Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Lago Season: Revelation 1:18., No Help Sent, Wine (Susan Elkin reviews)

society/company: West End & Fringe (directory)
performance date: 20 Sep 2018
venue: Tristan Bates Theatre, 1A Tower St, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9NP
 

★★★★

One writer, three plays, six actors and three directors: it’s a lot to take in on a single evening as I did on press night but it makes for pretty arresting rep season for which this young company, founded by talented LIPA graduates, have worked long and hard.

I have seen both No Help Sent and Wine in fully staged productions before and I attended a rehearsed reading of Revelation 1:18 so none of it was completely new to me but, of course, each piece has developed and become more polished over time and it’s interesting to see them all together because you notice things you otherwise might not.

For instance, each play is set in a living room so they can more or less share a set. I am struck afresh by the accomplished naturalness of Jack West’s dialogue too and the skilled use these actors make of dramatic silences. Slightly less positively I also spotted, for the first time, that West’s characters say “Seriously?” far too often and once you’ve noticed it becomes a bit of an irritant. That’s a minor gripe, though.

The enigmatic, academic title of the first play refers to a not very well known verse from the Bible which runs: “I am he that liveth and was dead; and, behold I am alive for evermore, Amen”. The play presents – with a lot of humour – a three man rock band who have just hit the big time. Cause for celebration and joy? Well, possibly but how do you hang on to fame for ever? Directed by Jack West, actors Oliver Buckner, Rob Hadden and Joshua Glenister work beautifully together with Buckner being especially watchable as they slowly bend to each other’s point of view. It will be a while before I forget Glenister’s quivering, terrified face at the end.

Directed by Scott Le Crass, Buckner is also outstanding in No Help Sent (NHS – get it?) in which he plays a testicular cancer sufferer in a profit-driven Britain which has just privatised its health service. There is no money for further treatment. Buckner finds vulnerability, anger, distress, resignation in the character and is charismatically compelling. His flat mates, played by Glenister, Hadden and Peter Lofsgaard try to help but are, actually, helpless in every sense. There are some interesting ideas in this play although, of the three pieces, I like it the least. At times it strays too close to becoming a clunky political polemic and the doctor kidnapping incident simply jars with implausibility – good as Tobi Falade (very expressive eyes) is in the role.

Wine is a fine two hander in which Harriet Clarke as Sam and Tobi Falade as Mark try to rekindle their relationship, which ended a year earlier, and gradually reveal the huge, controversial issue which scuppered it in the first place. Both actors listen actively and play off each other with the sort of skill which makes the situation very convincing. The body language is striking too as their initial awkwardness subsides to be replaced by real conversation, mutual attraction and, finally, the issue. There’s a great deal of anguish here and, directed by Harry Blumenau, the play is powerful in its understatement.

All these plays are worth seeing either separately or together. Lago Theatre have achieved a lot in a relatively short time and I’m interested to see what they do next. I hope, for example, that West will create a few more female roles soon.

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-Lago%20Season:%20%27Revelation%201:18%27%20%27No%20Help%20Sent%27%20%27Wine%27%20-%20%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85&reviewsID=3326
 
 
 
By Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Adapted for the Stage by Nick Lane. Music composed by Tristan Parkes. Produced in association with New Theatre Royal Portsmouth and South Hill Park Arts Centre
society/company: Blackeyed Theatre Ltd. (professional)(directory)
performance date: 18 Sep 2018
venue: EM Forster Theatre, Tonbridge, Kent
 

★★★

Nick Lane’s adaptation and direction of Conan Doyle’s 1890 novel tells the story pretty fully and faithfully and showcases a talented cast of six, most of them accomplished actor-musicians.

The problem with adapting Conan Doyle (not, it has to be admitted my favourite author) is that the plots are so complicated that there is a danger of becoming wordy and this show suffers from too much exposition and not enough action in the first half. It hots up after the interval, though.

Commendably, Lane never lets us forget that the novels and stories are narrated by Watson. Joseph Derrington finds plenty of colour in the role and his coyness in courting Mary Morstan (Stephanie Rutherford) is nicely caught. From time to time the script takes him, for a few lines, into narration rather than dialogue which works quite well.

As Holmes, Luke Barton has a distinctive stage presence with the right balance between tiresome intelligence, serious diligence and ennui. He reminded me at times both of Kenneth Branagh and Alex Jennings as young actors.

There’s strong work from Rutherford in all the female roles, especially Mary Morstan whose presence is stepped up in this adaptation. She conveys a feisty character and when she finally succumbs to Watson’s wooing you know that this won’t be a very patriarchal marriage A very versatile performer, Rutherford also brings impressive accent work to various servant roles as well as playing trombone, violin and several other instruments in the music (written by Tristan Parkes) which provides atmosphere almost continuously.

Christopher Glover is especially good – and funny – as the policeman, Athelney Jones, Ru Hamilton does well as the effete, camp Thaddeus Sholto and Zach Lee, playing Jonathan Small, makes a cumbersomely long monologue at the end, work surprisingly well. All three play instruments and there’s much ensemble work in which other characters are played – sometimes a little confusingly.

Victoria Spearing’s ingenious set comprises narrow geometric, scaffolding-like shapes which loosely connote a timeless London skyline. Sometimes it is part-dismantled to create something else such as the boat for the river chase.

A good introduction to Conan Doyle, I think for the dozens of early teenagers who had been brought to this production (the EM Forster theatre is part of Tonbridge School) and seemed riveted by it.

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Blackeyed%20Theatre%20Ltd.%20(professional)-Sherlock%20Holmes:%20The%20Sign%20of%20Four%20-%20%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85&reviewsID=3323

Last week I was lucky enough to get a sneak preview of Mountview’s jaw-dropping new £28m building in Peckham – just 48 hours before Mountview management were granted full possession and the students were allowed in on Friday. The place was crawling with dozens of busy “snaggers” and it was very noisy and dusty –  much racing against the clock to get the finishing touches sorted. And everyone on the premises, including me, was hard-hatted and in high vis clobber.

Well I have been known to say that buildings don’t matter much and that it’s the quality of the training which counts. Of course I stand by that. However glitzy the building is, if the teaching isn’t up to scratch then go somewhere else. But in this case, I think it really is going to make a massive difference – to Mountview students, staff and, crucially, to the local community. There’s a lot of arts (in general) in Peckham anyway and with full commitment and support from the London Borough of Southwark this new development has the potential to change many lives.

Positioned on the former wasteland (once a timber merchants) beside the canal, behind the award-winning library, Mountview now has enough space to teach all its students everything on a single site. Formerly, back in cramped Wood Green, technical theatre had, perforce, to be taught in a different building and shows staged all over the place which didn’t do much for cohesiveness and inter-departmental collaboration. Now there are two on-site theatres (the larger 200 seater one will be ready by Easter 2019). Of course there are full facilities for teaching all aspects of theatre therein – and there are 23 studios on four floors. Masses of staff accommodation and storage space will mean everyone can work better and more collaboratively. Then there’s a large rehearsal room with office and kitchen attached which will be available for hire – as will music practice rooms and other facilities, all of which will help both with putting the place firmly on the map as well as generating income.

The word “community” comes up in almost every sentence as I am shown round. The intention is, obviously, to retain vocational training as the core of Mountview’s work and there are no plans  to increase student numbers other than, possibly, launching some new specialist course for small numbers. Mountview has done this recently anyway with its imaginative MA programme.

The big change will be many more classes and activities at all levels for anyone who wants to come. “I’d like to double the number of young people who attend our Saturday sessions to at least 500, for example” principal/artistic director, Stephen Jameson tells me over a homely cuppa amongst the packing chests and builders.  He and his staff will also work with adults of all ages including well-being (yoga etc) along with performing arts. Community groups will be able to use the theatres and of course the many student shows will be open to the public – like the ground floor coffee shop and the roof top restaurant which has very arresting views of the London skyline.

So committed is arts-enthusiastic Southwark to all this that it has lent Mountview £21m on a 35 year, modest rate, fixed-rate, mortgage as well as giving it a grant of over £6m. The rest of the cost has come – or will do – from fund raising, personal donations and trusts and foundations.

I am now, really looking forward to seeing a show – later this term, I hope, in the completed Backstage Theatre, as the studio theatre is called. After all it’s south London, where all sensible people live or are based, so I can get to it very easily.

Who says I never write good news stories?

WorldAlzMonth

This Friday (21 September) is World Alzheimer’s Day. September is, in fact, World Alzheimer’s Month with this one day as the focus. Driven in the UK by Alzheimer’s Society and other charities, the idea is that everyone – organisations and individuals around the world –  work together  to “raise awareness, highlight issues faced by people affected by dementia and demonstrate how we can overcome them to help people live well with dementia.” That last bit is a quote from Alzheimer’s Society website.

It is, of course, exactly what I aim to do with these blogs of which I have now written over sixty. Every week more and more people tell me that they find them enlightening and helpful. Sometimes I’m even told that I’ve “moved” someone which is humbling. And the feedback comes from complete strangers. The other day I was in John Lewis at Ashford, Kent applying for one of their rather good credit cards. Of course I was asked what I do for a living and after a bit I mentioned these blogs. “I bet that’s helping many other people” said the warm, tactful woman who was processing my application.

As a journalist I get sent information about “awareness” days of one sort or another all the time. There’s one almost every day of the year, arguably far too many to be effective. It’s different for Alzheimer’s though. Globally, dementia is one of the biggest challenges we face, with nearly 50 million people living with dementia worldwide and we are told all the time that there are 850,000 people in the UK with dementia, 650,000 of them with Alzheimer’s. I don’t think My Loved One ever planned or wanted to be a statistic but these things happen.

So if you get the chance this week to attend a fund raising event or to contribute to an Alzheimer’s charity then I urge you to do it. Or maybe you might think about a little monthly direct debit which is what I’ve done.  As the Alzheimer’s Society puts it;  “To tackle this global dementia challenge we need to work together, and to collaborate and share best practice with one another.” But, of course, like everything else it costs money.

I’ve been thinking about Christmas cards too. Sorry, yes I know it’s only September but I’m an organised sort. For many years I’ve bought and sent cards in aid of Kidney Care UK and the Donkey Sanctuary. The former was in memory of my father who died of kidney disease in 1997 and the latter because I like, really like, donkeys. This year, under the circumstances, I’ve decided it has to be something different and I’ve ordered cards from the Alzheimer’s Society which declares that 100% of their profits are spent on their work.  Every little helps, as a certain supermarket likes to remind us.

Meanwhile back on the home front I seem to find myself increasingly fielding semi-verbal non-sequiturs. “I can’t find the thing with the spout” MLO said recently. “Do you mean the teapot? If so it’s in the dishwasher. Why do you want it?” said I. “No [fumbling for words]  I meant a green thing.” I eventually ascertained that he was looking for the small watering can for the hanging baskets. If you live with Alzheimer’s you need to be psychic – especially when, as often happens – the question or comment and response bear no relation to each other.

You need to maintain a sense of humour too. A couple of weeks ago, we had a problem with the controls on heating, hot water, radiators etc. I emailed our younger son (the family pro plumber who’d set it all up), asked for advice and went off to the theatre for work. I hadn’t expected our heroic son to drive up from Brighton and be on the doorstep by 7.15 – but he’d forgotten the keys he has to our house, so he rang the bell.

Now, living with Alzheimer’s is, in many ways, like caring for a child again. I have “forbidden” MLO as forcefully as I can from opening the front door to anyone he doesn’t know when I’m not in the house. He’s supposed to peep through the porch door to see who it is. On this occasion, he partially remembered what he’d been told and  didn’t open either door. Result? A frustrated, but ultimately amused son, who had to phone me and then call his dad up on the landline to say he was outside. But, when I came out of the theatre there was a very welcome text telling me laconically: “Heating fixed”.

Yes, we need to keep raising awareness of, and funding research into, this hideous illness. Do what you can this week.

 

Oh My, Nellie Bly was performed by students from the Musical Theatre Academy at the Bridewell Theatre, London.

Star rating: three stars ★ ★ ★ ✩ ✩

Nellie Bly was a ground-breaking 19th-century American journalist, hardly known in the UK but better known in the States.

She posed as an inmate in order to research a searing exposé, ‘10 Days in  Madhouse’, of the treatment of people incarcerated in asylums and later she circumvented the world in 72 days in order to beat Jules Verne’s Phileas Fogg.

In the hands of composer/lyricist, Annemarie Lewis Thomas (founder principal of The MTA), book writer Nick Stimson and director Simon Kane, the story makes effective theatre because Nellie’s journey is episodic and the madhouse flashback scenes add raw depth.

This is serious, horrifying stuff and it’s, apparently, straight off the pages of Nellie Bly’s journal in which she recorded the appalling abuse of inmates by the unchecked bullies who staffed the institution …

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review: http://musicaltheatrereview.com/musical-theatre-academy-oh-my-nellie-bly/

f you want a high quality piano recital cheerfully enlivened with a bit of stand up comedy than catch Steven Worbey and Kevin Farrell in action. Although they aren’t yet a household name they have performed in over 150 countries and seem to astound audiences everywhere they go – we reviewed them here when they played The Carnival of  Animals with Barry Wordsworth and Brighton Philharmonic earlier this year.

Yes, they follow in the tradition of Victor Borge and Liberace but their USP – and it’s quite a coup – is that they play four hands on one piano and arrange the music accordingly. It’s an original take on the concept of piano transcription.  This concert included their versions of Scott Joplin, Vidor’s Toccata and FugueBumble BoogieSidesaddle and much more – culminating in a stunning rendering of Rhapsody in Blue.

Worbey and Farrell, who were at the Royal College of Music together, are partners in life as well as in music. Normally I’d regard that as a complete irrelevance but here it isn’t. There’s a comfortable intimacy in the way they play because this is definitely not piano duetting in any conventional sense.  Sharing a single piano stool, they lean across each other, tucking notes in beneath each other’s hands as they race up and down the keys taking most works at phenomenal speed. They told the audience that Joplin stipulated that his rags should be played slowly. “We’ve come to the conclusion”, Farrell said chirpily, “That he just couldn’t play them as fast as we can! So we’ll meet him in the middle.” The joke, of course, was the accelerando in the Maple Leaf Rag after a gentle start.

In addition to lots of humour – they spark well off of each other as comedians too – the concert included extracts from The Carnival of Animals which they developed for the BPO concert. Each number is preceded by an introductory verse which they’ve written and they’re pretty witty.

I also really like the projection above and behind their heads which, with a camera placed near the piano, allows the audience to watch their hands. It’s carefully thought out too. Worbey was wearing floral cuffs while Farrell’s shirt had a scarlet band at the wrist so there was never any visual doubt whose hands were whose.

They are musically highly attuned to each other and achieve some astonishing effects with prestissimofortissimo playing especially in the Vidor. Such virtuosic flamboyance is testament to a lot of talent, the chemistry between Worbey and Farrell and many thousands of hours of work and practice. And it makes for an entertaining concert.

This review was first published by Lark Reviews: http://www.larkreviews.co.uk/?cat=3

Flowers for Mrs Harris – ★★★★
Based on the novel by Paul Gallico. Book by Rachel Wagstaff. Music & lyrics by Richard Taylor.
society/company: Chichester Festival Theatre (professional)(directory)
performance date: 14 Sep 2018
venue: Festival Theatre, Chichester
 

★★★★

[Above: Clare Burt, Joanna Riding, Mark Meadows and members of the company as Dior models in FLOWERS FOR MRS HARRIS at Chichester Festival Theatre. Directed by Daniel Evans Designed by Lez Brotherston Lighting by Mark Henderson. Photo by Johan Persson]

Mrs Ada Harris (Clare Burt) is a char lady working hard and loyally for “my clients” in the austerity of 1947. She has kept herself modestly since her husband (Mark Meadows) died at Passchendaele although he lives on, and ages alongside her in her mind and on stage. Then, in this gentle story, based on a Paul Gallico story and written by Rachel Wagstaff, Mrs H sees a photograph of a Dior dress, saves up and, against considerable odds, travels to Paris to buy it.

This show opens with dialogue and only gradually segues into rather hesitant music led by Tom Brady whose conducting hands protrude from a hole in the floor at the downstage apex of the playing space. Most of Richard Taylor’s score is unassuming, in a lilting conversational way. Much of it works like naturalistic recitative and there are few songs in the conventional musical theatre sense. It takes a while to get used to this and, frankly at the interval, I had this marked down as rather plodding two star show with far too much pointless marching round CFT’s revolve. By the end of the incomparably better second half it had acquired a couple more stars.

The scene in which Mrs Harris finally sees a parade of Dior dresses sweeping on models down a central staircase is as theatrically effective as, say the masques in The Tempest or, in a different mood, the procession of kings in Macbeth. There is something mesmerizingly magical about it and we are as stunned as Mrs Harris is. What fun, designer Lez Brotherston must have had with this. Then there’s the ending which moved me to tears because this is actually a story about happiness, friendship, helping others and moving on. It’s marvellously upbeat without being remotely sentimental or cloying.

Burt catches Mrs Harris’s rueful sadness tempered with a lot of kindness and wisdom perfectly and her wistful singing voice works beautifully here. And when she smiles for Mrs Harris it’s like the sun coming out. Claire Machin is hilarious as Mrs Harris’s supportive, lumpy friend and neighbour and outstanding as a French cleaning lady with a splendid morose Gallic shrug. Meadows does well too as the kindly dead husband so often present to advise when Mrs Harris is on her own.

There is some impressive doubling here because there is a new set of characters in Paris. Louis Maskell, for example, is entertaining as the ill-at-ease Dior employee who conveys his unspoken passion for Laura Pitt-Pulford’s Natasha mostly with his knees. He and Pitt-Pulford (who is also good back in London as one of Mrs Harris’s more self-obsessed clients) work well together especially in French.

Daniel Evans, who directs this thoughtful show, first staged it in 2016 in his former role as Artistic Director at Sheffield. It’s a rather lovely thing for him to have revived at Chichester and adds a different mood to this year’s pleasingly varied season after Me and My GirlCopenhagen and other delights.

[Below: Luke Latchman (Wireless Commentator) and Gary Wilmot (Major) in FLOWERS FOR MRS HARRIS at Chichester Festival Theatre. Directed by Daniel Evans Designed by Lez Brotherston Lighting by Mark Henderson. Photo by Johan Persson]

 This review was first published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Chichester%20Festival%20Theatre%20(professional)-Flowers%20for%20Mrs%20Harris%20-%20%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85&reviewsID=3321
About Leo – ★★★
By Alice Allemano.
society/company: West End & Fringe (directory)
performance date: 11 Sep 2018
venue: Jermyn Street Theatre, 16b Jermyn Street, London SW1Y 6ST
 
 

★★★

Above: Eleanor Wyld (Eliza Prentice), Susan Tracy (Leonora Carrington – older) – Photo: Robert Workman

Leonora Carrington (1917-2011) was a surrealist artist and a rebel. Famously, she had a three-year relationship with fellow artist Max Ernst in the 1930s.

Alice Allemano’s neatly structured, four-hander, debut play presents Leo (Susan Tracy) in old age being visited by an uninvited young journalist (Eleanor Wyld) who wants to talk about the older woman’s life. Carrington lived for many years in Mexico City where these scenes are set. The love affair with Ernst (Nigel Whitmey) took place in France which we see as flashback scenes with Phoebe Pryce as the younger Carrington.

At the heart of this thoughtfully directed (Michael Oakley) piece is an outstanding performance from Susan Tracy who combines physical frailty with mischievous feistiness and vulnerability with lucid determination. Tracy makes Carrington’s hands and eyes tellingly expressive. She works beautifully with Eleanor Wyld too whose character is nervous but trying to be grown up. Their dialogue together is delightfully naturalistic.

The 1930s scenes are less compelling although Pryce finds appropriate flashing passion in her role and Whitmey is reasonably arresting as Ernst – attractive enough, at least, to persuade a woman half his age to turn her back on her family and move in with a married man.

Less successful are the visions, preceded by blackouts (although they’re done slickly enough) in which Carrington is haunted by images from Ernst’s paintings with animal masks. They are meant, I think, along with her obsession with horses, to connote her state of mind. In fact – like the use of radio broadcasts to remind us that this is 1939 and war is being declared – they feel a bit clumsy and awkward.

There’s a fundamental flaw in what the play is trying to say too. It’s called About Leo but that’s misleading. If it’s intended, as it claims, to bring her own life and considerable personal achievements into the public eye then it shouldn’t be almost entirely focused on her time with Ernst. In defining her by her relationship with a man it does little to redeem Carrington from being a mere footnote in the history of art.

Below: Phoebe Pryce (Leonora Carrington – younger), Susan Tracy (Leonora Carrington – older) – Photo: Robert Workman

 This review was first published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-About%20Leo%20-%20%E2%98%85%E2%98%85%E2%98%85&reviewsID=3318