Press ESC or click the X to close this window

The Clothes They Stood Up In (Susan Elkin reviews)

Venue: Nottingham Playhouse. Wellington Circus, Nottingham NG1 5AF

Credits: By Alan Bennett. Adapted by Adrian Scarborough

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performance Date: 15/09/2022

The Clothes They Stood Up In

4 stars

All photos: The Other Richard


Alan Bennett is past master of insouciant incongruity – and trademark eloquent silences which are often hilarious and sometimes poignant. It’s slightly odd to see a Bennett story adapted by a different writer but I can confirm that Adrian Scarborough has more than nailed it. My only slight gripe is that Bennett’s novella of the same name dates from 1997. Scarborough has made some attempt to update it with references to Mary Berry, not being in the EU, digital TV and the like but it isn’t always consistent bcause we also get polaroid photographs and Kiri te Kanawa (now 78 and retired)  in live performance. Thus the play doesn’t always feel historically quite secure but it doesn’t matter much.

Maurice Ransome (Adrian Scarbrough) and his wife Rosemary (Sophie Thompson) have been to Covent Garden. Cue for several glorious Cos fan tutte sound bites. When they get home to their flat they discover that, in their absence it has been burgled: emptied, stripped bare so that they are left with just the titular clothes on their backs. Even the lavatory roll has gone which allows Bennett the opportunity for a few of his characterstic bodily funtions jokes. He has been accused, with some justification, of an obsession with excrement.

The unlikely plot which follows gives us – with Bennett’s unique blend of wistfulness and laughter – the chance to explore the Ransomes’ marriage, the significance of possessions, what friendship really means and a great deal more.

Scarborough and Thompson are magnificent together. He is, of course, insufferable with his bossy, pedantic, humourless, bigotry,  and self-absorption. Most of us would have put arsenic in his tea long ago. But his wife is loyal, dutiful and long suffering so she doesn’t do that. Thompson does a good line in brittle dappiness, deep underneath which is an independent woman who’d really quite like a life. She has a way of communicating – and getting laughs – by just looking. And everyone in the audience knows exactly what she’s thinking.

Also outstanding in this production are the three support actors: Ned Costello, Charlie de Melo and Natasha Magigi. Between them they play a whole raft of meaty cameo roles with oodles of versatility and impressive voice work. Magigi, for instance, delights as the overbearing, hands-on (literally) counsellor. De Melo’s Mr Anwar, local shopkeeper is warm and caring in stark contrast to Scarborough’s character. And Costello, who graduated from LAMDA, only last year is definitely one to watch. He pops up in so many convincing roles you keep blinking and checking that it’s the same actor.

A word of praise too for Robert Jones’s ingenious set which, using advancing and receding hydraulics, gives us the Ransomes’ sitting room in three different guises along with several smaller roll-on, roll-off scene evokers.

It’s well worth a trip to Nottingham.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-clothes-they-stood-up-in/

 

Show: The Two Popes

Society: Rose Theatre Kingston (professional)

Venue: Rose Theatre. 24-26 High Street, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT1 1HL

Credits: By Anthony McCarten. Rose Theatre in association with Everyman Theatre, Cheltenham and Oxford Playhouse present a Royal & Derngate, Northampton and Anthology Theatre co-production in association with Tara Finney Productions.

The Two Popes

4 stars

In 2013 Pope Benedict shook the world – particularly theticularly the Catholic world with its 1.36 billion followers – by resigning. No pope had done this for six centuries. The reason is a mystery. There were rumours of ill health but he’s still alive today, aged 95. Or was it political? Benedict is an ultra, backward inclined traditionalist. Could he see that there had to be a change and that if he resigned his successor would almost certainly be the relaxed, liberal, commonsensible, approachable Cardinal Bergoglio of Argentina – today still very much in charge at the Vatican as Pope Francis?

Enter Anthony McCarten’s intelligent, neatly crafted play based on his 2019 book The Pope. First staged at Royal and Derngate, Northampton in 2019, this is its first London run.

Anton Lesser as Benedict is sardonic, authoritative and oozing white robed charisma. That’s why the informal scene when, more or less in mufti, he visits his friend Sister Brigitta (Lynsey Beauchamp)  for supper and TV drama works so well – the incongruous contrast  means that we meet a wholly rounded character. And she is the first person to whom he confides his thoughts about possible resignation.

Nicholas Woodeson gives us a powerful contrast in Bergoglio: “I’m an Argentinian. Tango and football are compulsory.” At 75, he too wants to retire and travels to Rome to discuss it with the Pope – thus allowing McCarten to make long scenes between the two men the backbone of his play. They disagree about almost everything: gay rights, abortion, birth control and, most serious of all, the condoning of abuse by Catholic priests. Equally, as two old men who worship the same god they have much in common too. And both are from backgrounds they would have done well to distance themselves from much earlier: the Pope from Nazi Germany and Bergoglio from the Junta in Argentina.

Dramatically, none of this is heavy or static and there are a surprising number of laughs in the play which manages to be moving, funny and thoughtful all at the same time.  McCarten’s dialogue is as sharp as a razor blade and Lesser and Woodeson – both actors at the top of their game – know exactly how to spin off each other to spellbinding effect.  And I liked Duncan McLean’s video projections which use images on a huge proscenium frame atmospherically to evoke various rooms in the Vatican – and at one point, noisy colourful Argentina.

There’s a nice performance from Leaphia Darko as the sister who assists Bergoglio and questions him in Argentina but Malcolm James and Angela Jones, billed as “ensemble” are oddly underused

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-two-popes/

Show: Antigone

Society: Regent’s Park Open Air Theatre (professional productions)

Venue: Regent’s Park Open-air Theatre. The Regent’s Park, Inner Circle, London NW1 4NU

Credits: By Inua Ellams after Sophocles. Music composed by Michael ‘Mikey J’ Asante MBE. Co-directed by Max Webster and Jo Tyabji.

Antigone

4 stars


Antigone, written nearly two and a half millennia ago, is a political play about power. It’s also about family issues, tensions and conflicts of loyalty. You’d be hard put to find anything more searingly, timelessly topical especially in the hands of playwright/poet Inua Ellams. It took a few minutes to find its feet on press night but thereafter was pretty riveting.

Antigone (Zainab Hasan) is part of a 21 Century British Pakistani Muslim family whose uncle, Creon (Tony Jayawardena) becomes Prime Minister early in the play. A shootout leads to the death of Antigone’s police officer brother, Eteocles (Abe Jarman), a state of emergency declared and the body of the executed Polyneices (Nadeem Islam) detained indefinitely – a dreadful fate for a Muslim for whom burial rituals are crucial. Creon meanwhile, every inch a right wing Tory politician immaculately observed by Jayawardena, insists repeatedly that the law (which he has changed, of course) must come first. That means that no imam will bury Polyneices or be seen to sympathise with an extremist, however much Antigone pleads with her uncle. Of course neither Sophocles nor Ellams gives us a happy ending. As some wag behind me remarked at the end in rich Estuary “It’s Greek drama innit?”

Ellams’s language is richly poetic although most of the dialogue is in prose. I really liked Antigone’s opening speech – full of passionate rhetoric –  when she’s trying to prevent the closure of the youth centre she’s been helping to run and the moving poem Ellams gives her at the opening of Act 2 when she’s in prison. Hasan is splendid in this role. Her everyday London accent is very natural and she is totally convincing as a feisty young woman with passions, determination, love for her cousin, Haemon (Oliver Johnstone – good) and a powerful sense of right and wrong.

But the real star of this show is the chorus. What do you do with a Greek Chorus in a 21 Century play? Ellams repeatedly reworks them as young people in the youth centre, a posse of paparazzi, feminist groups, street demonstrators and much more. They rhythmically spit out angry, thoughtful or apposite words (often in iambic pentameter) and are spikily choreographed by Carrie-Anne Ingrouille to Michael ‘Mikey J’ Asante’s arrestingly dramatic music. It provides slick and very engrossing backbone to this interesting, gripping version of the play.

Welcome too is the casting of Islam as Polyneices. He is deaf and signs as he speaks as do some other cast members while he’s on stage. It’s a pleasing performance and adds yet another dimension to the drama – as well as making a fine production more accessible.

 

 First published by Sardines http://ardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/antigone-3/
 All photos: Helen Murray

Even if you don’t care for fantasy (and that’s me) it is inarguable that CS Lewis’s seven Narnia books grabbed millions of children when they were first published in the 1950s. And they still exert timeless magic. They’ve never been out of print. There have been countless spin-off TV versions, stage adaptations and films. People are still intrigued by Narnia. And that, inevitably perhaps, means curiosity about its creator.

Patti Callahan’s novel, published last year, is effectively a child-friendly biography of CS Lewis wrapped up in a fictional quest for information.

This is the thrust: Megs is a talented maths student who has just started at Somerville College, Oxford in the early 1950s when this would have been rare for a young woman. Back home in Worcester, her eight year old brother, George, is dying of a heart condition.  He wants to know “where Narnia comes from” so Megs sets off to find out. Lewis, is after all, an Oxford academic and she contrives a meeting with him and his brother Warnie, who cheerfully befriend her. Jack (CS Lewis’s name of choice) gradually tells her his life story which she packages up in the form of stories and relays to George who gradually comes to understand that narratives, such as The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe don’t come from any one place. They are a complex melange of life’s experiences seasoned with lots and lots of imagination.  In Lewis’s case, that includes a lonely childhood of frequent illness in a room with a big wardrobe, finding the town of Narni on a map of Italy, attending a dreadful boarding school, front line service in the first world war, taking in evacuees in the second world war and converting from atheism to Christianity

The framing device is, perhaps, a bit clumsy and certainly sentimental but Callahan is very good on the significance of stories. Myths are full of truths. We use stories to explore and explain things we don’t understand including our own pasts. And Megs who initially sees fiction and mathematics are being polar opposites eventually realises that good mathematicians need to be imaginative and creative and that equations are just another form of story.

I thought at first that the account of Lewis’s time at Wynyard School was an absurdly over egged take on British boarding school life by an American author who had read too much Jane Eyre, David Copperfield and Tom Brown’s School Days. It seems I was wrong. A bit of research showed me that Lewis left diaries detailing just how cruel it really was. The headmaster ended up detained in a psychiatric hospital.

Nonetheless Callahan’s period detail is shaky in places. It is most unlikely for example, that Padraig’s father’s car would have had a radio at this date. And the notion of Megs, a deferential, quiet female student, walking into a pub on her own and buying a drink in the early fifties is laughable.  And occasionally I was irritated by weak writing, shoddily edited. How could anyone have allowed “… he found every book on Norse mythology he could find”  to stand?

The shifts from first to third person narration, although currently fashionable, are a bit odd too.

In general, though, this is a reasonably worthwhile take on a well worn subject. Thank you to the friend who drew my attention to it when she spotted me asserting my dislike of fantasy on Facebook.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey

A few weeks ago I had lunch with a someone who used to be a colleague and has morphed into a friend. My friend is now in her late eighties and hailed originally from Chicago. When we repaired to her house for post-lunch coffee/tea, I noticed a big fat paperback on her garden table, her bookmark tucked in at about the half way point. “Have you read that?” she asked when she saw me looking. “It’s really good”. So I sat there on her patio and ordered it on my phone – partly out of politeness to her.

I have now read it and can confirm that it is the most riveting read I’ve enjoyed in a very long time. Although there’s nothing childish about the content, in some ways the whole experience reminded me of childhood because I kept sneaking off into corners to read just a few more pages and carrying on reading long after I should have been going something else. I could almost hear my father’s exasperated voice saying “For goodness sake, Susan, put that wretched book down and lay the table/ get ready to go out/come and talk to Grandma [or whatever]”.

Published in 2008 the book is a first person account of a woman whose husband became President of the USA in the early years of the 21st century. We know that from the beginning because she is unravelling her life story retrospectively while dropping hints about her present life. The reader, of course, pants with curiosity and compulsively turns the pages, wanting to know how a woman whose origins are so ordinary ended up in the White House.

Alice grew up modestly in small town Winsconsin influenced by her feisty grandmother who moved in after the death of her father. Eventually – a dreadful accident nothwithstanding – she becomes a pretty contented elementary school librarian with a couple of relationships behind her. Then she meets Charlie Blackwell and, thereby forfeiting a long term friendship, falls in love with him.

Now Blackwell – son of the former state governor and with one of his several brothers in politics – is not George Bush the younger but there are similarities and the time is more or less the latter’s era. Blackwell is bumptious, often outrageous and exasperating  but very loveable, vulnerable even, behind the scenes, There’s a faint hint of Trump and even Boris Johnson although I doubt that 14 years ago when this book was written Sittenfeld was thinking of either. Eventually – via various stepping stones Blackwell is elected President. And, of course, it’s a Republican ticket.

Alice’s sympathies are much more liberal but she promises never to disagree with him in public. Later that gets difficult when policies and people threaten to overturn Roe v Wade and make abortion much more difficult (another bit of extraordinary prescience given what has happened in real life in recent months) and the war in Iraq is killing thousands of Americans.

Sittenfeld is very good indeed about the day to day problems and pleasures faced by any First Lady. The novel is also full of insights about how it would be to be continuously surrounded by aides, assistants, advisers, security people and all the rest of it. And it’s all contrasted by with her other, earlier life in Riley where she used to drive her own car, encourage children to read and visit the grocery store whenever she liked.

It’s a huge novel full of enticing sub plots too: her grandmother’s friendship with a doctor in Chicago and Alice’s first visit to the Big City, for instance, her aborted friendship with Dena, her new friendship with her sister-in-law Jadey and much more.

But I think what I liked most about this novel is its plausibility and naturalness. Yes, it’s fiction but nothing happens or is said which isn’t totally believable. And every single character is rounded and recognisable even as they change with the passing years.

Soon I shall read Sittenfeld’s latest: a what-if? novel called Rodham (2020) which presents Hillary Clinton as she would have been if she’d never met and married Bill. I bet my octogenarian friend has read that too by now.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Once Upon a Wardrobe by Patti Callahan

American Wife

Society: Arrows & Traps (professional)

Venue: The Jack Studio Theatre, The Brockley Jack. 410 Brockley Road, London SE4 2DH

Credits: by Ross McGregor. Produced by Arrows & Traps Theatre

Persephone

4 stars

All images: Davor @ The Ocular Creative


So what happened to all those Greek gods and goddesses once people stopped believing in them? They became stories and are therefore here, among us every day living in a world of climate destruction, dog shelters, the Internet and home schooling. And as such they still matter. A lot.  That is the central point of Ross McGregor’s fiercely intelligent, compelling reworking of the Persephone story which is often, incidentally, very funny.  And what a timeless story it is – a girl finding her feet in the world, leaving a clingy mother for a sexier option and eventually reaching a time-share compromise.

All four actors are very strong and work cohesively together to deliver this immaculately well written piece, directed by the playwright so everyone is pulling firmly in the same direction. They are, though, four sharply different characters. Beatrice Vincent is outstanding as Hestia, goddess of hearth, home and family. She speaks eloquently even with her eyes and does wonderfully evocative, but subtle things with her hands. I couldn’t take my eyes off her during another actor’s long speech throughout which she wanted to stop the speaker but couldn’t quite manage to do so. She finds anxiety, awkwardness, earnestness, passion, tearfulness in her complex character and her fingers twitch when she’s angry. Bravo.

Cornelia Baumann gives us a forthright, furious, sweary, embittered Demeter slightly overdone at the start but her performance settles to become believable and we gradually see past the brittle carapace. This is a single mother who loses her only daughter and she does terror and despair well in this play which rests mostly on mini monologues and statements rather than on dialogue. Goodness knows, incidentally, how a male playwright knows post natal vaginal surgery feels “like opening an umbrella inside you” but the accuracy made the audience gasp even as it chuckled. And of course Demeter was Goddess of the Harvest so there’s a powerful – uncompromising –  environmental message in much of what she says and a solution to all our ills. It’s called a tree.

Daisy Farrington plays Cora – who later renames herself Persephone – the truculent daughter who runs off to Eastbourne with Hades who runs a dog rescue oufit called “The Underworld for the Underdog”. Later, in glamorous frock she goes to stay with her controlling father Zeus – a splendid performance from Jackson Wright. Wright first appears “one million and nine days earlier,” according to Laurel Marks’s backscreen video projection, bare chested, long fair hair flowing and oozing entitled charisma. Later he is neatly pony-tailed and be-suited as a man who pretends to be charmingly reasonable but is, of course, a bully who has raped lots of women – so there’s a court case sitting at the centre of this complicated narrative.

Towards the end comes a long speech from Jackson – angry and rapidly delivered at fortissimo. It’s a diatribe against modern life and it lasts several minutes as he works himself up and up. I found it hard to resist applauding when he eventually reached the end. I’m not sure how much this Sir Humphrey moment adds to the play but it’s a terrific bit of theatre. It won’t be long before it turns up as an audition speech – or party piece.

This is the third play by Ross McGregor, artistic director of Arrows and Traps I’ve seen this year and yes, Persephone is just as good as Holst: The Music in the Spheres and Payne: The Stars are Fire.    He and they have proved themselves a reliable source of high quality theatre for thoughtful adults. What’s next?

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/persephone/

I read Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, the first in the series, in 1997 because people were beginning to talk about it. And, always professionally interested in children’s and YA fiction, I was curious.

I could see that it would appeal to many people but fantasy leaves me pretty cold. I get irritated by broomsticks, dragons and spells and yearn to read about real people in real situations so I was quite glad when I’d finished it –  duty done. Later I had to read a couple of the later titles for work reasons and reacted in the same way. And I saw (sort of) the first film – without the sound track – on the flight home from a press trip to Egypt and that was quite enough. I’ve never seen the stage show either.

Recently, like many people, I’ve thought a lot about JK Rowling (whose adult crime fiction as Robert Galbraith I adore, by the way) and how much she’s done to make the world a better place. She got a whole generation of children reading avidly at same time as the Internet grew which was an extraordinary accomplishment. She has given a great deal of money to charity. Indirectly the films based on her books created life changing opportunities for the children who starred in them –  the same three who, as adults, are now all multimillionaires but who decry Ms Rowling for her attachment to free speech.

From where I’m standing, she has said nothing remotely unreasonable and even if she had I would still defend her right to express her views. Instead there has been public vilification and death threats.

Reflecting on all this decided me that perhaps, 25 years on, I should revisit Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone and see what I think in 2022 – partly, but not entirely, as a public demonstration of support for its author.

The first thing that struck me is that it was successful because it’s so familiar. We start with orphaned, misfit Harry as an abused, unwanted, unhappy child in the home of foul relatives – it’s the world of Cinderella, Jane Eyre, Snow White, James and the Giant Peach, David Copperfield and many more. Straightaway, we have someone to root for in horror. Then it’s off to boarding school with nice staff, nasty staff, nice students and nasty ones and suddenly it’s Malory Towers, Tom Brown’s Schooldays or almost anything by Angela Brazil. And yet – Jill Murphy’s The Worst Witch books notwithstanding – Rowling puts a totally original spin on all this. The boarding school details (names of lessons, books etc) are thought out in convincing detail and the plotting is tight with a good crime novel style twist at the end.

It’s also clever at another level. I chortled at the use of Latin in names such as Voldemort and the Hogwarts motto.  The names in general are good too, in a quasi-Dickensian way: Hagrid, Filch, Snape and the rest. Then there are literary allusions which no primary school reader is going to notice. A vicious cat called Mrs Norris, named after the nastiest woman Jane Austen ever created (Mansfield Park) is satisfying, for example.  And Fluffy, the drooling terrifying three-headed dog is obviously modelled on Cerberus.

Rowling also understands, as Enid Blyton did, what children want to dream of – and taste.  When they sit down to Christmas dinner it consists of “a hundred fat, roasted turkeys, mountains of roast and boiled potatoes, platters of fat chipolatas, tureens of buttered peas, silver boats of thick, rich gravy and cranberry sauce …” I suspect she’s chuckling again and that this is an oblique, tongue-in-cheek reference to lashings of ginger beer.

And what fun she must have had with the devising of Quidditch. With its arcane, eccentric rules it’s reminiscent of many a British game (cricket, golf and polo for instance) but totally different from any of them. No wonder it’s gone on to have an almost independent  life of its own.

Another stroke of near genius was to write a seven volume school series following Harry right through secondary school with the books getting more complex each year – so that the reader who is 11 at the start grows up with the series. It’s almost a course in reading development.

In short, I enjoyed this open-minded reread more than I expected to and I unequivocally admire the achievement. Nonetheless I shan’t be going on to read the other six. There are too many books about real life calling for my attention.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: American Wife by Curtis Sittenfeld

Show: The Seagull

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: The Bridge House Theatre. Bridge House, 2 High Street, London SE20 8RZ

Credits: Anton Chekhov adapted and directed by Luke Adamson

The Seagull

3 stars

I was delighted to see this production because the cast are fomer ALRA students. Their school suddenly closed earlier this year leaving the students course-less although some have continued at Rose Bruford. Bridge House Theatre offered to stage what is effectively a graduate show with these ten students in the hope that it might act as a springboard and help them to get representation.

Luke Adamson’s adaptation is very fluid and reduces the running time to 85 minutes without interval. It is now set in the 1920s (lovely vintage frocks) and apparently moved to Britain although this is confusingly inconsistent. Characters talk of going to London (instead of Moscow) but also of moving to Europe, for example. Masha (Leila Wetton – suitably brittle) snorts cocaine instead of swigging alcohol. There are a lot of references to Shaw and Wilde as having written plays to aspire and quips about experimental theatre. These are good ideas but nothing feels definite – which may be deliberate but it doesn’t make for clear story telling.

 

 

Gender blind casting gives us two male characters played by women which reminded me faintly of school plays at the girls’ schools I attended and taught in. Alice Gibson is however good as the impoverished, opportunist school teacher who marries Masha – not exactly a marriage made in heaven. Gibson brings nervous, diffident, insensitivity to the role and it works.  And Sally Toynton  is feistily strong as Dorn, the doctor who strides about being businesslike but of course there are cross currents in his relationships.

Best of all – and it’s a pretty good cast on the whole – is Anna Cameron-Mowat as Sorin. She lives and breathes the part, communicating with her eyes and every other part of her body. She does age and illness well too. It’s a terrific performance. But, again, there is confusion. The part is shared with Lewis Tidy who is presumably male as Chekhov’s Sorin originally was. At one point someone addresses Sorin with Cameron-Mowat in the role as “Mrs Sorin.” Thereafter she is often referred to as “he” and addressed as “uncle” which is a bit distracting. Gender fluidity is all very well but this is not Virginia Woolf’s Orlando. Cameron-Mowat is very clearly female.  At one point her character wears a glitzy dress and a wedding-style hat. The text should be adjusted to the sex of whoever is playing the part at each performance.

The Bridge House playing space is quite small and very simple. Adamson and his team (designer: Verity Johnson) make thoughtful use of it for this production using pallets covered with boards to make low level rostra and a red velvet curtain to suggest an opulent room. The all-important lake is conjured in the imagination by characters gazing into the corners of the space.

It’s always a pleasure to go to the Bridge House (excellent tea at the bar downstairs and surprisingly comfortable seating in the theatre) which runs a reliably innovative and interesting programme. This version of The Seagull is a novel take on a familiar play which certainly asks questions and sets you thinking. And I really hope it acts as a launch-pad for these actors.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-seagull/