Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Being Mr Wickham (Susan Elkin reviews)

Being Mr Wickham

Written and performed by Adrian Lukis

Directed by Guy Unsworth

Minerva Theatre, Chichester

Star rating: 4

 

Everybody remembers Pride and Prejudice’s Mr Wickham. He’s the cad who elopes with Lydia and has to be paid off by Darcy. But few remember him better than actor Adrian Lukis who played him the 1995 TV version, famed for Colin Firth in a wet shirt.

Lukis’s entertaining 60 minute play presents Wickam at 60 reminiscing late at night in his own home. And he’s very good company as he flirts knowingly with the audience and shows us exactly why first Elizabeth, and then Lydia, fell for him. He and Lydia have had a tiff earlier in the evening and she’s shut him out of the bedroom. Yes, they are still together, because  – peccadillos on both sides, notwithstanding – they complement each other in their hedonism.

This piece is funny from any point of view although the better you know Pride and Prejudice the richer it is. And he does make assumptions about that when, for example, he simply says, referring to Mrs Bennet “And that mother …”  It is also poignant in places. The sexagenarian Mr Wickham is occasionally wistful and he certainly knows his Byron.

Lukis gives us his childhood growing up with standoffish Darcy and there’s diversion into his schooldays with a vicious schoolmaster on whom the adult Wickham eventually takes revenge. We also get a recollection of seeing Byron and a famous courtesan at the theatre. And I liked the recognitions of the horror of the Battle of Waterloo. The play fleshes out, and builds on, Jane Austen’s novel

Thus we meet, and hear Wickham’s views on, most of the characters in Pride and Prejudice including a summary of where they all are “now” – around 1855 with Victoria firmly on the throne and less establishment approval of “fun”.

Many actors I see (and often don’t hear) are busily channelling Stanislavskian naturalism at the expense of  Stanislavskian clarity. Lukis is  definitely not one of them. He’s an old school actor who sounds every end consonant and speaks to everyone in the room despite the constraints of the Minerva’s thrust stage. And he does this without ever seeming mannered. Bravo.

Most impressive of all though is Lukis’s timing. He knows exactly how to drop asides and let them rest – while he half grins or cocks an eyebrow, as the audience responds.  He is, for a long time, very condemnatory of Darcy but eventually, after a pause, says “But of course there was a sister… ” and waits for the audience to remember and chuckle. Then his Wickham gives a hilarious account of her £30,000 fortune not mattering followed by a well practised  raconteur’s account of her being rescued from his clutches.

It’s a very accomplished show. Every drama school student should see it.

 

 

Cohen, Bernstein, Joni & Me – Upstairs at the Gatehouse

Cohen, Bernstein, Joni & Me continues at Upstairs at the Gatehouse, London until 1 February 2026.

Star rating: four stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ✩

This warmly engaging, autobiographical, one-woman story presents Deb Filler’s adventures as a wannabe singer. A complete stranger in the bar beforehand somehow clocked that I was reviewing and asked me incredulously whether she, Filler, really had met all those people in the title. I had to tell him that, at that stage, I didn’t know. The answer is that yes, she did – sort of. And those three unlikely encounters provide the piece with its structure.

She met Cohen, for example, when she was driving taxis in New York City and he was her fare to the airport. So she told him jokes and it led to a years-long email friendship. She also met Peter, Paul and Mary to whom her mother presented a cheesecake – as you do.

At the heart of it all are Filler’s Jewish parents and especially her father …

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review  musicaltheatrereview.com

 

My friends fall into two main camps: Reading Friends with whom I discuss books continually and Non-reading Friends who chat to me about other things.  The RFs and the NFs don’t seem to have much in common if they meet.   RFs, six of whom share the dedication in my own latest book Unheard Voices: Tales from the Margins of Literature, often suggest titles for this blog.

And that was how I stumbled across Marianne Cronin’s moving, compelling debut novel which was published in 2021: one of my RFs spotted it in her local library.

It tells the story of two lonely women, both terminally ill in a Glasgow hospital. Lenni is seventeen and Margot is eighty-three so between them they have a hundred years of memories. When they meet, and hit it off, in the hospital art room, they decide to record their memories in paintings as a shared project. It’s a simple enough plot and yet in Cronin’s hands it has more layers than an onion – and nearly as many tears. It isn’t a gloomy book, however. In places it’s very funny.

Lenni, who is half Swedish and therefore bi-lingual, has a troubled background. Her parents aren’t around and she’s a loner though no choice of her own. Her voice is sharp, sardonic and her personality is prematurely aged by her predicament. Her burgeoning friendship with the patient, bemused hospital chaplain, Arthur, is skilfully nuanced as she wickedly challenges his Christian conformity and uncovers his vulnerability. In an interview at the end of the novel Cronin reveals that Lenni’s very distinctive voice came to her fully formed in the middle of the night quipping about the difference between being “terminal” and passing through one at an airport. It provided the novel’s opening chapter.

Margot’s roller-coaster life meanwhile has brought her a bereavement from which she has never recovered, two very different husbands and a woman named Meena. All this is gently and gradually unfolded in a mixture of first person “present day” narrative by Lenni interpolated with recollections which they both narrate. The story telling is complex but beautifully controlled, complete with one or two satisfying twists.

Other engaging characters we meet along the way include sympathetic, decent Pippa, who runs the art class, New Nurse who is Lenni’s main carer, Margot’s fabulous second husband, Humphrey (oh my, that account of the initial onset of Alzheimers!) and the ebulliently attractive Meena. There’s a lot of caring humanity and benevolence in this uplifting story.

It’s obvious, or at least the reader assumes it is, how a novel about two dying people has to end. Actually Cronin springs a surprise. Yes, of course some things are inevitable but sometimes there are unexpected developments and a glimmer of hope even in the grimmest of situations. And I wasn’t remotely surprised to read that Cronin herself had a brush with potentially life-limiting illness which provided the stimulus for this novel.

I recommend it warmly.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Frontline Midwife by Anna Kent

The Olive Boy

Written and performed by Ollie Maddigan

Directed by Scott Le Crass

Free Run Productions

Southwark Playhouse

Star rating: 5

The power of this show lies in its visceral truthfulness. It tells the arresting story of a teenage boy losing his mother at age 15 and is firmly rooted in Ollie Maddigan’s own experience: the confusion, the denial, the jokey front and the preoccupation with sex. After all life and hormones don’t stop simply because you’re grieving.

Maddigan is a phenomenal performer. There’s a lot of physicality in this show: sometimes almost balletic. His range of voices is riveting. When he speaks direct to the audience, he has beautifully clear articulation but sounds totally natural. He commands both the stage and audience attention. And he oozes charisma.

The structure of the show presents Ollie remembering events and reconstructing them from the characters in the school canteen, to the girl he’d like to get close to at a party and to angry conversations with the formerly absent father he now has to live with.  And there are scenes with an unseen counsellor voiced by Ronni Acona which work rather well. It’s all very fast paced with video footage on the back wall of a home movie of Maddigan as a child and his mother which is used as a framing device.

Olives are thematic. The Ollie who’s a character in his own play says that he was born with a green tinge owing to a minor birth issue, soon rectified. It led to his mother nicknaming him “My Olive Boy”. At the same time he loathes olives which doesn’t stop him scoffing them at a party with disastrous (hilarious) effect. And at one point he recalls that his mother had red and green mottling on her body like an olive before she died.

This play is very funny – teenage boys can be ridiculous and Maddigan runs with that – but it’s also deeply serious. Grief is an expression of love and it’s a universal experience. You can’t get rid of it by burying it. If you face it and live with it, it’s richly empowering and means that the person you’ve lost lives on in you. It’s quite a message.

On the other hand I’m still chuckling at why sex is like fishing: if you leave your rod out in the water for long enough, sooner or later a fish will come along and put it in its mouth …

The Olive Boy started life at The Hope in 2021. That was followed by the Camden Fringe, Edinburgh Fringe, a national tour and now this run in London. It deserves to live on.

Ghosts

Henrik Ibsen, adapted by Richard Eyre

Directed by David Emmet

Questors Theatre, The Studio

16-26 January 2026

Star rating; 4

It’s a dark, brooding play about how the past can devastate the present. It also explores some very difficult issues including  congenital syphilis, incest and assisted dying. No wonder it was widely banned almost as soon it was written in 1881. It’s Ibsen at his best, boldy challenging the assumptions and conventions of his day.

All credit to Questors Theatre for tackling it and for bringing it off with such aplomb. Richard Eyre’s adaptation pares it down to 90 intense minutes although he retains the three act structure but we’re in period. Juliette Demoulin’s set gives us 1880s furniture spaced to give the impression of a comfortable middle class home and it sits well in The Studio with seating on four sides.

Mrs Alving (Caroline Bleakley) is a widow who has just welcomed home her only son Oswald (Usmaan Khan) after a long absence. She and Pastor Manders (Darren Chancey) are in the process of setting up an orphanage as a memorial to her late husband. Also in the mix are a sparky servant girl Regina (Stella Robinson) and her rather unpleasant father Jacob (Martin Halvey). Nothing is at it seems – this is Ibsen after all. The titular ghosts haunt all five characters mainly in connection with the late Alving, who has left a great deal of damage in his wake.

Khan is terrific as Oswald – initially casual and hiding his feelings but eventually subsiding into a form of hell not of his making. He is a recent East 15 Acting School graduate, and it shows. He has that very distinctive way of immersing himself in role with charisma and conviction that I’ve often noticed in other who’ve trained at East 15.  And Caroline Bleakley is outstanding as his anguished, misguided mother. I haven’t seen an actor having to mop the tears and visibly bring herself back to the real world at curtain call, since I saw Sharon C Clarke in Death of a Salesman.

Chancey does well as the manipulative, patronising, hypocritical, self-interested Manders. He’s so convincing that I wanted to hit him. Robinson finds plenty of warmth in Regina and her anger scene is strong. And Halvey imbues Jacob with the right level of cunning and sycophancy.

I first encountered Ghosts as a 19 year old student when I both studied and saw it. I’ve seen it several times since, most memorably directed for the RSC by Katie Mitchell with Jane Lapotaire and (a very young) Simon Russell Beale in 1994. This Questors production is as powerful as I’ve ever seen this play.

 

 

Hadestown: Teen Edition

Anais Mitchell

Directed by Cat Nicol

Behind the Bars

ADC Theatre, Cambridge

 

Star rating: 4

 

Hadestown is a hauntingly mesmeric piece and to see it carried off by a company of talented 14 to 19 year olds is quite a treat. Their  work buzzes with energy and enthusiasm.

The catchy folk/jazz music, often very lyrical, captivates from the first bar of that exposed trombone solo (Ellie Curson – excellent) at the start. The rest of the band does a fine job too, under Sam Kirby’s direction from keys. Musicians are seated upstage with a corridor through so that cast and players become an integrated unit.  There are also two very competent actor musos in the ensemble (George Ducker and Nafsika Kazani.)

Jennie Youngs, as Hermes who narrates and directs the two timeless love stories within the plot, finds exactly the right level of sassy insouciance. She’s a very engaging performer to watch with the wings on her bomber jacket and wild blue green hair. Youngs sings in a rich mid range voice too, every note and every word made to speak with just the right level of American inflexion.

Hades is a gift of a part for stage dominance and drama and Laurie Jones carries it off with aplomb. His Hades is suitably chilly, ruthless and dominant until we finally see him, softened, with his beloved Persephone once the agreement is made. Jones has an intensely powerful bass voice which belies his 15 year old stature. Naomi Mallabone more than matches him. She’s an unusually mature actor and singer and has a gift for nuanced facial expression.

Then there’s Elin Gregory as the vulnerable, wistful Eurydice and she tears your heart out with her anguished singing. And Charlie Dawe, complete with guitar creates a charismatic Orpheus with the requisite beautiful singing voice.

The Fates (Ceana Arnold, Grace Maynard and Isabelle Holme) work well together as a menacing trio and provide some attractive harmony singing.

And so to the backbone of the show: the ensemble who are workers in the hell which is Hadestown. My goodness they’re slick. Movement director Frances Sayer has them providing repetitive angular movements to represent machines and it’s seamless. So are the dance interludes.

Behind the Bars has been producing theatre in Cambridge for fifteen years. This is their first foray into youth theatre and they did it, the director told me after the show, by holding open auditions. The result is an achievement to be proud of and I hope the company has are plans for more youth theatre very soon.

 

It was my eldest granddaughter’s partner (they’re to become parents next month) who recommended this interesting novel to me. He is a bookish chap and has gradually become one of the many people with whom I often chat about reading. And, given that he’s half a century younger than me and male, it’s surprising how often our tastes and interests coincide.

The Memory Police (2020) is set on a fictional Japanese island at some point in the not too far distant future. Memories are illegal. And for a long time random things – roses, hats, specific fruits, photographs, novels and eventually body parts – have been being forcibly made to disappear one by one and erased from memory. The titular Memory Police are ruthless enforcers of this policy so we’re somewhere between George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty Four and Franz Kafka’s Metamorphosis with nasty Stasi undertones.

The narrator is an unnamed female (shades of Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca) who lives alone and writes novels – until novels are “disappeared”. Her friends are her publisher whom she calls R and “The Old Man” who is the widower of her old nurse. They trust each other implicitly and R retains the gene which means his memories are intact. Once – no plot spoilers – he and the narrator are obliged by circumstances to spend a lot of time together he works hard at trying to re-programme her brain to enable her to recover some of her lost memories. And that, of course, is subversive, illegal and dangerous.

Meanwhile the Old Man lives on the shabby, damaged boat he used to run as a ferry to the mainland until such trips, concepts and ideas were “disappeared”. The use of “disappear” as a transitive verb is sinister and effective. Then natural forces change things. And I really admired Ogawa’s invocation of landscape, weather and climate.

So what is all this really about? I found myself thinking a lot about Orwell’s “thought police”. If you condition or coerce people into believing there are things they must not say or think – and that happens all around us every day – then memories become distorted and you lose trust in your own mind and judgement. Patrick Hamilton’s play Gaslight (1938)  of which I coincidentally saw and reviewed a production at about the same time as I was reading this novel, makes the same pretty terrifying point. If you bully people insistently enough you can make them believe anything – as every tyrant understands very well from King Herod to … well, supply your own names. This is not the place for me to engage in international political judgements.

In The Memory Police R represents the central voice of reason, morality and humanity. We need people like him at every level of every society.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: One Hundred Years of Lenni and Margot by Marianne Cronin

Writer: Lyle Kessler

Director: Al Miller

Two adult brothers, Treat and Phillip, live together in a house in North Philadelphia. Their carefully managed Pennsylvanian accents, voice-coached by Rebecca Clark Carney, take a few minutes to tune into.

Philip (Fred Woodley Evans) is cowering, anxious and unable to leave the house, although fascinated by the street outside. Treat (Chris Walley) – all aggression and control – is a professional mugger bringing home what they need to live on. Then one day, he kidnaps drunken Harold (Forbes Masson), who is cleverer than Treat. He quickly sobers up and takes charge. Lyle Kessler’s 1983 play is a powerful, often darkly funny, exploration of fraternity, loss and family – all three men are orphans – along with the dynamics of power. And the dialogue is admirably pacey.

As Treat, Walley is an exceptionally eloquent listener. He can communicate a whole raft of emotional depth with the tiniest twitch of a facial muscle or subtle body movement. And Phillip is supposed to be disturbed, vulnerable and backward, but he has potential which Harold recognises and exploits. Woodley Evans brings a hollow-eyed attentiveness to Phillip, and it’s riveting to watch.  As Harold, actually a long-exiled gangster from Chicago, Masson does the bright-eyed, almost mercurial, manipulation very well.

All three characters are, in a sense, tragic, and director Al Miller knows exactly how to point that out by allowing silence to speak. He also uses every inch of Jermyn Street Theatre’s wide but awkward playing space to interesting effect, especially during the fight scenes (fight director Enric Ortuno), with actors almost spinning across the stage at times.

Sarah Beaton’s set is ingenious. There has to be a window which opens for Phillip to look out of, and it’s neatly contrived here. So is the table, which moves centre stage for Act 2, which is set two weeks later.

Anyone new to this modern American classic will struggle to anticipate the ending. In Miller’s hands, it’s as poignant, moving and unexpected as it could be.

Runs until: 24 January 2026

The Reviews Hub Star Rating;  4

Brothers, bonds and blood
This review was first published by The Reviews Hub