Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Susan’s Bookshelves: The Corfe Castle Murders by Rachel McLean

I’ve had a thing about Corfe Castle since I was three years old. It’s that first glimpse of it through the Purbeck Hills as you drive from Wareham to Swanage along the A351. It got me then and it still gets me now. The grown ups were thrilled (I couldn’t think why at the time) when the day after my first sighting I created a sandcastle version on the beach with two pieces of driftwood. For that matter I’m very fond of Dorset in general. My grandmother came from Dorset and I was taken there annually until I was 16. Lots of fond memories. I still go as often as I can.

So how could I possibly resist a novel with a title like The Corfe Castle Murders especially as my go-to light reading is usually detective fiction?  And I wasn’t disappointed.

DI Lesley Clarke has been seconded to Dorset from the West Midlands following a trauma, the details of which gradually emerge. Before she even gets to work, the evening before she’s due to start, she and her daughter get involved in a murder incident. One of the academics on an archeological dig in Corfe Castle village has been bludgeoned to death and his much younger girl friend finds him and screams. Lesley happens to be nearby.

What follows is neatly plotted with all the requisite twists, turns, coincidences and byways a good detective story needs. And I liked the emphasis on the contrast between slow rural Dorset and the high octane, urban rough and tumble Lesley is used too. And every time she drives along the A351 I’m there with her.

She’s a well drawn character and good at her job. There are things going on in her own life too and one senses a long trajectory – the linking story across the series. This is the first of six books, all set in Dorset, with a seventh due later this year. There is also a free prequel detailing the case which led to the vacancy in Dorset – about which none of Lesley’s new colleagues want to talk.

Lesley is feisty, forthright and doesn’t suffer fools. She finds religious and insular Dennis, one of her sergeants, hard going but by the end of this first novel they are beginning to respect each other. She is also keen to expand the team and brings in a uniformed female constable – another strong character beginning to show initiative.

It would be an ideal one for a long flight, or a beach/garden read – as the weather warms up and you don’t want anything too demanding. It isn’t Great Literature but McLean writes well and this yarn held my attention to the very last page. The acid test is whether or not I read the next in the series. Probably will. Lesley is good company and I don’t need much excuse to visit Dorset.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Drunken Forest by Gerald Durrell

Eugene Onegin Opera Holland Park Young Artists Performance June 2022

This production, like this season’s Carmen, makes imaginative use of takis’s annular set which puts the orchestra in the middle of the action. It’s a treat to see and hear some of the action only a few feet from the front rows of the audience.

At the performance, I saw, which showcased the talents of singers in Opera Holland Park Young Artists Scheme Samuel Dale Johnson – who plays the role in the main cast show – stood in as Onegin for indisposed Rory Musgrave. Johnson, tall and charismatic brings all the brash insouciance the character needs in the early scenes followed by wonderfully sung anguish and remorse at his final rejection – which is played on the very front of the ring.

Has anyone ever done passion quite like Tchaikovsky with his plaintive, plangent brass interjections? In this performance Lucy Anderson as Tatyana delivers every note and nuance in the challengingly long letter scene which she sustains with admirable control. And the repeated descending horn motif – hinting that this love letter is not going to bring happiness – hits the spot every time under Hannah von Wiehler’s clear, incisive baton. It’s a good directorial idea (Julia Burbach) to have Onegin physically on stage in mime at this point to connote what Tatyana is imagining. We see something similar in the second act when Onegin and Tatyana meet five years later and we are shown on stage what is going on in Tatyana’s head as her husband Prince Gemin (Henry Grant Kerswell – good) sings of married happiness.

Anne Elizabeth Cooper is suitably ebullient and excitable as the other sister Olga. She has the beginnings of a rich traditional contralto voice (think Ferrier or Baker) with some velvety bottom notes. She is a nice foil to the more intense Tatyana. Similarly Jack Roberts as Lenksy contrasts with Onegin especially as they quarrel at the end of the first act. He sings Lensky’s aria with both passion and precision while von Wiehler ensures we hear the woodwind shining through the texture.

The chorus sound is strong and only very occasionally, and briefly swamped by the orchestra. And every performer on stage is directed to make maximum use of the huge playing space.

In the first act the women wear simple white dresses which reminded me, off-puttingly, of nighties. I think these are meant to suggest youthful innocence because everyone is in heavy, grown up black after the interval. As a device it feels a bit clumsy – but this is a very minor gripe about a fine production and performance.

First published by Lark Reviews: https://www.larkreviews.co.uk/?p=6831

Fantastically Great Women Who Changed the World continues at Theatre Royal Stratford East, London until 17 July 2022. The show then visits the Marlowe Theatre, Canterbury (26-20 July) and the Edinburgh Festival Fringe (4-29 August).

Star rating: four stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ✩

It’s inspiring, upbeat and affirmative. And it has a clear aim of showing girls and young women that they too can change the world.

Based on the book by Kate Pankhurst, Chris Bush’s stage adaptation gives us Jade (Kudzai Mangombe), an 11 year old lost in a museum which has a gallery of greatness where she meets Amelia Earhart, Jane Austen, Frida Kahlo and many more.

Mangombe, playing over ten years younger than her age, is totally convincing. She is upset because nobody notices her, has low expectations of her own potential and is distressed by the break up of her parents’ marriage. It’s a lovely performance as she gradually becomes more positive.

The women who wander into the gallery gradually convince her that every one of us changes the world simply by being in it although making a real difference is rarely straightforward.

It feel as if the musical Six has been an influence (two of the cast of five are former “Queens”). Characters wear radiantly irreverent costumes and there are lots of flashing lights and neon signs (design by Joanna Scotcher).

The songs in various styles (lyrics by Bush and Miranda Cooper, music by Cooper and Jennifer Decilveo) are delivered with passion, energy, lively dancing and – most importantly in a show like this – impeccable diction so that children in the audience really do learn who these women are and what they’re remembered for.

Especially memorable is the number by three Marys: Seacole, Anning and Curie …

Read the rest of this review at Musical Theatre Review: https://musicaltheatrereview.com/fantastically-great-women-who-changed-the-world/

Although I’ve read it at least twice in the distant past I have never taught The Mill on the Floss. Reading it again now with huge pleasure I’m struck by what a good novel it would be for an A Level group. It’s so full of themes, ideas and discussion that I’d need a great deal more than a single side of A4 to list them: parenting, siblings, education, disability, female inequality, duty, loyalty, forgiveness and much more. It’s a gloriously rich novel. It’s also – by 19th century standards – a pretty accessible read.

It was her third novel – after Adam Bede and before Silas Marner – and I’m certain that there are elements of Maggie Tulliver which are modelled on Eliot’s own memories of being a fearsomelty intelligent, curious, imaginative girl growing up in a man’s world. After all Mary Ann Evans knew she had to write under a male pseudonym in order to be taken seriously.

Maggie Tulliver is a mill owner’s daughter who adores her brother, Tom who is by turns affectionate and dictatorial. She is drawn to Philp Wakem, who has been left with a minor disability by an illness. Unfortunately there is a long term feud between Wakem senior, a lawyer, and Mr Tulliver. The result of this is that Mr Tulliver loses his mill and, with a faint whiff of Romeo and Juliet, Maggie is forbidden to see Philip.

Mill 2 (2)

Years pass, Tom eventually manages to get the mill back and Maggie meets Stephen who is courting her cousin Lucy. There is, however, chemistry between Maggie and Stephen which both try to deny because of what they see as commitments elsewhere. Of course there is no happy ending for anyone. Eliot ends the novel with a gloriously symbolic flood sweeping through the community and washing things/people away both physically and metaphysically.

I love the way Eliot uses Mrs Tulliver’s very judgemental sisters as a quasi Greek chorus dispensing advice, opinion and, occasionally help although that always comes with conditions and chilly patronage which reminds me of that dreadful line in Measure for Measure: “See that she has needful but not lavish means”.  Their husbands – especially Uncle Deane who gives Tom a job when Tulliver fortunes are at their lowest ebb – are rather more attractive. You really wouldn’t want to share a cup of tea with any of Maggie and Tom’s aunts – George Eliot at her acidic best. She’s also very good (you see it strikingly in Middlemarch eleven years later) at small town group dynamics and the way distorted gossip takes a hold on communities.

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

I was repeatedly astonished by how topical some aspects of The Mill on The Floss are too. Maggie, in a moment when her agonising self-control slips, agrees to go away with Stephen and marry him. That means they spend a night together on the river before reaching the town where Maggie’s conscience overpowers her and she insists on leaving him and going home. Of course the night together is, although full of passionate longing, sexually innocent but Maggie is castigated by the populace of St Ogg’s for immoral behaviour in a way that Stephen isn’t. 162 years after the novel was published that still rings true. Although today nobody (or almost nobody) minds much whether or not young people have sex together, women are still judged differently from men on socio-sexual issues.

The character I empathise with most is poor, “more sinned against than sinning” Mrs Tulliver. Her story is tragic. She has two challenging children. She’s a fairly simple woman who can’t make head or tail of  Maggie’s mercurial intelligence and despairs of her sallowness and dark hair. Then she loses all her treasured possessions including her home and virtually has to go into service at the behest of her bossy sisters. Finally, long widowed,  she outlives both her children – an appalling fate for any mother. There’s scope here for a spin-off novel or play about Mrs Tulliver – anyone up for it?

Mill 3

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Corfe Castle Murders by Rachel McLean

 

Show: A Doll’s House, Part

Venue: Donmar Warehouse. 41 Earlham Street, London WC2H 9LX

Credits: By Lucas Hnath

A Doll’s House, Part 2

3 stars

Noma Dumezweni (as Nora). Photo: Marc Brenner


So what does Nora do after she leaves Torvald at the end of Ibsen’s play? It’s a question many writers have tried to answer. In Lucas Hnath’s engaging, four hander, ninety-minute sequel Nora has spent fifteen years establishing herself as a successful independent woman but now returns – with questions and a request.

Noma Dumezweni  is stonkingly good as Nora. Statusesque, elegant and articulate she towers over everyone else in every sense. She is variously sardonic, poised, determined, distressed, reasonable and furious. Her Nora is a charismatic force to be reckoned with and I have rarely seen an actor listen so expressively.

And June Watson (87) happily refuting the notion that there are no good parts for women is a delight as the grumpy, irascible, forthright Anne Marie. Brian F O’Byrne is plausible as Torvald especially in the later scenes while Patricia Allison is suitably chirpy as his daughter, Emmy.

The other star in this show is Rae Smith’s set which gives us a house on the Donmar’s central playing space. As you take your seats you can see only its oppressive walls. Then the lights go down and the whole structure lifts off dramatically – like a doll’s house – to reveal a sparsely furnished room. It’s both neat and symbolically ingenious.

Ibsen’s play was premiered in 1890 so we’re now in 1905 – with rather lovely period costumes. Hnath’s language, however, is firmly 2022 (“kids” “I get it” etc). Although there is humour in the incongruity of Watson’s elderly character declaring that she’s pissed off, and there’s a lot of that sort of thing, it doesn’t make for convincing coherence and feels wrong.

In  A Doll’s House Ibsen explores marriage in a partriarchal society. Although the situation still isn’t perfect things are very different today with much greater equality for women, at least in the West and those improvements, in both Norway and the UK, are charted in the programme for A Doll’s House Part 2. Many of the battles are won.  So I left the theatre puzzling over why exactly we need a new play now which examines and challenges obsolete laws and attitudes – although it’s certainly entertaining.

Photo: Marc Brenner

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/a-dolls-house-part-2/

Carmen Opera Holland Park June 2022

The world’s most popular opera feels fresh and vibrant, but free from gimmickry, under Cecilia Stinton’s direction with Lee Reynolds doing excellent work with City of London Sinfonia in the pit.

Staging anything coherently is a challenge on Opera Holland Park’s enormous, very wide stage. You have to allow extra bars to get people on and off because they have to travel so far. For this production the playing space is almost doubled (design by takis) with a sloping semi-circular thrust stage so that the orchestra is effectively encircled by the action. It adds still further to the logistic challenge but it works well and makes some of the action – especially the final scene – feel intimately immersive.

Kezia Bienek is terrific as Carmen. She sings with effortless panache and finds all the right assertive, sassy, flirtatiousness while always remaining her own woman. It’s a warmly convincing performance with, among many other fine moments, a deliciously sexy Habenera (lovely balance with the cello at the beginning).

Oliver Johnston more than matches her as the hapless, love-smitten, ultimately abusive Don José, His tenor voice is magnificent and the love aria he sings to Carmen in the tavern is beautifully, mellifluously lyrical. And yet he brings coarse, fierce passion to the final scene.

Alison Langer’s troubled frumpy Micaela is a fine foil to Carmen and her claret-rich voice delights especially in the resonant bottom notes. And Thomas Mole gets – and makes real drama out of – what is, I gather, the most widely recognised music theatre tune in the world. So somehow he has to make the Toreador song feel newly minted and he does – as his flamboyant, exhibitionist character shows off and captivates Carmen.

Lee Reynolds has slightly reduced the score but the omissions don’t show. He is a very clear conductor – mouthing every word with the singers, beaming in delight at the end of the glorious accelerando number with castanets and pizzicato strings. He allows a lot of detail to shine through. Like most people, I’ve known this music all my life but there’s a sparky horn line in the Toreador song I’d never noticed before. Once or twice he lost control of the male chorus which slipped out of synch for a few bars at the performance I saw but the juggernaut soon got back on track so it didn’t matter much.

The children’s chorus – arranged through Cardinal Vaughan Memorial School – fizzes with energy and sings with conviction. It’s good to see community involvement at this level.

First published by Lark Reviews: https://www.larkreviews.co.uk/?p=6827

Librarians and book prize panels do not care for Michael Morpurgo because they find his writing sentimental and predictable. I doubt that he minds much because he is one Britain’s most successful authors and children love his writing just as they did that of Enid Blyton, Roald Dahl and now Jacqueline Wilson. None of them met/meet  with much literary approval.

Morpurgo is an issues man and makes no secret of it. He often writes movingly about the horrors of war ( Private Peaceful, Kensuke’s Kingdom) or animal welfare and sentience (Born to Run, Running Wild).  Sometimes, as in War Horse he combines the two. And The Amazing Story of Adolphus Tips (2006) is another compelling story about both war and an animal.

Lily, who narrates, is an elderly lady. As a farm child in Devon, at the time when land was being evacuated for D Day training, she kept a journal which she is now handing over to her grandson.

Tips was her much loved cat. Lily was  an only child and her father was away at war. A cheerful, 18 year old, black American GI, who becomes a friend, eventually returns Tips to her because the cat gets lost when the family is forced to move out of the farm house. And then – at the end of the story the Lily of 2006 tells her grandson about much more recent developments. It’s a moving ending.

The detail about how the land was taken and used is what really happened  around Slapton Sands in 1943. And, as always, Morpurgo’s characters are all totally realistic – Barry the evacuee who comes to live with them from London and wants to be a farmer is, for example, beautifully drawn as is his in-your-face but nice bus driver mother when she visits. Lily’s grumpy grandfather is someone we all know too.

And as for the cat – well, anyone who’s ever lived with a cat will be able to feel Tips’s fur under his or her fingers, see her green eyes and hear her feline voice. Morpurgo really does do animals well.

The Amazing Story of Adolphus Tips has been dramatised once or twice but seems never to caught on to the extent that some other shows based on Morpurgo’s books have. It would be great to see it done again somewhere soon so that more children (and adults) are driven back to this really rather good book.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Mill on the Floss by George Eliot.

Show: Cancelling Socrates

Society: West End & Fringe

Venue: Jermyn Street Theatre. 16b Jermyn Street, London SW1Y 6ST

Credits: By Howard Brenton

Cancelling Socrates

4 stars

Photos: Steve Gregson


Socrates was a Greek philosopher at the turn of the Fourth Century BC. He questioned everything, was found guilty of atheism and died in prison of hemlock poisoning in his seventies – forced suicide as a form of execution – having resisted attempts to help him escape. Howard Brenton’s quite concise (two short acts) play uses these facts to create a witty, incisive commentary on 21st Century democracy, freedom to think and the function of art, among other things. And it’s rich theatre.

A four-hander directed by Tom Littler (who will be much missed at Jermyn Street when he moves to Orange Tree Theatre, Richmond later this year) it purrs along thoughtfully. It is also very funny because Brenton’s dialogue is second to none and we chuckle at mildly incongruous modern expressions, references to the plague and cynical lines such as “witch hunting and pulling down the old truths,” or “The young think it’s their right not to be upset.”

In a strong cast, Robert Mountford is outstanding as Euthyphro and then as the gaoler. He has very expressive eyes and talks with them. His Euthyphro quizzes Socrates (Jonathan Hyde) and is clearly irritated with him as well as trying to make him see sense about the management of his trial. He is variously persuasive, supportive and self-interested. When he morphs into the gaoler in the second act – coarse, forthright but gruffly sympathetic and using the strident voice of an uneducated man – we hardly recognise him. It’s masterly acting.

Hyde, using a deliciously refined voice.  finds all the right tiresome persistence in Socrates. He’s a decent enough chap but like his friend Euthyphro most of us would cross the street to avoid a long conversation with him. Hannah Morrish brings anger, passion, anxiety and dignity to Xanthippe, Socrates’s young wife and later as a rather creepy masked representation of the demon which possesses him. Sophie Ward’s account of Aspasia, an intelligent, articulate woman and former mistress, trying to help Socrates, is convincing as she manipulates the dynamic between the others. These four actors are an evidently well bonded team – different pairings occupy various scenes and they all play off each other effectively with much attentive listening.

It’s quite a treat to see a new play which manages to be both entertaingly accessible and intelligently exploratory.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/cancelling-socrates/