Press ESC or click the X to close this window

If. Destroyed. Still. True. (Susan Elkin reviews)

Show: If. Destroyed. Still. True.

Society: West End & Fringe

Venue: Hope Theatre (Hope & Anchor Pub) 207 Upper Street, Islington, London N1 1RL

Credits: By JACK CONDON. Directed by SARAH STACEY

If. Destroyed. Still. True.

3 stars

Two friends attend the same school in a deprived Essex seaside town. One leaves for university, gradually finds a different sort of life and settles down with a young woman whose background is more privileged. The other stays and is unhappily sucked ever further into emotional and economic poverty. Tensions build over the eight year  narrative span and there’s a great deal of anger, angst and guilt. It’s hardly an original story although many people will identify with it.

This seventy-minute piece is Jack Condon’s first play (he also plays the confused, disappointed, furious John) for Jawbones, a new company he has set up with Sarah Stacey, who directs. Although it’s a generally pleasing debut some of the writing is laboured especially in the first half hour which includes far too much clunky expositionary dialogue. The “issues” stick out clumsily. It does, however improve as it proceeds.

But the acting is excellent.  Condon stomps about being outrageous and often furious as well as deeply flawed and hurt. As James, Theo Ancient finds calm, reasonableness in his character and we identify with him because John really is difficult to deal with. Yet there’s also a troubled complexity especially in the memorably powerful  final scene when Whitney Kehinde, now his pregnant wife, tries to confront him about his unhappiness  so that they can move on together. She is calm, determined and worried, all of which Kehinde conveys beautifully and the way the two actors bounce of each other at this point packs a real punch.

First published by Sardines:https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/if-destroyed-still-true/

When I reread (and wrote about) Brave New World in January I kept thinking of his last novel, Island (1962). I’d read it only once many years ago and misremembered as an upbeat alternative future – the other side of the dystopian coin. In fact it’s a profoundly pessimistic novel with some pretty resonant 2022 topicality.

The fictional, titular island – Pala –  is in Indonesia and has, for rather contrived reasons, managed to refine all the benefits of a Western Education, culture and the English Language alongside open-minded philosophy without corrupting industrialisation. Will Farnaby is a cynical journalist who has made rather a mess of his life so far.  He gets shipwrecked (yes, plausibility is not what this novel is about) on Pala and looked after by Doctor McPhail and his family – a useful device to show us Pala from an outsider’s point of view.

The Island is free of organised religion, dogma and cant. It has an intelligent education system – child centred in the best sense of the word. Sex is regraded as a normal, natural part of life so that if a pair of youngsters fancy each other then there’s no ideological or cultural objection to their following their instincts. Death too, while sad for those who are left, is healthily regarded as a normal process not hedged about with taboos. And of course relationships are colour blind.

It is all idyllically Utopian although personally I struggle with Huxley’s evident belief that hallucinatory drugs are a sensible part of civilised life even when used in moderation and under supervision. That doesn’t sound in the least ideal to me.

This way of life, however, is under threat. There are people on the Island, represented by the Rani and her son, who envy life in the West and want to “improve” Pana with, for example, stricter education and more rules about everything. The Island, moreover, has natural resources which people on its borders are keen to “develop” or exploit which suddenly sounds all too familiar.

It’s an interesting novel although not a great one. There is far too much didacticism in the form of one character explaining things to another for that. Well worth reading and thinking about, though.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Opening Worlds – short stories from different cultures

Jina and the Stem Sisters continues at the Little Angel Theatre, London until 1 May 2022.

Star rating: four stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ✩

I first saw and reviewed this show a year ago, one of the very few I agreed to critique digitally. It’s interesting, therefore, to see it live now.

Rachel Barnett-Jones’ story gives us a little girl (pretty, earnest, feisty puppet) who wants to be a scientist. Lost in a wood she meets a series of inspiring female scientists from the past, each of whom gives her a gift – in the manner of the fairies at Sleeping Beauty’s Christening.

Thus, by the end, she is ready to embark on her career armed with curiosity, persistence, creativity, courage and open-mindedness. And we’ve enjoyed some sparky songs.

The Marie Curie song – a delightful G&S-type patter song in minor key …

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review: https://musicaltheatrereview.com/jina-and-the-stem-sisters-little-angel-theatre/

Monica Bellucci: Maria Callas “Letters and Memoirs” at Her Majesty’s Theatre, London.

Star rating: two stars ★ ★ ✩ ✩ ✩

Probably the most famous opera singer of her generation, Maria Callas (1923-1977) had terrific vocal power and charisma but we don’t get much sense of that in Monica Bellucci’s account of Albin Michel’s book Lettres & mémoires.

Bellucci is a model turned actor and models don’t smile. Neither does her Callas. For over an hour she speaks slowly, carefully and with anguish while we are told the source of her words – letters to her husband, teacher, Aristotle Onassis, Grace Kelly and various friends – on a projected back screen.

It’s very static piece of theatre based on a sofa. At one point she lies on it and at another she walks round it – and that’s the sum total of the action …

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review: https://musicaltheatrereview.com/monica-bellucci-maria-callas-letters-and-memoirs-her-majestys-theatre/

Show: Payne: The Stars are Fire

Society: Arrows & Traps (professional)

Venue: Studio at New Wimbledon Theatre. 93 The Broadway, Wimbledon, London SW19 1QG

Credits: by Ross McGregor

Payne: The Stars are Fire

4 stars

Photo: Taken at The Jack Studio Theatre


A companion piece to Ross McGreggor’s Holst: The Music in the Spheres  to which I awarded five stars in February, Payne is another delight – even though I am not quite as comfortable with physics and astronomy as I am with classical music.

Cecilia Payne (Laurel Marks) was a student of Gustav Holst at St Paul’s Girls’ School. From there she went to Cambridge and from thence to work as a researcher at Harvard. She was a pioneer who broke a great deal of new ground in her field although as the play makes clear she didn’t initially always get the credit for it. Among other things she worked out that stars are made predominantly of hydrogen and helium thereby refuting three thousand years of scientific theory – as Henry Russell (Toby Wynn-Davies) acidly and patronisingly points out to her.

The play is a detailed, intelligent exposition of the routine discrimination against women a century ago and a taut account of one woman’s struggles. Marks is an outstanding actor. She gives us a lumpy, awkward woman with the distorted vowel sounds of her period and class but indefatigably focused on her work. She is very good indeed at evincing the pain and hurt she feels when her character’s work is marginalised and yet her rare smiles light up the stage.

The five other cast members are generally strong and, as before. I was totally convinced by Wynn-Davies as Holst two scenes with whom effectively frame the play. American accents are, however, a bit iffy and although amusing, Alex Stevens makes Harlow Shapley simply too excessive and irritating to be taken seriously as head of department.

Nineteen twenties music links the scenes so that we never forget where we are. Lucy Ioannou as Adelaide Ames helps with that too. At first she seems a fairly frivolous flapper and a stark contrast with Cecilia but she gradually develops into something much deeper and we begin to see her as a serious scientist – with a healthy life/work balance. There is a very beautiful physical theatre/dance scene with her at its centre to symbolise her untimely death and the reactions of her friends and colleagues.

McGreggor, as director, does imaginative things with the gauzy backcloth providied by Odin Corie’s set. Some scenes, evocatively lit, take place beyond it to suggest outdoors or something otherworldly and it acts as screen for occasional projection.

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/payne-the-stars-are-fire/

Show: The Taxidermist’s Daughter

Society: Chichester Festival Theatre (professional)

Venue: Chichester Festival Theatre. Oaklands Way, Chichester PO19 6AP

Credits: Adapted for the stage by Kate Mosse. A new play based on her novel

The Taxidermist’s Daughter

2 stars

THE TAXIDERMIST’S DAUGHTER – PRODUCTION PHOTOS BY ELLIE KURTTZ


This is a weird show in every sense of the word. In the traditional sense it’s about demonic behaviour and in the modern sense it’s strangely incoherent with some very odd directorial decisions. Sinead Diskin’s gloomy, disturbing music and sound dominates everything. There’s an awful lot of angry/anguished/frightened shouting over it which gets wearisome because there isn’t enough ordinary life to balance it. It often feels overacted and overblown.

It’s 1912 and we’re mostly in Fishbourne and Chichester where Kate Mosse, who has adapted this play from her own novel of the same name, grew up. Taxidermy is fashionable and there’s a local museum dedicated to the art. Strange things happen at the church on St Mark’s Eve (24 April so it’s topical as well as local). Birds are everywhere, dead and alive, and it’s sinister. After all a play which, in an early scene, provides you with a detailed account of how to remove the eye of a dead bird with a scalpel and then eviscerate it ready for mounting is probably signalling that nasties are in the pipeline.

Graylingwell was the asylum, later psychiatric hospital, in Chichester which finally closed in 2001. I know that because I was at college in the city for three years in the 1960s when it was still fully operational but it would have taken me a long time to infer it from this often incomprehensible play. Perhaps the local audience is simply expected to know.

Two women have escaped from Graylingwell and various characters are very worried about what they might now do. It’s a convoluted plot but Cassie Pine (Pearl Chanda) incarcerated for ten years, has every reason to be bitterly, determinedly vengeful which is why the local “establishment” men are worried. Before the show I met and was chatting to a colleague who asked me if, as he had, I had read the book. I hadn’t and by the interval I could see why he asked because I hadn’t got a clue what was going on – none of the scenes hang together or make sense. The story telling is a little clearer in the second half but still puzzling in places. The bright sunlight traditional happy ending, for instance, is  unconvincing and seems to belong in a different play.

Some of the acting feels laboured although Daisy Prosper pleases as the eponymous daughter who’s quietly doing the work because her father (Forbes Masson) is literally out of his mind and Akai Osei is good value as the chirpy servant Davey, although he says he’s from Portsmouth but sounds like a London barrow boy. Taheen Modak is warmly appealing as the refreshingly decent Harry Woolston and Pearl Chanda is strong in her cunning psychosis – moving from horror to everyday chat in an instant.

Andrzej Goulding’s video designs and Prema Mehta’s lighting work very well to create a grey, menacing atmosphere. The weather is dreadful through most of the play. We get magnificent rain, thunder and lightning and a terrifyingly rough sea. In many ways these are the best bits.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-taxidermists-daughter/

Arriving recently in North Yorkshire to stay with a friend, I found myself, in her sitting room, chatting to another woman who told me that the Arts Society which she helps to run locally had enjoyed a very informed talk by Tony Faber. Topic: violins. When my ears pricked up she said he has also written a book. So sitting there, chatting over the teacups, I reached for my phone and bought Stradivarius: five violins, one cello and a genius as a digital download and I’m really glad I did.

I have played the violin on and off since I was seven and knew, almost from the beginning, that Antonio Stradivari was a famous Italian violin maker. As I grew up I learned that there were other esteemed makers in Cremona and that many of the surviving instruments are worth a lot of money. But that was about the extent of my knowledge until I immersed myself in Tony Faber’s fascinating, very readable book which was published in 2005.

Stradivari (c.1644-1737) lived a long and fruitful life – two wives and two sets of children some of whom followed their father into the trade –  which he had, of course, learned from earlier makers such as Nicola Amati. He never stopped experimenting and trying to improve the design, shape and construction of his instruments. The experts reckon he made around 1,116 stringed instruments. Of these about 960 were violins. 650 or so instruments survive today of which 450-500 are violins. The reason that the figures are approximate, as Faber’s detailed account makes clear, are because of arguments about authenticity. The waters have been much muddied in the last three centuries because of alterations and updating made by people like Jean-Baptiste Vuillaume, a nineteenth century luthier and shrewd businessman. Moreover, Stradivari was making violins and occasionally violas and cellos for Baroque use. As the music became more classical and then more romantic, needs changed and many older instruments were given, for example, longer necks and unfretted finger boards.

The backbone of Faber’s book is his tracing the history and fate of six specific instruments and he’s very good on the habits and business practices of dealers and luthiers. Then of course there are owners and players – often not the same thing. Collectors are not necessarily virtuosi.  The Davidov cello, for example, named for Russian cellist Karl Davidov (1838-1889) who played it to great acclaim, later belonged to Jacqueline du Pre whose godmother purchased it and gave it to her.  After illness forced du Pre into premature retirement from performance it was made available to Yo-Yo Ma (who couldn’t afford to buy it) for his lifetime by a benefactor. He says that whenever he plays the Elgar concerto he can feel the spirit of du Pre in the instrument.

The whole point about such instruments is that make a very special sound and no one quite understands why. Is it the varnish? Makers have been trying to crack the code for over three hundred years.

However, eventually instruments wear out and no longer sound as good. Many Strads are now in museums and unlikely to be played much, if at all. Faber hopes that one day a new maker of genius will discover and develop special techniques which, maybe, will surpass the Stradivari sound.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Island by Aldous Huxley

Show: Shrek

Society: Bromley Players

Venue: Bob Hope Theatre

Credits: Jeanine Tesori, David Lindsay-Abaire.

Shrek the Musical

3 stars

This very decent account of a show about decency makes good use of the delights of the splendid Bob Hope Theatre. Director Sarah Chapman ensures that every inch of the large stage is used (this show was originally intended for the larger Churchill Theatre Bromley, pre-Pandemic) and that the action spills engagingly onto the side steps and the gap between the pit and the front row. Steve Trill, meanwhile, and his nine piece band in said pit gives us a lot of pleasing sound.

Shrek the Musical is a celebration of otherness. One of its best lines is “Beautiful ain’t always pretty” in this piece in which the “monster” gets the princess without turning into a prince and that’s very 2022. It’s also a fine choice for an enthusiastic amateur company because it features a big cast with lots of tasty cameo roles among all those feisty fairy tale characters who form the main ensemble. No wonder there are so many productions of it about at present.

Ellie Mulhern is outstanding as Princess Fiona. She dances with verve, sings with passion and twinkles attractively as well as being believably naturalistic. Michael Flanagan finds a lot of witty physicality in the persistence of Donkey and he, too, has strong stage presence. Jamie Fillery excels as the appalling Lord Farquaad and Laura Whittingham is very successful as Dragon and Wicked Witch – what a voice!

Shrek is a difficult part to play because this ogre is meant to be quiet and self-effacing in contrast with almost everyone else on stage. Ian Chapman begins so mildly that you hardly notice him but he grows as the show goes on. By the time he gets to falling in love with Fiona we are very much on his side.

The ensemble numbers – including the post curtain “I’m a Believer” are lively and entertaining, imaginatively choreographed by William and Jenni Rye. And both the dragon and the plastic horse are very show stoppers.

A cast this size ensures an audience brimming over with supportive enthusiasm so that the atmosphere feels like a family party and that’s good to see and hear after so long. I hope, however, that someone sorts out the sound system for the rest of the run. There was a great deal of crackle and incidents of radio mics cutting out at the performance I saw.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/shrek-the-musical-6/