Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Mathilde Milwidsky and Huw Watkins (Jeni Whittaker reviews)

MATHILDE MILWIDSKY, VIOLIN AND HUW WATKINS, PIANO
at the LEVINSKY HALL, PLYMOUTH UNIVERSITY, Saturday 11 th November 2023

Part of the Musica Viva series, which brings classical music to the Arts Institute for the benefit of
students and the wider community, this delightful concert was well-attended and received, as it
deserved to be. As always with these concerts the programme started with an introduction by both
musicians, telling us a little bit about the works they were to perform. Some of these helpful nuggets
of information I shall mention when writing about each piece. The programme was wide-ranging,
using works from Classical early Beethoven, Romantic Cesar Franck to twentieth century Vaughan-
Williams, Eugene Ysaye and Anton Webern. The contrasts of style and form were a wonderful
showpiece for the range and ability of both performers.


They started with the gorgeously emotional The Lark Ascending by Ralph Vaughan-Williams.
Milwidsky told us she had chosen it for the programme because the 11 th November was Armistice
Day and the piece, in the version they were performing it, had been composed at the beginning of
the First World War. After this war Vaughan-Williams reworked it for solo violin and in 1920 the first
orchestral version was delivered. The composer was inspired by George Meredith’s poem of the
same title, where the lark is described as producing ‘the silver chain of sound/ Of many links without
a break/ In chirrup, whistle, slur and slake.’ Later in the poem he describes how the song of the lark
descends into the valley below: ‘ and he the wine which overflows/ To lift us with him as he goes.’ That
extraordinary little bird, so high in the sky as to be almost invisible, pours down his song which, to
human ears, takes us up into the heavens.

This is indeed what happened as we heard the exquisite rendering of the violin, sometimes
carrying us upwards to ‘far and wee’ heights, sometimes plunging downwards, but always tender
and expressive, the piano echoing and colouring the music. The middle section broadens out with
chords that describe the pastoral scene before we return to the bird, his courage and determination,
the violin almost defiant as the lark disappears once more to impossible heights in an echo of the
beginning.

There is always an edge of sadness to this piece and it was indeed a fitting reminder of that
most terrible and wasteful of twentieth century wars in this new century, where it seems pointless
and collateral death still abounds.

Next were four very short pieces for violin and piano by Webern, a pupil of Schoenberg.
Pianist Huw Watkins said one thing about these pieces that resonated with me. He said that the
characteristic of all four was that it ‘made you listen.’ And it did. The first piece contained single
notes sometimes bowed, sometimes plucked. The silences between gave each sound importance.
The stormy second piece employed a variety of colouration from the violin with the piano supplying
a tense undercurrent. In the third, single shorter notes on the piano were played against longer
violin strokes. The single notes were like raindrops that made the listener wait for the next sound
from either instrument. And the last piece contrasted loud with soft, including scrapes and falling
runs. This composer and his work were thought-provoking and challenged one think of music in a
different way.

The last part of the first half was on the more familiar ground of Beethoven’s Sonata for
violin and piano in A minor, Opus 23. Here is Beethoven, young but already pushing away at those
boundaries set by earlier composers.

The first movement Presto plays with echoes between the instruments, questions posed
and answers given, threaded through with beautiful melodies which emerge and then build to a
crescendo but which end on a quiet note. In the second Andante Scherzoso piu allegretto the piano
leads and the violin picks up the tune; it has the pleasing effect of the fitting together of two
brackets. Here the two instruments are in true duet, weaving in and out of each other, often with
skipping rhythms and contrasts between strong and light colouring. In the third movement Allegro
Molto the duet is maintained. It is a strong, fast movement, full of echoing returns between the
two, contrasts in tempo and colouration between legato and staccato until, with frantic bowing cut
across by strongly broad chords the piece races to its emphatic finale.

After the interval we were treated to the third movement of Eugene Ysaye’s Sonata for solo
violin in D minor, Opus 27, labelled Ballade. Ysaye, we were told in the introduction, was the greatest
violinist of his day. In his compositions he is often inspired by Bach’s polyphonic writing, though he
takes it to greater extremes.

The opening was soft, full of lingering long notes which Milwidsky dwelled on  with obvious
enjoyment. Being a solo piece it allowed a lingering in the listener too, who experienced the quality
of each note, each fantastical run and playful phrase, often repeated. It is clearly a very difficult
piece but Milwidsky never let us realise this. Particularly enjoyable were the little scampers, followed
by longer deeper notes, the variations in tempo giving the idea that here was a soloist set free to
explore and enjoy the wonder and range of her instrument.

Finally came Cesar Franck’s Sonata in A major for Violin and Piano in four movements, where
we experienced the whole full-blown delight of romanticism at its best. It opened with strongly
bowed rich melodies, as always Milwidsky getting the most out of the length and quality of the
notes. She is a very watchable performer, her face, eyebrows and whole body showing her
involvement with her instrument while always, in every piece of the evening, judging with a firm
accuracy the depth of each note. The piano gave a rich battery of sound so that the whole
movement created an intricate tapestry of sound. The second movement began with a restless
piano which dipped to allow the voice of an equally restless violin. The partnership between the two
was on show here as the tempo slowed then speeded up to a frenzied close. The third movement
again began with a strong piano theme which then swapped back and forth with the violin. Both
came together in a triumphant emphatic melody, dipping into tender moments. The end of this
movement was really beautiful, making the most of the range of both instruments and both
musicians’ ability to explore the emotional content to its full. The final movement had a more
positive feel to it. It was full of lovely tunes from both instruments. The piano rippled along with the
broader notes of the violin rising above. Then both dived into a lower but equally tuneful register. It
was noticeable how big a sound the two instruments could make as they weaved towards the
conclusion – an almost jaunty, strongly marked ending.

What a wonderful evening from two very talented musicians. Huw Watkins is already a well-
known composer and soloist who was recently awarded an MBE in the 2021 birthday honours for his
services to music. Mathilde Milwidsky has been dubbed a rising star by Classic FM. She has already
won many prizes and worked with a wide range of composers and as a soloist in many concert halls.
The talents of both musicians were evident throughout the evening. Their sensitivity to each other
as well as to the demands of the wide range of musical styles was clear. Thank you for a wonderful
evening, which was rounded off with a tender work by Debussy as a fitting encore.

 

I’m not really a dog person. Cats are more my thing. I like dogs, though. In the last year or two I have acquired two as close canine family members and I always engage with friendly dogs I see on trains or in the park. I just have no wish to take full responsibility for one.

Veteran crime writer Peter James, unlike me, is clearly every inch a dog man and his new Roy Grace title spells out the horror of dog crime –  now apparently, even more rampant than drug crime first, because  there’s a lot of money in it and second, because the pandemic has triggered a huge thirst for dog ownership which in some cases is shortlived.

I’m a sucker for crime fiction. It’s my go-to for light reading, Peter James is always a curl-up-on-the-sofa treat. And I suppose the gripping, overarching narrative from novel to novel, now de rigeur in all crime series, is the reading woman’s answer to TV soaps. And in this case I also enjoy the Brigton setting because it’s a city I know pretty well.

As always there are several story lines in Stop Them Dead which eventually come together. A genuine, decent farmer who has bred a litter of puppies is killed in his yard when he tries to stop a gang of thieves stealing his dogs. A (usually) sensible family deny common sense and advice and buy a puppy for cash in a lay-by after which their beloved, only child becomes seriously ill. Meanwhile Grace and his wife Cleo want a second dog … and there is a spate of dog thefts (to order) in the streets and parks of Brighton. This is Peter James so, of course, it’s a perfectly plotted page turner and will eventually attract millions of viewers when it’s televised for ITV with John Simm as Grace.

I like this novel particularly because James evidently wants to spread information about the cruel, dark ruthless world which forms the background. Yes, in real life as well as in fiction, there are still gullible people who find “breeders” online and buy dogs from them in motorway service stations for cash only to find that all the paperwork is fake and that, often, that the dog is weak or, at worst, seriously ill. At a time when a proper pedigree dog from a registered breeder costs thousands it’s not surprising that a half price bargain seems attractive to some. But some of the puppies are imported from abroad, or bred in terrible conditions in Britain and they’re almost always too young to be taken from their mothers. Caveat emptor or buyer beware. The only way to stop this dreadful trade is to boycott and report it.

You’ll be pleased to know, by the way, that my granddog (pictured) was born and rescued  in Cyprus before finding a new home in Britain via a reputatable charity.  My nephew-dog meanwhile came from a registered breeder and my sister saw the whole litter with their mother, more than once.

Kayla

But, another relation who has kept dogs all her life bought, in order to rescue, a three year old “Covid dog”,  who had never been chipped, vaccinated or checked by a vet after producing eleven puppies. That particular dog has now landed on all four paws but they aren’t all so lucky. These horrors really do go on. Read Peter James’s gripping novel and pass on the information.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Man Who Pays the Rent by Judi Dench

Show: The Inquiry

Society: Chichester Festival Theatre (professional)

Venue: Minerva Theatre, Chichester Festival Theatre. Oaklands Park, Chichester PO19 6AP

Credits: By Harry Davies.

The Inquiry

4 stars

Photo: Manuel Harlan


Whenever there’s the national crisis, the government of the day calls for an independent public enquiry: Chilcot, Levenson, Covid. We’re all used the concept. Although they take years they are meant to be fully impartial and a force for the good  – except that nobody is legally bound by the findings and a process known as “Maxwellisation” means that anyone adversely criticised in an enquiry is now often, and controversially, shown the report in advance and given time to respond before it goes public.

That’s the starting point for Harry Davies’s first play. He’s an investigative journalist on The Guardian who originally trained and worked as an actor so he knows both his subject and his craft. The result is intelligently riveting.

Hundreds of people have died because of water pollution. The water company responsible is squirming, unsuprisingly. There are hints of pay-offs, vested interests etc. So of course a public enquiry is underway chaired by Lady Justice Deborah Wingate (Deborah Findlay). The Rt. Hon. Arthur Gill MP (John Hefferman) who is Minister for Justice is concerned both in, and about, the outcome. There are leaks. No one is clean. I wonder whether Davies considered titling his play Quid Pro Quo?

Findlay is outstanding as Deborah Wingate. She has all the right clipped gravitas shot through with plenty of human observation in private. Then eventually, she crumbles (no spoilers) and it’s spellbinding. Hefferman gives us a pretty plausible camp, self interested minister and Malcolm Sinclair shows us just what an outstanding actor he is as Lord Patrick Thorncliffe KC, a schoolfriend of Gill’s, with his icy RP, use of “Darling” and Machiavellian, face-saving plotting. I last saw him playing Eisenhower in David Haig’s play Pressure and he is anything but typecast.

The strong cast of seven is well directed by Joanna Bowman who makes imaginative use of the Minerva’s horseshoe playing space – often placing physical distance between characters to stress their positions within the action. It sits, moreover, very neatly on Max Jones’ set which uses lots of House of Lords red chairs, wooden panelling and a long table so that we never forget where we are. And the moment when it opens to reveal Wingate and her friend Jonathan Hayden KC (Nicholas Rowe – good)  sharing a bottle of wine in her very flowery Suffolk garden is nicely done.

The Inquiry is a refreshingly – and enjoyably – grown up play, unsullied by fancy music or special effects. Its power lies entirely in its words and you need to listen – as suggested by the very word “audience”. Obviously, it’s also bravely topical. I noticed a child of about nine in the audience at the matinee I attended, however, and couldn’t help wondering what he made of it. It would be too esoteric for most children.

 

First published by Sardines https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-inquiry/

 Subscribe 
guest

Philharmonia

Bach Choir

David Hill

Royal Festival Hall

02 November 2023

It was a good idea to open this large scale choral concert with Samuel Coleridge Taylor’s Solemn Prelude because it set the mood for what was to come. It was performed with lots of lyricism, bombast, fresh charm and excellent work from three trombones. And my goodness SCT could turn out a good tune. If only this music – and I thought the same about his Ballade in A minor   recently –  were heard more often I’m convinced the public would soon be voting it top of the classical music charts.

 

Then came Amy Beech’s Canticle of the Sun which was completely new to me. It’s a choral setting, for orchestra, choir and four soloists  of words by St Francis of Assisi translated by Matthew Arnold which sounds very much like Parry when it gets going. The passage which opens with lovely growling basses followed by unaccompanied quartet of singers was especially striking. The choir faces a challenge in Royal Festival Hall because the altos are, perforce, so far from the sopranos although most of them are facing each other across the orchestra. Hill has found ways of making it work, though and there was some lovely singing in this piece with an immaculately controlled morendo ending.

 

But the main event was, of course, Brahms’s German Requiem with all its plangent mood and tempo changes. This was an intelligently measured rendering in which Hill really got the balance right and leaned on the detail. I have never before, for example, noticed quite how much timp there is in this piece (I’ve sung it many times but never played in the orchestra). Here we heard every single drum beat under Hill’s very clear downbeat. At the very end, I liked the way he made sure we heard the harp too because it can so easily get lost.

 

We got all the sweetness and warmth from the choir that Wie lieblick sind deine Wohnungen needs but without self-indulgence and there was some good staccato work in Ihr habt nun Traurigkeit although Clare Rutter sang the soprano solo with too much vibrato for my taste. Baritone Ross Ramgorin made a decent job of both his numbers but it was really the choir which deserved the most applause – and got it.

 

I started reading the Booker shortlist as an annual project in the 1980s. I saw it a personal, horizon-widening exercise. As a reader, as with so much else in life, it’s all too easy to like what you know and know what you like. And some of the discoveries were wonderful. I first read, for example, David Lodge, Carol Shields and Peter Carey because one of their titles was shortlisted. I then went on and read everything else of theirs I could lay hands along with their new titles as they appeared.

In early 1989 when Salman Rushie and The Satanic Verses hit the headlines because of the fatwa demanding his execution for blasphemy, I was the only person I knew who had actually read it. it had been shortlisted for Booker the previous autumn. It didn’t win although Chairman of the Judges, Michael Foot, made it clear that he thought it should have done. Personally, I didn’t enjoy it very much but took the view as that if you don’t like it, or don’t think you will, then don’t read it. But nothing gives you the right to stop, or try to stop, other people reading a book – any book. Of course, though, I am not a religious extremist and see things differently.

Another good reason for reading those shortlists was that I was teaching secondary English to GCSE and A Level, and it meant I could talk to my students about current titles as I tried to encourage them to follow my example and try books which were not necessarily within the habitual comfort zone – because therein can often lurk new treasures. I always regarded developing wider reading as almost as important as getting everyone through the exam although, naturally, I did that too.

Since I stopped teaching to become a full-time writer in 2004 I have got out of the Booker shortlist habit although I have usually read the winner and sometimes one or two of the others if I liked the sound of them. This year, however, the final announcement is not until 26 November. The shortlist was announced on 21 September which meant there was full two months to get acquainted with the books. So I did.

It’s strong, beautifully diverse list:

Study for Obedience by Sarah Bernstein (Canadian)

If I Survive You by Jonathan Escoffery (American)

The Other Eden by Paul Harding (American)

Prophet Song by Paul Lynch (Irish)

The Bee Sting by Paul Murray (Irish)

Western Lane by Chetna Maroo (British Indian).

I found things to like in them all but the one which moved, shocked and haunted me most was Prophet Song.

We’re in Ireland in the present day when a totalitarian regime is elected. Changes are small to start with, as ordinary citizens’ rights begin to disappear. It made me think, initially, of the pandemic, lockdown and government emergency edicts. Of course the situation rapidly gets worse and you know that nothing is going to get any better for the family at the heart of it: Eilish, a scientist, her husband Larry who’s a teacher/trade unionist and their children Mark, Molly, Bailey and Ben. Suddenly it’s a world of torture, death, sudden disappearance, corruption and suffering. And the arrival of the rebels to overturn the regime doesn’t make any discernible difference for families on the ground.  What Lynch has done is to retell the story of Syria in a European context and I’m deeply ashamed of what it says about me that I found this much more disturbing than anything I’ve ever read about horrendous atrocities thousands of miles away.

The depiction of Eilish’s despair and declining mental health is masterly. I suffered every shred of the horror with her – especially when she goes in search of 12-year-old Bailey. That will stay with me for a very long time.  The novel ends in bleak, ambiguous hope, tempered with horror and anxiety.

I read it in just a couple of days – it’s very compelling. On the first night I slept for an hour, then woke up instantly alert because I thought sometime was flashing a torch and shouting up aggressively from the garden.  It took me a few minutes to recognise that I’d been dreaming. Perhaps I shouldn’t read novels as powerful as Prophet Song just before I put the light out but it is testament to its strength.

So this is the book which would get my vote, if I were on the judging panel. I suspect, though, that the prize will go to Sarah Bernstein for Study for Obedience which is original, edgy, topical because its protagonist is Jewish, and written in an unusual style, It just didn’t hit me between the eyes me as much as Prophet Song did.

Booker-Paul_Lynch-031

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Stop Them Dead by Peter James

Show: The Loaf

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: The Bridge House Theatre. Bridge House, 2 High Street, London SE20 8RZ

Credits: By Alan Booty

 

The Loaf

4 stars

This 70 minute, two hander play has matured a lot since I saw it last year at Jack Studio. Playwright Alan Booty, who also plays Hermann and directs, has found ways of making it seem much more natural and less awkward.

We’re in Hamburg, two years after the end of World War Two. Food is in very short supply. Hermann wakes in the night and, unbearably hungry, sneaks into the kitchen for a piece of bread although the small loaf has to “last until Thursday”. His wife, Martha (Joanna Karlsson) hears him moving about and comes to see what’s up. What follows is a long conversation in which we learn about privation, loss, fear, life under the Nazis and the relationship between a couple who’ve been married for 39 years.

Booty finds a child-like impishness in Hermann – using silly jokes as a way of covering his character’s refusal to succumb to despair under awful circumstances. Karlsson, meanwhile, gives us a Martha who is variously anxious, decent, caring, maternal and desperately worried about her own elderly mother in Russia-controlled Berlin. Her active, finely nuanced listening while Hermann is talking beautifully done. They, are, in this revised version of the play a totally convincing couple. Apparently childless, they have lived through two world wars. They have only each other and we sense that, despite occasional exasperation they will live on peacefully together.  She is distressed, for example, that he has sold his father’s ring for a few vegetables and a small bottle of schnapps but later he tells her, for the first time, how much he hated his father. They are still learning about each other – with tenderness and affection.

The dialogue now flows believably because Booty has dropped any attempt to mimic German syntax in English. Instead, both characters speak in gentle, quite subtle but well sustained German accents and the dialogue is peppered with German words which seem to lie happily in the context. As a device, it works well. And the pacing is adeptly managed.

Rose Balp has done a good job with evocative props and costumes too. The bread board is vintage and in period, a fresh loaf is placed on it at every performance and she knitted the slippers to a 1940s pattern.

I enjoyed this reworking of a thoughtful play very much. I’m, glad moreover that a decision was made to open and close with Beethoven’s piano sonata Op 27 no 2 (“Moonlight”) because it sets the scene at several levels. C# minor connotes the poignant but ultimately positive mood beautifully.

First published by Sardines https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-loaf-2/

Show: Owners

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Jermyn Street Theatre. 16b Jermyn Street, London SW1Y 6ST

Credits: Caryl Churchill

 

Owners

3 stars

Photo: Steve Gregson


This early (1972) Caryl Churchill play hasn’t had many outings over the years which is a pity because it’s sharp, very funny and remains topical – in a country in which property ownership is still, for many, life’s ultimate goal.

Clegg (Mark Huckett), a butcher, is fed up with his property tycoon wife, Marion (Laura Doddington) and fantasises about killing her. Alec (Ryan Donaldson) and Lisa (Boadicea Ricketts), with whom relations are doubly complicated, are her tenants. Worsley (Tom Morley) works for Marion and Clegg. Also in the mix, in much smaller roles, are Alec’s mother (Pearl Marsland) who has dementia and Mrs Arlington, a neighbour (Laura Woodhouse). What evolves from this is a dark – there’s a lot about death – comedy which explores ownership in every sense.

Now let me get this out of the way first. I do not find dementia-based comedy remotely funny and although the audience responded with gales of laughter I was distinctly unamused by the scene in which Pearl Marsland’s pitiful character attempts to make tea. Surely, in this age of much greater Alzheimer’s awareness, this could have been toned down rather than hammed up?

Otherwise this is an engaging 135 mins of theatre featuring some good performances. Doddington gives us a magnificently rounded Marion, outrageously used to getting her own way but also with unfulfilled needs and desires – which don’t include her ghastly husband. There’s fine work too from Tom Morley whose Worsley is hilariously deadpan and lugubrious. He has tried and failed to die by suicide so often that it has become a joke as he sustains more and more injuries – or maybe not, come to think of it, for anyone who has actually had to deal with suicide in someone close to them.

Cat Fuller’s design is delightful and very neat in Jermyn Street’s small space. She gives us a crescent of front doors, all different, to connote property and its importance. Some moveable items slide in and out of a hole where meters would be between two houses. Alec and Lisa’s bed emeges, like a drawer, from the air vent beneath two doors. Her 1970s costumes are lovely too – “expensive” brightly coloured outfits for Marion, simple plain dresses for Lisa and a tweedy brown suit for Worsley.

 

I wouldn’t normally write about a single short story here but this one is such a gem I think it deserves a space all of its own. Actually it’s a miniature masterpiece structured like a tiny novel in twelve mini-chapters. So that’s my excuse –  if I need one.

Written in 1920, The Daughters of the Late Colonel was published in 1921 by John Murry to whom Mansfield was married. She was from New Zealand but settled in England in 1918. She and Murry were close friends of DH Lawrence and his wife Freda – all four of them convention breakers. Aged 34, she died of tuberculosis in 1923  as Lawrence would seven years later. It was a hideously common disease.

The titular daughters are Constantia and Josephine whose domineering father has just died. They are virgins in their fifties – their younger brother is old enough to have an adult son. Their mother has been dead for 35 years.  But they have no emotional maturity so they still share a room, giggle like nervous teenagers and struggle with everyday tasks and decisions. They are, moreover, limited by genteel poverty. It’s beautifully imagined and observed – and extraordinarily poignant.

LateColonel

These women were terrified of their father, who has dominated their lives, and Mansfield drips in flashbacks to show how awful it was as the reader is allowed to look “past” them objectively. Now they are frightened even to “trespass” in his bedroom even though he’s dead. He’s been the dominant presence in their arid lives for so long that they can’t switch him off.

They are frightened of the nurse who looked after the old man and allow her to take advantage of them. They’d like to sack the insolent maid Kate, who sees them as “old tabbies” but they haven’t the courage. They have never met their sister-in-law who lives with their brother in Ceylon but get occasional duty visits from their nephew, Cyril and these are painful, tortured occasions.

I think of The Daughters of the Late Colonel a lot when I struggle to communicate with deaf friends. It is true that once you have, perforce, repeated a piece of everyday, conversational trivia three times it begins to sound ridiculous so you give up usually to the fury of the person you’re trying to talk to. Then I remember Katharine Mansfield, Cyril and the meringues.

I know this story well because it features in many school anthologies and I used to teach it. Coming back to it now I marvel at the tension of sentences like this: “They only gave the blind a touch, but it flew up and the cord flew after rolling round the blindstick, and the little tassel tapped as if trying to get free.” Of course, Mansfield, despite her early death, was a prolific story teller and since I first read this one – still my favourite – I have read most of the others in various collections and more recently in  Katharine Mansfield: The Collected Stories with introduction by Ali Smith (Penguin Classics,2007) which is a fat 700-page volume They’re all worth reading although some are stronger than others. And I don’t think she ever bettered The Daughters of the Late Colonel.

LateCol2

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Whichever title of the six on the 2023 Booker Prize shortlist I have, by then, decided I like best!