Press ESC or click the X to close this window

The Daughter-in-Law (Susan Elkin reviews)

The Daughter-in-Law – ★★★
by D H Lawrence. Produced by Arcola Theatre and Dippermouth
performance date: 15 Jan 2019
venue: Arcola Theatre, 24 Ashwin Street, Dalston, London E8 3DL

Photo: Idil Sukan/Draw HQ

★★★

My life, even now, is full of firsts. I’ve read most of DH Lawrence’s prose and poetry, much of it many times. But The Daughter-in-Law, written in 1913 but not staged until 1967, was my first encounter with one of his plays. Like most of the novels it explores the relationships between sons and lovers and/or strong passionate women and weak men against a backdrop of the mining community world that Lawrence was born into.

It’s an uncompromising, rather grown-up regional play written and performed in Nottinghamshire dialect – comprehensible without the glossary in the programme thanks to some very clear speaking, good acting and an excellent job by voice and dialect coach Penny Dyer. Lawrence isn’t usually a bundle of laughs but in places this play – the dialogue well paced – is quite funny. Marriage, snaps Veronica Roberts as the forthright, unsmiling Mrs Gascoyne, is like a mousetrap … the cheese doesn’t last long.

Stomping heavily about with her stick, Mrs Gascoyne learns from a neighbour (Tessa Bell-Briggs – powerful) that her newly married elder son Luther (Matthew Barker) has recently impregnated another girl. The conversation is naturalistic and compelling in the Arcola’s transverse configuration with a longish dining table forming the centrepiece in the miner’s cottage – either Mrs Gascoyne’s or Luther’s.

The girl needs forty pounds (around £3,000 in today’s money) for an ‘arrangement’. Money is short. There’s a contentious miners’ strike but Luther’s wife, Minnie (Ellie Nunn), who has worked as a governess, has a little nest egg. Should she pay up? Eventually she loses her money rather more dramatically but no spoilers here.

Nunn is splendid as the titular daughter-in-law looking after Luther – who makes a terrific first appearance in his “pit dirt” – and then rebelling against the injustice of the marriage she’s in before finally regretting her feistiness and realising just how much she really does love her man. It’s an unlikely, very Laurentian, ending in which the men triumph over women against the odds. Nunn’s is complex role to bring off but she nips ably between cool reasoned argument and passion. And she’s exceptionally good at the shouty bits.

Barker gives a balanced performance as the troubled, confused Luther – still tied, as his wife forcibly asserts, to his doughty mother’s apron strings. And Matthew Biddulph does well as the faintly foxy, jokey unmarried younger brother, similarly over-attached to his mother.

It’s a wordy, but generally well constructed, play and director Jack Gamble ensures that the pace rarely flags even in the 90 minute first half. It’s an interesting piece of theatre although I doubt that DH Lawrence will ever feature of lists of finest British playwrights.

Photo: Idil Sukan/Draw HQ

 
 First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Arcola%20Theatre%20(professional)-The%20Daughter-in-Law%20-%20%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85&reviewsID=3456
 
 
 
 
Kinky Boots – ★★★★
Music and lyrics by Cyndi Lauper, book by Harvey Fierstein. Based on the film by Geoff Deane and Tim Firth. Produced by Cameron Mackintosh and Playful Productions
performance date: 14 Jan 2019
venue: Marlowe Theatre, Canterbury
reviewer/s: Susan Elkin (Sardines review)

Photo: Helen Maybanks

★★★★

Kinky Boots, full of truth, challenging issues and triumphant feel-good factor, is just the show for these politically troubled times and a damp, chilly January night. You simply can’t help but smile at its cheery ebullience.

The 2005 film (Geoff Deane and Tim Firth) was entertaining and thoughtful, the West End version was a roof-rouser and this touring production more than ticks the boxes. A reminder in case you’ve been on Mars for the last fourteen years or so: Price and Son, a family-run shoe factory in Northampton is unexpectedly inherited by Charlie Price who discovers that it’s in deep financial trouble. A chance meeting with a transvestite dancer leads to the idea that making sexy long boots, strong enough to take a man’s weight, for the Milan Fashion Week could save the day for Charlie and his workforce.

Kayi Ushe is splendid as larger than life Lola, strutting about issuing put-downs being outrageously funny and – then the real depth – revealing of his innate vulnerability. I have a very wise, experienced clergyperson friend who says that the toilet scene is the best bit. She means that it’s about acceptance, trust and love, I think. This is the point when flamboyant Lola – aka as Simon from Clacton and now conventionally dressed – tells Charlie (Joel Harper-Jackson) about his troubled childhood. In the musical version it is, of course, a sung dialogue and Ushe does it with powerful poignance. And when Harper-Jackon joins in, with minimal accompaniment at this point. it becomes really special. It works brilliantly within the rhythm of the whole piece too because it contrasts so colourfully with the big brash singing and dancing numbers.

Harper-Jackson sings well as Charlie and is a very convincing anxious factory owner with other conflicts in his life to compound his problems. Paula Lane is good value as Lauren, his right hand woman in the factory and Demitri Lampra has entertaining fun as the lumbering, homophobic Don especially in the boxing scene with Ushe from whom he is about as different in every way as he could possibly be. Inspired casting.

Really, though, this is an ensemble piece. The factory staff becomes an accomplished, slick chorus from which each actor emerges to play small roles. Then there’s Lola’s backing group of drag queens from her London nightclub act. Their work is energetic, deliciously over-the-top and nicely choreographed (Jerry Mitchell who also directs).

Warmly recommended for an escapist evening if you need cheering up.

Photo: Helen Maybanks

 
 First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Marlowe%20Theatre%20(professional)-Kinky%20Boots%20-%20%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85&reviewsID=3454
Little Women the Musical
Book by Allan Knee, lyrics by Mindi Dickstein, music by Jason Howland. Based on the novel by Louisa M Alcott.
society/company: Cambridge Theatre Company
performance date: 12 Jan 2019
venue: ADC Theatre, Cambridge

This musical version of Little Women was completely new to me. Much of Jason Howland’s music is lovely and it deserves to be much better known. It opened for a short run on Broadway in 2005 and then toured the US. There was a production at Hope Mill Theatre, Manchester in 2017 but nonetheless this is a show off most people’s radar which is a pity. Off to Massachusetts is great fun, for example, and the proposal duet Small Umbrella in the Rainis fine and imaginative piece of writing.

Yes, there’s plenty of fine material here for a high flying (although still only four years old) community company to work on. And Cambridge Theatre Company certainly rises to the challenge admirably.

Allan Knee’s book and Mindi Dickstein’s lyrics create a very sympathetic and respectful account of Louisa M Alcott’s famous, feisty, quasi feminist American Civil War novel about a relatively impoverished, middle class family of four daughters whose father is away in the war.

Emma Vieceli is splendid as the central character Jo, the impetuous, independent daughter with ambitions to write professionally (a loose self-portrait of Alcott herself). Vieceli, who sings with warmth, strength, accuracy and sensitivity, catches all the conflict Jo deals with between love for her family and passion to succeed. She’s an eloquent actor too and it will be a long time before my image of Jo March as a literary character ceases to have Vieceli’s expressive face.

In the support roles there’s some top notch singing from Cat Nicol as the girls’ mother. Eleanor Thompson is delightful as Beth the piano playing sister who later becomes ill and Ekaterina Rahr-Bohr, as the youngest sister Amy deals with the complexities of the role with real flair. Her character is spitefully jealous but she’s no Austenian Lydia Bennett and eventually redeems herself. Caroline Dyson is, as ever, good value as the judgemental Aunt March – her soaring contralto voice works especially well in ensemble numbers – and Davinia Fisher brings the right level of worried maturity to the eldest sister, Meg.

The men are strong too. You can see why Meg falls for Matt Gregory’s attractively voiced John Brooke and Andrew Ruddick’s sardonic but ultimately coy Professor Bhaer convinces us that, yes, Jo might just succumb. Leo Stewart Oakley is persuasive as Laurie too and Richard Sockett, a very reliable Cambridge stalwart, is good as the initially irascible but later warmly supportive neighbour Mr Laurence.

Also very impressive is the (unseen) the twelve piece band led by James Harvey. There’s some very exposed string solo work in this score along with lots of different styles, rhythms and effects. And it all comes off with aplomb in this production.

Keep them coming, CTC. You may be in your infancy but you go from strength to strength and I’m already looking forward to the five further shows you have scheduled for later this year.

 First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Cambridge%20Theatre%20Company%20-Little%20Women%20the%20Musical&reviewsID=3451
Original Death Rabbit – ★★★★
By Rose Heiney
society/company: West End & Fringe
performance date: 11 Jan 2019
venue: Jermyn Street Theatre, 16b Jermyn Street, London SW1Y 6ST
 

★★★★

Rose Heiney’s 90-minute play about internet addiction, self respect, relationships and more is acutely observed and immaculately well written. Bravo.

A monologue, directed by Hannah Joss, it presents an unnamed 20-something woman (Kimberley Nixon) who occupies a gloriously squalid room (an accolade for designer Louie Whitemore), dressed in a filthy pink rabbit onesie – with ears. The set and her clothing reflect her state of mind. As she unravels her story we learn that, traumatised by her father’s developing violent, section-able schizophrenia in his mid fifties she becomes attached to “the bunny”. That doesn’t matter too much until she accidentally gets into a press photograph of a teenage funeral unconnected to her. Then she and her photograph, her tweets and her blog posts go viral and she becomes ever more “fucked up” as her favourite poet Philip Larkin bluntly but eloquently put it. But she never stops being very funny indeed as well as evoking horrified sympathy.

Nixon’s naturalistic acting is splendid. Most of the time the work is invisible and therefore totally convincing as she slurps vodka, fiddles with her computer, perches on an old sideboard or waves odd bits of the set about. She times her anecdotes skilfully and imitates everyone she meets and tells us about. She presents a fine cameo for example of her rampantly left wing but posh Oxford University friend Penny (Benenden and her father has five Labradors) and another of her strident, needy younger sister who can barely read packet instructions. The neat way she nails the all too recognisable stereotypes and the things they say is hilarious. She’d good at voices and accents too, playing in her native Welsh lilt but mimicking lots of others. It’s a bravura performance and if it was, in places, slightly gabbled with consequent stumbles on press night I shall put that down to opening night nerves.

It’s a fine, cuttingly topical play which showcases an outstanding performance. You have until 9 February to catch it.

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-Original%20Death%20Rabbit%20-%20%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85&reviewsID=3449
Aspects of Love – ★★★★
Music by Andrew Lloyd Webber. Lyrics by Don Black and Charles Hart. Based on the novel by David Garnett. Produced by Katy Lipson for Aria Entertainment and Hope Mill Theatre with Jim Kierstead.
society/company: Southwark Playhouse
performance date: 10 Jan 2019
venue: Southwark Playhouse
 

Kelly Price and Felix Mosse in ASPECTS OF LOVE. Photo: Pamela Raith

★★★★

Andrew Lloyd Webber’s 1989 sung-through, quasi-operatic show was probably overdue for a loving revival. It is shot through with the one song everyone knows – Love Changes Everything – which is arguably overused but there’s lot more to it than that.

Now it has one. Following a successful run at Hope Mill Theatre last year and ably directed by Jonathan O’Boyle, it’s small scale. But since this is a story of convoluted inter-generational relationships it sits rather well in the intimacy of the Southwark Playhouse space configured in the round

The music is substantially reduced in scale too. Originally written for full orchestra, here it is a transcription for two keyboards and percussion. MD, Richard Bates and his colleagues are out of sight above the stage playing plenty of attention to musical detail.

The 1955 novel on which this musical is based was written by David Garnett. It is rooted in the author’s own complex Bloomsbury Group relationships. It tells the story of love, loyalty, desire, regrets across three generations of one family. Garnett himself (to cut a long story short) was the lover of Angelica’s father Duncan Grant when she was born. A generation later he married her. And there are echoes of that in Aspects of Love.

Lyrics by Don Black and Charles Hart add a neat and witty dimension and it’s a credit to this cast and their director that you hear every word: “hatchet” rhymed with “catch it” for example. Jason Denvir’s set and costume designs and Aaron J Dootson’s lighting create lots of very appealing period atmosphere. Price’s dresses are stunning and when the stage is flooded with warm, mellow Mediterranean sun you can almost smell the armagnac.

And so to the cast. Kelly Price is terrific as the troubled but hedonistic Rose, a charismatic French actor who marries an older man. She brings what Marcel (Minal Patel), her business manager and theatre colleague, calls “your strength and your fragility” to life. Price finds brittleness, passion, humour and elegance in the role and has remarkable voice control and range – both in pitch and dynamic – especially in what, in a classical opera would be called “recitative”.

Also very strong is Felix Mosse as Alex. He’s meant to be 17 when he first meets Rose and Mosse, slight and boyish in appearance more than convinces us that he’ll be “twenty in three years’ time” He too can manage the lightest, quietest thoughtful song as well as passionate full belt and he’s a fine duet singer. The six-eight number he does with Eleanor Walsh as the pubescent Jenny with lots of verses comes off delightfully, for instance, as they both lean on the chromatic accidentals as the relationship between them begins to spark. It means that we can see what’s happening even if their characters can’t.

Walsh excels as the child who then blossoms into a desirable adolescent. Wince we might, but the age of consent was (and is) 15 in France where most of the action takes place. Alex is waiting – just as, in real life David Garnett waited for Angelica Bell throughout her childhood. The on-stage chemistry between Mosse and Walsh nails all that and her top notes are quite something.

This is one to catch if you can. It punches well above its weight.

Jerome Pradon, Kelly Price and Felix Mosse in ASPECTS OF LOVE. Photo: Pamela Raith

 
 First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Southwark%20Playhouse-Aspects%20of%20Love%20-%20%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85&reviewsID=3446
 

Time is one of the last abstract concepts to develop in children. It’s why a three year old cannot conceive of 10 more days until Christmas and many a nine or ten year old struggles with the notion that Julius Caesar invaded these shores a thousand years – or ten centuries –  before William of Normandy did. It was one of the very few useful observations I recall from my generally poor three year teaching training at Bishop Otter College, Chichester in the 1960s.

It presumably then follows that when a brain is heading in the opposite direction, at the other end of life, time is likely to be one of the first things to slip off the mental hard drive. That is certainly our experience.

I used to joke (perish the thought) about people “who don’t know what day of the week it is”. My Loved One hasn’t had a clue whether it’s Monday, Thursday or Sunday for over a year now. I’m drafting this piece on 14 January. Before I  disappeared off to my PC I asked him what month we’re in. After a bit of thought he said brightly, like an approval-seeking child: “Is it September?”  Asking him what the year is produces some unlikely answers too. Maybe because he lived the first 55 years of his life in the 20th century he readily slips back there.

None of that matters much because he can simply take each day as it comes and I’ll tell him what’s going on – careful to avoid information overload which always exacerbates confusion.

More disconcerting (for me, anyway) is his increasing inability to sort out what time of day it is or to be able to tell the time reliably on his watch or a clock. Several times in recent weeks I have told him, 6pm-ish, that I’ll start cooking dinner next job only to discover that he’s gone upstairs and started to undress because he thinks it’s bedtime. More than once he’s tried to get dressed in the middle of the night because “it’s time to get up”. I’ve sometimes found him coated and scarfed by the front door too because “We’re going to (Wherever) aren’t we?” when actually that planned excursion was hours later or the next day.

One night last week, I came in from a work job about an hour after the carer had finished her stint. MLO had painstakingly (although very badly – strange items in the wrong places) laid the table for a meal. “Oh” I said, a bit taken aback. “What’s this for?” He said it was for breakfast. He wasn’t sure how many people were coming so he’d laid it for three. He thought it was early morning. It’s quite surprising really that I don’t weep –  or tear my hair out –  more often.

Even odder – delusional in effect – is his conviction that “they” have in some way altered the time. “I don’t understand it.” he’ll say. “Why did they have to change something which worked perfectly well?” I’ve patiently explained about a hundred times that nothing has changed. In the UK we shift the time forward one hour in March and back one hour in October and have done so all his life, I point out. I get blank looks of disbelief as if I’m the one talking nonsense. It’s an idea very firmly lodged in his dementia-afflicted mind and a conversation we have on repeat loop.

Of course we’ve travelled a lot in recent years and have often had to deal with different time zones. Could that be why when I’m out working and ring him to touch base he sometimes asks me “What time is it where you are?” I tell him it’s nine o’clock at night, or whatever, just as it is for him. “No. I don’t think so” he’ll say. “I simply don’t understand this new system” and off we go again. It’s a circular route.

One day last week he was utterly convinced that if we go to Cambridge or Brighton where our sons and their families live the time would be different when we got there. Patience, patience, Susan. I explain. Again. “There are no time zones within the UK and never have been. If it’s midday in south London then it’s also midday in Aberdeen and Penzance. Trust me!”

You are supposed, I gather, not to argue with someone who has dementia. The professional advice is that you simply agree with everything they say. Hmm. I try but I really can’t have him getting dressed and wandering off at 2am or trying to go to bed when he hasn’t had any supper.

When it’s things which really don’t matter I’m trying to cultivate casual granddaughter-speak and that usefully impartial word “Whatever …” although I can’t get it out without a note of irony. In a way it’s rather nice because such an expression is so absurdly far from my normal speech mode that even MLO recognises the incongruity and we smile together. Sometimes.

Learning from GD1 at MLO’s 70th birthday lunch in 2015 (featured photograph). Doesn’t he look well here on the same day!

Nick 70 (1)

Theatre critics have diaries bubbling with commitments. There’s some sort of press night or performance almost every day and often more than one. Clashes are surprisingly common. Getting to as many shows as possible is a juggling act.

Most theatres, producers and companies –  and the PR companies the larger ones often outsource press liaison to –  understand this very well. So they do their utmost to accommodate reviewers as flexibly as possible. They need to get critics at their shows. They want reviews.

Except one: Cambridge Arts Theatre which has an extraordinarily rigid, dismissive way of working and presumably doesn’t want professional critics – prepared to put themselves out and travel – to review shows there.

This week Cambridge Operatic Society is staging My Fair Lady at the Arts. CaOS is a community company whose shows I have, for many years, regularly reviewed in Sardines Magazine, for which I do a lot of work. Sardines specialises in amateur theatre although it also runs many reviews of professional shows.

Anyway I can’t – usual diary problem – get to press night on Wednesday so I offered to cover the Thursday matinee. Oh no, no no. The Arts – and in this case you have to deal with the venue rather than the production company – cannot countenance giving press comps to a professional London critic writing for a nationally respected publication other than on press night. I pleaded and I made a case. To no avail. So I’m not going and there will be no review.

I simply do not understand this blinkered attitude. Thank goodness it’s unusual. On the same day that I was having this little spat with the Arts I received two invitations to review shows: one from Susan Jamson at Chickenshed and the other from David Burns, a freelance PR who’s looking after My Dad’s Gap Year starring Michelle Collins at Park Theatre.

It’s worth quoting them in full. Jamson wrote: “Please find details of our new production – monolog 2 which opens on Tuesday 12 February. Our press night will be on Tuesday 19 February, when we will be performing all seven of our monologues.  We would love you to join us if you are free on that day – however, if this date is not convenient, please let me know and I will arrange tickets on a more suitable evening.”

Burns’s email said: Do let me know if you’d like to book in for press night on Feb 1 or any subsequent performance.

Thank goodness for reasonableness and people who know first, how to do their job well and second, how to get the best out of those they work with rather than alienating them. I shall, of course, review both shows. Perhaps Jamson and Burns (and/or many others like them) could run a few training sessions for those with lessons to learn.

Sinatra: Raw – ★★★
Produced by James Seabright.
performance date: 02 Jan 2019
venue: The Crazy Coqs bar, Brasserie Zédel, 20 Sherwood Street London W1F 7E

RICHARD SHELTON as Frank Sinatra in SINATRA: RAW. Photo: Betty Zapata

★★★

We’re in Palm Springs in 1971 where Frank Sinatra (Richard Shelton) is giving a retirement concert which is actually, of course, an autobiographical one man show playing in London for the first time after a successful run in Edinburgh. Behind Shelton is his ‘orchestra’ in the form of accompanist Michael Roulston, a pianist of such talent and skill that any actor would be proud to work with him.

The backbone of the show is ten songs including All or Nothing at AllI’ve Got You Under My Skin and That’s Life plus a few audience requests sung unaccompanied which don’t really come off. The rehearsed numbers, however, work well. Shelton, a British actor, really has got under Sinatra’s skin. His mimicry of that very distinctive voice, not to mention clear diction and impeccable intonation are spot on. He also has Sinatra’s manner.

Between the numbers he talks revealingly and sips his Jack Daniels. And we see a troubled, anguished, sometimes angry and often misunderstood man. We learn how devastated he was, for example, that his ex wife, Ava Gardner, by then living in London, broke her promise to attend his Royal Festival Hall concert. Then there was the time he made elaborate preparations (including having a helipad built) for a visit from John F Kennedy only to have it pulled for personal, political reasons at the eleventh hour. He is contemptuous of rock and roll, racists and anyone who disagrees with him.

It’s warmly informative and Shelton, who explains at the end that he and Sinatra “go back a long way” is a fine singer. He has that Sinatra-esque abilty to sustain long notes as they die away and his dynamic control is splendid. The rendering of My Way at the end is moving. And yet this show – not quite a play, not quite tribute – feels a bit contrived and isn’t, somehow, as engaging as it ought to be. 75 minutes is, I’m afraid, more than enough.

RICHARD SHELTON as Frank Sinatra in SINATRA: RAW. Photo: Betty Zapata

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-Sinatra:%20Raw%20-%20%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85&reviewsID=3441