Press ESC or click the X to close this window

Heath Quartet (Susan Elkin reviews)

Brighton Dome and Strings Attached Coffee Concert 26 January 2020

You can rely on Beethoven and Brahms to fill a venue. On this occasion there was scarcely a spare seat in the Attenborough Centre – quite a fillip for the ten year old Strings Attached, whose chair, Mary McQueen, told the audience before the concert that she had never seen the hall so full.

And so to the ever approachable Beethoven Op 18 no 3 with which the Heath Quartet opened their interestingly programmed concert – Brahms sandwiched between early and mature Beethoven. They play standing up (apart from Christopher Murray on cello who sits on a podium which puts him almost at eye level with the other three) which means that their playing is unusually free – leaning into each other with lots of whole body, expressive communication.  They have an intensely sensitive rapport playing like a folk band, as if their instruments are dancing together, and they barely look at the music. Their do-what-you-like dress code is a bit odd – one suit, one fairly formal female outfit, one black shirt and one green – but of course it doesn’t matter.

The andante, built on a four note descending scale came with striking richness of tone and I admired the elegant and witty delivery – like an insouciant chat. The crystalline clarity of articulation in the presto (which has a lot of notes) was impressive too.

Then we moved forward more than seven decades to 1873 into the warm, romantic, lush territory of Brahms Op 51 no 2, leaving the (relative) crisp classicism of 1799 Beethoven far behind. There’s something about A minor for string quartets (Schubert No 13 D 804 is another example) and the Heath Quartet really brought out the lyrical beauty especially in the andante which they played with intelligent dynamic emphasis and lots of contrast. I loved the elegant musical baton passing of themes too which was particularly noticeable in the finale.

Beethoven’s Razumovsky quartets were written only four years after Op 18 but this is post-Eroica symphony and suddenly we are in a completely different “sound world” and new technical challenges such as the ethereal harmony and potential problematic timing of the extraordinary slow introduction. The Heath Quartet played it arrestingly. Also outstanding was the glorious andante with its percussive cello pizzicato underpinning the tightly woven minor key melody and its variations. The control with which the Heath Quartet played the end which dies away to nothing was another high spot. So was the frenzied allegro molto – tiring even to listen too but the Heath Quartet made it sound effortless as well as intense.

All in all this was a very enjoyable concert and I’m glad so many people were there to hear it.

First published by Lark Reviews: https://www.larkreviews.co.uk/?p=5818

Theatre ticket prices are loaded with extras and they shouldn’t be. If a seat is priced at, say, £50, then that’s what the purchaser should pay. A venue or company which actually needs to charge £55  should write it on the ticket. We need transparency. For most people many tickets are obscenely expensive anyway without their being topped up with what one waggish mate of mine disapprovingly dubs “the ticket tax”.

It’s rife in London and in major venues elsewhere. I recently bought a pair of £44 tickets for Theatre Royal Brighton. That’s £88 I was spending. I did it online and printed my own tickets which is, obviously the easiest and cheapest option for the theatre as well as being convenient for me. It costs nobody anything. So why did I have to pay a £3.50 “transaction charge” on top of the £88?

Yes, I know this is so common that many purchasers don’t even notice but think about it for a moment. Just imagine the outcry if you or I tried to buy a pullover, book or toaster online or in a shop and were told that we had to pay an additional £3.50 on top of the purchase price just for the privilege of buying the item. Outrageous? Definitely, and exactly the same applies to theatre tickets.

Then there’s the restoration levy – sorely needed, maybe, if it will help to prevent any more bits of theatre ceiling dropping onto punters and preserve our historic theatres for future generations. But, if it’s not voluntary it should always be incorporated into the stated price of the ticket and never added on as a compulsory extra.

Want your tickets posted to you, in the old fashioned way? Well you will pay at least double what it actually costs to put the tickets in an envelope and frank it at business rates. So part of what you pay becomes yet another component of the ticket tax. In some cases that’s three additions to the stated ticket price – almost as bad as the so called “budget” airlines. And sometimes on top of all this, the organisation has the temerity to tell you that it would welcome a tip – sorry, voluntary donation –  as well.

We worry a lot in this industry these days about inclusivity and attracting new audiences. Ticket pricing which is at best opaque and, at worst, little short of dishonest, is not likely to help.

 

I see a great deal of theatre for young audiences, most of it imaginative and enjoyable. In some ways it’s the most challenging work a performer can undertake because the younger the audience members the less conditioned to politeness they are. If you fail to engage them they will simply switch off or worse.

That’s why the best work for very young audiences is multi-sensory with plenty of interesting sound, visually engaging things, touchable items and even smells and tastes. For older young audiences theatre has to offer experiences the audience is not expecting. And of course that often means live music. Welcome to the world of the actor-musician.

An actor who can play musical instruments, as many as possible,  and use them as part of his or her acting, is currently in high demand. Yes, these things go in fashions and a few years ago everyone wanted acrobats. In five or ten years’ time fashion may turn elsewhere. But at present actor-musos are more employable than their friends who can’t do music, especially, but not exclusively, in shows for under 21s although I’m seeing ever more family and adult shows featuring actor-musos – Once which I wrote about last week, for instance.

So how do you become an actor-muso? Well of course there are actors who happen to play a musical instrument and who are therefore able to use that skill as part of their work. Every drama school acting class includes some students with quite high level skills on musical instruments. You only have to read the CVs in graduate showcase programmes to see the evidence  although there aren’t many actor-pianists about. Most musically inclined acting students seem to play portable or orchestral instruments.

Increasingly, actor-musos are coming through drama school courses specifically designed for them.  Mountview, for instance, offers a BA Hons in Performance: Actor Musician. Rose Bruford’s has a  well established BA (Hons) in Actor Musicianship.  GSA has a newer one through which very employable performers are now coming into the industry.

There has always been scope for the informal development of actor-muso skills if you train to act in a conservatoire which also trains musicians – Guildhall School of Music and Drama, Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama and the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland – and more recently Royal Birmingham Conservatoire.

It cuts both ways too. Sometimes musicians, normally in a pit or on balcony, have to come on stage and do a bit of acting. It happens at The Globe all the time for example. It makes sense to allow the training to overlap a bit to maximise every student’s employment potential. Actors and musicians no longer live in precious watertight boxes – if they ever did.

If you’ve long since trained and are working or wanting to be, all is not lost either. Actors who haven’t really done any musical playing for a long time can, obviously, self-help. If you played trumpet, cello, flute or whatever even at a very basic standard when you were a child, what you learned is still hardwired into you somewhere because that’s how music works. It’s worth digging out the instrument, or getting another one, and working up those skills again now. Get a few lessons. Practise. Act confidently with it and it might help you to get a job you wouldn’t otherwise have got. A lot of the music used in shows, especially for young audiences, is not particularly complicated. It just needs playing with panache.

Be adventurous too. People who’ve once, even many years ago, been taught, say, violin can often teach themselves the guitar, ukulele, banjo, rhythm double bass and more because they know how to hold strings down. It’s quite common for people who play reed or brass instruments to be able “to find their way around” close relatives of the instrument they originally had lessons on. Most accordionists start on piano. And any competent performer can play non-pitch percussion and sing. I’ve seen literally hundreds of actors in children’s shows in recent years knocking or shaking out rhythms in cast bands. And they didn’t all attend the Royal Academy of Music. Some have had no musical training at all.

My observation is that the days of acting as a tightly focused single discipline are well and truly over. The more strings you have to your bow – literally perhaps – the more likely you are to be able to pay the bills. So if you’re still at school and have an eye on a career in acting for goodness sake don’t give up the trombone.

Image: Actor-muso, Dannie Harris

 

 

 

My father, Ken Hillyer, was an accomplished folk fiddler and ceilidh band leader. He formed a group called the Southerners, the other members of which became almost part of the family.  They played for dances continually in the 1960s and 70s, made records, went on radio and TV and occasionally toured abroad. (And that wasn’t even his day job!) Inevitably as we grew up, my sister and I, who both had violin lessons at school, got peripherally caught up in all this and sometimes played with our Dad and his band. I taught myself guitar and sang solo folk songs at related gigs too. (Just don’t ask me to do that now!)  British folk music, we often say, is in our blood. My sister, interestingly, has returned to our roots and now plays for a local morris team. I cheer her on occasionally but simply don’t have time to do it myself at present although she and I often play classical music together.

Well, all  those memories came flooding back last week when I reviewed Once at Fairfield Halls in Croydon at the start of its big national tour. The hugely enjoyable show, based on John Carney’s film, is a love story about music making and set in Dublin. The 19 strong cast – every one of them a competent musician and some, including four violinists, very good indeed – were jamming trad stuff on stage as the audience found seats and I was so transfixed by the energy, vibrance, excitement and familiarity of it all that I sat mesmerised and forgot to get my notebook and pen out.

Once the show begins, Peter Rowe’s direction allows the music and musicians to become almost part of the set sitting at the sides and back, playing continuo or interjections and then occasionally, quite literally, moving into the spotlight. There’s unusual beauty and elegance in such seamlessness.

Watch out, in particular, for Hannah Khogali, fresh from GSMD. How many actors do you know who can play the violin, sing and jump up and down in rhythm all at the same time? And she does it with arresting energetic aplomb. She looks as if she’s enjoying every moment and perhaps she is. It’s jolly infectious.

Towards the end of the second act there’s a number in which the whole cast sings an unaccompanied number in harmony. Goodness knows how they keep it together as tightly as they do but “When you’re staring out to sea” sung at dawn as they look towards Dublin is perfect. Yes, I’ve done an awful lot of choral singing too and I was lost in admiration for the quality of this moment.

I loved Once, and  gave it a rare five stars. I have already recommended to several people that they pick it up on tour, not least because the music spoke to me so personally. Life really does go round in circles.

20200110_144500

International folk festival on Levkas, Greece in 1966. Me with guitar, my sister in hat and our father on far left.

What do you do with theatre programmes after the event? As a professional reviewer I am always given one because, obviously, I can’t review without cast and creative details. Actually a single sheet of A4 rather than the full-Monty glossy job would do perfectly well and in fringe theatre quite often that’s what I’m given.

Even so, if I kept every single sheet, booklet or whatever, I’d be neck deep in paper. I reviewed 153 shows and concerts last year ranging from drama school shows (single sheet, usually) to Proms and large scale shows such as Joseph and the Amazing Technicoloured Dreamcoat and  Mary Poppins.

There was a time when I kept and neatly filed every single one. Not any more, I’m afraid. After a couple of weeks – once I’m sure there won’t be a query on the review or an interview opportunity arising from the show – I put them firmly in the recycling bin.

Wasteful? Yes, programmes are a useful resource. When I was teaching and regularly taking school groups to the theatre I used to suggest to O Level (that dates me). GCSE and A level classes that they bought a programme in order to read the usually informative background information about the play we were seeing and studying. “It can be expensive so I suggest you buy one between three or four of you and then pass it round afterwards” I’d advise. Some teachers would, I suppose, have bought one with petty cash, photocopied anything useful therein and distributed it. As a writer myself I was always too mindful of copyright to do that. Anyway I didn’t believe in spoonfeeding my students any more than I did my own children.

It’s also a dreadful thing from an ecological point of view that so many trees die to provide peripheral theatre programmes. I’m sure I bin a whole tree every year all by myself – a small forest over a lifetime. Why isn’t there greater emphasis on downloading paper-free programmes in advance? That would work perfectly well for me as reviewer but it rarely seems to happen.

On the other hand  proper programmes or playbills are an interesting record of old shows. Every now and again someone donates a collection of historic programmes to some archive or library – potential gold dust to students of theatre history. There will be less of this in future, if people do as I now have to do, and simply bin them. I hope they’re all digitised somewhere.

Meanwhile I still have a few. My late husband was very keen on keeping them and I have several boxes in my loft which survived our ruthless 2016 downsizing. They include an Alleyns School programme for Richard II starring a very young Simon Ward – he and Mr E were near contemporaries at school. Then there’s Maxim Shostakovich conducting his father’s fifth symphony in Royal Festival Hall and an RSC programme for Antony and Cleopatra starring Judi Dench and Antony Hopkins among many others. We were never sure why neither of us kept the programme for Stravinsky conducting his own work on his last visit to London – probably the most memorable concert of all. Perhaps, for teenagers, the tickets were so expensive (cheapest £1. We usually paid 7/6) that we couldn’t actually afford to buy a programme.

I sometimes wonder what I’m throwing away now which posterity would rather I had kept.

Not many programmes in the photograph because, of course, I have thrown away most of the 2019 ones!

Hairspray
Music by Marc Shaiman, lyrics by Scott Wittman and Shaiman. Book by Mark O’Donnell and Thomas Meehan. Based on John Waters’s 1988 film of the same name.
society/company: Cambridge Theatre Company
performance date: 21 Dec 2019
venue: Great Hall at The Leys, The Fen Causeway, Cambridge CB2 7A

You can’t go far wrong with Hairspray if you have a strong youthful cast so that you can create spectacular choreography as Jo Rix does here: the the tap-dance number outside the prison in Act II, for example, is a tour de force.

Another reason for this show’s success is its now familiar, upbeat plot. Dumpy, ordinary teenager Tracy Turnblad (Laura Saunders) wants to sing and dance on a TV show in her native Baltimore. She gets sidetracked by a campaign for racial equality on said TV show, eventually effects change, wins a title and starts a relationship with a boy she really fancies. It’s a fine show with witty book (Mark O’Donnell and Thomas Meehan) with only the gentlest of double entendres. And all that is in accomplished hands with director Holly White.

One of the potential problems with Hairspray is that you need a strong contingent of black actors and the performing rights preclude blacking up – in the unlikely event that anyone in 2019 would want to. This company has the wonderful Trenetta Jones (a Cambridge regular) as Motormouth Maybelle. She can sing anything and makes a fine job of her Big Blonde and Beautiful number as well as commanding the stage with personality. Zacchaeus James McEwen, whom I haven’t seen before, is a suitably charismatic dancer and singer, as Seaweed. Otherwise most of the people dancing in the ‘negro’ record shop are, with a couple of talented exceptions, white and we have to use our imagination.

Saunders, who has an enviable full belt, finds the right naïve wistfulness – and later moral determination – in Tracy. Alan Hay puts in a sensitive and often funny but not grotesque performance as Tracy’s mother. Leo Stewart Oakley is good value as the Elvis-like, ambitious but decent Link and Richard Scarr shows real versatility in sliding in an out of several roles.

A word of praise too for the sound coming from the unseen eight-piece band led by James Harvey. There is, in particular, great stuff by Simon Andrews on reeds and Jason Ward on guitar,

CTC produces a range of shows – some are youth theatre and others are more general community theatre. This very pleasing production of Hairspray uses a talented, mixed age cast who work impressively together.

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Cambridge%20Theatre%20Company%20-Hairspray&reviewsID=3833
The Wizard of Oz
(Chichester Festival Youth Theatre) By L. Frank Baum. Music and Lyrics of the MGM motion picture score by Harold Arlen and E.Y. Harburg. Background Music by Herbert Stothart.Adapted by John Kane from
society/company: Chichester Festival Theatre
performance date: 18 Dec 2019
venue: Chichester Festival Theatre, Oaklands Park, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 6AP

Richard Chapman, Joe Clines, Alfie Scott, Ellie Dickens, Ella OKeeffe in CFYT’s The Wizard of Oz. Photo: Helen Murray

It has long been my contention that Chichester Festival Youth Theatre is one of the best youth theatres in the country and this glitteringly good show simply confirms my view. An eighty-year-old classic, directed by Lucy Betts, it surpasses even CFYT’s usual high standards.

A word, first, about how it all works: CFYT works with 800 young people across three counties. At Christmas the main house is turned over to the youth theatre who present the venue’s Christmas show for a two-week run – a wonderfully enlightened approach. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, second best about this and CFT affords the show exactly the same top notch production values that would be used for any other show. Result? The best stage version of The Wizard of Oz I have ever seen.

This version uses the music and lyrics of the MGM motion picture score by Harold Arlen and EY Hamburg so we’re only ten minutes in before Ella O’Keefe (she alternates at other performances with Polly Maltby) is raising the roof with Somewhere Over the Rainbow and after a few bars we’re hooked and have forgotten all about Judy Garland.

The advantage of a huge youth cast is that you can make the chorus numbers numerically spectacular and there are some very impressive group scenes in this show. The Jitterbug (I’d forgotten what a long sequence it is and what energy it needs) in particular is a colourful, foot-tapping showstopper and the Winkies’ menacing march is terrific too – a rhythmic ear worm.

The three farmhands (Joe Clines, Alfie Scott and Richard Chapman on press night) who become Tin Man, Scarecrow and Lion work pack plenty of personality. They sing well and work together expertly. Three tuneful, truthful performances.

There are no weak links in this cast. Every single participant is full on in a quasi-professonal way. Perhaps, in a mainstream production, the casting director would have cast people who look a bit older in some roles but it doesn’t matter in the least.

Simon Higlett’s set and James Whiteside’s lighting design uses a huge arched rainbow behind and over the thrust – somewhere over the rainbow in every sense. It changes colour to connote, for example the arrival in Oz or the Wicked Witch of the West’s castle. Sometimes it is reflected against the shiny surface of the playing area to create the illusion of a full circle and it looks wonderful. Also, utterly delightful, are Ryan Dawson Laight’s magnificent costumes, made by a team of eleven costume makers rather than hired in. No one who sees this show will forget the poppies.

Then, hidden from view, there’s an excellent seven piece band, led by Colin Billing who also wrote the orchestrations for this show. The sound is arresting.

It’s always a challenge to re-create something which almost every man, woman and child knows intimately from what is probably the most watched film of all time. In this case I love the nod to the film by which at the point of the storm which blows Dorothy away to Oz, the costumes, assisted by lighting, change from greys and pale blues to bright primary colours. Even Toto (supremely well puppeted by Ellie Dickens on press night) turns from a grey dog into a colourful brown and gold one.

If you want an escapist show to take you right out of yourself then get to Chichester for this. It’s the best seasonal production I’ve seen this year.

CFYT’s The Wizard of Oz. Photo: Helen Murray

First published by Sardines: http://www.sardinesmagazine.co.uk/reviews/review.php?REVIEW-Chichester%20Festival%20Theatre%20(professional)-The%20Wizard%20of%20Oz&reviewsID=3831

Drama schools are still accused of having their heads stuck in theatrical clouds so that their graduates leave college with little idea or experience of how to adapt acting technique for film or TV.

Actually it isn’t a fair accusation any more. Most schools now try very hard to split their curriculum so that students get a breadth of acting training including film. Many of them ensure that their grads leave with decent showreels too. But nonetheless, in some cases, the focus still tends to be more heavily on stage acting which is – in this diverse industry – likely to be the minority of a successful actor’s work rather than its mainstay. So there’s definitely room for a how-to book such as Michael Bray’s So You Want to Act on Screen (Nick Hern Bools, 2019).

Bray trained at RADA and worked as an actor on stage and screen before moving into writing and directing for TV and fim. He has taught screen acting at a number of drama schools, including GSA and ArtsEd and directed hundreds of showreels. In short he knows what he’s talking about.

He divides his very practical, accessible book into two halves: The Process and the The Practice. He sees the former as coming down to three key things – preparation, concentration and relaxation. It is, for example, absolutely essential for a screen actor to prepare by studying the script very thoroughly in advance because the subtext of the scene and the actions of the character carry as much meaning as anything which is said. He’s strong on how you keep your skills, especially observation, honed between jobs too and interesting on the question of location where the actor often has to do a lot of concentrated imagining in order to convey truth. It’s useful, down to earth, detailed advice.

The practice of film acting includes a run down on how the film industry and the process of making a film works – who does what, where, when and how from clapperboard to single camera shots and technical skills from when you should release your tears if you’re required to cry on screen, to managing your voice. The final chapter discusses the all important topic of casting and interviews.

Yet another good title in NHB’s So you want to … series, this book  will help fill in gaps for students who think their training is selling them short. It would also be a good basic introduction for any student or actor just embarking on screen actor training.

Formatted