Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Jules and Jim (Susan Elkin reviews)

Show: Jules and Jim

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Jermyn Street Theatre. 16b Jermyn Street, London SW1Y 6ST

Credits: BY TIMBERLAKE WERTENBAKER. BASED ON THE NOVEL BY HENRI-PIERRE ROCHÉ. DIRECTED BY STELLA POWELL-JONES.

Jules and Jim

3 stars

It’s a love triangle – of sorts. Two men Jules (Samuel Collins) who’s German and Jim (Alex Mugnaioni), a Frenchman, meet in Paris, become close friends and share their girlfriends in pursuit of establishing some basic truths about feeling and love. Then, as the action darts around Europe spanning 20 years into the 1930s, Kath (Patricia Allison) comes along.

Wertenbaker’s dialogue is lively and often funny but jokes such as “I’m French. We invented freedom” wear thin after a while. Three fine actors, however, do their best with it. Patricia Allison, in particular, as the charismatic, free-thinking, feisty Kath, finds an attractive translucent purity in the character.

During a play which runs 90 minutes, I spent the first half hour noticing that Stella Powell-Jones, Jermyn Street’s new artistic director and director of this show, is clearly not afraid of stillness. Then it began to feel too static. There are a lot of quite long speeches spoken by characters addressing each other across a space without movement. Sometimes they’re meant to be letters or narrative interjections and that’s fine but when it’s dialogue it’s not. Maybe this awkwardness accounts for the several nervous stumbles in the delivery of the lines on press night.

Mugnaioni is well cast because he looks imposing which is what his role needs. As the tension between the three of them deepens and twists he becomes convincingly anguished. Collins’s character, in contrast, remains more dispassionate. He’s an academic translator and pretty focused on work but he’s Jewish and plausibly ignoring the threats around him as time moves on. It’s a strong performance.

There’s a running theme in this play about water and drowning. Isabella Van Braekel’s set, which comprises impressionistic blue swirls daubed on off-white “paper”, supports that although I was initially puzzled and then irritated by the two opaque screens, suspended on quasi curtain track continually moved back and forth across the stage. Her costume designs, however, particularly for Allison are stunningly elegant.  Also delightful is Chris McDonnell’s evocative lighting and the special effect which suggested an underwater scene of Allison swimming.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/jules-and-jim/

Show: A Midsummer Night’s Dream

Society: Bowler Crab Theatre Company (professional)

Venue: Shoreham Centre. 2 Pond Road, Shoreham-by-Sea, West Sussex BN43 5WU

Credits: By William Shakespeare. Performed by Bowler Hat Theatre Company

A Midsummer Night’s Dream

4 stars

Susan Elkin | 23 Apr 2023 17:03pm

Part of a Larger ‘Professional’ Tour… and this performance was part of ‘Shoreham Wordfest’

This lively, five hander reduction of Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream is attractively staged. The Shoreham Centre’s large first floor Council Chamber is festooned in flowers (who made the papier-mache vegetation-filled swans at the entrance?) and lit is soft lilacy pinks and turquoisey blues. There is no blackout so we watch dusk fall though the trees outside the long side window and feel as if we are outdoors but without the rain and cold. There’s no raked seating but sight lines more or less work.

A highly talented cast of five have the simplest possible ‘tiring house’ – just a small space behind a screen in front of which is small rostra-built playing area. In the event, of course, they use the space in front of the ‘stage’ and the whole auditorium to good effect especially for the chases.

Of course Bowler Crab isn’t the only company to present Shakespeare with a bijoux cast but founder director Stephen John (who plays Egeus and Bottom) has some impressively original ideas. Hippolyta is mentioned but never present in body. Theseus becomes a female duke played with a highly plausible louche ennui with occasional spurts of decisiveness by Jessamy James. James (whom I have seen before, when she was training at Cygnet Theatre) then becomes a bespectacled, anguished Helena, a feisty Titania and a hilarious Snug, wearing a woolly hat and being a gloriously unconvincing Lion. She is a multi-talented actor.

Other good ideas include representing the fairies as puppeted, gauzy twittering insects and the funniest fight between Lysander and Demetrius (Keiran Kerswell and Jack Cameron respectively – both good) while the girls are quarrelling, that I have ever seen at this point in the play.

The multi-roling is nicely managed with a lot of outstanding voice work. Emma Kemp, for example, plays Hermia – all twittery teenage infatuation – in RP but doubles as a very charismatic Scots Puck holding the audience in the palm of her hand every time she appears. Bottom should, of course, be a stage stealer and he is. Stephen John knows how to coax every possible nuance out of this role and he’s hilarious – especially as Pyramus once we arrive at Shakespeare’s timeless version of The Play That Went Wrong. We then, very neatly, segue straight from it into Puck’s last speech and that works well. I always think the end of A Midsummer Night’s Dream as Shakespeare wrote it is clumsy – like the last bars of a symphony with a lot of dominant seventh chords uncertain of how to reach a resolution. John’s decisive version is better.

Inevitably there are a lot of costume changes, which can’t be easy behind that small screen, and sometimes they take a few moments so other characters amuse the audience. There’s a really silly but very amusing dance to a xylophone tune while a couple of characters move props. And at what would normally be the beginning of Act 5 John, in role as Bottom, does a bit of stand-up with puns, joking about hoping that the cast will hurry up and that’s fun. The whole text, meanwhile, is studded with asides in 21st century colloquial English. This is a fashion in Shakespeare productions at the moment but none the worse for that. It makes the comedy even funnier.

This year Bowler Crab is celebrating 10 years of presenting Shakespeare (five different shows)  in a range of venues and is available for appearance at events and for work in schools.

www.bowler-crab.com

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/a-midsummer-nights-dream-11/

Many of these blogs are about re-reads. As anyone who is kind enough to be a regular reader will know, I am interested in the way one’s reactions to a particular book evolve over a lifetime. But of course I gleefully gobble up lots of new ones too. Some I enjoy but forget almost as soon as I read the last page. Others grab me by the throat and shake me so dramatically that they really make me think long and hard: Louise Swanson’s End of Story, for example, which was published last month.

We’re in a 2030s dystopia. Fiction of all sorts  has been been banned and the ban is ruthlessly enforced. There are sinister, intrusive visits to people’s homes, punishment by mutilation and the ever present threat of a re-education centre where lobotomy is a common “cure”. The imagination must be suppressed at all costs. The narrator, Fern,  has been a  best selling, prize-winning novelist with a nice house. She now lives widowed and alone in a small house and works as a hospital cleaner. All her books have gone.

Fern writes in a notebook, though, and lives in constant fear of being caught with it because, of course, writing fiction is a criminal offence. And the tension rachets up when she associates herself with an underground (literally) organisation which reads bed time stories to children on phones. There are serious punishments for anyone caught corrupting children by sharing fiction with them.

It feels like a world co-created by George Orwell and Margaret Atwood with a strong whiff of Ray Bradbury’s Farenheit 451. And somehow it seems slightly more plausible today, when we all vividly remember the absurd, draconian rules of 2020 and 2021, than it would have done say, five years ago. I’m not surprised, therefore, to read in Swanson’s afterword acknowledgements that she was (partly) inspired by Rishi Sunak’s 2020 suggestion, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, that arts people should retrain, thus suggesting by strong implication that the arts are expendable.

So we’re pounding along in this dreadful environment in which horror story decisions are being made at the hospital, Fern develops a serious aversion to milk and forms a forbidden bond with one of the phone-in children she reads clandestine stories to. Then, like a bombshell, comes the best plot twist since Sarah Waters’s Fingersmith. Of course I’m not going to reveal it here but I don’t think it’s giving much away to observe that we’re firmly in the world of unreliable narration. Suddenly the reader is confronted with another set of issues to reflect on and the realisation that yes, silly me, the hints and clues were there all along. It’s an exceptionally well crafted novel.

My only tiny gripe is that the publisher has marketed End of Story as a “thriller.”  Well I don’t think I can define “thriller” beyond the sense that whatever this book is it’s not what I think of as a thriller. I’m not sure why we need to be constantly trying to categorise books by packing them neatly into genres anyway. So I shan’t try here – suffice it to say that End of Story is an outstandingly compelling read and one of those rare books which has permanently changed the way I think about several things.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Sea, the Sea by Iris Murdoch

SUNDAY, 2 APRIL 2023

Bloody Yesterday – Review

White Bear Theatre, London

**

Written by Deirdre Kinahan

Directed by Rex Ryan

 
Elizabeth Moynihan and Sinead Keegan

Deirdre Kinahan’s new 50 minute two-hander tells the story of Lily (Elizabeth Moynihan) an English art student who married an Irish farmer, hated the set up and finally abandoned him and their small children. This quite simple story is told in a series of interlocking monologues that alternate between the now 40-something Lily and her elder adult daughter, Siofra (Sinead Keegan). Lily feels a certain amount of guilt while Siofra evinces anger that is sometimes sardonic, sometimes bitter.

Keegan is a strong actor and warms into the part as the play progresses. Her occasional pretend comments to the audience are effective and very natural. Moynihan gives us a much colder character who has never come to terms with her failures. They occupy different halves of the playing area because, of course, they are in different places without contact, until eventually they speak on the phone when Siofra realises she needs to tell this person –  she repeatedly says, puzzled, to herself “Mum, mummy, mama … Lily?” –  about recent developments in the family.

The story telling is convoluted and the show is almost over before the details of what happened are clear. The writing carries careless inconsistencies too with at one point Siofra saying that her mother left before she was four and yet later she remembers sitting at a table with her, aged six. It is, however, occasionally interesting to hear something from two points of view. Siofra has always loved her Granny, for example, and is rueful about her eventual dementia. Lily on the other hand loathed her mother-in-law.

This play might possibly work better as part of a double bill. As it is it feels slight as a standalone piece. Moreover, one has to wonder why the dance interludes were included, unless it was to bulk out the length.

The ending proves to be a damp squib. The main narrative interest is anticipation of what will occur when the two women finally meet. In the event nothing happens – it is as if the playwright has run out of ideas.

Runs until 2nd April

Reviewed by Susan Elkin

First published by Jonathan.Baz.com: http://www.jonathanbaz.com/2023/04/bloody-yesterday-review.html

Forget David Jason and Bradley Walsh. Go back to HE Bates’s 1958 short novel. No dramatisation will ever capture the glorious, hilarious, sensuous plenteousness of the writing.

Pop Larkin has a “perfick” life. He has a wife (sort of) who is “almost two yards wide”, laughs like a jelly and cooks likes an angel. She has borne him six pleasure loving, contented children. He has a comfortable  home surrounded by nature, his land, farm animals, wheeling/dealing activities and vehicles. Taxes? What are they?

It’s the most colourful book I’ve ever read – you almost need sunglasses. There are, for example, eleven colour references on page one alone.  Everything gleams, beams, beckons and glitters.  The book works on every one of the reader’s five senses. You can taste the apple sauce, feel the feathery goose foraging under the table, hear the sounds of the horn on the old Rolls Royce which Pop acquires (don’t ask how), see Ma’s capacious folds and smell the blossom and fruit in the Kent countryside in a warm May.

Now, I remember 1958 clearly. It was the year I left primary school. We weren’t well off at all but did all right  by the standards of the day, as did most of my friends. But I never saw a fresh pineapple. Ma Larkin goes out and buys three – which they eat with Jersey double cream, a product I’d never seen or tasted at that date. For most of us it was a dribble of Libby’s evaporated milk on tinned fruit  which was supposed to be a treat. The last of WW2 rationing had only been gone four years after all. My family had a small fridge by then but I had lots of friends whose mums still had to rely on cool larder. The Larkins have a huge fridge and a deep-freeze – I knew no one who had the latter in a private house at that date. Most of us had TV in the sitting room by then but the Larkins have two sets.  Few ordinary people kept booze in the house other than at Christmas but the Larkins knock back blow-your-head-off cocktails all the time.

So the Larkins are not ordinary. And that’s where the humour lies. They are neither educated nor privileged. Pop cannot sign his name, although he manages to read a book of cocktail recipes. These people are what my Grandmother (decades before political correctness or wokery were invented) would have called “common as dirt”.  While people in circles like mine were worrying about the eleven plus, paying the rent and maybe having a roast chicken (luxury!) for Christmas,  The Larkins are cheerfully and happily  living life to the full – very full. In places the description of Ma’s meals – which are served continually – is almost food pornography. Yet, they’re wonderfully generous to other people and the chuckling reader can’t help liking them. l

The main plot line in The Darling Buds of May (the first of five Larkin books) is the arrival of querulous, thin, anxious Mr Charlton from The Inland Revenue. Pop plies him with drink and friendly overtures and flaunts the delectable Mariette (the eldest daughter who could do with a husband fairly urgently – although that eventually turns out to be a false alarm). Gradually Mr Charlton goes native – and the transition is laugh-aloud funny  because we can see that Pop isn’t quite as disingenuous as he pretends. He has no intention of paying any taxes and this young man, knocked out by rich food, strong drink and arousal, could be a useful way of dealing with Mariette’s situation.

Finally, and as an extra bonus, the book is worth reading for the rich originality of HE Bates’s writing. “The field trembled like a zither with chattering women’s voices” and “… a pair of crumpled corduroys the colour of a moulting stoat” are examples of the sort of writing which makes this reader alternate between jumping for joy and sighing in admiration.

No TV adaptation comes close. I rest my case.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: End of Story by Louise Swanson

Show: Family Tree

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Brixton House. 385 Coldharbour Lane, Brixton, London SW9 8GL

Credits: by Mojisola Adebayo and directed by Matthew Xia.

Family Tree

2 stars

Photo: Helen Murray


Produced by Actors Touring Company and Belgrade Theatre Coventry in association with Brixton House.


There is some convincing acting in this play which brims over with ideas. It is, moreover, imaginatively staged with haunting music (Francesca Amewudah-Rivers) and an intriguing set (big symbolic tree which lights up) by Simon Kenny.

The trouble is that it’s so overambitious for a one act, 95-minute play that you get dizzy trying to keep up with it all. Basically its message is that yes, black lives really do matter. Of course they do. In order to say that forcibly the play ricochets over more than a century and tries to pack in colonialism, slavery, non-consensual surgery, historical vaccine trials, Doreen Lawrence. George Floyd, the dependence of the NHS on black staff, the vulnerability of black people to Covid and a whole lot more. It’s like being on a carousel whose brakes have failed.

Henrietta Lacks (Aminta Francis – good) died of cervical cancer in 1951. Cells were taken from her body, apparently without permission, and used to develop treatments which have since saved thousands of (white, by implication) lives. Frances opens this play with a long monologue in verse. It’s a thoughtful, occasionally witty, pleasingly lyrical piece with rap rhythms although puzzling if you don’t happen to know the history of Henrietta Lacks. Thereafter we meet three women (Mofetoluwa Akande, Keziah Joseph and Aimee Powell) – first as NHS professionals chatting though a tea break and then as long skirted, elderly, shuffling plantation workers. All three are strong actors and Akande does fury at such speed and intensity that she’s actually funny. In each case there’s a lot of anger, frustration and reiteration of their plight. The word “stolen” is frequently used instead of “enslaved” with puts a chillingly truthful slant on what happened in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In the background lurks a white man (Alistair Hall) who smokes and silently gazes for no apparent reason, sometimes wearing a cowboy hat. If he’s a symbol of white oppression he doesn’t seem very oppressive.

Just to add to the complexity the central conceit is that everyone is dead so we’re in some sort of amorphous afterlife looking back on, for example, surgery without anaesthetic, serving the sexual needs of slave owners, dying from Covid and more. Eventually the smoking man is taken ill and they feel obliged to help him. He dies (so presumably not already dead?) and they bury him on stage. No … I don’t know why either.

It isn’t a play without humour despite the weighty subject matter. I had no idea, for example, that it’s acceptably trendy to be of Nigerian descent but to have Ghana in your family tree is an “uncool” turn off. There was a ripple of knowing laughter at this point. It was one of the many moments in this show when I felt very much an outsider. Perhaps that was the idea.

Photo: Helen Murray

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/family-tree/

Group 4I read first read The Group in 1963 not long after it was published. I was a callow, shallow sixteen year old. Word on the street was that this book included explicit sex. There wasn’t too much of it about then (less than three years after the Lady Chatterley’s Lover trial) and we were hungry for it. Rereading it now in the coolness of maturity I notice that yes, there is some sex there, but it’s bluntly matter of fact and not remotely erotic. I doubt I understood the difference in 1963.

Mary McCarthy’s best known novel details the lives of eight women in their twenties. They graduated from Vassar in 1933 and this is what happened next. They’re all bright and ambitious in their different ways but marriage and childbirth proves restricting – in what soon became a seminal feminist novel.

I find the timing fascinating. I’m over thirty years behind the women depicted but I can identify totally with some of their predicaments. Priss’s paediatrician husband wants her to breastfeed their son but she finds it difficult and nobody else – family, friends, nursing staff is committed to it. That was exactly the situation I encountered, at least with medical professionals, when my babies were born in Britain in 1972 and 1976 – except that I’m a lot more bloody minded than Priss is and did it anyway. Interestingly they were told then (as I was in 1972) that you had to stick to a 10.00/2.00/6.00  feeding routine through the 24 hours so that the baby would soon learn to sleep though the night. I’ve wondered for decades how/why it is that my fully breast fed boys slept through at 3 months and modern children seem to go on waking up in the night until they’re at least 2 years old. Perhaps there’s something in the old ways. McCarthy contrasts this with Norrine’s “Bohemian” child-centred approach which is, of course, exactly what young mothers are advised to do now. It certainly set me thinking. But of course, these issues passed me by completely in 1963 when I hadn’t even taken my O levels.

Then there’s Polly who has an affair with Libby’s married publisher boss which clearly isn’t going anywhere. Eventually she settles amiably for a decent doctor – there’s no passion but it’s a workable marriage. Haven’t we all known people like this? McCarthy’s observation is very sharp.

Group 3

The book is structured around Kay – first her short-lived marriage to the rather tiresome, pretentious, wannabe actor/playwright/director Harald – and eventually her funeral aged 29, which neatly brings the whole group back into the same space. Kay, a “blurter” who can’t help saying what she thinks, puts her own career on hold – taking a fairly menial job at Macys – in order to support Harald who never achieves anything much and is serially unfaithful.

Some members of the group remain single and are therefore able to do the work they’ve chosen without reference to anyone else – although parents are quite prominent in this novel too. One goes off to Europe and returns after the outbreak of war with a lesbian partner who is, after initial awkwardness, cheerfully accepted by the rest of the group as any other husband would be. These women, have after all, had a liberal education.

Group 2

One of the most disturbing episodes is Kay’s being committed to a mental hospital by Harald. She is not mentally ill but cannot be discharged without Harald’s permission. That’s chilling. As I often opine, some things have improved – and female equality is one of them on both sides of the Atlantic.

The Group, now 60 years old, speaks of both the 1960s and the 1930s. It has worn very well. It’s funny in places and the writing is needle-sharp. But don’t bother to read it for the explicit sex.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Darling Buds of May by HE Bates

Venue: Union Theatre. 229 Union Street, London SE1 0LX

Credits: Book by Ron Cowne and Daniel Lipman. Music & lyrics by George Stiles and Anthony Drewe. Directed by Sasha Regan. Co-produced by The Union Theatre and Sea Productions

Betty Blue Eyes

4 stars

A musical about chiropody and pigs sounds unlikely but sometimes it’s the wackiest things which work best. Based on a 1994 film by Alan Bennett (Maggie Smith and Michael Palin) and then developed as a successful musical by Cameron Mackintosh in 2011 (Sarah Lancashire and Reece Shearsmith), Betty Blue Eyes now sits remarkably well in the bijoux Union Theatre. Somehow it accommodates a talented ensemble cast of nineteen and a three piece band without ever feeling cramped.

We’re in 1947 ( a rather good year for your reviewer but I won’t labour that) when rationing and austerity dominated everyone’s thinking. However, the imminent wedding of Princess Elizabeth to Philip Mountbatten might just cheer everyone up and provide an excuse to party, at least for some. It’s a Yorkshire village with a strong sense of community. That inimitable Bennett-ian Yorkshire insouciance has survived into this production.

Sam Kipling (strong actor), familiar from Sasha Regan’s Gilbert and Sullivan shows, is a peripatetic chiropodist desperately wanting his own premises. There’s a very funny number “Magic Fingers” in which chiropody becomes erotic when he services the feet of four women. Bespectacled, nervous and daunted he can’t cope with the double entendres especially when he gets to the butcher’s sexy wife Mrs Allardyce (Laurel Dougall).

It can’t be easy to follow Maggie Smith and Sarah Lancashire but Amelia Atherton has a commendable crack at making the role of Joyce Chilvers entirely her own. Her character is an aspirant social riser and even just a tilt of her head or rippling of her fingers tells a whole story as she tries, in a faintly Lady Macbeth-ian way to stir Gilbert to action, teach piano or manage her difficult mother (Jayne Ashley, good). She sings beautifully – wistful passion –  and inhabits her character entirely. Atherton is only three years out of drama school. I hope we’ll see a lot more of her very soon.

Meanwhile the whole community is hungry – both for food and normal life. David Pendlebury has fun playing Inspector Wormold, the man from the Ministry of Food who suspects (rightly) that illegal pig farming is going on, as an over-the-top Miss Trunchbull type. And the ghastly local council members led by Stuart Simons as Dr Swaby are good value because they are, of course, cheating for their own benefit. It works particularly well in 2023 because the idea of petti-fogging rules dominating everyday life and being enforced by bossy jobsworths feels very topical. So does the concept of the people who make and enforce the rules, breaking them when it suits them.

The blue-eyed pig puppet is sentimentally appealing and, of course, having been vegetarian for 45 years, I’m as pleased as anyone else when nobody manages to kill it for roast pork and bacon. There’s a lot of feel-good stuff in this up-beat show. Members of the press were each given a bag of fudge (referred to longingly in the show because everything was still tightly rationed in 1947) presumably in the hope that the sugar rush would put us all in a good mood. It worked for me and I’m really glad they didn’t give us pork scratchings.

Stiles and Drewe can always be relied upon to come up with good tunes and ear worms and this show is no exception. The out of sight  band, led by MD Aaron Clingham on piano does an excellent job with the score which nips cheerfully along.  Work by Becky Hughes on winds (flute, clarinet, alto & baritone sax) is especially memorable.

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/betty-blue-eyes-5/