Press ESC or click the X to close this window

ENO: Carmen (Susan Elkin reviews)

Set in late-Franco, 1970s Spain this Carmen (revival of a 2012 production) simmers with timeless hot passion and a culture of bullying. All those minor keys, seductive rhythms and earworm melodies do their work along with Bizet’s colourful orchestration, as ever, but in this case the concept of the production really drives the piece. The male chorus are variously soldiers, amateur smugglers and a crowd while the well characterised women convincingly represent mainstream Spain in mini-skirts, shorts, flouncy dresses and the like. Then there are the children, all recruited via the ENO Baylis scheme, doing a fabulously vibrant job. The huge ensemble is diverse in every sense – race, age, size and so on – so it forms a pleasingly plausible picture of every day life in Seville. It all feels very fresh.

Justina Gringyte in the title role has a gravelly contralto voice and some very sexy bottom notes. She is also a fine actor able to command the stage with a twitch of her hips and toss of her head – yes, we can see exactly why Jose (Sean Panikkar) and Escamillio (Ashley Riches) are captivated by her capricious, sulky passion. She also finds the right vulnerability in the devastating final scene: a woman who makes the wrong decisions and whose tragedy is timeless.

Pannikar matches her beautifully and there is some nicely nuanced duet work especially in the last scene. Riches, who is strikingly tall, does well as the bombastic Escamillo too. His big number is so familiar that it’s as hard to bring off as “To be or not to be” in Hamlet but he, and his delicious bass voice, run with it and take us with them.

Alfons Flores’s set is a masterpiece. The stage is usually quite bare which gives the huge cast plenty of space to move in. Occasionally connotative items arrive such as a phone box or a huge, flat, metal, roundabout-style bull. The cars (five of them) at the beginning of Act 3 are a stroke of genius. Not only do they provide a realistic sense of ordinary people trying to get their contraband over the border but they also provide lots of dramatic hiding places and levels for agile performers to hop on and off. Skilfully lit shadow and stage smoke adds to the sultry ambience.

I have reservations, however about Christopher Cowell’s translation. For a start, what little of the spoken dialogue has been left in sounds gratingly out of place – it’s perfectly possible to do Carmen sung through and I wish this production had done that. Second, however hard you try, if you do Carmen in English it can start to sound inappropriately like WS Gilbert. “Roll up and get yourself a fan/Get some oranges while you can” and “But now I love you more than ever/Carmen we have to be together”, for example, make me giggle at inappropriate moments. Of course I understand and respect ENO’s commitment to accessibility and everything in English but banality is an ever present danger.

First published by Lark Reviews: https://www.larkreviews.co.uk/?p=5852

 

Mote Hall, Maidstone, 1 February 2020

There are few more atmospheric pieces than Britten’s Four Sea Interludes from Peter Grimes. It only needs a bar or two of those ethereal pianissimo high strings and you’re standing on the remote Suffolk coast gazing out to sea. MSO had imported lots of extra players for this ambitious piece (and the Elgar with which the concert ended) so we had double brass, four percussionists and eight double basses – all contributing to the colourful descriptiveness which Brian Wright drew out of the orchestra.

Then we skipped 150 years back to the classical world of Weber and reduced forces to accompany Emma Johnson in the second Clarinet Concerto. Always a charismatic player, she twinkled with delight as she played, turning the concerto into an engaging musical conversation, especially in the first movement. She also gave us a nicely controlled andante and enjoyably sparky syncopation in the third movement.

Unusual programming meant she was again the soloist in another concerto after the interval. Malcolm Arnold’s second Clarinet Concerto is not very well known and, although she played it with panache, it’s obvious why we don’t hear it more often. It’s an incongruous mixture of disparate elements including a long improvised cadenza, a soulful central lento and then “The pre-Goodman Rag”. Even Johnson’s fine playing and Brian Wright’s skilful direction failed to endow it with any sense of cohesion.

And so, finally, to Enigma Variations in which all those mood changes and potential pitfalls were adeptly negotiated with the wit of Variation 3 and Variation 11 nicely brought out. It was also a treat to hear Elgar’s imaginative orchestration so clearly stressed: the tuba in Variation 7, the piccolo in Variation 8 and the viola and bassoon solos in Variation 10, for example. And I admired the tempi in Variation 9 (Nimrod). There often is a tendency to play it so slowly that it feels as if it’s dragging. Wright resisted that by keeping it moving which worked well.

In short, another good night for MSO.

First published by Lark Reviews: https://www.larkreviews.co.uk/?p=5823

 

Peter Pan
By Stephen Duckham, based on the story by J.M. Barrie.
society/company: GDS Productions
performance date: 21 Feb 2020
venue: The Brook Chatham, Kent ME4 4SE
 

Every year I set off to the GDS annual panto in Chatham thinking: “Panto in February? No, I’m not in the mood.” Than I get there and realise it’s actually rather a good idea to provide a family show for half term and of course, panto doesn’t have to be seasonal.

It’s an unusual Peter Pan in other ways too. GDS has clearly got gender blind casting cracked (possibly partly because it has fewer male members than it would like but never mind). John and Michael are played by juvenile girls – Charlotte Galea and Xanthe Gwatkin – both of whom are delightful actors with lots of stage presence. Most of the lost boys are, in fact, girls with Rachael Heard doing lovely work as a feisty Tootles. The pirates have an suitably motley, ragged, piratical edge because they’re a diverse bunch in terms of age and size as well as gender with Emma Constantine strong as a cuddly, Cornish Smee getting close to Marianna Allen who, as Nanny Nora presents a sort-of Dame.

Stephen Duckham’s script/book, a version which was new to me, is well thought out too – a lot of quite close reference to the original JM Barrie with some rather ingengious liberties such as taking Nanny Nora to Neverland and developing her into the mother figure rather than Wendy. Personally I could have done without her alcoholism and mildly risqué lines but Allen does it well enough and the rest of the audience seemed to like it. Another departure from most other productions is a simple low-tech, but very effective, way of conveying the flying when you’re trying to keep the budget down and not set yourself up with a whole folder full of health and safety issues.

The real show stealer, though, is Emilio Nieta as Captain Hook. He is head and shoulders above everyone else in every sense. He follows the tradition of being costumed like Charles II and speaks the most gloriously dishy/sexy heightened RP with a resonant echo on it. When he sings – not perhaps his greatest strength – you can still feel the power of that voice. He uses every inch of his long body to express disdain, determination and malice except when he hears the crocodile and crumples, ludicrously, into a frightened six year old. He commands the stage whenever he’s on it and is one of the best Hooks I’ve ever seen – and there have been dozens over the years.

I also quite liked Joe Warrilow as a slightly older and less boyish Peter than some but he is pretty watchable especially when he’s mimicking Hook’s voice and laughing with the others. Rhea Baker delights as Wendy – lots of poise and a good singing voice – and Carly Harwood makes a good fist of Tiger Lily with angular dancing (choreography by Bethany Kimber) and attractive singing.

Meanwhile Peter Bailey’s five-piece band are supporting all this from their usual corner below stage right. There’s a lovely moment when Nieta is singing a silly song on stage and the band members all wave coloured panto wands in rhythm at the same time as playing.

It’s an enjoyable couple of hours of family theatre. Panto, like a dog, is not just for Christmas. QED.

 

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-GDS%20Productions-Peter%20Pan&reviewsID=3874

monolog 3
The Conundrum by Alex Murtinheira, Dropping Pennies by Sophie White, Pickled Limes by Cathy Jansen-Ridings, On The Out by Peter Hastings
performance date: 18 Feb 2020
venue: Chickenshed Theatre, Chase Side, Southgate, London N14 4PE
 

⭐⭐⭐

I was deeply moved by Cathy Jansen-Ridings’s Pickled Limes. In a beautifully written monologue which examines a long term relationship, Marion (Julie Wood) is angry with the absent Patrick. His empty chair turns out to be more telling than we’re led to think at first and her constant slurping of red wine tells its own story. Wood gets all the right irritation, anger, sadness, regret and guilt – most of which I can identify with personally – in a very finely nuanced performance. She is also, in places, very funny.

Pickled Limes is one of the four varied monologues which make up Group One of Chickenshed’s 2020 Monologue programme which it entitled Monolog 3 because this is the third year. There is another parallel show featuring four different monologues.

We also hear Peter Hastings’s On the Out in which Olivier LeClair presents a volatile, troubled, vulnerable man just released from prison and waiting for his lift. The Condundrum by Alex Murtinheira gives us an eminent historian (Finn Walters) – geeky and gawky – agitatedly trying to solve a major linguistic mystery

Maria Wheeler is very good indeed in Dropping Pennies by Sophie White. There has been an incident of domestic violence and she’s talking to the police. But is she the victim or the perpetrator? Wheeler has a very naturalistic trick of hesitating before her character tries, quite articulately, to explain her point of view, tapping her long black false nails on the table for emphasis. It’s convincing acting.

As Lou Stein, Chickenshed’s artistic director, notes in the Monolog 3 programme, the monologue “has now matured into a fully-fledged dramatic genre” presented in theatres everywhere. It is no longer something actors do only when the phone doesn’t ring or just something for drama school showcases. It is therefore pleasing to see monologues being commissioned, performed and celebrated in this way.

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Chickenshed-monolog%203&reviewsID=3868

The Dog Walker
By Paul Minx
performance date: 15 Feb 2020
venue: Jermyn Street Theatre, 16b Jermyn Street, London SW1Y 6ST
 

⭐⭐⭐⭐

We’re in New York in a grubby, untidy upstairs flat. Keri Levin (Victoria Yeates) and Herbert Doakes (Andrew Dennis) are “two peas in the same damaged pod”. Life has not treated either of them kindly. Both are broken by personal tragedy, we realise as their back stories gradually unfold, but I’ll spare you the spoilers.

In other ways they are diametrically different. Keri is lost to trauma. She’s alcoholic, drug addicted, crazed, deluded, sluttish, agoraphobic and showing traits of nymphomania but her wits are sharp and she has a good line in cutting and/or deliberately inappropriate remarks. Then her agency dog walker arrives in the shape of businesslike but brittle Herbert. And the first thing to say about this very funny, achingly poignant, ultimately hopeful, ninety-minute piece is that these two actors work outstandingly well together: listening, snapping back, arguing, condoling, bouncing off each other and making expert use of pauses and silence. And they do all this using pretty convincing New York accents.

Yeates has a way of gazing soulfully which speaks volumes about her mental health as she develops her character so that she’s riveting as well as horrifying. Dennis’s character is a complete contrast and, my goodness, how he captures his character’s mood swings as we shift through time in three acts separated by just a minute or two for costume change and breath drawing. Doakes goes from being briskly professional, sensible and reasonable to embittered succumbing to passion and anguish (and drink) but also always comic to a greater or lesser extent because the situation itself is so incongruous.

The Dog Walker is an entertaining and thoughtful new play, intelligently presented under Harry Burton’s direction. And Isabella Van Braeckel’s messy set for Keri’s flat, centered round her unmade bed, sets the scene nicely. Definitely one for the try-and-see list.

 

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-The%20Dog%20Walker&reviewsID=3864

Persona
Adaptation of Ingmar Bergman’s iconic film by Paul Schoolman. Presented by Persona Onstage by arrangement with Josef Weinberger Plays Limited, London on behalf of The Ingmar Bergman Foundation.
performance date: 29 Jan 2020
venue: Riverside Studios, 101 Queen Caroline Street, Hammersmith, London W6 9

Photos: Pamela Raith

⭐⭐⭐

It’s an intriguing and challenging piece, the real star of which is the earth harp, played by its inventor, William Close. Vibrating, pitched wires are suspended right across the auditorium from their glitzy Wurlitzer like base stage at stage right. Close, who looks like a powerful Viking, stands legs akimbo wearing gloves which he has dusted with some kind of resin for cohesion. He then strokes, or plucks the wires to create ethereal, minor key melodic music. It’s very spectacular, highly atmospheric and well deserving of its longish solo spot at the start – a quasi overture to the play.

This is an adaptation – by Paul Schoolman who also directs, narrates and plays minor roles – of Ingmar Bergman’s 1966 film. And we’re never allowed to forget that. Scenery – mostly a seascape in various moods – is projected, moving, onto the back wall which also displays photographs including a series of horrifying, familiar ones at the end. The earth harp meanwhile provides sound effects and filmic background music throughout. Sometimes Schoolman, as narrator, breaks in and comments on the making of the film.

In a play which explores who we are, who we think we are and how we consequently relate to each other, Elizabet (Nobuhle Mngcwengi) is a famous actress. Apparently happily married and mother of a six year old, she is in hospital suffering from paralysis and mutism. Because doctors can find nothing wrong with her, physically or mentally, she is sent to the seaside in the care of a nurse, Alma (Alice Krige) to recover. The relationship between the two women and their troubled back stories (no spoilers) drives the rest of the narrative.

Mngcwengi is silent for most of the ninety minutes but communicates powerfully with her face and head. She listens and responds to Alice effectively in what must be a pretty difficult role to carry off. Krige as Alice, on the other hand, has a massive speaking part. She is impassioned, angry, maudlin, unhappy, caring, conscientious and troubled – and convincing.

This is a play which requires a lot of concentration, asks more questions than it answers and isn’t going to be everyone’s cup of tea – the man next to me was very fidgety and kept sighing. Nonetheless, it’s a fascinating idea and the quality of performance is high.

 

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-Persona&reviewsID=3850

Isn’t it odd how “gender-blind” casting and the not-enough-good-roles-for-women issue still vexes the profession and yet many amateur companies have little choice?

Amateur companies often have a strong pool of very competent women but struggle to cast male roles because fewer men sign up to amdram. I saw, for instance, a rather jolly non-pro Peter Pan (half term panto – good idea)  last week in which John and Michael Darling, most of the pirates and lost boys were played by girls and women. The dame – usually of course played by a man pretending to be a grotesque woman – was played by a woman too which certainly gives pause for thought. There weren’t many men on stage but it all worked to pretty reasonable theatrical effect.

I know too, that amateur companies have to cast their nets quite widely when they’re trying to cast say, Priscilla Queen of the Desert, The Gondoliers, or anything else which really does demand some strong male casting.

And yet, at another level, we’re still told that men dominate the profession to the detriment of talented women so what on earth is going on? Are drama schools getting equal numbers of applicants? Because if they’re not but are recruiting 50/50 (as I know most of them are) then they are presumably not applying  quite the the same  strict criteria to men that they do to women.

The only drama school I know which determinedly recruits on talent, potential and nothing else usually ends up with far more girls than boys – many of them, presumably,  the very ones, who’ve been shining in their local community or youth theatre.

I often see quite weak graduating students in drama school showcases because we are, of course, running too many courses and training far more actors/performers  than the industry needs or can absorb. In a showcase “tail” most will usually be male. That confirms my strong, long held suspicion that some of them were enrolled more for political reasons than for their ability.

And yet … traditionally once they’re out and available for hire male actors find far more roles and opportunities than female ones. There’s something very strange happening here. And it boils down to muddled thinking about casting as well as recruitment to drama school.

Don’t blame Shakespeare, by the way. He was simply writing within the constraints of his day. In 2020, as most productions now acknowledge, there’s no reason why nearly all Shakespeare’s roles can’t be played very successfully by women as anyone who saw Glenda Jackson as Lear or Harriet Walter as Brutus will attest. I’ve also seen women ably playing Banquo, Bottom, Mercutio, Hamlet and lots of others.

Television and film are, possibly, different because we do expect a certain adherence to naturalism and suspend our disbelief less readily. But look at the number of shows which now revolve around women and create wonderful roles for them: Gentleman Jack, Call the Midwife and The Crown to cite just three examples from dozens I could mention.

Yes, these women are there. One of the ways of solving the gender imbalance might be to forget quotas and simply recruit the best. Trouble is, it wouldn’t be long before we were fretting about a shortage of male actors for professional roles. Welcome to Topsy Turvy Land.

Perhaps the time has come to focus on trying to persuade more boys to take part in schools, youth theatres and local companies. A big project in schools nationwide perhaps? “It’s cool to perform”? We need the best – regardless of gender.

Meanwhile, on the face of it,  it seems pretty absurd that talented female actors are abundant at pre-entry level but struggle against (often) less talented males for roles once they hit the industry.

Nobody knows for certain (although several journalists have made rigorous efforts to find out) how the tradition of buying and eating ice cream in theatre intervals began. It’s certainly deeply entrenched now and may be linked to the same tradition in cinemas which has been with us almost since the screen began to flicker.

It’s an odd thing to do, when you think about it. How many of us would – at home – suddenly reach for a pricey junk food sugar fix at nine o’clock in the evening? Well each to her (his) own but it’s the “pricey” bit which has been vexing me lately.

I almost never succumb to the ice cream thing despite usually being in a theatre or concert hall several times each week. In fact it was probably twenty years since I’d bought one. Then – last summer when I was feeling low and it was very hot – I was reviewing at the proms and suddenly fancied one. I am still reeling with indignation and astonishment that my little five minute indulgence cost me £4.50. I won’t bore you with Ancient Briton comments such as that when I was first married I could buy a week’s groceries for that – but I confess it all went through my mind.

Since then I’ve been watching ice cream costs elsewhere – I gave in again last month at Jermyn Street Theatre and paid a much more reasonable £2. My grown up granddaughters wanted to treat me at Cambridge Arts Theatre recently because I’d bought them a pre-show supper. I assured them that it shouldn’t be more than £2.50. They returned with an ice cream for everyone but were annoyed that they’d had to pay £4.00 each.

Such pricing is outrageous. The brand leader is Criterion Ices and they are sold wholesale for £18.53 for eighteen 130ml units That is, please note, JUST OVER ONE POUND PER TUB and I don’t suppose competing brands are very different.  But some theatre managements seem to think it’s OK to chalk up a 300 or 350% profit. The words “rip” and “off” come to mind. Well done Jermyn Street – yes, of course, theatres and venues need to find ways of maximising their income and I suppose ice creams can help with that. 100% profit is reasonable. Any more is extortionate.

On the other hand, I’d rather – as I’ve said before – that tickets were priced according to what the theatre needs to charge to balance the books. I really don’t like added extras (“transaction charges”, “heritage levy” etc) or merchandise sold at obscene prices.

And if we could get to that stage perhaps we could phase out ice cream sales in theatre altogether? They don’t sell them at Unicorn Theatre and that’s a dedicated children’s venue. Perhaps there’s a case for boycotting them elsewhere? I’m tempted to lose a lot of friends by starting a campaign. It really isn’t necessary especially given the so-called obesity crisis and the state of the nation’s teeth. Snacking is not good for any of us – except, perhaps, money grabbing theatre managements.

130ml-vanilla