Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Susan’s Bookshelves: The Lost Father by Marina Warner

Every family has stories which are passed down through the generations. Typically, they are unconsciously reworked at each retelling and in the end – who knows? That is partly what Marina Warner’s rather magnificent, 1987 novel The Lost Father is about.

I first read it soon after publication, when it was shortlisted for the Booker Prize and I still have the hardback copy I bought then. It’s a family saga but the narrative is anything but linear so you have to concentrate, especially at the beginning.

Anna is a London-based independent woman of the 1980s and a single mother. She works in a museum threatened with closure, where she is a collector and curator of ephemera. Her family was part of the post-war Italian diaspora and she has become so intrigued by its history that she is trying to write a book about it.

Gradually we learn that, in the first quarter of the 20th century, Maria-Filippa married Davide to whom were born four daughters and a son in a traditional, quite remote part of southern Italy. Anna’s mother was the youngest daughter so these were her Italian grandparents. Davide, a gentle soul who loved opera, died while still relatively young, apparently in a duel for honour with his brash friend Tomasso – or perhaps it wasn’t quite like that?

The flashbacks into Anna’s work-in-progress present a masterful picture of how southern Italy was and how it changed with the arrival of the fascists. There is, for instance, a desperately sad moment when the widowed Maria-Filppa is forced to give up her wedding ring for “the cause”. I remember finding this upsetting in 1987 and it moved me again this time.

The girls, as Anna imagines them, are all different – and in some cases maybe not quite as pure as convention and the Catholic church expects them to be – with ambitions and longings, even as they launder, cook and sew with their mother.  It’s very evocative and atmospheric. You can almost smell the laundry and the vegetables cooking. And of course their adult lives eventually become very different from the world of their childhood.

At the very end of the novel Anna goes to California to visit one of her – now prosperous – aunts and meets the extended and  extensive family  which now spans more generations. And at last she discovers the “truth” but we left reflecting that truth is a slippery concept especially in family and folk memory when things change but retain an inner truth of their own.

Lost Father old

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Limberlost by Robbie Arnott

Show: Infamous

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Jermyn Street Theatre. 16B Jermyn Street, St. James’s, London SW1Y 6ST

Credits: BY APRIL DE ANGELIS. DIRECTED BY MICHAEL OAKLEY

 

Infamous

4 stars


Jermyn Street Theatre has always punched above its weight. And now, under Stella Powell-Jones’s artistic directorship it seems to be punching harder than ever. To stage the premiere of a new April de Angelis play is quite something. To cast it with talented mother and daughter, Caroline Quentin and Rose Quentin, splendidly directed by Michael Oakley, is definitely Something Else.

Most of us know the outline of this story. Emma Hamilton (rags to riches to rags) was Horatio Nelson’s adored mistress and for a while her flag flew as high up the mast as it possibly could. Then he was killed at Trafalgar in 1805 after which her fortunes waned, partly because the British government ignored the wishes of its most famous war hero. There was a daughter, though, who was proud to be Nelson’s child but in denial about the identity of her mother.

De Angelis has created a very clever double narrative exploration of motherhood out of this. In Act 1 we see Emma (Rose Quentin – glittering)  in Naples in 1798 about to seduce Nelson, more or less with her elderly husband’s tacit agreement. Her forthright mother, who speaks like a working woman from Cheshire (Caroline Quentin – down-to-earth and funny) acts as her housekeeper. Emma has already borne, and effectively abandoned, a child back in Britian.

Then in Act 2 comes a neat coup de theatre. We’ve slid forward 17 years. Caroline Quentin is now the aging, impoverished but still sparkily flamboyant Emma, alcohol dependent and in denial. Rose Quentin, now plainly dressed, practical and angry is her teenage daughter Horatia struggling with their life in the outhouse of a farm – actually a barn – in France.

Of course it makes sense. These women  across three generations would have looked alike and their behaviour would mirror, or react against, each other. And the powerful chemistry of the dialogue between them, including the pauses, is partly down to De Angelis’s sharp writing. As in Playhouse Creatures, she brings a historical situation to life by using language which is completely current. That  sense of communication, though, also relates to the casting of a real life mother and daughter. These are two people who know one another very well at every level and it shows.

The third cast member is Riad Richie and he’s hugely enjoyable too. He plays an unlikely, pushy Italian courtier in the first act and a gently gallant French farmer’s son in the second. Richie has fun with two exaggerated contrasting accents and skips around flirting with the audience. He even makes 2023 announcements and moves the furniture in role. He’s a refreshing contrast to the two women not least because his presence changes the dynamic and adds balance.

Best not to miss this one.

 

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/infamous/

This beautiful, upbeat book was published in June this year and I picked it up following a recommendation on the Good Housekeeping books page, a place where I quite often find some enjoyable reads.

It’s a story which explores friendship, bereavement, family, reconciliation, love and the redemptive power of gardening in a joyfully original way.

We’re in Stoke Newington, a place I know reasonably well because I often review shows at the Tower Theatre there. Imagine two houses which, for historical reasons share a garden. When Prem and Maya, move in to rent one of them in the 1970s, they find Alma who owns the other house very daunting but gradually things change. Interspersed with this is another story set in 2018/19 in which two gay men, Winston and Lewis are renting and an irritable single mother Bernice lives next door with her son. All of them, one way and another, become involved with the garden.

Adams slowly interweaves her stories. There is an old chair in the garden which Prem made 30 years earlier, for example. For a long time we wonder where Prem and Maya’s daughter who becomes a quasi-grandchild to Alma is now and, for that matter, where Maya went and what she did. The garden is overgrown until Winston, deeply troubled by the death of his mother with which he has never come to terms, starts to work on it assisted by Bernice’s son Sebastian. The garden is, in effect, a metaphor for creating new life and finding ways of moving on. I love the idea of Bernice buying Winston a banana tree to remind him of home and his mother, but pretending that it’s nothing because she got it in a sale.

Then there’s the community around them – Erol, the local shopkeeper whose business has been taken over by his son Sal and Sal’s wife Angela by the time Winston, Lewis and Bernice get there. Meanwhile, Bob, over the road, is a good friend who has always carried a torch for Alma. All these people are so sensitively and convincingly drawn that you could reach out and touch them. They’re all good folk, too. There are no “villains” in this novel. Yes, some of them sometimes behave badly because they’re worried, frightened, sad or whatever but they’re all likeable – even Bernice’s “difficult” ex, Simon is doing his best. And there’s something warm and life-affirming about that.

This book is not particularly “literary” and certainly wouldn’t win the Booker prize but it’s delightful, moving, poignant and thoughtful which, today, is quite enough for me. I read the final pages, while stationary in an hours long traffic jam on the Blackwall Tunnel approach and was moved to tears so it proved a wonderful escape in a pretty tiresome situation.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves:  The Lost Father by Marina Warner

Show: Never Have I Ever

Society: Chichester Festival Theatre (professional)

Venue: Minerva Theatre, Minerva Theatre, Oaklands Park, Chichester PO19 6AP

Credits: by Deborah Frances-White

Never Have I Ever

3 stars

This tight, visceral four hander is a debut play and a remarkable achievement for Deborah Frances-White. It is also a relatively unusual theatrical treat to see four highly accomplished actors playing off, and listening to, each other with this level of focused intelligence.

We’re in the Masada Restaurant in East London run by Jacq (Alex Roach) and her partner Kas (Amit Shah). The pandemic has left them facing bankruptcy, news which they now have to break to their wealthy friends, married couple Tobin (Greg Wise) and Adaego (Susan Wokoma) who financed the enterprise. All four were at university together.

That’s the exposition. What happens after that is a sharp, shocking and sometimes funny exploration of sexual, racial and gender politics. I was totally convinced by it all until a few minutes before the end when suddenly we’re in a Mozart Opera or a Shakespeare comedy with unlikely deals being made by two women out to fool the men.

Greg Wise is terrific as the only white male and a successful/wealthy one so he has a lot of power or thinks he has. It’s the drunken game of Never Have I Ever in which players force unexpected truths out of each other which throws up something he can’t deal with. Then we see hurt, anger, cool logic and incisiveness all done with the sort of timing you only get from a highly experienced actor.

Wokoma’s character is meant to be impressive and magnificent and she rises splendidly to the challenge. This is a woman you’d want on your side rather than anyone else’s and of course the script gives her plenty to say about the experience of being a black woman.

Roach presents a thoughtful, feisty, bi-sexual woman in Jacq with a huge talent as a chef but she’s troubled too and we see her three dimensionally especially in her scenes with Wokoma. Frankie Bradshaw’s set configures the whole playing area as a restaurant but the space in front, very close to the audience, represents the wine cellar and imaginative use is made of that for some two-person scenes.

Shah, of course, plays a brown man so he too has “otherness” issues but wears them lightly – often seeming the simplest and most straightforward of the four until he finally loses his cool in the second act and launches into and impassioned account of  his true feelings. It’s an arresting few minutes.

This production makes interesting use of stillness. All four actors are on stage, almost continuously. If two have a scene together then the others are usually silent, shadowy, stationary figures elsewhere on the set. Also fun is the use of loud music, strobe lighting and some neat choreography (movement director, Chi-San Howard) as the four of them get drunk in act one although it felt as if it belonged in a different play.

I am still pondering on the observation that you have to keep your head down to keep it above water.

 

 First published by Sardines https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/never-have-i-ever/
 Subscribe 

Show: Colder than Here

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: THE JACK STUDIO THEATRE. 410 Brockley Road, London SE4 2DH

Credits: by Laura Wade. directed by Jenny Eastop and produced by Upper Hand Theatre

Colder than Here

3 stars

This play, which premiered in 2005 at Soho Theatre, is new to me. And I’m forcibly struck by its total lack of theatrical pretentiousness. It is simply a well written four hander presenting four members of a family facing an imminent death.

Myra (Laura Fitzpatrick) has bone cancer and a few months to live. She is trying to be much more upfront and direct about this than her daughters and husband feel able to be and she wants a “green” woodland funeral. The play is set over six months in the family living room and in various possible burial venues.

I liked the paciness of Wade’s dialogue and very much admired Emma Riches’s beautifully nuanced work as the younger daughter, Harriet. She is one of those actors who can communicate volumes with a tilt of her chin or an eye movement and she finds a huge range of moods during the course of the play.

Also enjoyable was the sub plot about the broken boiler. Michael Tuffnell as Alec finally comes into his own with a wonderful telephone conversation with the boiler company. I’m not sure it actually adds much to the play but it is a fine five minutes of nicely paced comedy.

The set is ingenious in its simplicity. A few items of sitting room furniture are upended, rearranged and covered with cloths to represent different burial grounds, appropriately lit by Matthew Karmios as we progress through the winter to spring.  The music which covers the scene changes is pleasing too. Alec is a classical music buff so we get at various times, Mozart, Verdi, Vivaldi, Brahms and some evocatively remixed Purcell.

I’m doubtful, though, about the cardboard coffin. I attended a funeral recently which featured one and it was the traditional navicular shape. It certainly didn’t look like a coffee table.

Colder Than Here is not especially cutting edge but this production is decent work. Moreover, it’s a thoughtful piece of theatre and it’s always good to be made to think about the need to confront death and loss rather than deny it.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/colder-than-here-2/

 Subscribe 

Lines from Shakespeare’s Sonnets have a habit of lodging themselves in my head and playing on a repeat loop – poetic earworms as it were. I suppose it’s not surprising really. Poetry is, after, all a form of music (or should that be the other way round?) and the Greeks, in their wisdom, barely distinguished between the two forms.

When, for no apparent reason, “No longer mourn for me when I am dead” (Sonnet 71) sprang persistently into my brain recently, I reached for my favourite edition of the Sonnets. Of course I have several versions but the one I like best is edited by Katherine Duncan-Jones for Arden Shakespeare, 1997 – mine is the revised 2010 edition. I like it because her introduction and notes are so good. It’s scholarly and very detailed but always accessible and never abstruse.

I took it away with me to a six day residential music summer school last month so that I’d have something completely different – although the music clearly a linking factor – to read at night. And it turned out to be an inspired idea.  “Music to hear, why hear’st thou music sadly?” (Sonnet 8).

I think, on balance, I prefer the “dark lady” sonnets to the young man ones but I don’t much care whether either of them was real or why these love poems were written. I just adore the idea that “fair” might mean both blonde and pretty but you can be attractive and dark. I was brunette in my youth so I don’t need convincing. I empathise with anyone who is not blonde for ethnic and or genetic reasons. “Then will I swear beauty herself is black/ And all they foul that thy complexion lack”. (Sonnet 132)

I enjoy, and marvel at, the shape of each Sonnet too: four quatrains and a clinching rhyming couplet. The  technical craftsmanship is as extraordinary as a Mozart string quartet or a Dante Gabriel Rossetti painting. If you hear one of these sonnets read aloud Shakespeare makes you listen for those last two lines – like a cricket ball landing.

A few years ago I set myself  the task of reading the 154 sonnets, one each night, starting on 01 January and finishing around the end of May – I can’t remember whether or not it was a leap year. It was a rewarding experience to savour each one slowly and individually. Yes, scholars divide them into sequences but each and every sonnet also stands alone with something timeless to say: about love, beauty, respect, the power of writing, ageing, grief, mortality and a whole lot more

I am of an age now, for example, when “Like as the waves make towards their pebbled shore/ So do our minute hasten to their end” (Sonnet 60)  has more resonance than it once did as I try to pack more and more in while there’s still time. And having published a book (selling well – thanks, Folks) The Alzheimer’s Diaries about my late husband’s final years, the line “Or I shall live, your epitaph to make” (Sonnet 81) packs a certain punch too.

Sonnets

Shakespeare’s Sonnets, which were appeared in 1609 are unusual because they were published in his lifetime – unlike almost everything else he wrote. I hope they made him lots of money. And how right he was: “Since spite of him I’ll live in this poor rhyme” … “When tyrants’ crests and tombs of brass are spent” (Sonnet 107). We are still listening to that voice and its music 414 years after these near-perfect poems were published.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Twilight Garden by Sara Nisha Adams

 

Show: The Threepenny Opera

Society: OVO

Venue: Roman Theatre of Verulamium. Bluehouse Hill, St Albans, Hertfordshire AL3 6AE

Credits: Produced by OVO By Bertolt Brecht (text & lyrics) and Kurt Weill (music) in collaboration with Elisabeth Hauptmann English translation of the dialogue by Robert David MacDonald | English translation of the lyrics by Jeremy Sams Directed by Adam Nichols and Co-Directed by Julia Mintzer | Musically Directed and Conducted by Lada Valesova

The Threepenny Opera

2 stars

Photo: Elliott Franks


This is the first open air production of The Threepenny Opera that the Kurt Weill Foundation has given permission for so I suppose there was a lot of pressure to make it special. That might explain the over direction, busy-ness and an apparent  lack of trust in the material which isn’t really allowed to speak for itself until well into the second half.

Famously, it’s a response to John Gay’s The Beggars’ Opera, set in the corrupt, murky underworld of 1920s Berlin as a radical, no-holds-barred political comment. It’s timeless and I like the translation by Jeremy Sams and David MacDonald very much.

The production’s greatest strength is Peter Watts as Macheath. He has commanding stage presence, a terrifying sneer, heaps of charisma and a powerful voice. He’s also deliciously “Brechtian” stepping into the audience at one point to “steal” a phone from an audience member and he brings intense physicality to the part. Of course, when he’s in role and within the fourth wall we’re meant to see him as an unscrupulous villain but Watts also manages to factor some vulnerability and even tenderness into this serpentine character. He is well matched by Emily Panes who sings beautifully  as Polly Peachum, whom neither we nor Macheath can ever quite trust. She’s convincingly – and by turns –  sassy, coy, persuasive and ruthless.

Otherwise there’s a lot of miscasting. Although some of the 15 performers sing well, others don’t and in places the weak intonation is embarrassing. Most of the cast are actor-musicians and normally I’m full of praise for that. In this case, though, everyone seems overstretched as they shift in and out of the three shelters which (sort of) sometimes house the band to take quite big roles. It feels oddly random. And as for musical director Lada Valesova, who hops about and sometimes dances round set and the actors, conducting from all sorts of strange angles – the music would have been much more accurate, rather than woolly and not together as if often is, if all players had been able to see her.

Simon Nicholas’s set comprises a centre stage gasometer (or is it meant to be a bandstand?) which becomes the various unlikely things such as the abatoir where Macheath “marries” Polly. It also obscures sightlines so that musicians can’t see the MD and, worse, so that many of the audience can’t see the action on the balcony or in corners of the main stage. Yes, I know Brecht defied every convention and, in many ways, redefined theatre and the audience won’t be expecting Puccini. But they are still entitled to be able to see what’s going on – and they would probably rather not go home wondering what on earth Mattis Larsen’s apparently random lighting design was meant to contribute.

The applause, at the end of the performance I saw was polite but far from rapturous. It’s a pity because every one of these fifteen performers is talented and has much to offer but they are sold short by this messy production.

 

 

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-threepenny-opera-4/

Show: A Midsummer Night’s Dream

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Brockley Jack Studio. 410 Brockley Road, London SE4 2DH

Credits: By William Shakespeare and adapted by Heather Simpkin, produced by Bear in the Air Productions

A Midsummer Night’s Dream

4 stars

Directed by Conor Cook

If you’ve read, seen, taught, studied and written about a play as much as I have A Midsummer Night’s Dream every line is as familiar as your own fingers. It’s a delightful surprise, therefore, to see a production which has actors speaking the text in freshly nuanced ways and features some interesting directorial ingenuity. It also made me giggle throughout, often in places I’d never found especially funny before.

Six talented actors have to do a great deal of doubling but they are so good at it that it barely notices. Distinctive accent work – another strength – helps to make it work. Sadie Pepperrell, for instance is just a frightened girl in love as Hermia. She then gives us a Starveling who is so terrified of being in a play that s/he shakes continually, his/her mouth working. As First Fairy she is sexy, knowing and otherwordly with a London vernacular voice. I also really liked Jack Jacob’s performance as Peter Quince, fussing about and, a totally incompetent director, trying to get his actors to toe the line and keep them happy.  As a stereotype it’s only just exaggerated. He also brings a cocky, insolence to Lysander which I’ve never seen stressed before but it sits well with the text and situation.

Yvette Bruin and Elizabeth Prideaux play both the Theseus and Hippolyta and Oberon and Titania pairings  as lesbian relationships with Bruin being bossily, gruffly mannish in both roles. Prideaux is wonderfully plausible at the beginning as a Hippolyta who wants nothing to do with it and is clearly repelled by this political marriage she has to undertake. She also delights as angry misunderstood Helena and as bored Snout who has a drink problem.

Nicholas Southcott, who also plays Demetrius, is terrific as Bottom – interfering and arguing, dominating every conversation and very funny when he manages to produce donkey brays which sound like sexual arousal.  His acting is so intelligently detailed that even when he’s asleep in Titania’s arms he twitches his face as a donkey probably would. He loads “I could munch your dried oats” with delicious innuendo too.

The attractive costumes, designed by Heather Simpkin are more or less Grecian and quite complicated. So there are many costume changes which are neatly accommodated by giving some of the speeches to different characters. For instance Sally Sharp as Egea, who also does a lovely northern Puck, gets “My hounds are bred out a Spartan kind” as a soliloquy with a rather good mime of playing with a dog which gives other characters time  to get into their Mechanicals costumes. She then slips in to join them as Snug, almost unnoticed a few minutes into the next scene.

I’ve always understood that when Shakespeare uses continuous rhyming couplets it’s a signal not to take what’s happening too seriously. There’s a lot of that in the central three acts of A Midsummer Night’s Dream while the action is in the wood and this production leans on it which heightens the comedy. There are however some rather odd pronunciation decisions such as “ere” to rhyme with “here” and putting the stress on the second syllable in “promontory”.

This is a very funny, pacey (2 hours with interval) Dream in which the meaning of every word is clear even though it’s very true to the original text. The asides in modern English occur mostly in the Mechanicals scenes where they really add to the humour. I’m not sure we really need the rather banal songs at the beginning, end and before the interval though. They don’t add anything worthwhile.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/a-midsummer-nights-dream-12/
 Subscribe