Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Susan Elkin reviews: What the Ladybird Heard

Show: What The Ladybird Heard

Society: West End & Fringe

Venue: Palace Theatre, 113 Shaftesbury Avenue, Soho, London

Credits: By Julia Donaldson & Lydia Monks. Music by Jon Fiber and Andy Shaw for JollyGoodTunes. Lyrics by Jon Fiber and Howard Jacques. Produced by Kenny Wax Family Entertainment in association with Matthew Gregory.

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performence Date: 17/07/2021

What the Ladybird Heard

Susan Elkin | 18 Jul 2021 00:02am

When I first saw this production in 2017 I described it as a mini-musical for pre-schoolers and I stand by that, four years later. But there are differences: I think the show has settled, the present four actors have a palpable onstage rapport with both the audience and each other and Nikita Johal is delightful as the reassuring, very smiley Lily who also sings splendidly.

The show works on the assumption that the children in the audience are already very familiar with Julia Donaldson’s rhyming adventure story about a ladybird who thwarts a burglary on an idyllic farm. But the show also offers its young audience new things which they’re not expecting: songs by Jon Fiber and Andy Shaw with additional lyrics by Howard Jacques, for instance. The words are witty, simple and clear – in the hands of four actor-musos – and the melodies very simple so that children can pick them up easily.

Another imaginative idea is the use of puppets – assembled from farmyard bits and pieces – to bring to life Donaldson’s cast of animal characters and Lydia Monks’s illustrations for the original book. Monks was involved in the development of the stage show which includes a horse created from a bicycle, an inverted long tin bath and a bucket while a hen emerges from an old brown cushion and a red rubber glove and a goose from a white watering can. It makes good theatre as children are invited to identify each animal as it is realised on stage.

Roddy Lynch is a solid, warm-voiced, comforting figure as the farmer and I enjoyed his sound effects on violin. Matthew McPherson is full of character as Hefty Hugh and a useful guitarist while James Mateo-Salt is an entertaining Mr Bean-ish comic character initially pretending to be a theatre usher drawn into the show because they are one short.

This review was first published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/what-the-ladybird-heard-2/

Show: Love’s Labour’s Lost

Society: West End & Fringe

Venue: The Plough Inn. 297 Northfield Avenue, London W5 4XB

Credits: William Shakespeare – part of the Fuller’s Shakepeare in the Garden tour

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performence Date: 15/07/2021

Love’s Labour’s Lost

Susan Elkin | 16 Jul 2021 17:23pm

All photos: lhphotoshots


Whenever I see Love’s Labour’s Lost I’m struck by what a good play it is, in so many ways – so many interesting roles – and I wonder why it has never garnered the popularity of, say, Twelfth Night. It’s a pretty appropriate choice for now too since, as the opening song points out in this production, the starting point is four men choosing to self-isolate.

The King of Navarre and three courtiers vow to eschew the company of women and to live as self denying ascetics for a three year study period. Of course this doesn’t last long once a French princess turns up with three attractive ladies. Then there are subplots involving the lower born Costard and Jaquenetta and a ludicrously flamboyant Spaniard, named Don Amardo. To achieve all this with just four actors as Open Bar does is a rather stunning piece of imaginative versatility, which includes some witty homespun puppets.

It is also striking that the textual cuts are quite light so that the show runs well over  2 hours 30 minutes. That means that each member of this talented quartet has to work very hard but the energy levels are such that they make of each of them having to speak  as many lines as Hamlet seem effortless.

Each actor does a whole range of voices and the doubling is often fast and furious as well as gender-blind. Stuart Turner adeptly switches from earnest King to deliciously camp Boyet to the ridiculous Moth. Grace Kelly Miller gives us a warm princess, a hilariously pedantic Holfernes and has a field day as Don Amardo. I really liked the gently subtlety of Charlotte Worthing’s Costard alongside her deep-voiced Longaville and her determined Rosaline.

And as for Adam Courting as Berowne, he makes him plausible and charismatic although my judgement of any actor playing this role is impaired by very fond memories of seeing David Tennant do it with the RSC in 2008. Courting’s Sir Nathaniel is fun and, like all this cast, he is very good at flirting with the audience and making remarks which pretend to be out of role and off-the-cuff. Thus we get references to masks and Matt Hancock as well as nice injections of modern English and a commentary on the play as a running gag. David Knight’s jolly songs at the beginning of each half and at the end are part of this.

This engaging show is produced by Fullers and tours its pub gardens – hence the company name: Open Bar. It’s an enlightened idea which both brings people into pubs to buy food and drink while also providing work for actors and theatre creatives. I approve heartily of such an initiative given the challenges currently faced in the hospitality and performing arts industries.

This review was first published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/loves-labours-lost-5/

Show: South Pacific

Society: Chichester Festival Theatre (professional)

Venue: Chichester Festival Theatre, Oaklands Way, Chichester

Credits: Music by Richard Rodgers. Lyrics by Oscar Hammerstein II. Book by Oscar Hammerstein II and Joshua Logan. Adapted from the Pulitzer Prize-winning novel ‘Tales of the South Pacific’ by James A. Michener.

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performence Date: 13/07/2021

South Pacific

Susan Elkin | 14 Jul 2021 18:04pm

Photo: Gina Beck (Nellie), Julian Ovenden (Emile) in Chichester Festival Theatre’s SOUTH PACIFIC. Photo: Johan Persson


Well it certainly was Some Enchanted Evening. The press night audience applauded loudly and at length as soon as the lights went down, so delighted were they to be – at last – in a real theatre for a much-loved old favourite.

But  there’s nothing clichéd about this production. Tt is different from the first note. As a fine fifteen piece band, high above the stage out of sight, conducted by MD Cat Beveridge, launches into Richard Rodgers’s evocatively scored overture, we watch an otherworldly solo ballet sequence by Sera Maehara alone on the big round thrust stage. Then she is surrounded by American GIs, marching. It’s a neat way of signalling the serious and dark cultural clash which lies at the heart of this ever topical piece.

Daniel Evans, Chichester Festival Theatre’s artistic director and director of this show, is a man of many talents – one of which is making vivid spectacular use of CFT’s capacious playing space and exploiting its revolve to maximum effect. The opening sequence was just one example of that.

Full as it is of hummable melodies, South Pacific is a profoundly political piece and this production brings that out: Racism and the need to overcome it is, if anything, more urgent now even than it was in 1949. Of course you can’t dismiss a man (or wash him right out of your hair) simply because his late partner was Polynesian. And despite, their need to repel the invading Japanese, what right have these Americans to be in this ocean paradise anyway – criticising local people and their culture?

Julian Ovenden is the best Emile I’ve ever seen. He is self-effacing, charming, attractive and, clearly, an attentive father. And that voice! No wonder his “This nearly was mine” – mellifluous, beautifully balanced and richly warm – won a massive round of applause of press night. Gina Beck is a lively match, shifting convincingly from loving to critical and from embarrassed to contrite. Her account of “I’m Going to Wash That Man Right Out of My Hair” is, as ever, an all singing, all dancing show stopper although I always think of Mary Martin in the original Broadway production who famously washed her hair for real on stage hundreds of time. Beck dances with a shampoo bottle and then ducks in the shower for a few drips. Radio mics (and health and safety?) have a lot to answer for.

The support cast is strong too with Joanna Ampil standing out as Bloody Mary and Keir Charles bringing oodles of character to Luther Billis. It’s good to see something which a large cast too and I note that several are recent ArtsEd graduates which is good news all round.

This sensitive show is much enhanced by Peter McKintosh’s set which consists of one hydraulically controlled balcony platform to represent Emile’s house and a series of push-on units to change scenes.

All in all a pretty remarkable achievement considering the circumstances under which this production has developed. It was originally scheduled but 2020 but had to be cancelled. Rehearsals have had to be masked and distant – and CFT has conducted 27,000 Covid tests in the making of it.

This review was first published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/south-pacific-7/

Show: Piaf (In Person)

Society: Nottingham Playhouse (professional)

Venue: Nottingham Playhouse. Wellington Circus, Nottingham

Credits: By Pam Gems. Co-presented by Nottingham Playhouse Theatre Company and Leeds Playhouse

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performence Date: 08/07/2021

Piaf (In Person)

 

All photos: Marc Brenner


There´s much to enjoy in Pam Gems´s musical theatre biography of Edith Piaf although, set on a big stage, and presumably rehearsed with social distancing it sometimes feels a bit remote.

Piaf´s life story is pretty well known and Gem leans quite heavily on the motherless childhood and youth in her grandmother´s brothel, her work as a street singer, an international career and and many men. Of course she was vulnerable and pitiful and her short life – 47 when she died in 1963 – was tragically bedevilled by alcohol, drugs and personality flaws.

Adam Penfold directs an ensemble of nine which includes several accomplished actor musos so that the music, with MD Gareth Valentine on stage at the side on piano, becomes a seamless part of the action. And there are, naturally, a lot of songs.

A show with a lot going for it then but there are problems. There is always a difficulty when you try to present very famous, distinctive people in a theatrical way – Kenneth Williams, Frankie Howerd, Margaret Thatcher for instance – because we all know exactly how they sounded and looked. Laura Pitt-Pulford us a talented actor-muso and good in other roles here but she does not cut the mustard as Marlene Dietrich. And sadly Jenna Russell – although her acting is at masterclass level especially at the end – hasn´t quite got Piaf´s gravelly, sexy, vocal pathos which so many people found so captivating for so long. It requires, therefore, an effort of imagination to understand what the fuss what actually about.

There´s some sensitive work from Louis Grant as Theo Serapo who fell in love with Piaf and looked after her lovingly at the end of her life. And Sally-Ann Triplett is raucously, outrageously entertaining as Piaf´s old friend Toine.

All Piaf´s famous songs were, obviously, sung in French when she preformed and recorded them. In this show there is a mixture of French songs with passages of English. And all the dialogue, some of which seems a bit forced and unnatural, is in English with Russell using earthy street speak. This feels a bit odd when she then sings in French and none of the French in this show sounds convincingly like anyone´s first language.

Nonetheless it´s a strong story and a moving piece of musical theatre which certainly worth seeing.

This review was first published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/piaf-in-person/

Show: Mr and Mrs Nobody

Society: West End & Fringe

Venue: Jermyn Street Theatre, 16b Jermyn Street, London

Credits: BY KEITH WATERHOUSE. BASED ON THE NOVEL BY GEORGE AND WEEDON GROSSMITH

Type: Sardines

Author: Susan Elkin

Performence Date: 07/07/2021

Mr and Mrs Nobody

Keith Waterhouse’s 1983 play is based on the hilarious, quintessentially English Diary of a Nobody (1892) by George and Weedon Grossmith of G&S fame. The play has quite a track record although I’d not seen it before,

The novel, which I’ve read more than once over the years, gives us the thoughts of Charles Pooter, a pompous lower middle class man, humourlessly blind to what the people around him are actually thinking and doing. Waterhouse’s take on it shares the diary narrative with his long suffering wife, Carrie. And in the hands of director Gabriella Bird and actors Miranda Foster and Edward Baker-Duly, it becomes a very funny two hander with some witty doubling to represent other characters as required.

Foster gives us a stressed character trying hard to tolerate and love her impossibly tiresome husband who is in thrall to a city boss who clearly sees Pooter’s talents as middling like everything else about him. She grits her teeth, smiles gamely, soldiers on despite the noisy, dirty trains at the bottom of the garden and her rendering of a badly song at a party is a moment to treasure in the Florence Foster Jenkins tradition.

Baker-Duly, who has a wolfish Hugh Grant look about him at times, is plausibly ridiculous as Pooter and strong as Lupin, their useless foppish son and several other characters distinguished by a brief change of voice and/or body language. These two actors, moreover, work together with quickfire slickness most of the time.

I was, however, puzzled by the quite long section of Act 1 dialogue which is repeated (presumably deliberately?) in the second half. Whatever point Waterhouse or the director is trying to make it falls flat here. And maybe this is difficult dialogue to manage anyway – at one point on press night they needed a prompt which is unusual these days.

Nonetheless it’s an evening full of laughter and so clean and sparky that you really could take your great aunt if she happened to up from the country.

This review was first published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/mr-and-mrs-nobody/

It is a great pleasure to see and hear young artists at the very beginning of their careers making and sharing fine music. The Oriole String Quartet – Emmanuel Webb, Mira Marton, Hattie Quick and Elizaveta Lessoun – met at the Royal College of Music. This afternoon concert was their first public event since the pandemic and it was good to see so many people (masked and distanced) from the local community there to support them and to rejoice at the rebirth of Real Music in their church.

A rather neatly programmed concert, the focus was on pupils and teachers so we got Britten and Mozart in the first half and Bridge and Haydn in the second.

The plaintive third movement of Britten’s Simple Symphony (“Sentimental Sarabande”) was the starting point with Emmanuel Webb telling the audience that it seemed like a suitable lament for many months of lost time. I liked the dynamic attentiveness to each other which was clear from the first note. The sound was very rich too because the acoustic in this attractive old church is warm without being fuzzy. The same qualities sang out, later in the concert, in Frank Bridge’s Three Idylls for String Quartet, the first of which included some very well managed crescendi and some richly arresting viola work from Hattie Quick.

The two main works were Mozart’s String Quartet no 16 in E flat and Haydn’s String Quartet op 33 no 2 in E Flat, “The Joke”. I suppose the choice of two quartets in the same key was deliberate although it will, I suspect, have passed most of the audience by.

Well, in a very amateur way, I play a lot of Mozart and Haydn Quartets for fun (“consenting adults in private”!) and I know how relatively easy it is to get the notes and rhythm right and just how difficult is to make it sound like music. These musicians play with oodles of sensitivity and technical panache particularly in the first movement of the Mozart. I admired the lyrical slow (second) movement too with its leaned-on chromatic notes and the evocatively underscored lilting 6|8 beats especially from Elizaveta Lessoun on cello. The minor key trio was beautifully played too.

Then they injected all the right spiky froth into the opening movement of the Haydn and had fun with the unexpected chords and some cheeky little glissandi from Emmanuel Webb in the second movement. And their take on the finale danced along with Haydnesque wit until it reached the famous series of false endings – smiles all round.

Only very occasionally in 90 minutes of music did the odd note (strained or slightly out of tune) remind you that these young players are not yet fully professional. I look forward to hearing more of them both as a quartet and individually.

This review was first published by Lark Reviews

 

Delderfield2 (1)I’m a sucker for sagas. So, around 1970 – once I’d worked through everything saga-ish by Daphne du Maurier, read all the Forsytes and much more – I was delighted to stumble across RF Delderfield. His best ideas involve a young man returning from something (usually a war) looking for a purpose in life. The author then contrives an evolving community – suburban street, school, family business or whatever – in which to develop a huge network of characters across several generations, dominated by the aforesaid young man, in big fat trilogies the length of which makes a Victorian three decker seem like a novella.

A Horseman Riding By (1966) is arguably the best example of Delderfield’s prime genre, although, very prolific he also wrote other things including standalone novels, biographies and plays such as Worm’s Eye View. Its three component novels are: Long Summer’s Day, Post of Honour and The Green Gauntlet. All are still in print or you can download them.

Paul Craddock arrives back in London in 1902 having been injured in the Boer War. Although he’s not proud of it, he discovers from his late father’s partner that he has inherited a fortune made from scrap metal, an industry which usually benefits from war. He uses it to buy a Devon valley estate which includes six farms and gradually turns himself into a very wise, benevolent “Squire”. Cue for a wonderfully plausible, mostly likeable cast of characters including the valley families, his growing family of children and eventually grandchildren and great grandchildren.

All this is set accurately against the events of the day including the Suffragette movement (of which Paul’s first wife is a member), two world wars, the move away from farming towards tourism in the 1950s and lots more. The third novel ends soon after Churchill’s funeral in 1965.

One of the best things about A Horseman Riding By and its two sequels is Delderfield’s gift for realistic character development. No one stays the same any more than they do in real life. Circumstances change and so do people. Paul, a natural leader,  becomes a Liberal and, at one point, stands for parliament but I love the reactionary crustiness he acquires in old age. Smut Potter is the valley poacher and does a stretch in prison but later becomes a useful member of the community – among other things enlisting in 1914, meeting a French wife and starting a bakery back home in the local village. Paul’s twin sons seem very rackety and shallow until events change them both – in different ways.

It still reads very compellingly although it’s probably too long, at over 18,000  pages across the three novels. A modern editor would probably want to cut much of the philosophical reflections attributed to characters, especially Paul and would certainly condemn the weird whimsical passages in which a lone seagull drifts over the valley observing the activity below. There’s also a fair amount of repetition as Delderfield strives, usually, successfully to keep the reader on board when he’s harking back to something which happened hundreds of pages earlier. Don’t attempt to read this trilogy other than in the right order. These are minor points though, these three books have drawn me in in 2021 just as much as they did when I first read them 50 years ago.

Some of us remember a 1978  BBC TV adaptation of A Horseman Riding By starring the young Nigel Havers as Paul and the late Prunella Ransome as his wife, Claire. There were thirteen episodes back in the days when the BBC was willing/able to invest in big budget, ambitious projects. Perhaps Netflix could consider having a go at it now? I bet it would go down well in the US.

Meanwhile I shall continue to enjoy the books – there are three more Big Sagas on the Delderfield shelf. If, by the way, you want to know who Mr Delderfield was and what he did check out the New Dictionary of National Biograpahy ( online through your local library) Guess who wrote the Delderfield entry?

Delderfield3

Delderfield2 (2)

 

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: An Experiment in Love by Hilary Mantel

It’s like buses. You wait a long time and then two come along at once. I don’t remember ever seeing a dramatisation of Animal Farm and now I’ve seen two in a month courtesy of National Youth Theatre Rep Company and Spontaneous Productions. Well, I don’t really do politics in this blog but the parallels between our current situation and  Animal Farm are so glaringly obvious that I can see why theatre companies are homing in on it … cabinet ministers getting up close when the rest of us have to observe the two metre rule, allowing the ruling class to travel but not the plebs and all the rest of it.  Rarely has “All animals are equal but some are more equal than others” seemed truer or more sinister.

Anyway, having – as a reviewer – had to think a lot about Animal Farm lately I was drawn back to the book which was published in 1945. I don’t remember when I first read it – probably in my mid teens at my future husband’s recommendation. Mr E ( I first met him when I was 14) was very keen on Orwell. And, inevitably, I shared it with, and taught it to, many classes over the years because – witness where we are now – it’s an absolutely timeless a book about human nature. It hits you on the head on almost every page.

Orwell’s “fairy story” about a group of animals who rebel against, and evict, the farmer in order to manage the farm themselves was inspired by the Russian Revolution, Stalin’s emerging autocracy and the inclusion of Russia as an ally in World War Two. With clear sighted, cynical accuracy, Orwell saw those thirty years of history  as entirely cyclical.

The near-miracle of Animal Farm is its clarity. In the real world these are very complex issues. In just 118 pages Orwell entertainingly puts them within reach of any child who can read – although, of course, this is not in any sense a children’s book.

I also found myself marvelling (again) at his precise, succinct use of language. Sentences such as “At this moment there was a tremendous uproar.”, “The animals were thoroughly frightened.” and “Benjamin felt a nose nuzzling at his shoulder” are exquisite in their simplicity.  Semi-colons, subordinate clauses and other clutter are rare. Elsewhere Orwell condemned the gratuitous use of adjectives and long words where short ones will do and Animal Farm is a fine example of exactly what he meant. It should be used as a text book in creative writing classes and I hope it is.

If, like me, you haven’t read Animal Farm for a while go back to it – and prepare to gasp. Often.

Orwell died in 1950 aged only 47 with a whole string of fine books under his belt. I don’t suppose I’m the first person to wonder what he could have achieved if he’d lived to old age. Imagine Orwell in the 1960s and 70s ….

On Susan’s Bookshelves next week: A Horseman Riding By by RF Delderfield.