Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Susan’s Bookshelves: Elizabeth Finch by Julian Barnes

Of course I’ve read Julian Barnes before. I particularly remember enjoying Arthur & George in 2005 during a week in a gîte in Normandy with the extended family. The sun shone gloriously every day and Barnes and I spent a lot of time together under the awning outside the kitchen door. Do other people associate books with the place where they read them?

Elizabeth Finch (2022) is his latest and newly out in paperback so, for once, that’s how I read it rather than via Kindle. The eponymous Elizabeth is a lecturer in culture and civilisation  in whose adult class the narrator, Neil, finds himself when he’s in his thirties. She is inscrutable but fascinating and fearsomely intelligent.  She dresses with frumpy elegance and no one knows whether there has ever been any sort of private life.

In time Neil gets into the habit of having lunch with her once a month and when she dies she leaves him her books and papers. He has, by then, two failed marriages behind him and is dubbed “the king of unfinished projects” by his children. He simply doesn’t know what he should or could do with her archive.

What he eventually does relates to Julian the Apostate (you’ll learn a lot from this novel) and forms the central section of what is effectively a sort of literary triptych. The first and third sections form a narrative  framework for Neil’s one and only finished project. He tells us about his research, getting to know Elizabeth’s brother, and contacting a couple of people who were in the original class with him. In a sense it’s like a Picasso painting because, although it’s all filtered through Neil we get glimpses of Elizabeth from several other perspectives including the time she wrote something for which she was pilloried by the Daily Mirror, a story which got out of hand.

ElizabethF2

It’s an engagingly grown up, hugely well informed novel.  And as someone who has recently published a totally different sort of book about a (real) dead person – The Alzheimer’s Diaries, 2022 – I was stopped in my tracks by this passage:

“To please the dead. Naturally we honour the dead, but in honouring them, we somehow make them even more dead. But to please the dead, this brings them to life again. Does that make sense?”

Yes, Julian/Neil, it certainly does. Thank you.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Cat’s Eye by Margaret Atwood.

 

 

Show: After All These Years

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Jermyn Street Theatre. 16B Jermyn Street, St. James’s, London SW1Y 6ST

Credits: Giles Cole. PRODUCED BY CLOSE QUARTER PRODUCTIONS LTD. AND THEATRE REVIVA! IN ASSOCIATION WITH HOLOFCENER LTD. DIRECTED BY GRAHAM POUNTNEY.

After All These Years

3 stars

Gile’s Cole’s new play, which did well at the Brighton Fringe earlier this year, is an unashamedly traditional comedy of manners with undercurrents. A simple, often funny, four hander it is completely free of gimmickry, special effects, role doubling and fancy sound tracks. Brecht, Pinter and Berkoff are not in the room. And that’s all rather refreshing. Yes, you can still have a perfectly decent, entertaining evening in the theatre without overworked, fashionable “innovation.”

Two couples – all with a background in show business – are now retired, or semi-retired, but restless. The symmetry (another thing I quite liked) of Cole’s play gives us a scene with the two men, one with the two women and ends with them all together, two years later.

The opening scene with Graham Pountney, who also directs, as Charlie and Jeffrey Holland as Alfred is beautifully written and paced.  Two old mates are in a pub, as they are daily, chatting inconsequentially. Both actors use silence beautifully and Pountney speaks volumes just by crossing and uncrossing his legs. Holland does wonderful things with his face. Gradually we learn about their marriages and the tensions between the four of them.

The second scene with the two women Joan (Judy Buxton) and Marianne (Carol Ball) feels slightly more forced and less convincingly natural as it works towards some unexpected revelations. The final scene, however, which establishes that there are going to be major changes in future is pretty lively. Ball eventually finds a tender, delicate warmth in her character and Buxton gets spark into the idea that Joan isn’t quite what she’d always seemed – her Alfred has become very tedious after all.

In many ways it’s Holland’s Alfred who stands out in this show. He forgets words all the time and then, during the two year “gap”, has a mild stroke. The resulting slight speech defect and balance issues are immaculately well observed. And we end up sympathising more with him than anyone else.

First published by Sardines https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/after-all-these-years/

Show: The Railway Children

Society: OVO

Venue: The Roman Theatre of Verulamium. Bluehouse Hill, St Albans, Hertfordshire AL3 6AE

Credits: An adaptation of the E.Nesbitt novel by Mike Kenny. Produced by OVO. Directed by Scott le Crass.

The Railway Children

3 stars

Mike Kenny’s 2010 adaptation of E Nesbit’s famous 1906 novel has rapidly become a modern classic. I’ve seen it several times in the hands of various directors and companies and – tender, realistic, nostalgic but with plenty of bite – it’s always a sure fire winner. And Scott le Crass’s version for OVO with 6 adults and six children (alternating teams) is, of course, an enjoyable evening’s theatre.

It’s an ingeniously low budget show – the unrolling of a huge train banner to suggest the near miss railway crash is a brilliant idea. And the upstage gantry – part of all this season’s OVO shows at the Roman Theatre – works perfectly as a railway bridge. Less successful is the use of trunks and suitcases as a moveable set. Yes, they evoke the whole idea of trains and travel and work well enough as, say, tables or fallen rocks but there is far too much lifting and waving them around the stage for no apparent reason. It becomes a distracting irritant.

Kenny’s script gives us the three children looking back and telling their story as adults – often disagreeing about the details. That gets round their being adults but acting like children as neatly in this production as it always does. Charlotte Ware is warm and compelling as adolescent Bobbie although I was unconvinced by the “flirtation” with the broken legged boy in the tunnel because he’s half her size and at least five years younger. Will Kirkham gets all the right boyishness, decency and vulnerability that Peter needs. Best of the three, however, is Grace Bassett as Phyllis, the youngest Railway Child. Bassett pouts, stamps her foot, puts her oar in and then smiles through it all. It’s an outstanding performance. I really believed she was every nine year old I’ve ever known.

Charlie Clee plays all the male roles with a nice range of voices and gaits. And I liked the doubling joke when he is suddenly thrown the stethoscope and told he has to be the doctor and he says “But I haven’t got any more voices!” He then finds one – obviously  Emma Wright packs gravitas, and anxiety along with love for her children and yearning for her husband into Mother and Josie Rattigan adeptly plays all the other adult female roles with lots of good Yorkshire voice where required.

I wish, though, that more time had been spent training the juvenile ensemble to use radio mics properly. One of them occasionally gets a line or two to speak and they’re hard to hear which gives the show an amateurish feel at those moments. They could have been rehearsed more fully in stage presence too although their running through the “tunnel” is a strong moment.

My other reservation is Tom Cagnoni’s music which is both clumsy and bolted on. This is not a film – familiar as we all are with a famous film of this very story. We don’t need sudden (miscued?) bursts of incongruous, loud music. Michael Bird’s sound design, though, complete with steam train noises is quite effective.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-railway-children-4/

Show: Pride and Prejudice

Society: Illyria (professional)

Venue: Cranford Road, Dartford, Kent DA1 1JP

Credits: By Jane Austen

Pride and Prejudice

4 stars

Now in its thirty-second touring season, Illyria has developed and honed to perfection a very distinctive and outstandingly nippy way of working in the open-air. Oliver Gray’s version of Pride and Prejudice (which I have seen before) dates from 2003, uses five actors, mostly Jane Austen’s words and masses of high octane energy.

This talented bunch start by selling programmes dressed in simple. loosely Regency, cotton undergarments, and then spend the next two and a half hours hopping in and out of bonnets, frocks, coats, shawls and hat at top speed.  Pat Farmer’s costumes are a stroke of genius. Perhaps they’d like to let me know some time where I can buy a gorgeous statement long double breasted overcoat and top hat like the one Mr Darcy wears – and makes quite a power statement with.

Edward Simpson is curmudgeonly but very attractive as plain speaking Mr Bennet. He is also hilarious as the revolting Lady Catherine de Bourgh, benign as Mr Gardiner and a good, back-to-the-audience Darcy double in That Coat – among other things. It’s an extraordinarily busy show. Anyone who’s not actually playing a character has to be the coconut-clicking horse in one of the numerous carriage journeys.

One neat way of ensuring that we really hear Austen’s sardonic voice is to make Elizabeth also into the main narrator and Nicola Foxfield (alongside occasional appearances as a Brummy housekeeper) does this well. Her Lizzy is feisty and intelligent but also warmly human. She conveys the distress when she hears of Lydia’s devastating escapade very convincingly. And of course she reacts to the outrageous Darcy with hilarious fury before, eventually, we reach the conclusion we all know is coming complete with a good joke about the lake at Pemberley also being good for swimming in.

Sarah Pugh’s Mrs Bennet (among lots of other roles) is a joy. She has the obsessive nervous energy and general shallow dimness perfectly – hilarious to watch but utterly impossible if one had to live with it. And Rosie Zeidler’s Lydia really dialls up the likeness between them. Zeidler is very good too at the contrasting, sober, sensible pragmatic Charlotte Lucas and as Jane, the eldest daughter whose future hangs in the balance for so long.

Chris Wills is a fine actor. His Darcy – all charismatic haughtiness and outrageous, disdainful prejudice – is spot on and his oily-voiced Mr Collins an enjoyable contrast. Dancing as Mr Collins –  bowing, scraping, and bobbing up and down is lovely comedy. And, he’s good as the caddish Wickham.

Yes, there are lots of very enjoyable performances in this show which really runs with Jane Austen’s satire rather than trying to reinvent it. And it sits neatly on a simple open air set consisting of a big backing fan, a couple of flexibly used garden benches and two big costume boxes. I’m always delighted, moreover, to see  good quality live theatre reaching a pleasingly big audience in a setting such as Dartford Central Park at affordable prices.

 

 First published by Sardines:

Show: The Sound of Music

Society: Chichester Festival Theatre (professional)

Venue: Chichester Festival Theatre. Oaklands Park, Chichester PO19 6AP

Credits: Music by Richard Rodgers. Lyrics by Oscar Hammerstein II. Book by Howard Lindsay and Russel Crouse. Suggested by The Trapp Family Singers by Maria Augusta Trapp.

The Sound of Music

5 stars

Photo: Manuel Harlan


Rarely have I enjoyed a musical as much as I did Adam Penford’s fresh, vibrant account of Rogers and Hammerstein’s best known and final collaboration. It’s respectfully traditionalist but feels sparklingly new minted.

Gina Beck’s Maria is naïve and feisty, humble but passionate and joyful but troubled. She makes the part completely her own – and there is no sense that she has modelled it on That Actress in That Film which still usually tops the charts for the most viewings of any film ever. Moreover Beck’s voice is sweet, strong, beautifully modulated and of course her diction is perfect. If you can’t hear every word of “The Lonely Goatherd” then it flops. Here it is a show stopper.

Edward Harrison gives us an ideal Georg – initially worried, bereaved, lonely and hiding behind fierceness but eventually healed by Maria’s presence. He does the transition effectively and I loved the final moments when, every inch a loving father, he takes Gretl (Felicity Walton on press night – delightful) on his back and the von Trapp family sets off up the steps through the dark auditorium which represents the mountains to Switzerland.

Of course there are two teams of children  and what a lovely, appropriate idea to bring the non-performing team on at the press night curtain call. The team I saw exuded talent and are a fabulous credit to Lizzi Gee’s choreography – moving with impeccable slickness and singing with accuracy as well as charm. Sasha Watson-Lobo as Louisa stands out particularly: dancing effervescently and singing with charismatic gusto.

Another great strength in this production is the sung harmony, especially from the female ensemble as nuns. Musical Director Matt Samer (tucked away with a fine 14 piece band behind and above the stage) makes sure that we hear every harmonic shift and enjoyed every chord and cadence.

Robert Jones’s set uses revolving flats and a rising desk and chair to evoke different parts of the von Trap villa and Abbess’s office against a craggy mountain backdrop. As we all know, though, this is 1938 and Austria is being annexed.  Hayley Egan’s projection of real Third Reich footage at the top, when the mood changes, is chillingly evocative – as are the Nazi flags carried through the audience to the stage.

While it is true that one or two of the principals don’t sing quite as well as Beck and Harrison (although Penelope Woodman does well as Frau Schmidt), in general this is a faultless show. I might have given it four stars but for one thing – the reaction of my 47 year old plus one. He knew the film, of course, but had never seen the show live although he is in general a pretty seasoned theatre goer.  He was in tears for most of the first half  –  deeply moved by the sheer power of it all. Any show that can do that to a middle-aged man of the world more than earns the final star in my view.

In short, buy a ticket before it sells out. And take plenty of tissues.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-sound-of-music-8/

I’ve been keen on the operas of WS Gilbert and Arthur Sullivan for most of my life. It began with The Mikado at the school my father was teaching when I was five after which I sang “Tit Willow” as a party piece to anyone who would listen. My sister got the same bug because she grew up in the same household surrounded by G&S LPs. Delightfully my elder son, Lucas, who’s a very competent semi-pro musician on top of the day job, has got it too.

He and I were chatting at his home recently late one evening over a glass of wine after he’d conducted a performance of The Sorcerer in a Cambridgeshire village barn. Somehow we got on to George Grossmith who sang most of the bass baritone roles in the original G&S  productions. Martin Savage played him rather well in Mike Leigh’s 1999 film, Topsy Turvey.  Lucas has sung most of those parts – often known as the Grossmith roles –  too. I’ve seen him as Koko, The Lord Chancellor and all the rest. Well, we agreed that neither of us knew anything  about Grossmith beyond his having sung the roles and written a timeless and famous comic novel called The  Diary of a Nobody with his brother Weedon. “Surely” I said, reaching for my phone, “Someone must have written a biography?” Indeed someone  had: Tony Joseph in 1982. Of course nearly 40 years later it’s out of print but there are plenty of second hand copies available via Amazon. I bought one on the spot.

Born in 1847, Grossmith came from a theatrically inclined family. His father performed as did his grandfather. Young George was clever, funny and well educated. He worked as a journalist (court reporter) before being gradually sucked in to the theatre. He met Gilbert in 1877 who offered him the role of John Wellington Wells in The Sorcerer. He was slight, had impeccable diction, a gift for comedy and an unremarkable singing voice. He found first nights so nerve-wracking that it affected his performance.

He stayed with the D’Oyly Carte Opera Company for seven years, became very famous, made many friends in high places including royalty before branching out on his own. He wrote hundreds of songs the most famous of which is “See Me Dance the Polka” and would do a one man performance from the piano including sketches and songs – he toured Britain and America with these shows and was commercially successful. Meanwhile he had married, was happy and the father of four children, most of whom eventually followed him into the business. Their descendants have many letters and papers which provided much of the source material for Tony Joseph’s book. Although the style is a bit stilted in places it’s very well researched and detailed.

No one really knows how much imput Weedon had in The Diary of a Nobody. He certainly illustrated it. He was a trained artist who could never quite make ends meet commercially so he too, went into stage work. Joseph thinks that even if Weedon didn’t do much of the writing he certainly provided a number of the ideas for the hilariously dead pan doings of Charles Pooter.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Elizabeth Finch by Julian Barnes

 

 

Show: Much Ado About Nothing

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Leicester Square Theatre. 6 Leicester Place, London WC2H 7BX

Credits: by William Shakespeare. Presented by Sh!t-faced Shakespeare®

Much Ado About Nothing

4 stars

Photo: AB Photography


The fourth version of Much Ado About Nothing I’ve seen this year, and the third in the last twelve days, is an antidote to all the others.

It’s an irreverent send-up predicated on the idea that the actress playing Beatrice (Flora Sowerby at the performance I saw – the cast rotates) is drunk or “sh!t-faced”. She therefore messes up the show with a lot of asides, falling about and disinhibition. Think – if this company’s modus operandi is new to you – Horrible Histories spliced with The Play That Goes Wrong and blended with an energetic adult pantomime.

Sowerby is a gifted comic actor and uses her height – nearly six foot of it – to great effect. She also exudes charisma along with the daftness and has the audience eating out of her hand. And the other five actors work seamlessly with her. It must be fun to develop a show like this. I wonder who came up with the line “Refrain from mounting my codpiece”?

But it’s a bit of an irritant that every time Beatrice swears – and there’s a lot of that –  the audience falls about laughing. Yes, it sounds modern and therefore incongruous but actually these words are centuries old and Shakespeare knew them as well as anyone. Witness the “country matters” joke in Hamlet. It’s funny at first but for me it quite quickly wears thin. It’s a show about drink, in a sense. Perhaps I should have drunk more while I watched it because I thought the chlamydia joke was over-egged too. Trouble is that at heart I don’t find the British obsession with drink and drunkenness funny but that’s a personal reaction. It doesn’t mean that this isn’t a fine show of its type. After all they do – sort of – wind their way through Much Ado and even speak some Shakespeare occasionally.

There’s a compere (Beth-Louise Priestley on press night) who acts as a quasi stage manager and pantomime-style liaison with the audience, along with some rather contrived audience participation: It’s the sort of thing which grates on me but that’s to do with personal taste and not a criticism of the show.

It is, of course, much harder to do something like this than it is to do a Shakespeare play “straight” even with a heavily cut text. You have to convince the audience it’s all spontaneous while at the same time keeping it carefully under control – quite an art and this company do that extremely well which why I’m giving it four stars. This is a classic case of a reviewer having to separate her own likes and dislikes from assessment of quality.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/much-ado-about-nothing-15/

I heard Kit de Waal talking to Michael Berkley on Radio 3’s Private Passions recently, having not come across her before, I was so taken with who she is and what’s she’s done that I immediately bought her debut novel, My Name is Leon, which was published in 2016.  Private Passions quite often has this effect on me.

I read it in 24 hours, totally hooked and devastated by the plausible inevitability of its tragedy. Leon is the mixed race son of a totally inadequate white mother: drugs, drink, promiscuity and mental health issues.  Now she has a new, white baby and Leon, aged eight, feels he has to care for them both. Of course, it goes horribly wrong. Social Services arrive and do their best. Appallingly, in time that “best” includes finding a white family to adopt  baby Jake but accepting that there is “no hope” for Leon. You feel his agony, guilt, anxiety and the yearning to be with his brother, on every single page.

The interesting thing is that everyone Leon encounters – his mother’s friend upstairs, the woman who fosters him and her sister, each social worker he meets, the friends he makes at the allotments –  are good people in their way although many have issues of their own. Even his mother loves him while eventually accepting that she doesn’t know why, but she can’t look after him.  No one wants Leon to be unhappy.  Yet from where he is standing (and eavesdropping)  everyone is lying, breaking promises and letting him down – so he lies too. And steals. And truants. And vandalises. And runs away. It’s a gut wrenching story which  every social worker and teacher will recognise. Eventually – no spoilers – he gets a bit of stability. It’s not perfect but it will do.

Mixed race herself, Kit de Waal’s origins are unequivocally working class. She grew up in the Irish community in Birmingham. She has served as a magistrate and on adoption panels. She knows, really knows, the world she’s writing about. That accounts for the extraordinary ring of truthfulness in this compelling novel. It’s fiction but every word of it is authentic.

The other thing which impressed me enormously is the way in which she gets into Leon’s mind. She knows what he’s thinking. She understands – and so, therefore does the reader  – everything that Leon does even when, on the face of it, he appears to be rude and difficult to the people who have to deal with, and look after, him.  It’s written in the third person but entirely presented from Leon’s point of view. This novel should be compulsory reading for everyone training as a social worker or wanting to. I’d insist every foster parent, teacher, magistrate, police officer and policy maker read it too.

Leon2 (1)

So determined is Kit de Waal, incidentally, that working class people and those from minority backgrounds should have a voice in fiction and the world of books that, as soon as she had secured a publishing deal for My Name is Leon she launched the Kit de Waal Creative Writing Scholarship. It provides a fully funded place for a student to do the Creative Writing MA at Birkbeck.  Her own achievement – getting this impressive novel published in 2016 when she was in her mid fifties – makes her a pretty powerful role model.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: George Grossmith by Tony Joseph