Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Brighton Philharmonic Orchestra – 02 October 2022 (Susan Elkin reviews)

Brighton Philharmonic Orchestra Brighton Dome 2 October 2022

Featuring a programme of American classics, the first concert of the new Brighton Philharmonic Orchestra season was pretty lively. Each half began, for instance with a fanfare – Copland’s Fanfare for the Common Man at the beginning and Joan Tower’s witty 1986 response, Fanfare for the Uncommon Woman, after the interval. Both were played with panache and drama and allowed brass and percussion sections a few minutes of glory.

Then came a fine performance of Copland’s Appalachian Spring which, under Sian Edwards’s no-nonsense baton, really pointed up the contrasts in this colourfully orchestrated piece with Ruth Rogers’s violin solo being a high spot. And Edwards really ran with that rather magical moment when the Shaker tune breaks through with a delightful trombone solo from William Brown who, incidentally, drew my attention several times during this concert to which he contributed lots of excellent work.

The high spot of the afternoon, though was an exceptionally joyful performance of Rhapsody in Blue (the Grofe version) with BPO’s artistic director, Joanna MacGregor at the keyboard. I’m not usually a fan of being talked at during concerts but MacGregor and Edwards are such personable, informative communicators, even when they’re not making music, that it was a bonus to hear their thoughts during the moving of the piano to front stage.

Fiona Cross’s opening trill was as sexily played – with lots of rubato – as I’ve ever heard it. And MacGregor delivered what she had just told the audience was really a series of cadenzas which otherwise required her to retreat into the big orchestra texture, with palpable enjoyment and incisive warmth. For most of the piece she seemed to be almost literally dancing on her piano stool. Then, as if that weren’t enough she gave us a high speed, show-piece arrangement of I’ve Got Rhythm as an encore – great fun and her technical ability leaves you breathless.

In Copland’s much less familiar Quiet City, in the second half, there was sensitive duetting from solists John Ellwood on Trumpet and Clare Hoskins on cor anglais. Notheless, it’s a dull-ish piece, scored for strings and horns only and felt like a filler before the grand finale: Catfish Row: Symphonic Suite from Porgy and Bess.

Of course the latter was dramatic. It’s effectively a five movement symphony telling the entire story of Porgy and Bess – with a gloriously big orchestral sound. MacGregor was, this time, tucked away on piano at the back next to percussionist Donna-Maria Landowski who worked hard and with terrific precision throughout this concert – The piece is characterisied by quirky solos, including a lovely louche introduction to the Summertime tune from Ruth Rogers, Peter Adams with an eloquent cello solo and – joy of quirky joys – a deliciously tuneful banjo solo from Martin Wheatley.

Definitely a concert which sent you away with a spring in your step and a head full of earworms. I was pleased to see a fuller house than sometimes and glad to spot a number of children in the audience. Two boys behind me, around seven and five. brought by their parents who were clearly musicians, seemed to be at their first concert – lots of explaining beforehand about how it all works. They sat quietly engrossed. Hurrah.

 

 

https://www.larkreviews.co.uk/?p=6941

The King of Nothing – Little Angel Theatre

Picture: Ellie Kurttz

The King of Nothing continues at the Little Angel Theatre, London.

Star rating: four stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ✩

Ben Glasstone’s account of The Emperor Who Has No Clothes is full of charm and wit. And it works well for two main reasons. First it is one of the most perceptive stories ever written, dealing as it does with vanity, self delusion, conformity and truth. It’s both topical and timeless.

Second, we have a cost of living crisis and the gap between rich and poor is neatly pointed up in this show. Funny and entertaining as it is, there are some serious points just below the surface which some children will go away reflecting on …

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review: https://musicaltheatrereview.com/the-king-of-nothing-little-angel-theatre/

Show: Candlesticks

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: The White Bear Theatre. 138 Kennington Park Road, London SE11 4DJ

Credits: By Deborah Freeman

Candlesticks

3 stars


Deborah Freeman’s four-hander play is an interesting exploration of what it means to be Jewish or Christian in 21st Century Britain and it sits quite happily in the White Bear’s intimate square space with audience on two sides.

Jenny (Sophie McMahon) has come home for Seder and it’s the first time she’s seen her mother (Mary Tillett) for several years. Her announcement that she’s become a Christian is a bombshell.  Her mother Louise, it transpires, has very little doctrinal belief although she’s a political supporter of her fellow Jews and enjoys the traditional celebrations. Her daughter’s heartfelt, Christian evangelism and enthusiasm for forgiveness is therefore hard to take.

Next door is the non-Jewish Julia (Kathryn Worth) who doesn’t believe in anything. She’s a single mother and her son Ian (James Duddy). Ian and Jenny have been friends since infancy and the relationship shows signs of developing into something else – until Ian drops his own bombshell and the dynamic shifts.

And we’re left pondering the difference between cultural alignment and religious conviction especially when two young people want, in the opinion of their parents “to put the clock back a hundred years”. Meanwhile, these same young people argue that we live in “a world where we’re all mixed up” which means there’s no need for all this friction.

So it’s a play of ideas. And for the most part it takes the audience along with it without too much didactic information sharing. In places the plot creaks with unanswered questions though. What exactly did Ian do in his teens to worry his mother so much? Louise’s job is a bit vague too. She gives every sign that she’s a teacher and then announces she’s a social worker. And although Jenny’s father is clearly around he is mentioned oddly little. There are a couple of soliloquies which seem jarringly false too.

Possibly because there were press night nerves the first act was a bit wooden and often unconvincingly acted. It warmed up after the interval, however, when we see real distress and tension and there’s a fine scene with Jenny and Ian in which she finally accepts that her life isn’t going to be quite what she’s hoped.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/candlesticks/

Venue: Chichester Festival Theatre. Oaklands Way, Chichester PO19 6AP

Credits: Alan Ayckbourn

Type: Sardines

Woman in Mind 4 stars


We tend to associate Alan Ayckbourn with comedy but, as every reader of Sardines knows, his work is much more nuanced than that. Woman in Mind, which he wrote in 1985, as a young playwright, is actually a searing tragedy whose many comic moments only highlight the plight of the central character.

Susan (Jenna Russell) is a middle class, middle-aged vicar’s wife losing her mind. Perhaps it’s the result of a knock on the head. Or it may be a severe menopause or early onset Alzheimer’s. The reason doesn’t matter much. What we’re watching is a mind being taken over by dementia.

 

 

Her delusions take the form of re-enactions of the life she, at some level, wishes she’d had: a grand country home, maybe even an estate, a loving daughter (Flora Higgins) a dishy very caring husband (Marc Elliott), a dashing younger brother (Orlando James) and a glittering career in her own right.

What she actually has – and Mark Henderson’s lighting and Simon Barker’s video design complete with flying birds make us acutely aware of the difference – is an overbearing, boorish, boring, bossy sexless husband (Nigel Lindsay in excellent form) and a small garden. Their son Rick (Will Attenborough) has attached himself to a silent sect in Hemel Hempstead but comes home and upsets his mother still further during the course of the play.

Russell finds a lot of eloquent silence as Susan gazing into the distance, clearly desperately unhappy and barking cynical remarks at those around her – between her delusional episodes. It’s a challenging but very meaty role and Russell is good at switching mood as suddenly she sees her other life or aspects of it. Her final scenes when, soaked to the skin by rain, she falls apart completely – and, in a bizarre muddled-mind sequence – conjures up entwined, distorted versions of both her lives are almost unbearably moving. Anyone who has lived with loss of mind at close quarters, as I have, will identify with the horror of watching someone disappear into a world of their own while onlookers, rooted in their own version of reality, have no idea what is going on.

Matthew Cottle turns in a fine performance as Bill, the kindly but slightly dotty local doctor who tries to help Susan but is out of his depth. And there’s lovely work from Stephanie Jacob as the lumpy sister-in-law galumphing round the stage and producing inedible food and undrinkable beverages.

Yes, this is a production which will make you laugh. A lot. It is also likely to make you cry.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/woman-in-mind-2/

Anya Seyton. What a historical novelist she was. Born in 1904 in Manhattan, she died in 1990 in Connecticut.  My attention was first drawn to her by a friend at college who – as almost every reader does – had fallen in love with Katherine. So I read that in the late 1960s and then, gradually the rest of Seyton’s wonderful, varied oeuvre in the years that followed, including Smouldering Fires (1975) which was one of her last.

Unusually for me, and perhaps because I tend to associate novels with where I was when I read them, I can remember exactly when I read The Winthrop Woman (1958). The first time was on a school trip to France in my first teaching job in 1970 when a waggish older colleague, who hadn’t read it, inaccurately dubbed it a “hysterical novel”. Then I came back to it on a family camping trip also to France, when my children were young, in 1984. It’s a meaty brick of a book so maybe, in those busy days, I needed to be away to get a run at it.

Even now I was glad of a five hour rail journey (and back) to Cornwall last week because The Winthrop Woman was the perfect companion. Not that Seyton is remotely difficult to read. She is a compelling, very accessible story teller – through whom, I have learned, over time a great deal of 17th and 18th century American, and other, history.

The Winthrops were a leading family in the migration of settlers to the east coast of America in the early 1600s. They were prosperous in Suffolk but felt the pull of a new life where they could be true puritans – devout believers wishing to cleanse (purify) their lives from anything tainted with Catholicism,  newish conventional Anglicanism or even paganism which involved traditions such as dancing and maypoles.

Elizabeth “Bess” Winthrop, niece of the famous John Winthrop (whose son, Bess’s cousin, was eventually Governor of Connecticut) was a much freer thinker – not least, according to Seyton, because of a ruthless, public beating at her uncle’s hand, back in her Suffolk childhood. Not that John Winthrop is a villain. All Seyton’s characters are roundly multi-dimensional – often misguided and/or misunderstood but rarely evil.

The life which awaits them, once they’ve survived the perilous trip across the Atlantic, is primitive but gradually improves as they build substantial homes and cultivate land – and that’s a huge problem because, of course, native Americans (“Indians”) have been there for millennia and naturally resist invasion and attempts to wipe them out. It struck me more forcibly than ever before on this third reading of The Winthrop Woman that white settlers from England, Holland, France and elsewhere behaved appallingly and indigenous Americans – whose descendants  still protest today –  suffered terrible losses and treatment. Seyton presents it in a nuanced way, though, because Bess is not hostile to Indians, makes a friend of Telaka whom she rescues from slavery and helps Telaka’s brother which turns out to be a life saver.

Bess Winthrop – trying to put a distance between herself and her uncle although she is very fond of his third wife, Margaret – marries three times and bears lots of children, most of whom survive. First there’s the passionate and exciting cousin Harry who dies in a drowning accident. Then there’s the dull but usually harmless Robert Feake who is mentally ill and, in fits and starts, gradually gets worse. Finally she marries (not without untold complications) Will Hallett – a real love match. She first meets him on the trip out from England and he crops up occasionally in her life from there on. She loses everything several times for various reasons and, somehow, finds the strength to start again – repeatedly. In real life Will Hallett, incidentally, did eventually achieve stable prosperity and lived to be 94, an extraordinary age for those times.

If you have yet to discover the joy of Anya Seyton, you have a treat in store. Take The Winthrop Woman on a long flight and prepare to be engrossed, moved, informed and entertained.

Winthrop1

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Hologram and Other Sinister Stories by Stewart Ross.

Venue: The Old Red Lion Theatre. 418 St John Street, London EC1V 4NJ

Credits: By Eric Henry Sanders. Directed by Lydia Parker. Presented by Over Here Theatre Company.

Maybe, Probably

3 stars

Photo: Rah Petherbridge Photography


Structured episodically like a sharply written TV sit com, Eric Henry Sanders’  four-hander is a witty exploration of 30-something first pregnancy.

Kate (Christie Meyer) wins a horse race bet which brings her to the realisation that she would like a baby with her somewhat reluctant husband of twelve years, Guy (Cory English). Quite soon a pregnancy starts and brings with it a great deal of pretty plausible worry, angst and agonising. Meanwhile their friends Hugh (Lance C Fuller) and Zoe (Maria Teresa Creasey), who also happens to be Kate’s boss, have a two year old child, Lola, who horrifies, intrigues and fascinates Kate and Guy. Horse racing runs thematically through the play but doesn’t add much.

 

 

There are some good scenes, mostly duologues, all of them funny as well as occasionally poignant. Kate and Zoe assembling a to-do/to-buy list for Kate is a pleasing example of two actors working responsively together. Meyer has a way of communicating real depth of feeling with just a look or a dip of her head. The scene in which all four of them queue for the cinema in bitter cold is convincing. And I liked the contrast between the intense, truthful Guy and the rather more relaxed self accepting Hugh, who is currently a stay-at-home father.

Maybe, Probably has done well in the USA and is staged here with an American cast so it feels very natural. Although it is set in New York the issues it ranges over are both timeless and universal so we identify with each character and they’re all pretty well defined.  It sits happily in the bijoux intimacy of the Old Red Lion, with audience on two sides too.

The play could, however, be more streamlined. As it is we get a brief semi- black out and scurrying about with props at the end of each short scene which  feels oddly old fashioned and underdeveloped.  And, bizarrely, on press night a small but enthusiastically supportive audience applauded after each little episode. Thus the piece feels fragmented.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/maybe-probably/

 

Venue: Jack Studio Theatre. 410 Brockley Road, London SE4 2DH

Credits: Conceptualised and directed by John Patterson. Produced by Angel Theatre Company.

 

Another Eavesdropping

3 stars

Well, if you want naturalism in a showcase for versatility this is probably the way to go. Based on eavesdroppings collected by the twelve cast members in public places this summer, Another Eavesdropping is verbatim theatre in its purest form – ranging in an hour and three quarters (including interval) from three young  men trying to get an Uber to the irritation of someone carelessly coughing over popcorn in a crowded cinema, an earnest discussion about cheese, and a lot more. Some of the conversation is so mundane that the humour lies in the banality. It’s very finely observed.

It’s effectively a series of vignettes of various lengths with, usually, one of the actors morphing into another character for the next scene so that there’s a casting overlap. Meanwhile the rest of the company sit – in their plain coloured teeshirts and jeans – absolutely still and neutral at the sides.  It is not a play as such. Rather it hops from one situation to another, randomly. Such structure feels reminiscent of a student showcase but that is certainly not a criticism of the standard of acting which is pleasingly high.

Ricky Zalman, for instance, is splendid as a sick, angry, man in a pharmacy ranting at great length about the way his prescription has been prepared. And Georgia Dawson plays against him perfectly as the patient, long suffering pharmacist. Both shine in other roles too – Dawson, for example, cries in a cubicle in the gents while Taylor Pope (excellent at all times) kindly tries to coax her out. Like every single scene in this show, it’s pretty convincing.

I liked Gordana Kostic’s preshow performance as a street busker, soprano soon casually moved on by a bossy official and she is strong as the doctor/social worker ruthlessly trying to manage a mental health patient. Ben Armitage’s opening scene in which he meets a girl he knows and camply talks at her for what feels to us, and to her, for a very long time is nicely done too.

There is a lot of talent in this show and most of it is entertaining but inevitably it feels bitty and that makes it hard work to watch because you have to keep readjusting.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/another-eavesdropping/

Josephine Tey straddled two genres with her The Daughter of Time in 1951: crime fiction meets historical novel. Of course others have done this since in different styles: Ellis Peters and CJ Sansom to name but two. But when I first discovered it (I think someone mentioned it at school) in the 1960s, I was intrigued by the whole concept. I was used to Jean Plaidy and Agatha Christie – but not in the same book.

Time for a revisit. Tey’s detective, Inspector Alan Grant, who features in several novels is flat on his back in hospital with a broken leg. Given a photograph of Richard III by a friend he becomes fascinated by the mystery of the Princes in the Tower. They disappeared and although there was a confession from a man (fall guy?) named Tyrell, the truth has always been elusive. With the help of an outstandingly competent young researcher and several books, Grant  sets out to solve the 400 year old mystery. Were the boys actually killed and, if so, whodunit?

The novel is a good read but never let it be forgotten that this is fiction. Some of the source books Grant relies on are fictional too. And as soon as Thomas More’s writings about Richard were mentioned, alarm bells rang in my head because he was not a contemporary. Grant initially thinks he was but, eventually, realises that More was merely producing malicious hearsay between 1515 and 1518 (Richard died in 1460) for propaganda purposes, and comes to loath “the sainted More”.

Of course Tey manipulates the evidence to convince the reader (if s/he hasn’t got bogged down in Plantaganet family history and lost track) that Richard was a kindly man who couldn’t possibly have given the order to murder his nephews. It’s an interesting thesis. Grant, like all the best fictional detectives, is a pleasant man to spend time with and I love the character of Brent Carradine – a young American. He has persuaded his wealthy manufacturer father that he has to be in London to carry out research in the British Library. Actually he wants to be with his actress girlfriend. Grant’s all absorbing research is just what he needs. He will now write a book and avoid for ever the fate of having to go into the dreaded family business.

There’s now another slant on all this. Grant, Carradine and maybe their  creator Josephine Tey  are convinced that the posthumous presentation of Richard as a crippled monster was Tudor propaganda, well oiled by one William Shakespeare. Then, in 2012, astonishingly, Richard’s remains were found beneath a car park in Leicester. And guess what? The skeleton, of which we all saw photographs, showed clear evidence of scoliosis. So he really was a “hunchback”.  But that, of course, does not make him guilty of infanticide. So the mystery remains.

Tey’s novel is a gripping period piece but, like all historical novels,  needs to be read with cautious scepticism.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Winthrop Woman by Anya Seyton

81H6lsmYavL._AC_UY218_