Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Susan’s Bookshelves: As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner

It has taken me a long time to get round to William Faulkner (1897-1962). I first heard of him back in the late 60s when a fellow English student at Bishop Otter College, Chichester told me that he was going to do Faulkner for his Special Study. This was an extended essay which most institutions would now dignify with the term “dissertation” but we weren’t a university.  Ours was a teacher training college and the distinctions were clear at the time.  So “special study” it was. Since you ask, I did mine on the presentation of women in the novels of CP Snow.

Anyway, I never gave Faulkner  much thought until his name came up recently in conversation with a bookish friend. I said I’d never read him and wondered whether I should rectify that. She suggested I start with As I Lay Dying. So I did.

And it was quite a revelation. It’s a stream of consciousness novel with 15 narrating characters and 59 chapters of varying length. The multi-faceted view points are reminiscent of a Picasso painting and the influences of, say Joyce and Woolf are clear although the story telling is more accessible than either, despite the fractured chronology.

We’re in Yoknapatawpha County in Mississippi, a fictional version of Faulkner’s native Lafayette County where he spent most of his life. Addie Bundren is dying. Her eldest son Cash is building her coffin. Once she dies the family – Cash, Darl, Jewel, Dewey Dell and Vardaman – set out with their father Anse to bury the body in Jefferson, Mississippi. These people are poor rural folk and the coffin has to go in their mule cart in what becomes a time-honoured quest story. The journey is beset by dreadful hazards including the traditional water and fire  which means the journey takes a long time and the body begins to smell.

And there is a complex, gradually unravelled, back story. The big ten year gap between Darl and Jewel, for example, is down to a breakdown in relations between Anse and Addie and part of the reason Anse is now blinkeredly determined to bury his wife with her own people. There’s a lot of guilt and angst in this novel. Darl is poetic by nature, Jewel is obsessed with having a decent horse, Cash is injured en route and the account of setting his broken leg with concrete is horrific. Vardaman is still a child and his point of view is poignant. And the gut-wrenching tragedy and anguish of Dewey Dell’s search for an abortifacient and the way she is duped remind me strongly of Steinbeck.

It isn’t an easy novel to penetrate at the start but once you tune into it, it’s  powerful and deeply moving.  Moreover, I have fallen in love with the poetry of Faulkner’s prose. For example: “… the no-wind, no-sound,  the weary gestures wearily recapitulant: echoes of the old compulsions with no-hand on no-strings: in sunset we fall into furious attitudes, dead gestures of dolls.” Or, of a horse being rescued from fire: “ …its eyes roll with soft fleet opaline fire: its muscles bunch as it flings its head about.

So I’m now wondering why it took me so long.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Eagle of the Ninth by Rosemary Sutcliff

Show: Shakespeare In Love

Society: Trinity Drama Productions

Venue: Trinity Concert Hall

Credits: Tom Stoppard, Marc Norman, Lee Hall, Paddy Cuneen

Shakespeare in Love

4 stars

It’s a good choice for a school play. Shakespeare in Love has a big cast and lots of meaty roles. And it works especially well for a school which is boys only other than in the sixth from because the company run by the hapless Burbage (Matteo de Lorenzo – pleasing performance) and his rivals, were of course, all male.

James Bradburn, directs his cast (Head of Drama is Chris Chambers) to make imaginative use of the big playing space and there are some excellent stage grouping moments. The show is slickly paced too.

Barney Sayburn excels as Shakespeare. He has plenty of stage presence and brings colour and nuance to the role  as he works though his love affair with wannabe actor Viola  De Lesseps (Anna Brovko – warm and convincing) and the gradual development of Romeo and Juliet.  Arthur White, diminutive and feisty, is great fun as John Webster and Alex Molony’s Kit Marlowe is enjoyable.

But the real stars of this show are Tom Stoppard’s script and the side stage band directed by Ralph Barlow. (I had forgotten just how clever Stoppard’s writing is here. He weaves quotes and cross references in continually. I hope the young people acting it are aware that, for example, “Give me to drink mandragora” “The play’s the thing” “Brave new world” “sick of self love” and dozens of other lines are Shakespeare’s own words. It’s sad, though, that when John Webster makes a particularly blood-thirsty remark and then reveals his name, I am the only audience member who laughs.

Trinity School is famous for its music (Trinity Boys Choir etc) so it’s  a treat to hear/see it shining on its own patch. The all-student band provides arrestingly good period music on instruments such as lute, viol, psaltery and spinet alongside trumpets and flutes. Half a dozen fine singers stand behind them producing some pretty impressive harmony. The music sits between scenes and often under dialogue to provide atmosphere.

And that, perversely, creates occasional problems because sometimes there are issues with the acoustic and sound system so that words aren’t always audible despite the use of radio mics. This show is staged in the school’s very large concert hall rather than the smaller theatre next door and, clearly, that has created challenges although it’s a lovely thing for the cast and creatives to be able to work in, and fill, such a large space.

An enormous amount of hard work and dedication has gone into this show and it’s a joy to me to see so many young people, of all abilities, working together and producing something worthwhile. Well done, all.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/shakespeare-in-love/

 

Show: 21 Round For Christmas

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Bridge House Theatre. Bridge House, 2 High Street, London SE20 8RZ

Credits: By Toby Hampton and Matt Ballantyne. Presented by Everything Theatre.

21 Round For Christmas

4 stars

Rebecca Crankshaw is riveting. She holds the audience in the palm of her hand as Tracey treating us to her memories, thoughts and life story as she potters about in her kitchen cooking Christmas dinner for 21 noisy and demanding people who can be heard in the next room.

This beautifully written, scrupulously observed play is very funny but it’s also pretty poignant as we gradually learn why the in-your-face Tracey is married to a fat prick (“Actually” she says wryly. “That’s not fair. He isn’t fat”) with a ghastly vegan mother who loves to lay down the law. Then there’s Jackie, the friend who’s been beside her since she was nine years old. Usually Jackie would be there at Christmas having a laugh with her in the kitchen and we eventually realise why she isn’t – and that isn’t funny at all.

It’s a powerful  60-minute, one-hander, not least because Crankshaw’s timing and voice work are so accomplished. She treats us to a hilarious account of attending and hilariously subverting a séance she once attended with her mother in law and Jackie. Then there’s meeting and being captivated by a glamorous American named Gregory – and the dashed dream which follows. Tracey is very witty too about how to “bag a bloke” although Crankshaw plays this with a nuanced sense of brittleness. It’s a very charismatic performance.

The play, written by two men, is partly a feminist crie-de-coeur. Tracey really doesn’t deserve to be a solitary kitchen skivvy single-handedly fulfilling the complex dietary needs of 21 people. When the rebellion finally comes it’s such a relief that you want to cheer.

Because the Bridge House studio space is small and simple, sets there are usually quite basic but directors Luke Adamson and Joe Lindoe have really pushed the boat out for this one. A fitted kitchen, including a fridge and lots of cupboards hugs two sides of the square space so that Crankshaw can work with real food and at one point we get steam – all pretty convincing although it must be quite complicated to stage manage.

I did wonder, though, about the food waste but at the end Crankshaw speaks, as herself, to the audience and explains that there’s a collection for a local food bank to offset this. Nice touch and people seemed to be donating quite generously after the performance I saw.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/21-round-for-christmas/

TURN AROUND AND TAKE A BOW! MY MUSICAL LIFE – Mike Dixon (Matador).

Star rating: three stars ★ ★ ★ ✩ ✩

Mike Dixon has been MD-ing in musical theatre since the 1970s and this account of his journey to eminence in 20 West End productions makes encouraging reading – especially for anyone starting out.

Born in Plymouth in 1957 to a church-going family, Dixon recalls being fascinated by music from infancy. There were hymns and an organ at church, classical music records, the school choir and recorder playing at primary school. He doesn’t remember learning to read music any more than most people can remember learning to read words.

A turning point came when head teacher, Mr Parish, spotted the young Dixon’s talent and gave him a piano he was replacing …

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review: https://musicaltheatrereview.com/book-review-turn-around-and-take-a-bow-my-musical-life-mike-dixon/

My ancient copy of Christmas Stories by Charles Dickens is inscribed “To Susan with love from Aunty Jill xx 1956”. Jill was my mother’s much younger sister. In 1956, she’d have been 20. I was nine. I suppose I was perceived, with some accuracy, as a bookish child. Of course I read them then and have dipped many times since. Coming back to them now, I’m struck by a number of things – not least that my old Heirloom Library edition with illustrations by William Littlewood contains just three stories: A Christmas Carol, The Chimes and The Cricket on the Hearth. There are actually two more (The Battle of Life and The Haunted Man) which get included in modern collections, because after A Christmas Carol, published in 1843,  when Dickens was only 32, he knew he was on to a (very) good thing. He called these five stories his “Carol series”

A Christmas Carol is so well known that everyone “knows” it. Ebeneezer Scrooge, courtesy of dozens of screen and stage adaptations, is one of a handful of literary characters (Mr Darcy and Charles Dodgson’s Alice are other examples) who has a vibrant public consciousness existence far from the pages which gave birth to him. This year, wearing my theatre reviewing hat, I have, several different dramatised versions of this seasonal classic lined up to see –  as usual.

Dickens2Xmas

So it’s quite interesting to go back to where it all started and read what Dickens actually wrote. Ever theatrical, Dickens structured it like a three act play preceded by a prologue and completed with an epilogue which form a framing device. Thus we start with an exposition of Scrooge’s meanness and then his vision of Marley, work through the three spirits and then finally see the reformed Scrooge making amends and doing good. It’s neat and satisfying without ever feeling contrived. I’m also struck, long sentences notwithstanding, by the straightforwardness of Dickens’s language: “After tea, they had some music” or “He went to church, and walked about the streets, and watched the people hurrying to and fro, and patted children on the head, and questioned beggars, and looked down into the kitchens of houses, and up to the windows: and found that everything could yield him pleasure”. Yes, I can see how I could have read this stuff quite comfortably when I was only nine.

And, incidentally, I used to send my secondary school English students to Mr Dickens when I was trying to undo the damage done by blinkered primary school teachers who had taught them that a sentence must never start with a conjunction. Dickens, arguably the greatest writer in English after Shakespeare, does it on almost every page (“And it was clear he meant to do it” “But now a knocking at the door was heard …”.  And if it was good enough for him ..?  (Alert readers, moreover, will spot that I deliberately did it twice in this paragraph)

My favourite passage was always the description of the Cratchits’ Christmas pudding and it still is. At nine, I couldn’t have identified gentle irony as the reason it works so well. Today I can analyse and admire the warmth with which he conveys the tiny size of the pudding for such a big, impoverished family alongside their utter delight in it. It is, actually, very beautiful and an example of stunningly good writing.

The Chimes followed a year later in 1844 and he was clearly trying to follow the success of A Christmas Carol which it resembles in many ways as Toby/Trotty the poor porter trying to make things better for his daughter is eventually confronted by the ghostly church chimes. Tellingly it hasn’t grabbed the public imagination to anything like the same extent and hasn’t been adapted so often.

The Cricket on the Hearth (1845) is a domestic fairy tale about John and Dot Peerybingle (where on earth did Dickens  find his wonderful names?) and their baby. The titular chirping insect acts as a sort of guardian angel to the family. It isn’t desperately “Christmassy” but it works. It has to be said, though, that of these three long short stories/novellas A Christmas Carol is by far the best.

Treat yourself to a reread on these dark winter nights and see if you agree.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: As I Lay Dying by William Falkner

 

Show: Jack!

Society: Chickenshed

Venue: Chickenshed Theatre, 290 Chase Side, London N14 4PE

Credits: Author and music: Dave Carey.

Type: Sardines

Jack!

4 stars

As always I watched the final curtain call with what I think of as a “Chickenshed lump” in my throat. There is something profoundly moving about seeing two hundred or so people on stage, celebrating a visually and vocally vibrant, totally inclusive musical theatre achievement.

This is a very original take on Jack and the Beanstalk, positioned a very long way from pantomime to which it is a refreshing antidote.  Jack (Hector Dogliani who doubles the role in other performances with Ellie Carroll) has a realistic family. His widowed mother is anxious, distracted, volatile and dependent on foodbanks or going without. A troubled dreamer and a bit of a loner he is badly bullied by other teenagers (chilling scenes) until he discovers the Beanstalk computer game in the arcade his late father used to own. The show then comprises his big scale working through three challenging levels until he finally “meets” the giant and comes to terms with his situation so that he can face the future with courage, confidence and self knowledge. Oh yes, Dave Carey who wrote this show is a highly talented man. And, primarily a musician, he also gives us some terrific music, partly live and visible on an overstage platform, and some pre-recorded. He gets lots of applause from me, too, for using a youth band.

The show, whose huge ensemble is beautifully choreographed, includes avatars, monsters, a colourful set, lively dancing (especially from the utterly splendid Courtney Dayes as Dance Boss 1), real drama and lots of kindness. I am always impressed by the glorious cast mix at Chickenshed including wheelchair users, people with Downs Syndrome and other conditions, child Chickenshed members, Btec and degrees students, and staffers, many of whom have been involved with Chickenshed since childhood. Ashley Driver, for example, who has been a member since he was a child, is a graduate of both Btec and degree programme and is now part of the tutoring and mentoring team. He excels as the forceful, glittering Pinball Wizard in this show. There is a given in the choreographing of Chickenshed shows that anyone who needs help is unobtrusively scooped up or taken by the hand and led within the ensemble. It’s a lovely thing to notice.

Hector Dogliani plays a lonely introvert at the opening, gradually and skilfully revealing a rounded, much happier person. And he sings beautifully – lots of tuneful, well controlled warmth.

This show works with over eight hundred people because the ensemble operates in four rotas. I saw the yellow rota doing a fine job. I marvel at the discipline with which they make their entrances and exits and can only wonder how on earth you manage a cast that size, some of whom are very young, backstage.

Inclusivity is what underlies all this so every word of the show is integrally signed by a large number of very competent signers who are threaded into the action. Some of these are children so that’s excellent too. I also like the way short solos are distributed across the ensemble so that lots of young people get the chance to shine. It isn’t always easy, given the crowded stage, to spot who is holding the hand mic and having a moment of glory but the blending in is a Chickenshed trademark.

I suspect that this is going to be one of the best Christmas shows I see this month.

 

 First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/jack/

Show: Mother Goose

Society: Hackney Empire Ltd

Venue: Hackney Empire. 291 Mare Street, London E8 1EJ

Credits: Author: Will Brenton. Director Clive Rowe. Produced by Hackney Empire Productions

Type: Sardines

Mother Goose

2 stars

Image: Billy Goose (Kat B) and Priscilla the Goose (Ruth Lynch). Photo by Manuel Harlan


Hackney has a culture all of its own and as a visitor from Catford, and the other side of the tracks – sorry, river – its pantomime always makes me feel a bit of an outsider. This year’s rather pedestrian effort was no exception.

We’re in Hackney Woods where Will Brenton weaves a somewhat contrived story about a beauty parlour, run by kindly Mother Goose (Clive Rowe). Then alas, acquiring a source of wealth from her pet goose’s golden eggs, she is seduced into the idea that she wants to be beautiful. And, of course, although she succeeds and gets glamorous, that is never going to work out well.

Of course fabulous Clive Rowe is good, sings strongly and, as director, does his very best to hold it together and Kat B, as ever, is charismatically rueful and funny as Billy Goose. Otherwise, I’m afraid it limps along with a lot of mis-pacing.

For example, there are several spotlight solo numbers which are well enough sung but are overlong for this context and feel like time fillers. Then there’s a very peculiar scene giving us the history of Hackney Empire – 120 years old this year – which, although quite interesting, is totally out of place here.

Worst of all is the way this cast – almost all of them – mis-time dozens of jokes so that they fall repeatedly flat. Even the slosh scene, which brings an “audience member” (I have my suspicions) on stage is tame. The timing of gags is a pretty basic pantomime skill so this is puzzling.

Rebecca Parker looks good (lots of leggy height and glittery black) and sings well as Demon Queen but her speech is blurred and often inaudible which is down, presumably, partly to her delivery and partly to iffy sound management. Tony Marshall is moderately funny as the exaggeratedly East End  Squire Purchase (and I like the punning name) and Holly Mallet is feisty as Jill Purchase.

Meanwhile the four piece band, led by Alex Maynard, is doing a grand job at the front. There is, for example, some lovely guitar work from Charlie Laffer.

There were some enthusiastic adult insiders laughing very loudly and supportively in the press night audience and relatively few children. The boy – maybe 8 – who was the only child in my row sat impassive throughout.

 

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/mother-goose-6/

The Wind in the Wi̵l̵l̵o̵w̵s̵ Wilton’s

4 stars

Show: The Wind in the Wi̵l̵l̵o̵w̵s̵ Wilton’s

Society: London (professional shows)

Venue: Wilton’s Music Hall. 1 Graces Alley, London E1 8JB

Credits: An adaptation, by Piers Torday, of Kenneth Grahame’s The Wind in the Willows. Directed by Elizabeth Freestone.

Image: Tom Chapman, Chris Nayak and Paula James. Photo: Courtesy of Wilton’s Music Hall


Just has he did with A Christmas Carol, Piers Torday has reimagined The Wind in the Willows to make it relevant and sharp for the 21st century. The inventive result packs a powerful anti-capitalist message and has a strong environmental message but also retains all the affirmation of friendship and collaboration which is what made Kenneth Grahame’s 1905 novel work in the first place. It’s also crisply fresh and very funny.

We’re in central London in a park, where the river is under threat from Weasel companies wanting to build everywhere and take control of the river. These people (sorry – animals) are ruthlessly self-interested. The Wild Wood is now the Animal Banking District and not a safe place for small animals who just want to live peacefully and simply.

Mole (Corey Montague Sholay) becomes a fastidious wimp, gradually learning to let go and enjoy life but very concerned about health and safety risk assessments. Toad – who has been in the theatre – played by Darrell Brockis, (also a whizz on the clarinet) is a deliciously flamboyant, cheek-kissing over-actor given to calling everyone “darling”. His obsessions are an electric exercise bike, an Alexa-type device, a very pretty drone and an e-scooter. The latter is illegal on river banks in the UK, as his Alexa reminds him.

The cast of seven, immaculately directed by Elizabeth Freestone are mostly actor-musicians who generate accompaniments for Chris Warner’s rather good songs as well as atmospheric sounds when, for example, there’s danger. And they’re a talented bunch. Rosie Wyatt is very convincing as Rat with a gore-blimey London voice and lots of rueful vulnerability beneath the feistiness. She also has a strong and beautiful singing voice and can multi-task. I can both play the violin and sing but I really envy and admire Wyatt’s ability to do them at the same time.

Melody Brown is a splendid Badger, curmugeonly and passionate about all the things she has campaigned for all her life but now weary. In an understated visual pun she is covered in badges to connote her causes. Tom Chapman is wonderfully slimy and nasty as the multi-millionaire Weasel and I liked Paula James in lots of ensemble roles but especially as the leader of the Duck Aerobics – a witty and rhythmic account of Grahame’s “Up Tails All”

Chris Nyak is a very versatile actor shifting from a West Midlands weasel to the hilarious poseur Otter who is then devastated by the loss of his baby daughter (nicely puppeted). He too races about seamlessly from one ensemble role to another.

Tom Piper’s set is impressive: lots of rushes and a big, twiggy upstage tree with branches which can be detached and waved by cast members. He also does simple but effective things with quasi-washing lines on which are pegged items to indicate setting. When we first meet Toad, for instance we chuckle at his expensive – Prada and so on – carrier bags on the line.

It’s a  good idea to move the carol singers to the end of the show after the animals have worked together to regain Toad Hall and control of the river. It makes for an upbeat ending and I really liked the arranged of Joy Shall Be Yours in the Morning  sung in harmony based mostly on bell-like descending arpeggios with hand bells to accompany. It is a good moment in pretty compelling show. I was also pleased the see no attempt to run a trial scene (it happens off stage with a bit of voice over) and Toad’s rather laboured escape from prison has gone. It’s all neatly constructed.

Torday’s underlying political point is that these animals were commonplace 117 years ago when The Wind in the Willows was written. Today they are almost all endangered or under threat. We have to stop concreting over their habitats in the interests of “progress” which, all too often is just a means of making rich people richer.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-wind-in-the-wi%cc%b5l%cc%b5l%cc%b5o%cc%b5w%cc%b5s%cc%b5-wiltons/

guest