Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Maidstone Symphony Orchestra 05.02.22 (Susan Elkin reviews)

Maidstone Symphony Orchestra Mote Hall, Maidstone 5th February 2022

There was an upbeat atmosphere of new year/new optimism for this well attended first concert of 2022 spiced with a strong sense of the worst being behind us. And the overture to Mozart’s last opera, The Magic Flute (1791) was an aptly chosen opener. The orchestra made it sound bright, chirpy and celebratory especially in the fugato quaver passages which were delightfully crisp.

And so to Beethoven – and, arguably, the loveliest violin concerto ever written, premiered only 15 years after The Magic Flute. Benjamin Baker is an unshowy soloist who breathes the music like a singer – often with an impish half smile. He and Brian Wright made sure we heard every detail of the orchestral parts as well as the solo line and I loved the way they moved, as a team into the spirited rondo.

Two things, however really distinguished this performance. First, Baker chose to play the Christian Tetslaff candenzas, adapted from the ones Beethoven wrote for the piano version of the concerto and using a timpani accompaniment in the first one. I’m familiar with recordings of this but had never heard it live. Keith Price on timps, Brian Wright on the podium and Baker out front gave us a very arresting – if quirky rendering. No wonder the audience applauded – unusually at an MSO concert – at the end of the first movement. Second, Baker’s encore, a movement from Bach’s A Minor sonata presented double stopping, so breathtakingly skilled that it sounded like two instruments.

It was, intentionally or not, a chronological concert which shifted forward a further 137 years after the interval with Ralph Vaughan Williams’s fifth symphony: a work which has four movements all of them slow, and full of key changes and different time signatures so it was real contrast to the classicism of the first half.

Wright dug out plenty of lyrical passion as he delivered that characteristically RVW “wafty” quality – always with fluidity and sometimes with an evocatively clenched left fist. There was fine work from Simon Phillips as principal horn sailing over the textrure especially in the first movement. The muted strings patterning with the wind in the second movement created the required “misterioso” and, not withstanding one or two earlier ragged entries, I liked the way Wright controlled the magical dying away ending in three movements.

Show: The Spiral Path

Society: OVO

Venue: The Maltings Theatre. Level 2, Maltings Shopping Centre, 28 Victoria Street, St Albans, Hertfordshire AL1 3HL

Credits: By Andrew Sharpe. Produced by Katalyst and Mad Stallion

 

The Spiral Path 3 stars

The intimacy of the Maltings Theatre, St Albans – now configured in the round – lends itself very well to this tight, tense story of troubled family relationships in which two young women are married to two brothers who have an appalling, cold, manipulative mother. We shift back and forth through time in what are usually two person scenes as the truth is very gradually revealed.

Claire Jared’s small, blonde, feisty and impassioned Georgina is married to James but it’s failing and James has met someone else even as Georgina’s second child is born. And she is fond of her widowed, troubled brother-in-law, Edward (Jonny D’Spena – finely nuanced, sensitive work). Edward, however, is haunted – physically so in the play – by his dead wife Kirsty (Georgina Bennett) who floats about the playing area with a whiff of Blythe Spirit but this is definitely not a comedy. It’s a serious love triangle which is why the play opens with some symbolic mime.

Amidst all this is Jill Priest’s Edie, one of the least attractive characters I’ve seen in a play for some time. She is icily self centred and very unkind both “now” and in the things she’s done in the past. There is, for example, a backstory about Edward’s childhood friendship with a boy called Pete from whom we eventually hear some letters (voice over by Matthew Philip Harris). Priest gives a compelling, convincing account of this deeply unpleasant – but hideously plausible – woman.

It all hangs together pretty coherently. As the man sitting next to me commented. “The good thing about theatre is that you have to engage with it and apply your own intelligence – unlike a lot of film when it’s all spelled out for you”. Nonetheless I was a bit puzzled by the play’s opening scene which doesn’t sit quite right with the rest of it.  Harry, a  smart, plummy voiced man with the beginnings of dementia  is waiting for his wife in a Mayfair café where he meets Kirsty and confuses her with his wife. Paul Manuel gives a spot-on performance as Harry. I’ve seen, and lived with dementia at very close quarters in my own family and Manuel has it perfectly. He also gives a wonderfully moving account of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116 at the end which, in a sense, sums up the whole play. On balance though, I’d like to see Harry in a different play and keep The Spiral Path entirely focused on its central plot.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-spiral-path/

Show: Jarman

Society: Greenwich Theatre (professional)

Venue: Greenwich Theatre. Crooms Hill, London SE10 8ES

Credits: By Mark Farrelly

 

Jarman

4 stars

31 January 2022 would have been his eightieth birthday and this celebration should really been called “An Evening with Derek Jarman”.

The first half gave us Mark Farrelly’s one man, one act play, Jarman. I reviewed this for Sardines in November when it began its current tour at Bridge House Theatre, Penge and happily gave it four stars.  It has now bedded down well, become more assured. It presents the life story of this artist, film maker, gardener, gay rights activist and Aids victim with vivid passion – and, it seems, real accuracy. After the interval there were speeches from a group of people who had all known and worked with Jarman in real life. Several said that they felt – through Farelly’s play and acting talent – that Derek Jarman was definitely present at this, the birthday party he didn’t live to attend.

It is interesting to see Jarman a second time in a completely different sort of setting. No longer are we in a basic, sittingroom-sized black box. Now we’re in a traditional, middle-sized theatre theatre with rows of raked seating (about two thirds full – very gratifying) and the action takes place on a big thrust stage playing area. That means much more space for Farrelly to occupy – and he does, still with his simple props: one chair, a roll of brown paper, a torch and a gauzy sheet. There is scope here for the lighting to be more sophisticated too and I loved the way his figure was sometimes shadowed and huge on the back wall.

Farrelly is a remarkable actor. I’ve now seen him in action on four occasions and recently interviewed him face to face. He brings an extraordinary, glittering edge and sense of danger to everything he does. And the subtlety of his voice work is terrific. Jarman, for example, gets a resonant, middle class, public school-educated voice without being plummy. To borrow a term often used by actors, it’s utterly “truthful”.

The second half of Mr Jarman’s birthday party was uplifting and celebratory. David Mansell, writer, producer and director, whom Jarman called “Ginger Bits”, for example, remembered Jarman coming to the University of Kent to give a talk and later inviting him to Prospect Cottage which led to Mansell working with Jarman on two films and cutting his professional teeth. Almost every speaker mentioned Jarman’s generosity and kindness which sat along with his glee, impatience and polymathy. Then there was David Meyer who played Ferdinand in Jarman’s film The Tempest opposite Toyah Willcox as Miranda. He was very funny about Jarman’s insistence that he should walk naked out of the North Sea. Speaker after speaker talked of Jarman’s commitment to fighting for gay rights and for the grace with which he accepted his terminal illness. Jarman was the first national figure to admit openly that he had HIV/Aids which helped and supported thousands of others.

Peter Tatchell remembered the 1992 Outrage! March which led to Jarman’s arrest under a centuries old law which meant it was illegal to demonstrate within half a mile of the Houses of Parliament. Jarman, he told us, refused to accept a caution because that would have been an admission of guilt. Instead he told the police to do their work. In the end he was released without charge.

The whole audience sang Happy Birthday and I’m pretty sure many lumps had to be swallowed in many throats.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/jarman-2/

IN OUR TIME: Continuing the story of the Leicester Drama Society (The Book Guild)

Star rating: four stars ★ ★ ★ ★ ✩

Leicester Drama Society, which celebrates its centenary this year, is a fine example of just how significant a contribution well-managed amateur theatre can make to community life.

A hundred years ago three friends met in a Leicester café to discuss the formation of a drama society. The aims were high: they wanted to improve artistic standards of theatre in the city and to educate public taste.

Well, they clearly did just that because they are still here, a century later, with an impressive track record. Every show since 1922 is tabulated in the final pages of this book.

Since 1932 LDS has owned and occupied The Little Theatre in Grove Street, often affectionately known as “The Little”. The company also eventually acquired additional premises nearby which provide rehearsal space and other facilities …

Read the rest od this book review at Musical Theatre Reviews: https://musicaltheatrereview.com/book-review-in-our-time-continuing-the-story-of-the-leicester-drama-society/

I’ve never made any secret of my view that my CertEd teacher training course at Bishop Otter College, Chichester (1965-8) was not fit for purpose. But it did have its moments – occasionally. One of these fell in my second year when they invited in three Sussex-based writers of children’s books in to talk to us about literature for children. The three were Rosemary Sutcliffe, Brian Wildsmith and Ian Serrallier. I was riveted. Soon after, a group of us who were musically inclined were asked to go weekly for half a term to Singleton Primary School to help teach the children a cantata written for them by Ian Serraillier who lived in the village.

A year later found me floundering in a Deptford boys secondary school (see my memoir Please Miss We’re Boys, Book Guild, 2019) which was a bit – ahem – different from rural Sussex.  But in the English Department stock cupboard I found a familiar name: Ian Serraillier. I seized upon The Silver Sword to read with my own first year (year 7) English classes. From that point on I probably read it twenty or thirty times because, a popular text, it was in other schools I taught in later too.

At Christmas just gone my niece, who teaches Year 5, told me that she was about to embark on a World War 2 project. She’d been recommended to The Silver Sword. Did I know it? It led to a bit of a brainstorming session between her and me about what else she might also use and left me yearning to reread my old favourite – which I have now done.

The Sliver Sword

The new copy I bought includes an afterword from Ian Serraillier’s daughter, Jane Serraillier Grossfeld from which I learned several things I didn’t know. For example, he was a pacifist and an officially registered conscientious object during the war who did Air Raid Precautions work, lent his car to the Friends Ambulance Unit and went on teaching English. As a student he had travelled and camped along the route which features in The Silver Sword so he knew the area well.

Written in 1956, The Silver Sword is a gentle book of its time – the background issues are horrific but Serraillier focuses for the most part on kindness and decency. A family in Nazi-occupied Warsaw is split up in the middle of the war: the teacher father is sent to prison for refusing to have Hitler’s face on his classroom wall and the mother is arrested and sent to Germany as a land slave. The three children avoid being blown up in the house by escaping over the roofs. Later they team up with Jan who, by chance, has met their father. The Russian army liberates Warsaw and, after a couple of years of living in the cellar of a bombsite, they set off to Switzerland where they believe they might be reunited with their parents. Thereafter it’s a quest story with episodes en route such as meeting a friendly English Officer in Berlin and a kindly farmer named Wolff in Bavaria. The titular silver sword is a paper knife which once belonged to the children’s mother. Found by Janin the rubble,  it becomes a symbol of hope.

The tension is tautly done – at one point they have to negotiate a river with rapids in canoes and they very nearly don’t make it across Lake Constance. And of course, not everyone they meet is sympathetic. The Burgomaster, for example, is tasked with the job of rounding up Polish refugees and sending them back to Poland, regardless of their stories. And the middle child, Edek who – captured by the Nazis, spent two years in Germany slaving on the land while his sisters lived in the Warsaw cellar – has tuberculosis and is seriously ill so his condition is, in a sense, another enemy.

But the best thing is the characterisation. Jan is a ragamuffin, parentless thief who has a gift with animals. Until he gradually learns to trust and respect Ruth and begins very slowly to trust her, he is a loose cannon but oh such fun and so likeable. Ruth is fifteen when she becomes the family’s quasi mother and for a very long time shoulders the responsibility with extraordinary maturity – driven by the Christian values instilled by her parents.

SilverSword3

Modern children might be puzzled about where everyone went to the loo in a crowded train truck on a nine day journey to Berlin – and a 21st century novelist would probably tell them.  It’s a bit odd that the older ones can and do sometimes still carry Bronia  when she’s six years old. Nobody ever swears.  And there are other details which now seem a bit quaint but they matter very little. This is still a very heart warming tale from which today’s children will learn much about what happened in Europe during and after the war. It’s still topical too. In 2022 there are unaccompanied child refugees travelling in dangerous conditions across Europe in search of a better life. And yes I could never read the last few pages aloud in class without an audible lump in my throat. Even reading it now alone and silently I got something in my eye which is good going for a book now 66 years old – and as familiar as a favourite old coat.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: Return of the Native by Thomas Hardy

Show: The Winston Machine

Society: West End & Fringe

Venue: New Diorama Theatre. 15-16 Triton Street, London NW1 3BF

Credits: Commissioned by New Diorama Theatre. Presented by Kandinsky Theatre

 

The Winston Machine

2 stars

Devised by three performer-devisers, this piece presumably began life as a series of improvisation and sadly that’s exactly what it feels like for much of its 70-minute duration.

The story – such as it is – ranges episodically across several generations of one family from an RAF pilot and his wife in the 1940s through to the present. The chronology leaps about disjointedly so that one minute we’re in World War II and the next we’re thinking about pandemic restrictions. Apart from some business with an RAF jacket the role changes are done, often instantly, almost entirely through voice work. Nathaniel Christian, Rachel-Leah Hosker and Hamish Macdougall are all pretty good orally but not good enough to make the story telling clear.

It isn’t a musical but in one of her several incarnations Hosker is an aspirant singer so occasionally she breaks into a 1940s song sometimes “accompanied” by Lewis (Nathaniel Christian).  His piano miming is woefully weak – although the rest of his acting is convincing. Her singing voice is interesting. It has a slightly gravelly quality, faintly reminiscent of Edith Piaf but an octave or so lower.

Hamish Macdougall meanwhile gives us a father, an adult son, a young boy, a young husband and a brash party organiser – among other things. He’s clearly a skilled actor but we don’t see him at his best in this muddled narrative.

Paper planes are big symbolic thing here. Meant to connote the RAF link ( I think) they actually seem pointlessly silly although it’s a nice moment when Christian as a grandfather is teaching Hosker, as a very young child, how to fly.

In modern times one of Nathaniel Christian’s characters is a musician looking for a break trying to be realistic but optimistic about his future. This is a relatively gripping narrative development but seems to belong in a different play.

I liked the simplicity of the set, though, by Joshua Gadsby and Naomi Kuyck-Cohen. It uses a raised, sloped board as the playing area. Surrounding it are chairs to enable actors to get on and off and to provide a seat when one of them is on the edge of the action. Zac Gvirtzman’s music and Kieran Lucas’s sound design together provide an evocative atmosphere too.

At the heart of the modern scenes is a 1940s-themed party in a country house repeatedly described as “fucking weird”. Actually that’s a pretty good description of the whole play.

Originally published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/the-winston-machine/

Show: Krapp’s Last Tape

Society: Tower Theatre Company

Venue: Tower Theatre

Credits: Samuel Beckett

 

Performance Date: 25/01/2022

Krapp’s Last Tape

4 stars

 

Image: John Chapman (Rehearsal photo by David Sprecher).


The key thing with Beckett is timing and making silence speak. And John Chapman who shuffles, sighs, grunts and yawns very evocatively is master of both.

Krapp’s Last Tape is a solo one act play featuring an old man reflecting on his past sexual encounters. He has an ongoing taped autobiography including spool 5 in box 3 which he recorded 30 years ago. As well as listening to that, he is now trying – but mostly failing – to record his final one.

It was a treat in the performance I saw  – as Chapman worked through the opening long silent section including the famous banana sequence – to hear the audience listening intently even when no words were being spoken. There was real theatrical chemistry in the room.

Stout, dishevelled, laughing, wheezing, weeping and getting drunker, Chapman is both compelling and moving. He and his director Robert Pennant Jones are clearly a strong and sensitive team because we really feel Krapp’s regrets alongside his wistful longing and anger at his younger self. He also made me notice afresh the poetic glory and spareness of Beckett’s prose: “a bony old ghost of a whore” for example.

The attention to detail is impressive too. Chapman as Krapp sits at a desk behind an ancient, battered Grundig-type reel to reel tape recorder. At one point he rethreads it. When he hits the switch the reels are actually rotating. Then there’s his off-stage drinking. We hear corks drawn and liquid being poured into a glass (sound design by Laurence Tuerk) and each time Krapp returns his face is slightly more flushed.

Krapp’s Last Tape, which runs less than an hour, was written in 1958 and first performed as a double bill with Endgame. And it’s in this pairing that I’ve seen it presented in the past. After the interval Tower Theatre chose, instead, to offer a talk by  Robert Pennant Jones about The Tower Theatre’s Beckett productions during the last 60 years followed by a film entitled Stones which is an extract from Beckett’s 1955 novel, Molloy. A truly Beckettian evening.

First published by Sardines: https://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/review/krapps-last-tape-2/

All dystopian novels are warnings. And Brave New World is the grandfather of them all. Rereading it after many years, I am astonished by the things which Aldous Huxley was pessimistic about as long ago as 1932. He was writing fourteen years after the end of the First World War and seven years before the start of the second – and in the middle of a global financial crisis.

We move six centuries into the future to discover Huxley’s world in which there is no religion except for the worship of practical, pragmatic Henry Ford – “Our Ford” – and “his Fordship”. The change of initial consonant is both witty and plausible. No one is conceived or born naturally. People are bred in bottles to be one of five castes and therefore totally fitted for the life ahead of them. The word “mother” is an unspeakable obscenity. Promiscuous sex is encouraged as part of civilised life and everyone takes a mind altering drug “soma” to maintain serenity.

That’s an extremely abbreviated and banal account of the exposition. Then, of course, the boat starts to rock. Bernard Marx, hasn’t quite been conditioned fully (an error in the doses he was given before and after “decanting” or in the many thousands of night messages fed into his infant brain) and starts to ask questions. He and a reluctant young woman named Lenina visit one of the world’s only Savage Reservations (in Mexico). There they meet John and – shock horror – his mother.

John, known back in London when they bring him, simply as The Savage has read Shakespeare – a tattered old copy which turned up in the rubbish, All such subversive books have been banned for centuries. For entertainment “civilised” people have synthesised music and “Feelies” – films which give you a physical erotic sensation as long as you hold on to the arm rests in your seat.

Of course, like all the best dystopian novels this is actually a deeply thoughtful discussion about what really matters. And although the ending is a depressingly negative one the answer is that the power of the imagination and qualities such as love and loyalty are what make us fully human. Again and again – John makes you grin by coming up with an apt Shakespeare line to refute the (literally) soulless way of life he’s encountering.

What Brave New World is saying – and it’s extraordinarily topical just now – is that we have to put up with illness, pain, loss and inconvenience. They are part of being human and the pay off for togetherness, creativity, deep shared experience (such as seeing Romeo and Juliet or King Lear) which speaks to our innermost selves and much more. If you try to eliminate all discomfort and substitute artificial “happiness” you are not human any more.

Nearly thirty years after Brave New World, Huxley wrote Brave New World Revisited in which he looked to see how many of his predictions had come true and found that many had.  Today it’s even truer. Overpopulation was, and is, a serious problem. The rubbish played when you’re on hold is exactly like the “music” in Brave New World. IVF technology develops every year. Cannabis will probably be decriminalised very soon. And so on and on.

There is also his last novel, Island (1962) in which he presents a Utopia – an alternative outcome to his dystopian world. I read it – but only once, I think – in my youth. I’m planning to get back to it and to explore Brave New World Revisited later this year.

Next week on Susan’s Bookshelves: The Silver Sword by Ian Serraillier

BNW Me