Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Education defines the Roundhouse

RH Summer Projects - credit Ellie Pinney

Roundhouse Summer Projects. Credit: Ellie Pinney

Nobody uses the word ‘education’ at the Roundhouse. “Work by, with and for 11-25 year olds is our whole purpose. It underpins everything we do,” says chief executive and artistic director Marcus Davey. He is chatting to me in the organisation’s sparkling new offices, greenly and economically constructed from 72 shipping containers.

The figures he rattles off are impressive. Three thousand young people….

Read the rest of this article https://www.thestage.co.uk/opinion/2016/susan-elkin-for-some-of-us-education-is-more-than-just-a-word/

2479_1468451694

Drama Studio London.

Tristan Bates Theatre

Polly Teale’s highly imaginative and evocatively beautiful take on Hans Christian Andersen’s darkest fairy story is an ideal choice for a drama school. Its ensemble structure really showcases the talents of the eight graduating students (six women and two men) in the cast.

Lea Anderson’s sensitive innovative direction capitalises on otherwordly balletic movement for the underwater scenes and haunting siren-esque, whale-like song as the mermaids call to each other and to the world above. The mermaids wear short flared black tunics (over tights) which float as they move. Then when they play other parts they simply add different clothes on top with all the dressing taking place at the back of the playing space.

There is outstanding work from Nell Bradbury as Blue. She starts as a petulant, distressed teenager in dungarees – all sneers, shrugs and pain. Then as an escape from her well meaning but overbearing mother (Maria Hildebrand who doubles as Grandmer and Queen) and from her partying “friends”, Bradbury’s character morphs into a narrator, impassioned and ever present in every sense. The conceit is that she is inventing the story as we watch it unfold. She has a real gift for a wide eyed gaze thrown far beyond the audience. Moreover Bradbury has the ability you see in, for example Anna Maxwell Martin and Emma Thompson to blank her face off completely and then light it up. She is one of the most compelling young actors I’ve seen in a while and very castable. So remember where you first read her name.

Also very enjoyable is Emma Riches’s performance as the Little Mermaid. She nicely captures the question-asking intensity of the curious child at the beginning. Then, yielding to feelings she doesn’t understand she meets her mortal prince. It famously costs her her voice at the whim of a terrifying theatrical tour de force – a six headed, twelve legged (and perfectly choreographed) witch, malevolent, predatory and panting.

Teale’s writing is pretty political although she spares us the nasty ending of the original tale by inserting an upbeat feminist twist. She uses her mermaid colony to comment – and the dialogue is incisively delivered in this production – on the curious behaviour of human beings. They wage war relentlessly perhaps as a way of dealing with their own mortality. They establish hierarchies which mean that people at the top – royalty in this play – seem troubled and dysfunctional. They create “a world full of pain and suffering”. Spot on for the current political climate in Britain, really.

 Originally published by Sardineshttp://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Drama%20Studio%20London%20(student%20production)-Mermaid&reviewsID=2479
 
 

 

2482_1468539751

The Marlowe’s third annual community play is hugely ambitious. There are 150 people in the cast from primary school children to retirees. Some of the technical effects are spectacular, the action uses the auditorium as well as the stage and there’s a rather good four-piece band.

The plot, assembled by director Andy Dawson, uses contributions from half a dozen local script writers and is about Canterbury, its history and current concerns. Rooted in The Canterbury Tales – that is both the pub opposite the theatre and Chaucer’s masterpiece – we are also led to think a lot about asylum seekers, traffic jams caused by Operation Stack and about World War Two bombing among other things.

Strengths include a fabulous and enormous puppeted dragon in full fearsome colour. Then there’s a delightful camel which owes quite a lot to Handspring and War Horse. The set (good work from Rachael A Smith), which creates a constantly expanding refugee camp stretching as far as the eye can see using parallel gauze drops with tents painted on, is as effective as it is simple. Strong performances include Alda Daci as Maryam, the immigrant barmaid who tells a moving tale about her background. Ardit Daci has real stage presence as Guled and Ryan Hill impresses as the well observed, rough but oh-so-familiar street voice of anti-immigration. Peter Smith as Mahat plays well off Ardit Daci and Oliver Dawson scores as the man struggling with a stomach upset – funny but he certainly makes sure you feel his grief. Hannah Farley-Hills’s entertaining number as the predatory widow who has seen off four husbands is a delicious set piece. The piece also features some pretty moving moments.

On the other hand there are problems. The show is far too long. It really doesn’t justify almost three hours. I’ve seem shorter King Lears. And the first half runs for 1 hour 45 minutes – what Charles Spencer, former lead critic at The Daily Telegraph, used to call a bladder buster. It’s conceived as a fairly episodic piece, of course, but actually it’s disjointed in places because it’s so fragmentary. For the first half hour it isn’t clear what is happening or why.

This is the first time the Marlowe has staged its community play in the main house and it isn’t a good idea. Obviously you need a big space to accommodate such a large number of performers but few of them are up to reaching into the space with their voices. Audibility is a big issue particularly when younger actors are positioned upstage and their words, typically spoken too fast or pitched too high, simply disappear into the flies. And why put music under most of the dialogue which means that the actors, already struggling, have to compete and usually lose? The size of the space also means that it takes a relatively long time to get different groups on an off and that slows the pace of the piece even more. The Studio might have been a better choice although it would probably have necessitated a smaller ensemble.

There’s an old adage that you should never turn your back to the audience while you’re speaking. Professionals cheerfully ignore this because they know how to compensate and still reach the back row audibly. Untrained amateurs are put in an impossible position (literally) if they’re deliberately directed to face away from the audience. The long scene with actors in the front row of the theatre facing the stage, as motorists in the traffic jam, is disastrous. From row L hardly a word of it is audible.

Originally published by Sardineshttp://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Marlowe%20Theatre%20(professional)-Stacked!&reviewsID=2482

 

2480_1468511597
The Scarecrows’ Wedding
Based on the book by Julia Donaldson and Axel Scheffler, and produced by Scamp Theatre
society/company: West End & Fringe (directory)
performance date: 15 Jul 2016
venue: LEICESTER SQUARE THEATRE, 6 Leicester Place, London WC2H 7BX
Three accomplished actor musicians perform this miniature musical accompanying themselves on violin, guitar, banjo saxophone and various percussion instruments. The songs (music by Darren Clark) are suitably retro-folksy for a piece for very young children set in idyllic countryside with gentle harmonies and some attractive basic counterpoint. The word which comes to mind is “charm”. Whole tractor-loads of it.Based on a book by Julia Donaldson and Axel Scheffler, the partnership which created The Gruffalo, The Scarecrows’ Wedding is basically a quest story. Two scarecrows are in love and planning their wedding. So they make a list of what they need and set out to find feathers for the dress, bells to ring at the ceremony, a necklace, flowers and so on. And of course they succeed, despite the attempt of another scarecrow to make eyes at Betty, the bride-to-be (Lucy Wells). So like all the best fiction it ends with a wedding.

Wells flops her head and pivots her arms convincingly and beneath her traditional straw head she is pretty, coy and perky with very warm expressive eyes. Matthew Hamper as her beau is boyish and solemn except when his face engagingly lights up with love for Betty. All the other parts are played by the impressively talented Michael Palmer whose gift for accents takes us from, among other things, an officious lugubrious cow, a militarist toad bouncing on a big green balloon to a predatory, rakish moustache-twirling Frenchman. He also acts in a neutral voice, as narrator.

James Button’s set is spot on too. It includes a tatty armchair which turns into a car an angular green slope, a ladder, a toy dog on wheels which morphs into a puppet and lot of stands for all those musical instruments.

Oh yes, you can’t help but smile with delight at this one. I just hope that audience numbers pick up once the school holidays start. There were barely 20 people in the 400 seat venue at the performance I attended.

Originally published by Sardines

Writing Music for the Stage by Michael Bruce (Nick Hern Books) claims to be a “practical guide for theatre makers” so it takes the reader through the entire process. Plays are often brought to life by supportively atmospheric music written for new productions and Bruce has written scores for, among others, The Recruiting Officer, Coriolanus, Privacy, The Winslow Boy, Noises Off and Strange Interlude all of which feature in his book as case studies. The variety is huge and the work eclectic so there’s plenty of detailed practical advice here for you wherever you are in your learning journey. It’s also a good read for anyone who simply wants to understand how theatrical music works without necessarily wanting to create it. The book also points the reader to online extracts from Bruce’s scores.

New collections of audition speeches are always very welcome. Applicants to drama school, for example, are usually advised to play to type but that doesn’t stop many young actors making disastrous choices. New Monologues for Women (Bloomsbury) is edited by Geoff Colman, head of acting at Royal Central School of Speech and Drama so his advice is clearly well worth heeding. Colman has also edited a similar book of monologues for men, Then there’s a pair of new books from Bloomsbury both edited by Simeilia Hodge-Dallaway. The title Audition Speeches for Black, South Asian and Middle Eastern Actors: Monologues for Women is less than snappy but at least it’s clear and the material is very useful. The companion volume provides monologues for men. There can also be a problem if you’re far too young to play, say, King (or Queen) Lear or one of Alan Bennett’s feisty older women. A warm welcome then to Anthony Banks’s National Connections Monologues: Speeches for Young Actors. (Bloomsbury) Everything in the book comes from plays commissioned for young ensembles through NT Connections during the last 21 years.

Sticking with youth for a minute, Bloomsbury continues to build its excellent GCSE drama series with a student edition of Blood Brothers by Willy Russell and GCSE student guide to Sheila Delaney’s A Taste of Honey by Katie Whittaker. Young people are writing well too. The Wicked Young Writer Awards 2016 were announced last month. The shortlisted stories and poems by writers aged from 5-15 – some of them very good indeed – are privately published in a book Wicked Young Writers Awards 2016 Finalist Entries. Digital copies are available from [email protected]

And finally, should you cut it? And if you do how are you going to do it and how are others doing it? Shakespeare is widely abridged and reworked in modern theatre. When, for instance, did you last see a Twelfth Night which opened with Orsino languidly enjoying his music? Shakespeare Cut by Bruce R Smith (Oxford) examines contemporary practices including video games, book sculptures and YouTube postings as well as what happens to Shakespeare’s texts in the theatre. He is also interesting on the history of the “cut” trend, right back to Shakespeare’s own time.

Note: A few years ago I was commissioned to write pieces for a series of American humour books. They were meant to be “wittily informative”. Hmm. In the event most of them weren’t used because the company went out of business. I’ve decided to publish them here on an occasional basis rather than leaving them in a archived (dead?)  computer file.  They’re not exactly belly laugh funny but they might raise the odd grin. This is the first.

ear_free

 

Ears pricked?

For Shakespeare’s Cleopatra ears were just something to be filled full of Antony as often as possible like certain other of her orifices.  ‘Ram thou thy fruitful tidings in mine ears that have long been barren’ she pleads sexily.

To a European law enforcer right into the seventeenth century ears were an easy (dispensable?)  item to slice off or ‘dock’ – for which read mutilate in the most painful possible way –  on any criminal  he wanted to make an example of.

Ears are funny too, especially if they stick out.  How seriously can you take  Prince Charles, heir  to the British throne, with those taxi doors on the side of his head?  Some people can twitch them at will and you can buy special scissors to trim unwanted hair which sprouts out of them like grass.   And for Disney’s Dumbo ears became wings and people really did see an elephant fly.

Actually the bit we call the ear – be it large, small,  flat, protruding, hairy, bald, erotic, erogenous, functional  or festooned with earrings and studs – is only the surface accompaniment. Just the trumpet or funnel which traps the sound. The works, which are what really  matters, are out of sight.

The pinna – that’s the fleshy trumpet – leads via the ear canal into two tiny but vital chambers: the middle ear and the inner ear.  Think of it as a journey. Imagine you’re a sound wave.

First you go along the waxy-walled ear canal. Then you meet the ear drum – a  sensitive vibrating membrane called the tympanum which is stretched across the entrance to the middle ear. You – the sound wave – pass across and through it. Your next adventure is the crossing of the cavity of the middle ear. You do it via a mini bridge formed by the body’s three smallest bones.  They’re actually called ossicles rather then bones to remind you how titchy they are. This pretty little trio are imaginatively shaped like a mallet, an anvil and a stirrup and they  lead the way across the void to the oval window which is  the gateway  to the inner ear.

But before we penetrate the depths of the inner ear, stop being a sound wave for a minute and think about pressure. Know that feeling when you’re in a deep tunnel or an  aircraft and you don’t adjust immediately to the changed pressure so your  ears block? That’s because the atmospheric pressure in the middle ear cavity needs changing.  Yawning will do the trick. So will swallowing (one of the airline’s boiled sweets if you’re really lucky, or your own mints if you’re not) because of the handy little  Eustachian tube which runs from one corner of the middle ear through to your nice airy throat.

To the inner ear. It’s fluid filled and includes the cochlea and the semi-circular canals.  The former looks like a coiled-up snail and it transmits the sound along its branch of the auditory nerve – aka as cranial nerve VII – safely home into the brain where it gets sorted out and interpreted.

The semi-circular canals do a separate job in this diminutive, but busy, corner of the body. And they have their own hotline to the auditory nerve.  There are three of the them  and each lies  in a different  plane across the other two. Together they control your balance.  If they go wrong you fall over, get vertigo, feel dizzy  or something worse.  That’s why a severe inner ear infection can affect balance.

Perhaps it’s a good job Cleopatra didn’t know all that.  It might have taken the edge off things.

150px-Earrr

 

2473_1468105301
Cargo
Tess Berry-Hart. Produced by Metal Rabbit Productions.
society/company: Arcola Theatre (professional) (directory)
performance date: 08 Jul 2016
venue: Arcola Theatre, 24 Ashwin Street, Dalston, London E8 3DL.

We are in the hold of a big ferry with the cargo. The doors clang and it’s pitch black. The ship’s engines rumble and we are seated uncomfortably on pallets in the Arcola’s Studio 2 which lend itself very aptly to Max Dorey’s convincingly immersive design. The show runs 80 minutes like the crossing so we’re more or less in real time.

Three people start to scrabble around in the dark and eventually we meet them properly when they turn on a torch. The titular cargo is, of course, human. Tess Berry-Hart – who helps to run the advocacy charitable fund, Calais action – has provided a taut script to force us to think, and think hard, about the real plight of refugees from war zones desperate for a better life in Europe. Eventually the three are joined by a smooth talking American (John Schwab) was has been asleep elsewhere in the hold. His gift of the gab doesn’t fool the others for long. This man is not what he pretends to be and Schwab makes him suitably manipulative and untrustworthy.

All the acting in this show is outstanding and director David Mercatali makes skilled use of the talents of his four person cast who listen attentively and bounce off each other with real attention to detail. Milly Thomas as Joey is gritty, determined and still until she gets angry and eventually distraught. Hers is a beautifully controlled performance and she’s very compelling to watch. Debbie Korley is riveting as the dangerous, terrified Sarah, vomiting and shouting – when she isn’t dropping her defences and being relatively friendly. She has a way of using the whites of her eyes in the gloom to indicate that she’s much less than stable.

The biggest accolade must, however go to Jack Gouldbourne as Iz, Joey’s younger brother. Fresh from youth theatre this is his first professional job. Gouldbourne’s character is initially naïvely and ebulliently excited about the promise of a new life. He jumps up and down with glee and makes silly jokes. Then he gets swept up in the fears and anxieties of the others and things which he doesn’t understand. Eventually when Schwab as Kayffe graphically spells out the terrible truth about the sort of work which really awaits him – as a virtually imprisoned, pimped rent boy – the horror on Gouldbourne’s face and his terrified weeping is something I shall not forget for a long time.

Yes, it’s an acutely distressing piece but we all need to address these issues relating to human beings in the direst of straits so it’s good to have them spelled out. And it’s a fine piece of theatre, full of dramatic tension.

Originally published by Sardines http://nesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Arcola Theatre (professional)-Cargo&reviewsID=2473

2475_1468107129

This is verbatim theatre taken more literally than I’ve ever seen it. A series of short scenes – some no more than two or three sentences and others rather more sustained – are based entirely on words spoken by real people in real situations. We’ve all smiled at, or empathised with random eavesdroppings. Here, director, John Patterson and his cast of eight have turned a collection of them into 90 minutes of theatre which flows remarkably well considering how bitty a concept this actually is.

Thus we get a pharmacist advising a customer with a burn, banter in the hairdressers, two laughably self important men discussing designer shoes in a gym changing room, a pub scene where two older women are showing off to, and deliberately embarrassing a younger man, a pair of builders resolving a domestic problem as they work and much more. It’s the stuff of everyday life, sometimes wryly funny, occasionally hilarious and often poignant. Especially memorable is the concluding monologue in which Jack Cronin, who can cry real tears in role, presents a gay, apparently unloved suicidal man. It’s warmly powerful and deeply moving.

The basement playing space at Barons Court is very small which means that there’s much intimate immediacy in this show. The actors are never out of sight but simply retire to auditorium seats when they’re not on stage presumably because there is nowhere else for them to go. The cast of eight rise to the challenge off having to work quasi-televisually and all the acting is truthful and convincing. It isn’t easy to switch role and voice instantly and to do it many times in 90 minutes but these eight are very accomplished. I particularly liked the voice work by Anna Bonnett, for example, at one point the Eastern European daughter of a woman dying in hospital and at another a middleclass client having her hair done, among other roles. Stephanie Manton and Lara Bell are both admirably versatile too.
Angel Theatre Company exists to create opportunities for young actors to perform professionally during their first year out of drama school and it is clearly doing what is says on the tin. I just hope that lots of agents and casting directors see this show and that these actors are offered further work. They certainly deserve it.

Originally published by Sardines http:http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-West%20End%20&%20Fringe-Eavesdropping&reviewsID=2475