamble perfectly. Then Amy (Anya de Villiers) the fast food delivery girl turns up and seems to bond with the baby …

There is a lot of good dialogue in Tim Sullivan’s script and this cast works well together. Subplots abound too. The audience can see Phil getting pally with William long before Jack does. The builder has domestic issues of his own and Jack’s predatory boss Anna see the young widower as easy game. Amy, meanwhile, is trying to build a career as a singer songwriter and several of her sings occur in the narrative. Da Villiers sings with gentle sweetness.

Jack and Sarah is slickly entertaining and nicely directed. Moreover, it somehow manages to deal with a tragic subject in the rom-com format so there are plenty of chuckles and it ends on an upbeat note. On the other hand it feels a crowd-pleasingly obvious in places.

 

We all read at different levels. I used to tell my students that it was fine to be enjoying Henry Fielding one week, Stephen King the next and Colleen Hoover the week after if you feel like it. Throw some graphic novels, non-fiction, poetry and anything else you fancy into the mix.  Real Readers have eclectic tastes. Besides you will never develop any critical judgement if you always read in the same genre. And it doesn’t matter two hoots whether it’s a hardback with an arty cover, a dog-eared paperback or a digital download. It’s the content that counts. What fun I had subverting stuffy, blinkered teaching colleagues who were portentously instructing the students to read Shakespeare, Dickens and Orwell (preferably in antique bindings) to the exclusion of all else.

Sometimes, moreover, we all need to read – for comfort, maybe – about people and situations which are so close to our own world and experience that we could almost reach out and touch them. Ask my 20-something granddaughters, both of whom are addicted to Freida McFadden.

As for me, I have recently been unwell with a really horrible, three week-long cold (or was it some other viral thing?) in the middle of which I had double cataract surgery. I couldn’t – almost the worst part of the whole experience – read at all for a few hours but as soon as I could I reached for Julia Jarman’s latest “Widows” novel: The Widows’ Book Club. And apart from anything else it was a delicious contrast to Franz Kafka’s Metamorphosis which I’d reread a few days earlier. Reading as widely as possible is healthy. I rest my case.

This is the fourth book in the series featuring three women from Bedfordshire who originally met at a rather awful bereavement group and, soon joined by a fourth, decide to meet regularly and form their own support system. They like wine, food, dogs, clothes and, of course, nice men of a certain age. Now, with three of them quite happily “partnered”, they have to start a book club as a ploy to deal with Janet’s old friends, Lewis and Christobel who’ve come to live nearby in a Very Posh house. Christobel is bossy, difficult and puts backs up – and the relationship between her and her rather lovely husband of 45 years seems a bit odd.

I spotted where the plot was going at about the halfway point. It didn’t matter, though. Jarman writes so wittily that reading this book is like sipping a delicious cup of high quality, creamy hot chocolate. I love the way, for example, she includes the subtext – what characters are thinking rather than saying – in italics.

Zelda’s partner Richard, whom she met on a cruise in the third book, is a blind internationally renowned American cellist whose  guide dog Billie sits alongside him at performances. When he plays the Elgar concerto at a Prom, all four women go to the concert. Yes, this really is a world I know although, much as I’d like to, I’ve yet to see a guide dog on a concert platform.

It’s good fun – especially if, as I was, you’re feeling a bit under the weather. Probably best to start at the beginning of the series, if you’re new to these books, though.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves:   Horse by Geraldine Brooks

 

Come From Away

Irene Sankoff and David Hein

Artform

Bob Hope Theatre, Eltham

22-25 April 2026

Star rating: 4

This cheerful musical, which opened on Broadway in 2017, celebrates the sheer decency of human beings in an emergency – and it’s exactly what we need in these troubled times.

After the terrorist destruction of the World Trade Centre in New York on 11 September 2001, air traffic was grounded worldwide. 38 aircraft carrying 7000 passengers were stranded at Gander in Newfoundland almost doubling the population of the town. So everyone rallied round. Schools and other public spaces were opened. Clothes and blankets were produced. Food was cooked in massive quantities and nobody slept. The people of Gander even opened their homes to folk in need of showers and other facilities. It’s a deeply moving story and every incident in the musical is based on real incidents.

A strong twelve piece ensemble – six men and six women – play all the parts.  In this production the slickness, versality and level of professionalism would grace any stage anywhere. Although many of these actors have trained professionally, most of them have day jobs which makes this amateur production an even more remarkable achievement.

There are especially fine performances from Kathryn Sharratt as Beulah – the wise, sympathetic, practical, local elementary teacher. This she does along with many other roles because, of course, these twelve actors represent the passengers as well as the Gander people. Aimee Mutambo delights as, among other things, Hannah, the woman who is consumed with worry about her firefighter son in NYC. She has a stunning singing voice. So does Niamh Gasson as a stranded airline pilot – nice song describing the struggle she had to get where she is.

And there are stories within stories here: the pair of gay men whose relationship is feeling the strain and the older man and women who get together, for example

The folksy music – very pleasing eight piece band, led by Jeorgie Brett, across the back of the set comes with some stunning fiddle playing from Jade Cuthbert and lovely percussion work from the charismatic Dave Hunt.

It’s a one act 100-minute piece which manages to pack in some topical issues about tolerance. One of the best scenes takes us to a church where Christians are praying, Adrian Morrissey as Kevin T sings “Make me a Channel of Your Peace with Jamie Fillery as a stranded rabbi singing a Jewish chant and Basil Zafiropoulos chanting Muslim prayers on a mat. It’s harmony in every sense. The sound balance in this production is outstanding – you can hear every voice in music which is often fugal or counterpointed.

I enjoyed this show a lot and, hardened critic that I am (often four or five shows a week) I cried copiously.

Eric Tucker, who died in 2018, left a former Warrington council house full of messy hoardings and over 500 paintings that he’d produced over the previous 60 years. Of course his family knew that he painted but they had no idea of the extent – or the astonishing, consistent quality. Eric, who was eccentric, unpredictable, tramp-like in appearance but much loved by his often exasperated family, was secretive about his art. But then, in his final years, he let it be known that actually he’d quite like an exhibition.

His brother and sister and nieces and nephews tried hard but time outran them and, in the end, the first exhibition of the man the Daily Mail dubbed “the secret Lowry” ran as a memorial after Eric Tucker’s death.

Eric Tucker didn’t go to art school. He left school at 14, worked in manual labouring jobs and for a while boxed professionally. There is though, evidently, an artistic gene in this family since his younger brother Tony did go to art school and worked in graphic design. So did Tony’s son Joe, a script-writer, who wrote this book about his Uncle Eric. Published in 2025, it was serialised on BBC Radio 4 and became a Sunday Times best seller. I discovered it when a friend came to coffee and accidentally left it in my house.

Eric Tucker was a complex man who rejected, with a vengeance, anything he regarded as pretentious. Of course he loathed modernism in art and got his education from making weekly trips to Manchester (two hours each way) to visit art galleries and enjoy a pint. Joe Tucker describes these as quasi pilgrimages.  Ertic’s art depicts working class people in urban environments in streets, pubs, shops and out and about. He also did self portraits and street performers such as circus clowns. There are number of illustrations in Joe Tucker’s book or you can call up dozens of examples online – because, posthumously, Eric Tucker  is now quite well known.

The first exhibition was in the house that Tucker shared with his mother until her death when he was 76. They stripped out some rooms, presented some as Tucker left them and had everything painted white. Against this they hung paintings and put together a basic catalogue. Joe Tucker  led the publicity campaign, of which the details are fascinating, The art world is enclosed and impenetrable. Approaches that his and his father tried seemed to hit brick walls and as the date approached Joe Tucker was almost certain that nobody would attend and that the whole thing would be a damp squib. Then, at the eleventh hour, there was a tiny breakthrough in the form of an article which was picked up by the BBC Today programme. Suddenly the floodgates of publicity burst open. And so many people attended the exhibition that there was a long winding queue and crowd management skills were required. All this makes a wonderful, very British, uplifting story of ordinary people competing with Big People and triumphing. It would make a touching film in the tradition of Brassed Off, Calendar Girls, Kinky Boots or Made in Dagenham. How about Ian McKellen as Eric and Rory Kinnear as Joe?

In some ways, Eric was a troubled man. His father died in the  Second World War when he was only 10 and his brother Tony was born posthumously. He adored his mother and never really established a relationship with his stepfather although Joe Tucker stresses that the latter was a very decent, loveable man and beloved grandfather. Yet, somehow they all lived in that small house, eventually establishing a uneasy truce whereby Eric had the front room for painting and his “parents” occupied the back.

Joe Tucker explores Eric’s background extensively including finding a woman who may once have been a love interest but he also respects his uncle’s privacy and refuses to intrude too much. Eric wasn’t quite a recluse. He had strong relationships with all his family but there were  often arguments and disagreements. Joe remembers spending a lot of time at his grandparents’s house in childhood. Uncle Eric, of whom he was very fond, would take him to school and pick him up as well as offering plenty of whacky advice. Eric always, for instance, detested any form of authoritarianism and the account of his compulsory stint in National Service is witty and faintly poignant.  For all that he was a very private man and Joe uncovers a lot of things which he didn’t know during Eric’s lifetime.

There have been several exhibitions since Eric’s death and his paintings fetch good prices – quite a legacy. In a way it’s pity he didn’t live to see it although he would probably have loathed the commercial aspect of it all and withdrawn.

Joe Tucker’s book is an interesting, affectionate memorial too and has, no doubt, done much to help put Eric Tucker on the map. It’s very readable (I devoured it in two days) and one of the most entertaining non-fiction books I’ve read in a while.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Widows’ Book Club by Julia Jarman

 

Fibonacci Quartet

Strings Attached

Brighton Corn Exchange

19 April 2026

This interesting concert gave us two string quartets written 86 years apart but each focusing on the composer’s love for a specific woman.

But first came arrangement by the Fibonacci Quarter of a short suite of Moravian folk songs – the sort of thing which inspired Janacek whose String Quartet no 2 followed.  I have never before attended a string quartet concert which opened with the First Violin (Luna De Mol) singing but he did it well and the rest of the songs ranged from soulful to dancelike with plenty of anguish.

This Fibonacci plays with a great deal of commitment and passion and I admired the pain of the ponticello playing – a strangely harsh sound – in the opening movement of the quartet which seeks to present in music the tenor of the 700 letters Janacek obsessively wrote to Kamila Stosslova. There were eloquently played harmonies in the third movement and I enjoyed the folksy rhythmic chords with some powerful cello underpinning (Findlay Spence) in the last movement.

Watching the Fibonacci Quartet is an unusual visual experience. De Mol sits on a elevated piano stool and holds himself very upright. Krystof  Kohout (Violin 2) and Elliot Kempton (viola) are crouchers and there is surprisingly little obvious eye contact. Yet the music coheres sensitively enough so they are evidently communicating in other ways.

After the interval came Schumann’s String Quartet in A minor. Written in 1842 just two years after his marriage to the adored Clara and the famous fury of her father, it’s a melodious, happy piece. Highlights of this performance included a sensitively played adagio and nicely pointed up contrasts in the second movement especially in the playful Tempo risoluto passage. Kempton’s viola work in the third movement delighted and all four players really ran with quasi Mozartian wit in the last movement.

I am not keen on talking from the platform in concerts at the best of times. And there is absolutely no need for a player to repeat the information already printed in the free programme sheet which almost every audience member is holding. This practice of verbal introductions could, and should, be dropped next season.

Not Quite Three Sisters

After Anton Chekhov

UAL Central St Martins

Platform Theatre

Star rating: 1.5

This is the fourth reworked classic play I’ve seen in a fortnight (cf A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Edward II and Saint Joan).  And it is certainly the most experimental: too experimental for its own good. It is, however, always good to see young theatre makers and actors trying out new ideas.

In this show three different directors are each responsible for one of the titular sisters. It’s an interesting idea but it doesn’t make for effective interaction between  chrarcters. And although there are different acting methods and approaches in the mix it’s style at the expense of story telling.

Set on geometrically marked floor with a mobile gauze hinged screen, the narrative loosely follows Chekhov’s original in that these three women are unhappy in different ways and the longing to return to Moscow symbolises that. You would, I think, be hard pressed to follow the action much further if you were not familiar with the source material. And there isn’t much dialogue. Much of it is simply characters making statements.

Another experiment is the use of different languages – with surtitles. It starts in a language I didn’t recognise but soon switches to French in which I am reasonably proficient but it was so heavily accented here that it might just have well have been another language I didn’t know. Even the English, when it arrived, was less than clear. Pier Filippo Valensin, who multi-roles the male parts does pretty well with Italian. I suspect it’s his mother tongue. If this polyglot approach is meant to make a statement about universality I’m afraid it doesn’t. It simply muddies the waters still further

I have no idea, sadly, why Shuyl Alice Wang as Irina has an episode lying on a table communing with a folding step ladder or why she stands for quite a while with a white veil over her head looking like an escapee from Ghostbusters. And that’s just one example of the arty weirdness which dogs this production which is trying far too hard to be clever.

Billed at an hour, it actually runs barely 50 minutes. I wasn’t sorry.

 

 

Brief Encounter

Noel Coward in a version by Emma Rice

Directed by Rob Ellis

Tower Theatre, Stoke Newington

Star rating: 3

I may be the only person in Britain who has never seen David Lean’s famous 1945 film of Noel Coward’s best-known story of thwarted love. Of course, however, I have seen and heard snippets of the dialogue, and I knew that the film put Rachmaninov’s second piano concerto firmly and permanently on the popular culture map,

Normally I get a bit weary of the every-film-must-be made-into-a-musical mentality but Emma Rice’s (2008) take on Brief Encounter feels fresh and innovative. It is actually more of a play with songs and lots of evocative background music than a true musical.

So let’s start with the pleasing on-stage live band which is already playing when the audience enters. It is ably led on keys by Tower Theatre veteran, Jonathan Norris but he should not be singing in public as he does in the 15 minutes before the show goes up. Colin Guthrie, however – a talented and versatile musician, delights with one of the sassiest accounts of Coward’s timeless “There are bad times just around the corner” that I’ve heard in a while. Thereafter they accompany the odd song on stage and provide a filmic sound track. All eight cast members are reasonable singers with an exceptionally fine performance from Imogen Front as Beryl. Her duets with Tom Lafferty as Stanley are excellently done. You can hear every harmony and, as a flirty pair, they play well off each other.

At the heart of this story, as nearly everyone knows. is a middle-aged couple who meet in a railway station buffet and fall in love. Clandestine meetings follow. Eventually, not least because each has a perfectly decent spouse and children, they part and go their separate ways – cue for lots of Rachmaninov. The cast sings a rather nice reference to it in a wordless arrangement and we hear a grandiloquent recording at the end after Victoria Flint’s Laura has soulfully played the first few notes on Norris’s piano.

Flint gets the mannered middle class 1945 accent perfectly – stand to rhyme with bend and house to rhyme with dice. Dom Ward’s Alec sounds less convincing. She gazes dreamily into the distance effectively while he brings a lot of attentive warmth. The details niggle though. In the mid 1940s she would have worn nylons and suspenders rather than tights and a respected GP would not have been covered in tattoos but these are minor gripes.

The support cast is strong as they work through the two other relationships in the plot which have a future, unlike the one between Laura and Alec.  Matthew Vickers is a convincing cheeky station employee who has the hots for Deborah Ley’s lively buffet manageress – there’s lots of stage business with tea and tea cups in this show. And the younger Beryl and Stanley represent love at its most straightforward. James Taverner is fun as the crossword-addicted Fred and Fiyin Ifebogun is splendid as the both the sulky waitress and the loquacious Dolly. Most of the cast has to multi-role.

A note of praise for Stephen Ley’s lighting design. It really illuminates the emotion by highlighting faces and bringing the station to life.

While not flawless, this show is a decently entertaining, and often imaginative, couple of hours of theatre.

 

Heart Wall

Kit Withington

Directed by Katie Greenall

Bush Theatre

Star rating: 4

 

This tautly written, nicely directed, play about bereavement, grief and family dynamics is a Bush Theatre production, co-commissioned by Oldham Coliseum. It is set in and around a traditional community pub where Karaoke sessions bond the customers.

Franky (Rowan Robinson) has returned home unannounced. She is clearly troubled and evasive about the boyfriend and job she has left in London. She is no hurry to return.  Her father, Dez (Deka Walmsley) is  unravelling and her mother Linda (Sophie Stanton) is, it soon emerges, is seeking solace elsewhere although it’s compicated. Meanwhile there’s Franky’s old friend Charlene (Olivia Forrest) and Valentine (Aaron Anthony) in the pub, both with stories of their own and providing insights into Franky’s family.

From the beginning we know that there has been a dreadful tragedy in Franky’s family many years earlier which none of them has ever processed properly. Moroever, it has blighted Franky’s entire life even though it happened before she was born. Kit Withington’s script drip-feeds the facts with tantalising tension over the play’s 100-minute, interval-free duration. Eventually there’s a startlingly beautiful reconciliation scene for which Hazel Low’s set springs a rather effective surprise.

Three things stand out to make this production noteworthy. First the acting – especially Walmsley and Robinson – is highly compelling. Walmsley finds a whole range of emotion in Dez from affectionate dad, to bellowing fury and utter despair. And he switches almost instantly between moods to create this unhappy, disturbed character. And Robinson brings brittleness, curiosity and anxiety to Franky who, above all, needs to be loved unequivocally and to be talked to openly and honestly by her parents.

Second, director Katie Greenhall makes terrific use of eloquent silence. Time and again something is said and there’s a long beat – when, for example, Franky is talking to, and provocatively testing, Anthony’s character in the pub. You can hear the characters thinking.

Third, for the first 45 minutes or so there’s a lot of humour in this play. Then, as it gradually darkens, we laugh less and the shift is effectively managed.

It’s an admirable and engaging piece of theatre.

Photo credit: Harry Elletson