Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Susan’s Bookshelves: Lace by Shirley Conran

Lace isn’t the kind of book you forget in a hurry and I have vivid memories of reading it on a family camping holiday in France in 1983 when it had just come out in paperback. My overriding impression, 41 years later, is that there was an awful lot of sex. There is, but maybe not quite as much as I remembered.

Shirley Conran, whose fortune this novel made, died last month and it was reading her obituaries, and social media discussion about her work, which prompted me to return to Lace to see what I think now.

The plot is neat. Four very different young women are at finishing school in Switzerland just after the war. One of them gets pregnant. Now, the resultant child, a world-famous actor in her twenties, wants to know which of them was her mother. So at one level it’s the old “suo padre, sua madre” device as in the Marriage of Figaro and hundreds of other  “parentage reveal” fictions.  It takes Conran hundreds of pages – the novel is as fat as David Copperfield – to unravel all this with lots of diving back and forth in the chronology and plenty of distraction, along with the same incident  often being presented from more than one perspective, because there are five protagonists although it’s a third person narrative.

The sex is graphic and always from the female point of view which was refreshing in 1982 and to an extent still is. She’s very concerned about female orgasm and that really wasn’t much discussed when I first read Lace so it probably helped to liberate attitides and maybe in a small way even to educate. There are also ugly scenes of male domination, violence and exploitation which somehow feel less false and contrived than the consensual sex. She is, however, very good at getting into the mindset of sex-obsessed young women who have a lot more curiosity than experience – yup, that’s exactly how it was even in the 1960s in my girls’ grammar school.

How do you break into a big complex plot? Often from a side alley.  Think of Tolstoy’s unhappy Oblonsky family, Daphne du Maurier’s burning Manderley or Jane Austen’s famous observations about rich men and girls in need of them. There is no plot-driving reason to open Lace with thirteen year old Lili’s abortion without anaesthetic. As an incident it’s peripheral but, clunky as it is structurally, it makes an excruciatingly arresting first few pages and draws the reader in.

I think Conran over-eggs the “glamour” rather tiresomely.  I got, on this reread,  pretty weary of reading about clothes and luxurious rooms. Of course there’s a bit of squalor too but much less.  Women liked this book – it sold over 3 million copies. I wonder how many men read it? Did adolescents read it for titillation as my generation read Peyton Place? My elder son was 11 during that camping holiday and I’d always told both my children that they could read anything they wanted without any form of parental censorship. “Would you let me read Lace?” he asked me with a grin because he’d seen it in my hand for days and, for all I know, dipped into it on the quiet. “Yes” I said, after a bit of a gulp. “But I’m not sure you’d understand or like it”. I don’t know whether he ever did.

Most novelists firmly assert (to avoid litigation, I’ve always assumed) that their characters are entirely fictitious. Conran does the opposite. At the end of Lace she cheerfully declares that hers are nearly all based on real people – and she tells us who they are, too. I can’t help wondering how many friends or enemies that made her at the time because she isn’t polite about them all. Of course the finishing school is based on the one she attended.

It’s not a brilliant novel. There are flaws. But in its way it broke new ground and did its bit for feminism. It is, however, still a page turner and much more than a “bonkbuster”. I re-read it in just a few days and, once again, she held my attention to the end. So I’m glad, on balance, that Conran had such a success with it.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Black Beauty by Anna Sewell

Coram Boy

Helen Edmundson, adapted from novel by Jamila Gavin

Directed by Anna Ledwich

Chichester Festival Theatre

Star rating: 3

There’s plenty to admire about this show. It’s big scale, sumptuous theatre and sits very nicely on Chichester’s big thrust stage. The singing – Handel and his Messiah are top of the pops at the time the play is set – is excellent and I really liked Max Pappenheim’s musical arrangements and references. A hint of Zadok the Priest at the climactic end of Act One, for instance, made me grin but it’s dramatically effective. And, of course, we get a cast of sixteen talented actors plus a number of children. Also in the mix is a fine four piece band on an upper level in front of designer Simon Higlett’s gleaming organ pipes. Under Stephen Higgins, directing from the keyboard, they provide all the music mimed by actors and pay a great deal of incidental music.

The story telling, however, is confusing. I read Jamila Gavin’s award winning novel when it was first published in 2000. It was a young adult novel which may be why it tries to pack so much in. It bothered me at the time and it’s bothered me each time I’ve seen Helen Edmundson’s adaptation – twice at National Theatre in 2005 and 2006 and at least twice elsewhere since. It really is too complicated to attempt to explore, among other things, and in an eighteenth century setting, child abuse, infanticide, abortion, pimping, blackmail, trafficking, slavery, learning difficulties and the redemptive power of music – all in one fell swoop. No wonder the plot is convoluted.

There are problems too with casting girls as young boys who later grow up into chaps – the action moves forwards eight years in the second half.  It’s quite hard to hang on to who is who. Moreover, when two characters get stabbed and fall to the ground, it seems a bit odd when one reappears soon after, without explanation, but the other doesn’t so we’re left to draw our own conclusions.

The villain of the piece is Otis Gardiner (Samuel Oatley –  chillingly good) who collects babies from unmarried women in the countryside and delivers them to Thomas Coram’s Foundling Hospital in London. Except that he doesn’t. He takes the money and disposes of the babies. And it really went on. Skeletons have been found to corroborate it.  Gavin has done her research very thoroughly. Later, Gardiner reinvents himself in a very unlikely way and that really isn’t clear to the audience for a long time.

Jo Mcinnes plays Mrs Lynch, the housekeeper who liaises between Gardiner and young women in trouble. She is plausibly two-faced and self interested – and of course she and Gardiner are more than business associates. She is not always audible when she’s in one-to-one situations but her assertive speech when she finally leaves the Ashbrook house is quite something.

And all this is set against a background of two boys from very different backgrounds becoming friends at Gloucester Cathedral School and going on to be professional musicians – one at the Foundling Hospital and the other working with Handel who was one of the Foundling Hospital’s first sponsors.

There is a richly sensitive performance from Aled Gomer as Mishak Gardiner. Son of Otis, he is initially his father’s dogsbody. Later he breaks free and goes to work in the gardens at the Foundling Hospital. Gomer really captures the otherworldliness of a man who has seizures and is probably brain damaged but in some ways can see much more clearly then those around  him.

I could tell from the conversation around me that most of Chichester’s Tuesday matinee audience were new to this story and had little idea what to expect. Well, they certainly got high powered drama and lots of theatricality but I wasn’t surprised to hear some puzzled comments at the end.

Philharmonia

Isabelle Faust/Philippe Herreweghe

Royal Festival Hall

02 June 2024

Of course I’m warmly committed to promoting the excellent compositions of hitherto marginalised groups. But just occasionally it’s a real treat to hear a concert which concentrates unashamedly on masterpieces by “dead white men”. Beethoven and Brahms have been supremely popular for over two centuries and a century and a half, respectively, for very good reasons.

German violinist Isabelle Faust and Belgian conductor Philippe Herreweghe have worked together a lot (although not with this orchestra) and the chemistry both sounds and shows. He clearly doesn’t believe in flamboyant gestures and his “micro” style put me in mind of Otto Klemperer and yes, I’m afraid I am old enough to have seen the latter live.

Faust is a very poised performer and a terrific technician. She made the very soft passages sing out with unusual resonance, played the larghetto with lyricism, smiles and impressive control and gave us a very dramatic, quirky segue into the rondo which danced away with gossamer lightness. The duet with the bassoon was a high spot.

So was the timpani work (Antoine Bedwi) using historic pedal-free instruments which means old fashioned ear-to-drum to check tuning. The whole concerto turns on the opening timp statement which was excitingly done here. I used to be in love with the Kreisler cadenzas but lately I’ve become bewitched by the first movement one that Beethoven wrote for the later piano version of the concerto because – never a respecter of convention – he turns it into a duet with the timp and it’s magical. It’s getting more popular and I’ve now heard it within the violin concerto  several times. On this occasion Faust and Bedwi were clearly well adjusted to each other despite the physical distance between them. It was a very arresting few moments. On the other hand I’m not sure I care for the rattly timp rolls in the last part of the third movement but they certainly grab attention.

After the interval it was on to the multifarious glories of Brahms 4 which launched with noteworthy quality of attack, some gloriously grandiloquent brass playing and a magnificent fortissimo ending to the first movement. Herreweghe is good at contrasts and the lush melodies of the andante were a strong prelude to the briskness of the third movement.

Philippe Herreweghe

I never hear this symphony without, at the beginning of the final movement, thinking fondly of the late, great Antony Hopkins – the musicologist and educator not the actor. I once heard him telling a whole venue full of children to listen out for the opening chords in this movement and chant “B-R-A-H-M-S-Spells-Brahms” and then to listen for the recaps and do the same. He was, of course, trying to lay the foundations of active, attentive, analytical even, listening. I bet it worked and those 0nce-young listeners think of that, as I do, whenever this movement is played. I didn’t chant at this performance but I admired the way Herreweghe gave those chords lots of dynamic weight followed by all the energico the composer, or anyone else, could wish for. The trombone work at the end was thrilling too.

The Producers

Book by Mel Brooks and Thomas Meehan, Music and Lyrics by Mel Brooks

Festival Players

Directed by Alan Hay

ADC Theatre, Cambridge

 Star rating 5

This show is one of the finest non-pro productions I’ve seen in a very long time. It fizzes with talent and, best of all, this cast (and their director, Alan Hay) know exactly how to time and drop a joke or a witty line. They deliver every double-entendre with such professionally intelligent ease that this is the funniest production of The Producers I’ve ever seen – and it is, I’m afraid, a show which can feel creakily wooden in the hands of some companies.

Mel Brook’s book, is of course, innately hilarious: a pair of producers fraudulently set out to produce a Broadway flop because, for complicated accountancy reasons, they will make much more money than if it’s a hit. So they choose the utterly dire Springtime for Hitler and the “worst director in New York.” Then of course, the critics take it for brilliant satire and it becomes a hit. It’s full of theatrical “in-jokes” such as walking through the fourth wall, advancing stage left and the audition scene (a string of entertaining cameo roles for members of this productions’s excellent ensemble) is a glorious send up of a process which amateurs and professionals at all levels will identify with.

Matt Wilkinson as Max Bailystock, the has-been famous producer, talks with his eyes, and can communicate a whole sub text with one twist of his body. Apparently he has an academic day job with spiders and dactyls – I hope they, and his students, appreciate his remarkable talent as actor and singer because he really is the tops. Leo Bloom, the accountant who becomes Bailystock’s business partner,  played by Matt Brown is splendid too – he has a wonderful line in apparent wide-eyed innocence which conceals his burgeoning confidence – especially with women. The pair work together very well indeed.

Also in this rich mix is Luke Thomas as Roger de Bris – the campest most, excessive gay theatre director imaginable. He minces, flounces, flirts and flaunts – and sings beautifully. Jonathan Rosten is super as as the dour German Franz Leibkind with a  singing voice powered like a magnificent jaguar – both the animal and the car. And Elle Brown has huge, fun as the sexy Swedish secretary, Ulla – another terrific performance.

Meanwhile – as usual at the ADC – the band is tucked away in a side room. It’s musically very strong with thirteen players under Ana Sanderson’s baton. She ensures that everything in Mel Brooks’ tuneful score gels happily.

Of course this is a low budget show with a pretty basic set (the wobbly doors don’t detract from anything) but the overstage side screens are cleverly used especially when we get a birds’ eye view of Frances Sayer’s imaginative choreography. And talking of birds,  full marks to Mike Rudin for Franz Liebkind’s cage of moving pigeons. It’s quite a show stealer.

I’ve seen and reviewed Festival Players shows many times but they really have excelled themselves with this one. It runs until  08 June – get there if you possibly can.

 

Michelle Magorian’s much loved novel about a gruff old countryman and a traumatised, abused little evacuee and how they healed each other, was published in 1981. It was first introduced to me by a vistising speaker on a Kent English teachers’ resididential course the following year. She described it as “very perspicacious” and told us to go back to our schools and share it with our students. So I did – having bought a copy from the course book table and read most of it in bed late at nights during the rest of the course. I read it with classes, recommended it for independent reading and lent my copy to so many people that it should have fallen apart long since. Actually, it’s still intact – warmly tatty and evidently well read. A happy book.

A very bright Oxford-bound sixth form student once told me it was the best book she had ever read. And I’ve never met anyone – child or adult – who didn’t warm to it. There are lots of reasons for that but one of them is that, although Goodnight Mister Tom was published by Puffin and marketed as a children’s book, it isn’t really a “junior” title. It deals sensitively with issues such as mental health, child abuse, death and bereavement among many other things but it’s richly optimistic and positve. It’s a book for everyone in every sense.

The TV film starring John Thaw in 1998 brought the novel to the attention of even more people although Thaw as Tom – good as he was as an actor – failed to get the gritty gravelliness right. I’ve seen David Wood’s fine stage adaptation several times too. Again Oliver Ford Davies is excellent in some roles but his Mister Tom was  too elegant and mannered. David Troughton (whom I interviewed about it at the time) came closest in the production at Open Air Theatre, Regent’s Park. His Tom was rough, raw and convincing.

Rereading the book now, I’m struck afresh by several things. First there’s the mystery of William’s mentally ill mother. We see her behaviour but there is no other explanation or label. She clearly has religious mania which is a recognised psychiatric condition.  And  both William and his infant sister are appallingly abused (aptly contrasted with the happy families of Little Weirwold) At the same time she has produced (at least) two fatherless children and is regarded with moral suspicion by her neighbour. William is suprised when Tom gives him bacon because at home that’s just for “lodgers and visitors”. The subtle inference is that she is working as a prostitute because she apparently (no welfare state in the 1930s) has no other source of income. Then eventually there’s her suicide as William begins to grow up and tries to reconcile her anomalies. She is certainly very ill – and a danger to everyone around her.

Second, this novel confronts death head on. It’s war time. Lovely Mrs Hartridge’s husband (and father of her new baby) is missing presumed dead. Several of the families in the village see their sons conscripted and some receieve the dreaded telegram which leads to the younger children coming to school red eyed and wearing black armbands. Radio news gets ever worse. Moreover, William is hit towards the end of the novel by a dreadful loss and Magorian’s presentation of his grief and healing process is arrestingly moving.

Third there’s the character of Zach, the child of actors, irrepressible and hilariously articulate beyond his years.  He too has been evacuated to Little Weirwold. He’s “not a Christian” – an unheard of thing for William and the village children. Zach is Jewish and that’s nicely done too as, always ebullient, he just becomes part of the group. He’s charismatic and fun (probably tiresome to manage in school!). Of course the Jewishness is not an issue with anyone except William’s tragically bigoted mother when she hears about their friendship.

Fourth, I’ve always thought that Goodnight Mister Tom is a loose reworking of Silas Marner and have encouraged older students to read the two novels comparatively side by side. Tom is a lonely figure. He lost his young wife and the baby she had just given birth to, forty years earlier (cf Silas losing the respect and trust of his church community and thus his faith) which has left him introverted and unhappy. It is the arrival of William which forces Tom to emerge from his reclusiveness and help the boy, just as Silas does Eppie.  There is a lot to Tom which the reader isn’t expecting at the start too. He’s clearly literate – books on the side, newspapers and he can retell bible stories from his own imagination as well as sharing read-aloud books with Willie, whom he teaches to read and write. Later he turns out to be a lapsed church organist too – and is persuaded to return to it when the regular orgainist goes to war. And my goodness, he’s feisty, determined and decent – the trip to London to find William took my breath away as it has done every other time I’ve read this compelling book.

And don’t forget Sammy. Until William’s arrival, Sammy was Tom’s only companion. He’s a dog small enough to pick up, plays a big part in helping William back to health both on his first arrival and after the London disaster and it’s Sammy who finds William at the very dramatic moment that he most needs it.

Magorian loves the 1940s :  the setting for most of her books. Goodnight Mister Tom was her first and has been phenominally successful. Several others have been good and enjoyable (I particularly liked Back Home, for example) but none of her books has come anywhere near the popularity of Goodnight Mister Tom. Read it if you haven’t, or reread it to remind youself, and you’ll see why.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Lace by Shirley Conran

  

Measure for Measure

William Shakespeare

Tower Theatre. Stoke Newington

Directed by George Savona

 Star rating: 4

I am very fond of this fascinating but maybe underrated play which I used to teach to A level students. And I have, of course seen it many times including productions featuring famous names. This, however, is the first time I’ve seen it set firmly in period (lovely costumes by Christine Bowmaker). The play is so full of topical themes that most directors can’t resist  transposing it into a setting which looks or feels familiar to modern audiences.

George Savona, though, approaches the play with full confidence in the material. He doesn’t tinker with the text much apart from the occasional pronoun change and we’re firmly in what Shakespeare thought early 17 century Vienna might be like – although actually it’s London in all but name with the brothels, pimps and street life he would have known well.

So why does  Duke Vincentio (Nic Campos) suddenly decide to take a sabbatical and hand control of the city to “snow broth Angelo” (Patrick Shearer)  given that he doesn’t actually leave but disguises himself as a friar and proceeds to interfere in everything that’s going on? Does he really want the city “cleaned up”  but can’t or won’t do it himself?  Or is the whole thing an elaborate – and irresponsible – ruse to expose “well seeming” Angelo’s hypocrisy?  Measure for Measure is full of such questions which this production poses but doesn’t really attempt to answer.

The most disturbing thing in the play is Angelo demanding that Isabella (Ella Dale) yield her virginity to him in return for sparing the life of her brother who’s imprisoned and sentenced to death for “fornication” which has led to the pregnancy of his fiancée, Juliet. It’s well handled in this production not least because Dale is very good indeed. Her Isabella is passionate in her pleading and packs an erotic charge of which she’s unconscious which, of course, is what arouses Angelo. She also does anxiety, determination despair and, eventually joy, most convincingly. And I really liked the way Savola and Dale tackled that dreadful moment at the end of the play when the manipulative, domineering Duke suddenly announces that he’ll marry her. Of course she isn’t going to fall into his arms. Dale walks down stage and stares into the distance clearly indicating shock, alarm and horror.

Campos is strong as the Duke too – especially when he reassumes his own identity in the last act and dominates the action giving orders which are not always reasonable. Another question which lurks in the play is what sort of marriage are Angelo and Marianna likely to have? He had, after all, gone off the idea and had to be forced into it after the famous bed trick masterminded by the Duke which arguably makes him a pimp no better than the ones who have been rounded up and imprisoned. Patrick Shearer’s Angelo is chillingly cold and unempathetic – a commendable performance.

Other noteworthy performances include Sam D’Leon as Pompey. He’s an actor-muso who strums, blows and taps various instruments as part of his mercurial character’s personality and represents the voice of human commonsense in the play. I really liked BeEbop Curacao’s Provost too – quiet, haughty, dignified but ultimately decent. At first I didn’t find Luke Owen’s Lucio sufficiently outrageous but he picks up well in the second half.

In general the verse speaking is impressive and the diction admirably clear which means that the story telling works. And that’s important. Not everyone in the audience will be as familiar with the play as I am.

It’s a refreshing,  thoughtful “straight” account of an intriguing play, It’s also pretty uncompromising at nearly three hours with interval –  but none the worse for that.    

My Fair Lady

Alan Jay Lerner & Frederick Loewe

Ferrier Operatic Society

Bob Hope Theatre

 Star rating; 3

It’s everybody’s favourite show and we all know each and every one of Frederick Lowe’s engaging melodies. And in some ways, although it’s fun to do, and fun to see, it’s that familiarity which makes it hard to bring off. But, hey, the whole point of community theatre is taking part and working together and this show fizzes with the exuberance of that. And the themes of class, accent and identity are timeless.

David Maun is a fine Professor Higgins. Although he’s no singer and speaks most of his songs to music in the manner of Rex Harrison or Noel Coward,  he is an actor to his finger tips and knows exactly how to time every line, movement and twitch.

Helena Booer sings beautifully as Eliza Doolittle – she can do anger, wistfulness and excitement in song while making it sound glorious. I was, however, unconvinced by her raw Covent Garden accent.

The company’s best asset, though, is Vernon Leese as Alfred P Doolittle. He makes the part entirely his own – singing, dancing and being outrageous in a totally believable street accent. The “I’m getting married in the morning” sequence is one of this production’s highlights.

Director Barbara Archer and her cast have found ways of coaxing every last bit of humour out of this show and it’s much funnier than My Fair Lady often is. The projected back screens work well too – it’s probably quite low budget but seeing the glassy domes of Covent Garden, the turf at Ascot and a grand staircase for the ballroom scene is effective.

The thirteen-piece orchestra, tucked right under the stage as it has to be at the Bob Hope Theatre, does a generally pleasing job under David Stevens’s direction – woodwind and brass in particular. There were however, at the performamce I saw, some wobbly moments of timing and the orchestra is often too loud. The show requires the speaking of some dialogue over “background” music. Most of this was inaudible, drowned out by the orchestra, at least from where I was sitting in Row M.

Sadly some of the chorus work is beyond the modest capabilities of the sopranos in this company, especially in the “Poor Professor Higgins” interjections. The Ascot Gavotte, however, is excellent. It needs only perfect timing (watch the conductor) and crisp articulation and it gets both.

It’s always a treat to see My Fair Lady – and over the years I’ve experienced it many times at many levels (from a school production during my teaching years to English National Opera last year). And this production ticked lots of boxes despite a few flaws. I drove home singing – of course.

Roald Dahl’s The Enormous Crocodile The Musical – Regent’s Park Open Air Theatre

Malinda Parris in The Enormous Crocodile at Regent’s Park Open Air Theatre, London. Picture: Johan Persson

Roald Dahl’s The Enormous Crocodile The Musical continues at the Regent’s Park Open Air Theatre, London until 8 June 2024.

Star rating: four stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ✩

Roald Dahl’s time-honoured 1978 tale of a very peckish crocodile (we 1970s parents know it by heart) is effectively a very light-hearted take on the traditional overcoming-the-monster story. And in the hands of Suhayla El-Bushra and Ahmed Abdullahi Gallab (additional music and lyrics by Tom Brady), with Emily Lim directing, it makes a wittily entertaining piece of musical theatre.

The set (Fly Davis) is green and jungly and the show opens with the cast, looking leafy, touring the auditorium with coloured puppet birds on rods. And there’s a rather gorgeous scene at the end when we get huge planets and blue smoke as the eponymous reptile goes of to be “sizzled like a sausage” by the sun.

Musical director Màth Roberts sits with a keyboard in a side-stage …

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review https://musicaltheatrereview.com/roald-dahls-the-enormous-crocodile-the-musical-regents-park-open-air-theatre/