Press ESC or click the X to close this window

My life in knickers

I was thirteen when I finally persuaded my mother that I was old enough to have a pair of grown up stockings for the weekends rather than the childish socks I had to wear to school.

So she took me to her mother’s ladies’ wear shop to get kitted out. Now: my maternal grandmother, whom we all called Gladys, was a qualified “corsetiere” (yes, really – it meant she went to people’s houses to measure rotund ladies for made-to-measure bras and corsets) as well as running her little shop. On this occasion the stockings were the easy bit. “30 denier would be best. Here they are. Wash them through before you wear them.” They had seams, would you believe?

The difficult part was how was I going to hold them up? Mother: “Well, she needs something to hold that paunch in”. Gladys: “Oh yes, it will have to be a roll-on.” Gosh this was a long time ago. For younger readers, a roll-on was a tight fitting elastic tube with suspenders attached to the bottom. You rolled it up your legs and over your abdomen and then put knickers over the top. It was meant to make you look slimmer.

I thought little of it at the time. If that’s what they thought I needed then fine. All I was interested in was having nice smooth, stockinged legs as I’d seen in Woman magazine which my Mother had delivered every week.

I vaguely knew that other girls had flimsy things called “suspender belts” but I have never owned one – then or since –  because of my “paunch”. In time I graduated to panty-girdles – heavy duty knicker substitutes which clung tightly round the tum and had suspenders at the lower edge. As time went on and women turned to tights,  panty-girdles started to come with detachable suspenders. Eventually the suspenders disappeared.

By then I was grown up and buying my own underwear. Totally conditioned to the idea that, come what may, I had to have “control” knickers for fat people I went on buying them. Even when I was pregnant in the 1970s, I found some maternity ones in Mothercare.

Today there is a lot of “shapewear” on sale but my knickers were more old fashioned and less glamorous than that. You can still find them tucked away in a corner of M&S in the far reaches of the lingerie department usually on the first floor. They now cost around £18.00 per pair and the quality is not what it used to be. The 21st century ones wear out quite quickly. And I’ve worn them for my entire adult life, so trust me. I know.

But now something has changed. I have a very minor health issue – more of an irritant, really. Could this, I’ve recently wondered, just possibly be something to do with tightly encasing what Mother would have called my “nether regions” in constricting nylon for 60 years?

So, feeling ludicrously daring, a week or two ago I took courage in both hands and bought some plain cotton briefs, a famous brand whose quality is OK.  I understand this is the sort of thing normal people wear.

I am so ridiculously excited that I’m hard put to resist whipping them out and showing them to people. My lovely new knickers are liberatingly comfortable and wash nicely. I don’t think they’ll go wearily grey after a few washes as the others do either. And does my “paunch” protrude any more than in the tight ones? No. It doesn’t.  Sorry, Gladys (died 1977). Sorry, Mother (died 2001). It was all a myth. Ordinary knickers look absolutely fine under my trousers and skirts. Moreover they cost less than £5.00 a pair. I wonder how many hundreds of pounds I’ve spent on pricey constrictors in the last six decades? It just never occurred to me to do otherwise.

And the moral of this story? Be careful what you say to thirteen year olds. The effects of getting it wrong can be a bit pants.

 

 

Philharmonia Orchestra

Marlowe Theatre, Canterbury
Sunday 8 March 2020

Young British conductor, Alpesh Chauhan, was new to me but I’m sure I shall see a lot more of him before long. He has the Philharmonia totally under his baton with which – against the current fashion –  he beats time clearly. He also has a very expressive left hand, each finger on which seems to communicate its own message. And I expect, in time, he’ll learn to smile. He certainly had plenty to feel proud of in this all Russian concert.

We began with Tchaikovsky’s The Tempest – an early piece which doesn’t get performed as often as it deserves to. There are some terrific brass passages and lots of intense hard work for strings and piccolo. It sounded pretty good in this performance with a strong sense of story telling.

Shostakovich’s second piano concerto is much more familiar and  Valentina Lisitsa made it sound fresh and exciting especially in the frenetic first movement in which she delivered almost every one of her thousands of high speed fortissimo notes. I enjoyed her quiet smile at the recapitulation too. She’s an unshowy performer, and here she was accompanied by some fine, incisive orchestral playing complete with crisp col legno bowing, vibrant pizzicato and snare drum. The contrast as we moved into the warmth of the lyrical andante was delightful.

Pictures at an Exhibition is always a showstopper. The sheer colour and verve of Ravel’s orchestration sells itself. This was a  pleasingly energetic but well controlled performance, particularly in the arresting glissandi moments, perfectly punctuated by the percussion section’s whip. There was also some lovely solo work from wind and brass. When we finally reached the Great Gate of Kiev the tubular bell moved me, as it always does. And if the intonation was fractionally wonky in places and the timing was awry once or twice then it simply didn’t matter. The grandiloquence of the piece carried the day and ensured the audience left feeling uplifted.

One gripe though: Why doesn’t the Philharmonia list the names of its players in the programme – perhaps on a slip for each concert? I would like to cite some of the players for especially strong solo work but I can’t because I don’t know who is who.

First published by Lark Reviews: http://larkreviews.co.uk/?p=5948

Waiting for the Ship to Sail
An artistic response to the urgent and pressing questions of global migration, and investigates the concepts of national and personal identity.
 
performance date: 16 Mar 2020
venue: Chickenshed Theatre, Chase Side, Southgate, London N14 4PE
 

⭐⭐⭐⭐

The poignant, powerful ensemble piece looks at immigration from the point of view of the migrants themselves. It features 200 Chickenshed members, students, staff and alumni most of whom are on stage most of the time – telling stories through words, dance, song and theatricality.

We start with a long pre-show prologue as we find our seats during which we hear a register of immigrants who have died – drowned, lost, suicide, police brutality and more. We listen in silent horror while cast members act out some of the tensions in slow motion.

Thereafter we’re led to consider what we mean by home, the importance of family, the horror of the overcrowded boats, the ruthlessness of the people smugglers and the treatment of immigrants on arrival. There is a marvellous moment when MD Dave Carey, who composed the music for this show, is wheeled centre stage, still playing the white piano on a mobile platform which then becomes a refugee boat. And a word of praise for Andrew Caddies’s lighting because it’s warmly atmospheric against the backdrop of Sebastian Gonzalez’s set which includes scaffold, stairs and three levels for cast to stand on against the back wall.

Inclusivity is central to everything Chickenshed does and stands for and the whole concept of this show is to draw attention to the plight of migrants. It contends that they should be inclusively welcomed because we all descend from migrants which has what has made Britain what it is today – the piece ends movingly with various cast members speaking of fathers, grandfathers and great grandfathers who came from overseas and who became integrated, working in a wide variety of fields.

There is also agonising sadness – the young man who lost his younger brother’s hand as he climbed into a boat and the mother whose child was no longer in her arms when she woke up, for example.

The vibrant dancing – there are some talented dancers in the company – underpins the message. And I liked the imaginative choreography such as one character climbling up a lifted table held at 45 degrees and then over a block of bent backs to represent obstacles. Also striking is the contribution of Edith WeUtonga who plays various African percussion alongside Carey and sings hauntingly.

It’s a compelling, thought-provoking show and yet another credit to Chickenshed which does an impressively wide range of work these days. Congratulations to director, Lou Stein and the many people who work with him.

Unfortunately this looks likely to be my last review for the forseeable future. Just before I arrived at Chickenshed the news came through that the Government is advising people not to go to theatres because of Covid-19. That means most will close for the duration of the current crisis. I hope to be back when it’s over.

 First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Chickenshed-Waiting%20for%20the%20Ship%20to%20Sail&reviewsID=3900

 

The Tempest
William Shakespeare
 
performance date: 13 Mar 2020
venue: Jermyn Street Theatre, 16b Jermyn Street, London SW1Y 6ST
 

Whitney Kehinde (Ariel), Richard Derrington (Antonio), Peter Bramhill (Sebastian), Lynn Farleigh (Gonzalo) and Jim Findley (Alonso). Photo: Robert Workman

⭐⭐⭐⭐

“My old brain is troubled” says Michael Pennington as Prospero – a loaded line which I don’t think I’ve noticed before. And it’s typical of Pennington to make sure I hear it now: one of our finest ‘Shakespearean’ actors, he paces the verse with smooth, elegant clarity, while, at the same time, making it sound as fresh and conversational as if it were written yesterday. It’s like listening to a virtuoso at the very top of his/her game playing a concerto with enormous expertise and feeling. And of course he sets the tone for everyone else in the company.

It’s a key line too. When we first see Prospero he is angry, cunning and vengeful, conjuring the titular tempest by blowing on a toy boat. A man – shoulders hunched, head bent and given to mood swings – in the early stages of dementia? Kirsty Bushell’s loving, caring, concerned Miranda clearly thinks so. Then of course, her father gets a last burst of lucid, manipulative wisdom before commenting presciently that once he gets home to Milan “Every third thought shall be my grave”. This intelligent take on The Tempest, directed by Tom Littler, is among other things study of old age and peaceful resolution of life’s issues – a very different slant from King Lear.

Bushell has an evocatively expressive face – dirty because she lives on an isolated island and knows nothing of ladylike conventions (nice touch). Her tenderness towards her father and the warmth of her attraction to Ferdinand (Tam Williams) are very touching.

Although this production provides some of the funniest Trinculo (Peter Bramhill) and Stephano (Richard Derrington) scenes I’ve ever seen, Littler and his cast also bring out the ugliness of the ‘colonial’ attitude toward Caliban (Tam Williams, doubling as several cast members do). Almost naked in just a tattered loin cloth and a whole head mask made of dirty, mummy-like bandages this Caliban is covered in weals from abuse. He cowers, weeps and is pitifully undignified. 21st Century audience sympathy is definitely with the ‘monster’ as, appalled, we condemn the actions of Trinculo and Stephano even as we laugh at them. Bramhill, in a flat cap, with northern accent and a delightfully insouciant manner including asides not written by Shakespeare, is particularly entertaining.

Whitney Kehinde is a terrific Ariel dancing around the stage, eyes flashing. Her songs are graced with atonal settings (Max Pappenheim) supported by strange, ethereal echoes beneath them – they sound like the sort of thing Radio 3 broadcasts after 11pm but they work effectively in this context. She is also delightful when she lurks ‘unseen’ among other characters and very human when she pleads for her freedom from Prospero.

I liked Pappenheim’s realistic marine sound track and his storms. And it all sits well on the set by Neil Irish and Anett Black which gives us curved shelves on the back wall, a gauzy stage right curtain and a shallow centre stage hatch. It’s yet another example of what can be achieved in a bijou playing space.

This is a succinct (2 hours 20 minutes with interval) The Tempest which, mercifully, cuts very short the often tedious masque scene in Act 4. The cutting helps to make sure that the story telling is powerful and compelling. It would make a fine introduction to Shakespeare for a first-timer of any age as well as being a thoughtful contribution to the interpretation debate for those of us who’ve been seeing/reading/studying the play for years.

Kirsty Bushell (Miranda) and Tam Williams (Ferdinand). Photo: Robert Workman

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-The%20Tempest&reviewsID=3898

Troilus And Cressida
William Shakespeare. Performed by The Marlowe Youth Company
society/company: Marlowe Theatre
performance date: 07 Mar 2020
venue: Marlowe Theatre Studio, The Friars, Canterbury, Kent CT1 2AS
 

Staged by the ever-ambitious Marlowe Youth Company in the theatre’s studio space, this version of Troilius and Cressida features a huge cast of twenty-eight so it provides plenty of scope for these young actors, many of them in quite small roles. That means it isn’t always easy to work out who everyone is but it doesn’t matter much. And it’s both moving and encouraging to see such diverse participation – united by Shakespeare. I loved the gender-blind casting too. Caitlin Hatton, for example, was well cast as Ulysses.

Configured in-the-round with audience on all four sides with big panels featuring Grecian figures and shapes dominating two of them (design by Rachael A Smith), the Studio felt pretty atmospheric – and tense, because we are, after all, in the middle of the Trojan wars. A relentless drum tattoo and the whole cast on stage looking variously anxious, puzzled, fired up at the beginning is a good idea to convey that tension but arguably it was sustained for too long. After several minutes the audience was getting restive.

There are some fine performances in this show. Dan Ghigeanu stands out as Paris – direct, sure of himself and all over Helen (Matilda Scott – good) who has been famously whisked off to Troy, thereby causing a war. Chigeanu’s strong delivery works very well.

Lewis Dempsey – with expressive face and sensitive naturalistic delivery – gives an impressive account of Troilus and Darcy Priston is fun as the perceptive, fearless Thersites, one of Shakespeare’s most engaging fools. Roy Clarke is an excellent Achilles. He gets the fierce loyalty combined with not being over-bright perfectly.

There is a problem, however, with staging a youth company in the round. It takes a great deal of experience to engage an audience fully and audibly when you can face only a quarter of them at a time. Some lines in this show were lost because they simply couldn’t be heard from all sides of the auditorium – and this applied especially to the female voices because they’re higher pitched. And that, unfortunately, meant that the story telling wasn’t as strong as it might have been.

Director Paul Ainsworth and his team of keen young actors have clearly worked very hard on this interesting production and it does them all credit. Quite a journey with a play which is by no means an obvious or easy choice.

 
 First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Marlowe%20Theatre%20(professional)-Troilus%20And%20Cressida&reviewsID=3891
Can I Help You?
By Philip Osment. Presented by Playing On
society/company: West End & Fringe (directory)
performance date: 05 Mar 2020
venue: Omnibus Theatre, 1 Clapham Common North Side, Clapham Town, London SW4 0QW
reviewer/s: Susan Elkin (Sardines review)

Susan Aderin and Gabriel Vick. Photo: Bridie O’Sullivan

⭐⭐⭐⭐

The late Philip Osment’s last play is, as you’d expect, powerful, painful and poignant. Addressing some deeply difficult issues (Samaritans contact details are provided in the programme) the play is set on Beachy Head at night – with Max Pappenheim’s sound track providing the continuous, slightly threatening, rhythm of breaking waves.

Gabriel Vick is a policeman, Frances, covered in (someone else’s) blood at the end of a difficult day which has awakened dreadful memories of his own past. Just as he’s poised to jump Susan Aderin’s Fifi arrives – eccentric, funny, wise with a whole raft of unhappiness in her own life. Through the night they talk, eventually revealing their pasts and redeeming each other to such an extent that by morning when the sun rises (lighting: Ian Scott) there is definitely hope for both of them.

It’s imaginatively directed (Jim Pope) nicely nuanced acting as they fence around each other, he initially exasperated and she incredulous. There’s a lot of warmth there, though, as each slowly comes to understand the other. These actors spark effectively off each other and I admired the versatility of their frequent dips into other roles as they relive their troubled pasts – all done with nothing other than body language, accent and acting. There’s an especially striking moment when Fifi cuddles the “baby” she remembers – but it’s not the happy memory it should be.

Mental health problems are all around us and need to be taken very seriously – and drama is doing it’s utmost to support that. This is the second play addressing such issues I’ve seen in 48 hours. And if these explorations can a) raise awareness and empathy in those of us who are mentally healthy and b) help people who aren’t to understand that they’re not alone so that they can reach out for help – than that is a very good thing. I’d be the last person to suggest that drama has to have a purpose to justify it’s existence but it can be useful when it does.

This is an arresting piece of theatre, though, and well worth seeing for its own sake too.

Susan Aderin and Gabriel Vick. Photo: Bridie O’Sullivan

 
 First published by Sardines:http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-Can%20I%20Help%20You?&reviewsID=3889
 
Am I Happy Yet?
Written and performed by Jack Hesketh. Produced by 3Dumb Theatre
society/company: West End & Fringe 
performance date: 03 Mar 2020
venue: The Lion & Unicorn Theatre (Above the Lion & Unicorn Pub), 42-44 Gaisford Street, Kentish Town, London NW5 2ED
 

⭐⭐⭐

Rooted in his own experience of growing up in Aberdeen and then moving to a larger city to train at LIPA, Jack Hesketh’s one-man play is thoughtful, moving and entertaining.

We’re in a young man’s bedsit and we follow him as he gets up on several mornings and goes out variously meeting friends, on a date and doing what he needs to do – addressing the audience continually as he reflects on his own state of mind and enacts his encounters. He remembers his parents and talks to his dead father too, all the time trying to come to terms with his own anxiety and depression.

Hesketh is a charismatic and personable actor. He tiptoes, dances, mimes, uses the space imaginatively (director Coral Tarran has done a good job), talks naturalistically to the audience and is often quite funny. At the end of the fifty minutes we, the audience, are onside and rather sorry when it’s over.

Dominic Beale’s sound design provides rhythmic music for the young man to wake up to and a harsh grating sound like a radio which has wandered off the signal whenever the protagonist has a moment of anxiety. Red lights come on at the same time. It’s a simple device but it works,

LIPA has a strong tradition of encouraging its graduands and graduates to make their own work and supporting them to do so. Hesketh is clearly another example of that ethos and I suspect we shall we hearing/seeing a lot more of him very soon. It’s also good to see yet another piece exploring mental health – so many people have problems that these are issues which really can’t be visited too often.

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-Am%20I%20Happy%20Yet?&reviewsID=3886
 
 

Until four years ago I wrote three columns a week for The Stage –  one in print and two online. This theatre blog, here on my own website, is the direct descendant. I started it when the Stage columns ended in June 2016.

Every columnist writing on any topic has nightmares about running out of material when there’s a commitment to produce something every week. But somehow the stories go on emerging and the ideas go on coming. So in the end, you stop panicking because you know that something will turn up. It always does.

Until now. Never could I (or anyone else) have ever imagined that we’d suddenly be plunged into a theatre-free world – no theatres, pub, concerts, clubs, or even church services (a form of theatre, if you stretch a point). Nothing.  And I’ve always written a lot about education and training but COVID-19 has closed the schools and drama colleges too. My life and work is suddenly one vast sea of nothingness. Never has my diary been so blank and white.

So what am I doing instead? Trying to write a play. An act of faith? Maybe.  You’ll hear more about it (here) if it works. I also have a book project or two in mind which may or may not firm up.

Of course there are theatrical things I could write about: the fabulous levels of altruism and ingenuity which are emerging digitally: actors reading poems, free streamed theatre, music lessons from Big Names and more. The cloud may be all enveloping but the silver lining is shining pretty brightly.

But I’m not going to clutch at straws in order to space fill.  For the moment, I’m going to suspend these columns. I plan to be back as soon as the industry begins to rise again – and it will. Eventually. So this is au revoir and definitely not goodbye.

I may start a new blog about something else during this long virus-enforced interval. I’ll see how it goes.